HAMBURG – Long-time Nukewatch co-director John LaForge was convicted December 9 in Regional Court in Koblenz, Germany on two charges of trespassing, following a 4.5-hour appeal hearing stemming from two 2018 protests against the U.S. nuclear weapons stationed Germany’s Büchel air force base.

The Koblenz hearing was an appeal of two May 31, 2021 trespass convictions in Cochem District Court for “go-in” actions at the base during protests July 15, and August 6, 2018. Koblenz Regional Court Judge _____ van den Bosh ruled that LaForge’s affirmative defense of “crime prevention” was inadmissible and that such a defense would better be heard by a higher court. (German judge’s first names are not made public.) She ordered the long-time co-director of the nuclear watchdog organization Nukewatch (nukewatchinfo.org) to pay a fine of 600 Euros or about $680.00.

Judge van der Bosh denied motions from defense attorney Anna Busl to allow testimony from three experts regarding the status of nuclear weapons. Retired German judge Bernd Hahnfeld, a former board chair of the International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms, and University of Trier Professor of Computer Science Karl-Hans Bläsius both arrived at court for the hearing. Judge Hahnfeld planned to explain that the 1970 Nonproliferation Treaty and the 1990 Two-Plus-Four Treaty (on German reunification) both prohibit the stationing of U.S. nuclear weapons in Germany; and Prof. Bläsius would have testified about the growing risk of computer-driven accidental nuclear war. Univ. of Illinois Professor of Law Francis A. Boyle intended to explain via video conference from Champaign, Ill. the criminality of ongoing thermonuclear attack threats known as “deterrence.”

As is the practice in German criminal court, LaForge was able to testify at length and uninterrupted. With a German translator translating for the court, he spoke for 25/50 minutes, saying in part, “The ghastly effects of hydrogen bombs are well-known to be massacres caused by the weapons’ uncontrollable, indiscriminate, city-size blast destruction, ferocious mass fires, vastly widespread radiation burns, radiation-related diseases, and genetic damage. Deliberately planning to cause these effects is prohibited by international humanitarian law, the Nuremberg Charter, the Nuremberg Tribunal, and the Nuremberg Principles all of which are binding on Germany and the United States.”

By way of analogy LaForge said, “A fire fighter who breaks a door and rushes into a burning building to save someone is not charged with trespass. But what of a fire not yet burning but one that is planned, rehearsed, premeditated, and intentionally set to ignite with the heat, blast and radiation of a thousand suns? What if the premeditated fire would incinerate a city of 10 million people, or 20 cities — one each for the 20 US hydrogen bombs at Büchel?”

Before the hearing he said, “I participated in these actions because they are the only way to have the criminal status of nuclear weapons considered by the courts,” LaForge said. “The public wants these bombs out of Germany. But nuclear weapons’ programs are anti-democratic, controlled by presidential decree that ignore Congress and parliaments. Only a court of law can order them ousted.”

Marion Küpker of Hamburg, an anti-nuclear campaigner with Nonviolent Action to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (www.gaaa.org) and coordinator of the international action camps at the base, said, “In the last two years, about 50 court cases involving dozens of nuclear weapons protesters have taken place in Cochem and Koblenz for nonviolent civil disobedience actions at the Büchel air base.”

Büchel air base uses at least 20 U.S. thermonuclear gravity bombs known as B61s –like six other European NATO bases — under a controversial US/NATO program known as “nuclear sharing.” The U.S. Air Force’s 702nd Munitions Support Squadron maintains the U.S. bombs in readiness for German PA 200 Tornado jet fighter/bomber crews. According to Hans Kristensen of the Federation of American Scientists, “The Belgian, Dutch, German, and Italian air forces are assigned nuclear strike missions with U.S. nuclear weapons.”* Küpker said protesters continue their 25-year-long campaign demanding the ouster of the U.S. bombs and a cancellation of US plans to replace the current B61-3s and -4s with a new “B61-12.” (Full disclosure: Küpker and LaForge were married in August 2020.)

At Nukewatch, LaForge helped coordinate delegations of U.S. peace activists to international protest camps at the nuclear weapons base in 2017, 2018, and 2019. He is a co-recipient of the 2004 US Peace and Justice Studies Association’s Social Courage Award, who has served over 54 months in jail and prison for nonviolent protests.

*“US Nuclear Forces 2021,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, https://thebulletin.org/premium/2021-01/nuclear-notebook-united-states-nuclear-weapons-2021/.

HAMBURG – A long-time U.S. peace activist will be tried on two charges of trespassing on Thurs., December 9 in Koblenz Regional Court, Germany on charges stemming from two 2018 protests against US nuclear weapons stationed at Büchel air force base, located in southeastern Germany.

The Koblenz hearing for John LaForge, 65, of Luck, Wisconsin, is an appeal of two May 31, 2021 trespass convictions in Cochem District Court for so-called “go-in” protest actions involving entry into the base during protests on July 15, 2018 and August 6, 2018.

LaForge, a co-director of the nuclear watchdog organization Nukewatch (nukewatchinfo.org) in Wisconsin, helped coordinate delegations of U.S. peace activists to three annual international protests at the nuclear weapons base in 2017, 2018, and 2019. The German base maintains at least 20 US thermonuclear gravity bombs, known as B61-3s and B61-4s, under the auspices of the U.S. Air Force’s 702nd Munitions Support Squadron and the controversial US/NATO program called “nuclear sharing.” Protesters have targeted the site for over 25 years demanding the ouster of the US H-bombs and a halt to their planned replacement.

LaForge has asked the court in Koblenz to hear testimony from three expert witnesses regarding the legal status of the nuclear weapons. If allowed by the court, retired Judge Bernd Hahnfeld, a former board chair of the International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms, would testify regarding the illegality of stationing foreign nuclear weapons in Germany; University of Trier Prof. of Computer Science Karl-Hans Bläsius on the risk of accidental nuclear war; and Univ. of Illinois Professor of Law Francis A. Boyle on his 2002 book, The Criminality of Nuclear Deterrence.

The legal scholars say the stationing of US nuclear bombs in Germany violates the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) among others. The NPT prohibits any transfer of nuclear weapons to, or any reception of them from, other countries; and Germany’s reunification treaty, or Final Settlement Treaty, of 1990 renounced the possession of nuclear weapons.

“I participated in these actions because they are the only way to have the outlaw status of nuclear weapons considered by the courts. The public wants these bombs out of Germany. But nuclear weapons’ controllers are anti-democratic and they need a court of law to order them ousted,” LaForge said.

Marion Kuepker of Hamburg, an  anti-nuclear campaigner with Nonviolent Action to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (www.gaaa.org), reports, “In the last two years, about 50 court cases involving dozens of nuclear weapons protesters have taken place in Cochem and Koblenz for nonviolent civil disobedience actions at the Büchel air base.”