Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

June 5, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Radiation Exposure Rule Changes to Increase Cancer Rates

PLEASE SEND COMMENTS TO THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

John LaForge

Image by Dan Meyers.

Among the hundreds of Trump White House executive orders (EO), No. 14300 directs the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to weaken its long-standing radiation exposure rule, “Standards for Protection Against Radiation.

Based on the EO, an upcoming NRC rule change calls for setting a radiation exposure “threshold” or level below which your exposure to ionizing radiation “would not count” or would be considered “never to have occurred.”

The proposed NRC exposure rules will be 5-100 times less protective than current law, and will likely be based on the archaic “Reference Man” standard, the grossly outdated radiation risk model. “Reference Man” represents a young adult male, and so the standard both ignores and denies the greater harm exposure to the fetus, to infants, to children, and to women, done by a given radiation exposure.

The EO would impact people in thousands of communities surrounding the 94 operating nuclear reactors in the United States by increasing exposure to radiation from routine offsite emissions: from reactors, nuclear weapons facilities, nuclear material transport systems, and nuclear waste sites.

Forty citizen organizations, including the national nonprofit Physicians for Social Responsibility, wrote to federal officials warning of public health consequences of Trump’s EO. The joint letter points out sharply disproportionate impacts on women and children from weakening existing radiation exposure standards and calls for strengthening them.

But vested interests in the nuclear industry want to save money by attacking the basis of NRC regulation, the “Linear No Threshold” or LNT risk model.

Decades of published peer-reviewed research support the LNT model, including the authoritative National Academy of Sciences report “Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation, VII Phase 2” (BEIR VII), as well as many studies of nuclear industry and nuclear weapons production workers.

One industry-sponsored “Petition for Rule-making” appealed to the NRC in 2015 and it triggered a formal review of the ‘no threshold” model. The NRC then soundly rejected the petition in a 2021 decision. In fact, the NRC reaffirmed the scientific basis and global consensus that no radiation exposure is so small as to carry no risk of harmful effects. Well-documented findings show that even exposures so small that they cannot be measured may, sometimes, result in fatal cancer. Reducing the risk to zero requires zero radiation exposure.

A detailed analysis of the proposed rule change and its dire consequences was published by Princeton’s Frank von Hippel in the May 27 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. For more about sending comments to the NRC, see:   www.nirs.org/radiation or  www.radiationproject.org/online .

NRC rule changes, and its abandonment of the no-threshold model, are scheduled to be issued as a proposal on June 8, 2026, marking the start of a 30-day public comment period. We must oppose this dangerous deregulation and demand more, not less, protection against radiation. ###

— A version of this article appeared at Counterpunch, June 5-7, 2026

Filed Under: Environment, Environmental Justice, Nuclear Power, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste, Social Issues, Weekly Column

March 2, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Monticello Reactor is Down for Repairs Until at Least March 20

The Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) | Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The 55-year-old Monticello nuclear power reactor, a General Electric designed boiling water reactor like the melted and exploded Fukushima reactors in Japan, leaked almost 1-million gallons of highly radioactive cooling water into the ground under the reactor complex and some of the radioactive tritium reached the Mississippi River which is used for drinking water.

By John LaForge

The 55-year-old Monticello nuclear reactor owned by Xcel Energy was unexpectedly shut down Friday, Feb. 20, and the Monticello Times reports the reactor will be offline for at least 30 days, maybe more to “perform maintenance” and to “determine appropriate repairs.”

No regional or national news service made mention of Xcel’s reactor outage in spite of the “over 1 million users” that rely on its electricity, according to Xcel’s website. The reasons for the embarrassing outage were not made public by the company, which did not name the equipment that is in need of repair.

Further, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission made no announcement of the shutdown, and NRC Sr. Public Affairs Officer Viktoria Mitlyng wrote to Nukewatch Feb. 26 that, “The shutdown at Monticello was a planned maintenance shutdwon (sic) and did not require formal notifications. It’s a routine practice for nuclear plants.” The lack of an NRC notification might explain why not a single state-wide Minnesota news service made mention of the outage.

According to Xcel spokesperson Theo Keith, who spoke to editor Lauren Flaum of The Monticello Times, the shutdown “is not related to the tritium leak discovered at the facility in 2023.” Tritium is the radioactive form of hydrogen, and Mr. Keith’s reference is to the leak of nearly one-million gallons of highly radioactive coolant that contaminated groundwater under the reactor site, groundwater that reached the Mississippi River which is a drinking water source for Minneapolis and St. Paul.

Xcel explained to the press that the regional electrical power grid draws from multiple generators across the Midwest, and that the mix of providers allows uninterrupted service even when individual systems are taken offline.

Myths busted by Monticello shutdown

The shutdown debunks two principal myths endlessly repeated by the nuclear industry.

First, that nuclear reactors provide uninterrupted generation of electricity. The Nuclear Energy Institute’s website page-1 slogan is: “Only nuclear has the power to … deliver 24/7/365.” Let’s call BS. As the NRC’s Mitlyng said, “It’s a routine practice” for nuclear plants to shut down. Nuclear reactors are taken offline regularly and repeatedly by unplanned emergencies, by unexpected repair work, by refueling outages, and by emergencies and accidents that plague the youngest and the oldest reactors. Monticello is the sixth oldest in the United States.

Second: Promoters of commercial nuclear reactors say their electricity “is needed to keep the lights on.” This is BS again, as Xcel told the press that it “does not anticipate any impact to electric service while the plant is offline.”

Imagine a nuclear-free Mississippi River watershed. Xcel’s Monticello reactor isn’t needed to keep the lights on, and it’s so old that it can’t operate without major equipment repairs severe enough to gut Xcel’s profit-taking for thirty days. ###

Filed Under: Environment, Environmental Justice, Fukushima, Nuclear Power, Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor, Weekly Column

February 2, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

First Nation Stalls Planned Canadian Radioactive Waste Dump Near Ottawa River

According to the Journal de Montréal, the 365 Anishinabeg residents of the Kebaowek First Nation reserve in Abitibi-Témiscamingue, have halted the multi-million-dollar Canadian radioactive waste dump sited on their homelands. The intended permanent abandonment site, which would hold up to one-million cubic meters of radioactive and other toxic wastes including plutonium, was conceived of by a consortium of multinational corporations hired by the federally-owned corporation Atomic Energy of Canada. The proposal would sandwich the waste in a mound of clay, sand, and an insufficient membrane close to the surface and near the Ottawa River, drinking water for many downstream. The mound is engineered to last 550 years, but Gordon Edwards of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility points out that 19 of the 29 radioactive substances destined for the dump have half-lives of more than 5,500 years. In February, Federal Courts ruled that the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission did not obtain free, prior, and informed consent of affected Indigenous communities — required by the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples — before green-lighting construction. In March, Federal Courts found the dump threatens several at-risk species. The proposed dump is opposed by 130 Quebec municipalities. — Gordon Edwards, Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility, Sept. 22; Journal de Montréal, Sept.19, 2025

We the Nuclear Free North – Join us to oppose nuclear waste burial in ...

We the Nuclear Free North – Join us to oppose nuclear waste burial in Northwestern Ontario

Filed Under: Environment, Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

August 29, 2025 by Nukewatch 1 Comment

Fukushima Recovery Plagued with Setbacks

By John LaForge

Fukushima Workers Flee Site After Tsunami Scare

Japan is one of the most earthquake prone areas in the world, and the regular quakes raise traumatic memories of the March 11, 2011 record-breaker that left 19,000 dead and smashed the six-reactor Fukushima-Daiichi site. A magnitude 5.5 quake struck just off Japan’s southeast Tokara coast July 3; a mag. 4.2 quake hit east of Iwaki, in Fukushima Prefecture July 12; and a mag. 4.1 quake shook the same area July 25.

In late July, an extremely powerful 8.8-magnitude quake struck Avacha Bay in Russia’s Far East, triggering tsunami warnings and evacuations across the entire Pacific Rim. The U.S. Geological Survey said the quake was one of the strongest ever recorded.

The owner/operator of the wrecked reactor complex, Tokyo Electric Power Co., evacuated its entire staff of 4,000 in response to warnings of a possible nine-foot tsunami, after first halting its pumping of radioactive wastewater into the Pacific.

Elsewhere in Japan, over 1.9 million people were urged to evacuate the eastern seaboard, and a 4-foot tsunami wave did strike north of Fukushima at Iwate Prefecture, some 1,090 miles from Avacha Bay, site of the major Russian earthquake.

China partially lifts ban on Japanese seafood imports

China “conditionally resumed” the importation of Japanese seafood products June 30 ⸺ with the exception of the 10 prefectures closest to the Fukushima disaster site ⸺ after conducting water sample inspections off the coast of the site. Beijing had banned all such imports from Japan as a protest and precaution, following the 2023 start of deliberately discharging large volumes of radioactively contaminated cooling water into the Pacific Ocean. The 2023 ban was imposed to “comprehensively prevent the food safety risks of radioactive contamination caused by the discharge of nuclear wastewater from Fukushima into the sea,” China’s General Administration of Customs said then. Shocked by Japan’s action, Beijing’s Foreign Ministry added that the discharge was an “extremely selfish and irresponsible act,” which would “push the risks onto the whole world (and) pass on the pain to future generations of human beings,” the Agence France-Presse reported.

Chinese customs officials said June 30 the seafood import ban would continue for ten prefectures, namely Fukushima and its nine closest neighboring states. Products from other regions will need health certificates, radioactive substance detection qualification certificates, and production area certificates issued by the Japanese government for Chinese customs declarations, the government said.

Relatedly, Hong Kong announced that it will maintain its ban on Japanese seafood, sea salt, and seaweed imports from the same ten prefectures still targeted by mainland China ¾ Fukushima, Gunma, Tochigi, Ibaraki, Miyagi, Niigata, Nagano, Saitama, Tokyo, and Chiba ¾ citing ongoing concerns about the risks associated with the discharge of radioactive wastewater.

Tepco Lost $6 Billion as Meltdown Recovery Falters

Tokyo Electric Power Co. Holdings corporation (Tepco) lost $5.8 billion (903 billion yen) between April and June this year as the owner and operator of the triple reactor meltdown at Fukushima, overrun with the costs of inventing, designing, building, and testing robotic machines with which to remotely extract the ferociously radioactive melted reactor fuel from deep inside the earth-quake and tsunami-wrecked reactors. There are a total of over 880 metric tonnes of “corium” or melted and rubblized uranium and plutonium fuel in three reactors that Tepco claims it will extract. Nikkei-Asia reported August 1st that Tepco says it has $4.7 billion “earmarked for future demolition work” (700 billion yen), which doesn’t even cover this spring’s one-quarter loss. Tepco has said that its preparations for the extraction are “expected to take 12 to 15 years.”

The quarterly financial loss makes a mockery of announced plans by the government and TEPCO to fully complete decommissioning of the rubbished reactors by 2051.

Two out of 14-to-20-million tonnes of radioactive soil buried on PM’s office grounds, in “safety” parody

In a surreal display of political slapstick July 19th, the office of Japan’s Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba buried on his office’s garden grounds two cubic meters of radioactive soil scraped up during Fukushima clean-up operations (in which some 14-to-20 million cubic meters of topsoil and debris were collected) ¾ “to show it is safe to reuse.”

Nippon Television reported that “The radioactive cesium concentration in the soil being buried is 6,400 Becquerels per kilogram” (Bq/kg). “Becquerels” are a standard measuring unit of radioactivity. The 6,400 is below the legally permitted limit of 8,000 Bq/Kg.

The radiation emitted by the soil comes from cesium-137 which was spewed in large amounts by Fukushima’s melting and exploding reactors, and which came down as fallout. Cesium fallout still contaminates huge areas of forests and farm lands in the region.

The millions of tons of collected soil now in storage are being tested and sorted to identify material with cesium at 8,000 Bq/Kg or less. Several million tons of it may then be used as fill in construction projects, road-building, and railway embankments all around Japan. Asphalt, farm soil, “or layers of other materials should be used to seal in the radioactivity,” Akira Asakawa, an Environment Ministry official with the soil project, told the Agence France-Presse.

The PM’s demonstration plot is the first “reuse” of the poisoned waste, while experiments elsewhere have been halted due to public protest. The PM’s contaminated dirt was covered up with about eight inches of normal soil to provide some radiation shielding.

Any radiation exposure is unsafe, but negative effects like radiation sickness, immune disorders, or cancers caused by contact with the radioactive soil would take years or decades to appear, owing to the latency period between radiation exposure and the onset of induced health problems. The joke seems to be that since Prime Minister Ishiba hasn’t dropped dead after walking by, low-dose exposure must be harmless.

Readers may remember a very similar high-level comedy sketch performed by former President Barack Obama, who traveled to Flint, Michigan in May 2016. Drinking water supplies there had been contaminated with lead and to calm the public uproar, Obama sat before the cameras and theatrically downed a glass of water. The straight-faced routine was proof positive, and rock-solid confirmation beyond doubt of any kind whatsoever that Flint’s tap water was safe to drink. Bottom’s up!

 

“Yes, We Fooled You.” President Barack Obama drank a glass of filtered water in Flint, Michigan, which was scandalized by lead-poisoned drinking water, during a meeting there with officials. Photo: Carlos Barria/Reuters

Fukushima Disaster Response to Last Eons

Countless dilemmas and setbacks have plagued the now 14-year-long emergency response to the triple reactor meltdown and widespread radiation releases that began March 11, 2011 at Fukushima on Japan’s northeast coast.

Perhaps the most enormous of stumbling blocks, acknowledged by Tepco July 29, are the “unprecedented” technical complexities of finding, contacting, removing, and containerizing 880 tonnes of highly radioactive melted reactor fuel still smoldering at the bottom of the three devastated reactors.

Unprecedented is the key word here, since the industry has never before had to contain such a large mass of wasted and unapproachable radioactivity. All the work of dealing with the wasted fuel must be done robotically and remotely, since the waste’s fierce radioactivity kills living things that come near. Just planning and preparing to remove the “corium” material will take at least another 12 years.

Toyoshi Fuketa, head of a regulatory body overseeing the site, said at a press conference earlier that “The difficulty of retrieving the first handful of debris has become apparent,” the Kyodo News agency reported.

In 14 years’ time, engineers managed to design, build, test, and rebuild a one-of-a-kind robot that removed less than one-gram of the waste fuel from reactor No. 2 last year. That November “breakthrough” was three years behind schedule, “and some experts estimate that the decommissioning work could take more than a century,” CBS News and Mainichi Japan reported.

The torturously slow process has made Tepco’s early prediction of complete cleanup by 2051 (40 years’ time) appear to have been made up for PR reasons.

Tepco said July 29 that it would need another 12 to 15 years’ worth of preparation ¾ until 2040 ¾ “before starting the full-scale removal of melted fuel” at the No. 3 reactor. Tepco earlier claimed that “full-scale” extraction would begin four years ago, in 2021 according to the daily Asahi Shimbun August 1.

Of an estimated 880 tons of debris, only 0.9 gram has been recovered to date. With one million grams in a tonne, Tepco has only 879 million-plus grams to go, and “A simple calculation based on the time since the accident suggests the removal process could take another 13.6 billion years to complete,” the Asahi Shimbun smirked.

China’s reactor report card omits embarrassing emission info’

China issues annual reports on its large nuclear power operations known as “China Nuclear Energy.” The 2024 edition, its latest, made headlines by omitting for the first-time information on the routine radioactive gases and liquids released from its operating reactors.

Kyodo News reported that the omission may be a way to avoid accusations of hypocrisy since China has strenuously condemned Japan’s discharge of radioactively contaminated wastewater to the Pacific. At the same time China’s domestic reactors in 2022 reportedly “released wastewater containing tritium at levels up to nine times higher than the annual discharge limit” set by Japan’s discharge authorities. ###

Filed Under: Environment, Environmental Justice, Fukushima, Nuclear Power, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste, Weekly Column

July 14, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Report: Radiation and the Damage it Causes

A new publication from Beyond Nuclear, “Radiation and harm to human health,” is the latest in its series of booklets that together comprise what it calls, “The Case Against Nuclear Power: Facts and Arguments from A-Z.” Available online, BN says: “It’s time to set the record straight on radiation and the damage it causes, particularly to pregnancy, children and women. Contrary to what Trump’s recent executive orders claim, abundant and largely officially ignored, scientific evidence demonstrates that childhood cancers increase around normally operating nuclear facilities, with indications that these cancers begin during pregnancy. Uranium mining to get fuel for reactors, a worldwide environmental justice travesty, is also associated with a number of health impacts. Even already existing background radiation (from the nuclear industry’s uranium fuel chain) is associated with childhood cancers — a fact that nuclear proponents conveniently forget — the industry compounds these health impacts by releasing radiation accidentally, and routinely, from nuclear reactors; releases the U.S. NRC has been happy to legalize. Clearly our current radiation standards aren’t protective enough.”

— Read it here: https://beyondnuclearinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/radiation-and-harm-to-human-health_27-july.pdf

Filed Under: Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 24
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch