Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Weekly Column
    • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
    • Depleted Uranium
    • Direct Action
    • Lake Superior Barrels
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
    • Workshops
  • Donate

July 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

“Please Disobey Orders for Nuclear Attack from the President” — Secretary of Defense

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2014

BALTIMORE, Maryland — According to an obituary by Robert McFadden, James R. Schlesinger became so alarmed by President Nixon’s unstable behavior in the days leading to his August 1974 resignation, that Schlesinger “instructed the military not to react to White House orders, particularly on nuclear arms, unless cleared by him or Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.” Schlesinger, an influential Cold War hawk who served Presidents Nixon and Ford as Secretary of Defense, CIA director, and chief of the Atomic Energy Commission, and later as Jimmy Carter’s Secretary of Energy, died March 27.

According to research by Scott Sagan and Jeremy Suir, “From Oct. 10, 1969, through the rest of the month, the US military was ordered to full global war readiness alert, without any provocation, and with no explanation to US commanders as to the alert’s purpose.” Nuclear-armed fighter jets were dispersed, ICBM countdowns were initiated and ballistic missile submarines were deployed. “On Oct. 27, the Strategic Air Command was ordered to dispatch B-52 bombers, loaded with H-bombs, toward the Soviet Union … in an operation named Giant Lance. ‘The bombers crossed Alaska,’ Sagan and Suri wrote, ‘were refueled in midair by KC-135 tanker aircraft, and then flew in oval patterns toward the Soviet Union and back, on 18-hour vigils over the northern polar ice cap.’ This was all done in total secrecy — not from the Soviets, of course, since they knew quite well what was happening, but from the American people.”

— New York Times, March 28, 2014; James Carroll, “Nixon’s Madman Strategy,” Boston Globe, June 14, 2005

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

July 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

UK Protestors Arrested Aboard Nuclear Sub

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2014

HELENSBURGH, Scotland — Two anti-nuclear weapons activists gained access and were arrested March 19 aboard Britain’s Royal Navy submarine HMS Ambush at its Faslane berth in the West of Scotland. Faslane houses the headquarters of the Royal Navy and Britain’s Trident nuclear weapons.

“I am amazed and disturbed by the accessibility of the UK’s top defense site. Up to 80 nuclear warheads are often stationed here, along with several nuclear reactors. We thought we could get in, but not that we would be arrested within meters of nuclear materials,” stated Heather Stewart, one of those arrested.

The HMS Ambush is one of three new Astute Class hunter-killer nuclear submarines that will replace the UK’s aging Trident fleet. Four more Astute subs are scheduled to be built and based at Faslane, and the three built so far have cost the British government over $1.6 billion each.

“Direct actions such as this are necessary, to reflect the overwhelming public support for scrapping Trident and to show that we won’t accept a Trident replacement or new nuclear submarines,” Stewart said. Their action was launched from the Faslane Peace Camp, which has provided a base for action outside the site for 31 years.

The US Navy also faces opposition to the replacement of its own Trident fleet — its 12 new nuclear submarines are expected to cost taxpayers $100 billion.

— Faslane Peace Camp press release, Mar. 21; Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action, May 10, 2014

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

July 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Y-12 Plowshares Sabotage Convictions to be Appealed

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2014

On March 6 attorneys for the three Transform Now Plowshares activists who were sentenced to long prison terms in February announced that an appeal team was being assembled and moving forward. 

The disarmament action of July 2012 resulted in felony property damage and sabotage convictions for Sr. Megan Rice, 83, Greg Boertje-Obed, 58, and Michael Walli, 65, who were sentenced to 35 months, 62 months and 62 months in federal prison respectively. The three senior citizens humiliated the nuclear weapons establishment generally, and National Nuclear Security Agency in particular, by reaching the “Fort Knox of Uranium” building at the Y-12 nuclear weapons complex in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and painting slogans and hanging banners there after passing undetected through four fences. 

Transform Now Plowshares activists Michael Walli, Sr. Megan Rice, and Greg Boertje-Obed.

The federal appeal will confront the sabotage conviction. Attorney Bill Quiqley says the sabotage charge is “an attempt to intimidate the defendants and others from doing symbolic disarmament actions at other nuclear facilities.” 

Quigley, Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights and a professor of law at Loyola University, wrote to the three that the appeal will challenge the sabotage conviction “on the grounds that your open dedication to nuclear disarmament cannot be used as an element of ‘criminal intent.’” 

A reversal of the sabotage conviction would require the three to return to court to be re-sentenced. Such an appeal victory could also make the US government less likely to charge it against other peace activists. 

There is a risk that the government will choose to cross appeal and ask that the sentences be lengthened. 

Volunteer lawyers, including Quigley, Anna Lellelid, and members of the influential Orrick law firm in New York, are studying the May 2013 trial transcripts and preparing to enroll as counsel in the Sixth US Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati. The circuit takes cases from Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee. 

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

July 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Russian Expansion Sparks Nuclear Regression

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2014
By Paul Vos Benkowski

Russia’s recent annexation of Crimea in Ukraine has led to a rush for nuclear “protection” in the region. Many neighboring countries are changing their tunes from 2010 when President Obama, speaking in Prague after a NATO summit, outlined his vision for eliminating nuclear weapons. NATO countries applauded the sentiment and sought to remove the 180 US nuclear weapons from Europe. But on April 2, NATO suspended cooperation with Russia, ending the NATO-Russian Council which was established in 2002. NATO members and Russia had sought to “work towards achieving a true strategic and modernized partnership with the aim of contributing to the creation of a common space of peace, security and stability.” Not so much anymore.

Stanislaw Koziej, head of Poland’s National Security Bureau, has said, “Although there’s a very small risk of Russia acting against Poland, that risk is much bigger now than it was just a few weeks ago. The most important deterrence is NATO solidarity and the presence of the US military in Europe. Nuclear deterrence is a very important factor that NATO has at its disposal, and it’s becoming increasingly important.” Jiri Schneider, the Czech deputy foreign minister until earlier this year added to the concern, “nobody is expecting a large-scale Russian invasion but what Russia is doing is provocation, and we have to show some muscle.”

These fears are the same that led to the nuclear buildup during the Cold War. The deployments of US nuclear weapons in Europe are not the only ones in the region. France has 300 nuclear weapons and Britain possesses 225 submarine-mounted warheads. Germany has floated plans to end its “nuclear sharing” duties, hoping to retire its nuclear-capable aircraft by the year 2020. That leaves Russia with some 2,000 short-range warheads in its European territories and it has some neighboring countries more than a little nervous.

In order to assuage central European fears, the US has moved fighter planes from its base in Aviano, Italy to Poland and US Army and Navy units have been deployed to the Baltic States. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has asked NATO to station 10,000 troops on its soil. While these moves have been made public, the idea of bolstering certain countries with nuclear weapons has remained a secret. Polish National Security Chief, Koziej reportedly said, “In nuclear deterrence, the most important aspect is keeping your adversary in the dark about your plans, so it’s best not to talk about where it would be suitable to base US nuclear weapons.”

Russia’s interest in Ukraine is largely military. Ukraine is home to 50 factories that manufacture much of Russia’s military hardware. The city of Zhovti Vody provides 20 percent of all natural uranium currently used by the nuclear industry. The Washington Post reported that “Russian troops don’t just threaten Ukraine: They rely on it too.”

Hopefully NATO countries will recall the purpose of their alliance and remain committed to the peaceful resolution of disputes. As the Cold War has shown us, there are no winners in a nuclear arms race, only the toxic remains of rampant paranoia and bluster serving no one. 

— Newsweek, Apr. 15; Washington Post, May 9, 2014 

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, War

July 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Iran Limits Nuclear  Program, UN Certifies

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2014

The United Nations certified on April 17 that Iran has acted to cut is nuclear materials stockpile by almost 75 percent, carrying out parts of a landmark agreement. Iran says it does not want nuclear weapons and agreed with several world powers to the neutralization of partially enriched uranium that could have been turned into weapons-grade material. The UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency reported that Iran has so far taken the agreed-upon steps to limit its nuclear fuel program to civilian uses only. — JML

— AP, Apr. 15; USA Today, Apr. 16; Reuters, Apr. 17, 2014

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Facebook

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2022 · Nukewatch