Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
    • Workshops
  • Donate

June 22, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2022

Click the links below to access articles from the Summer 2022 Quarterly Newsletter. Page numbers take you to the pdf of each page as they appear in the print version. Individual articles are also tagged by issue category.

Page 1

Sen. Markey: ‘It’s possible they don’t know what they’re doing’
Get in Line: Investigate U.S. Atrocities First

Page 2

U.S. Still Buying Russian Uranium in Spite of War on Ukraine
We Need an International Antiwar Movement, and Not Cheerleaders for the Weapons Industry

Page 3

Ukraine in the Age of Self-Delusion

Page 4 

2022 Summer of Anti-Nuclear Revival
New Study: Cancer Epidemic is Result of Internal Fallout Radiation, Grossly Miscalculated

Page 5

New Office in Justice Dept. to Fight Environmental Racism
Zero-Emission Canada Possible
U.S./German Radioactive Waste Importation on Hold
U.S. Renewable Energy Output Surges Ahead of Nuclear
Nukewatch Welcomes Lindsay Potter  
Congress Approves Two- year Extension of Radiation Exposure Compensation Act

Page 6

Can Nuclear Power Be the Answer?
Nuclear goodbye: The future must be solar, wind, battery and LED/efficiency

Page 7

Nuclear Shorts

Page 8

Get in Line: Investigate U.S. Atrocities First

 

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Uncategorized

June 21, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Get in Line: Investigate U.S. Atrocities First

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2022
By John LaForge

The global outpouring of legitimate, agonized grief for civilian victims of Russia’s illegal war on Ukraine has brought countless calls for war crimes charges against the perpetrators. Before Russia’s criminal outrages are taken to the International Criminal Court, there are scores of alleged U.S. atrocities that must be investigated.

The U.S. military has a long record of apparently criminal conduct committed during its military assaults and unprovoked wars of aggression or occupation in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Pakistan, Yugoslavia, Somalia, and elsewhere. Like Russia in Ukraine, U.S. crimes include bombing hospitals, desecrating corpses, torturing and executing prisoners, using banned cluster bombs, and willfully attacking civilians and civilian objects.

A still from a video of smiling U.S. Marines urinating on dead Taliban fighters, from Jan. 16, 2013. Staff Sgt. Edward Deptola admitted multiple charges at a court martial, including desecrating remains. Reuters photo.

But unlike today’s wall-to-wall news coverage of Russia’s every move in Ukraine, the U.S. media mostly withdrew from and stopped reporting on U.S. military occupations as the wars dragged on, and generally chose not to present many photos or film of either U.S. war dead or alleged U.S. crimes. Like news censorship inside Russia, the U.S. media’s blind eye helped maintain public support for U.S. wars-of-choice. Generalized calls to “support our troops” overwhelmed most reports of unlawful, excessive, or criminal acts by officers or soldiers. Eddie Gallagher, the Navy SEAL platoon chief who was convicted of posing for a photo with the corpse of the 17-year-old detainee who other SEALs testified Gallagher had stabbed to death, was freed from his sentence by Donald Trump.

Some of the most notorious and well-documented U.S. war crimes have involved torturing prisoners. “It is indisputable that the United States engaged in the practice of torture,” concluded a panel of experts for the Constitution Project in 2013. The group’s 577-page report found that President George W. Bush and other administration officials bore responsibility for the crimes. (“U.S. Practiced Torture After 9/11, Nonpartisan Review Concludes,” New York Times, April 16, 2013)

Hardly less criminal, on Feb. 12, 2010, in an atrocity kept secret for a month, U.S. Special Forces in Afghanistan killed a teenage girl, a pregnant mother of 10, a pregnant mother of six, a police officer, and his brother, and were accused of trying to cover up the killings by digging bullets out of the victims’ bodies, washing the wounds with alcohol, and lying to superior officers. (“U.S. Admits Role in February Killing of Afghan Women,” New York Times, Apr. 4, 2010)

U.S. jets bombed and rocketed an allied Pakistani military base for two hours Nov. 26, 2011, killing 26 members of a force called the Frontier Corps and wounding dozens more. (“NATO Strikes Kill Pakistani Forces, Raising Tensions,” New York Times, Nov. 27, 2011.)

During the war in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, U.S. pilots deliberately bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade May 7, 1999, using five GPS-guided bombs. President Bill Clinton, CIA Director George Tenet, and Defense Secretary William Cohen all claimed it was a mistake. (“NATO bombed Chinese deliberately; NATO hit embassy on purpose,” Guardian Oct. 16, 1999).

On April 23, 1999, the U.S. rocketed the central state broadcasting offices in Belgrade, destroying the building, killing 16 civilian employees, and wounding 16. Human rights groups around the world said the attack was a war crime.[1]

The United States used cluster bombs widely in its wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the former Yugoslavia, according to reports by Human Rights Watch, The Lancet, and the UN International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.[2] In one case, U.S.-led NATO forces attacked the main hospital complex in Nis, Serbia with cluster bombs May 7, 1999, killing three outside the hospital, three on the operating table, and nine at an adjoining market. (“Serbs Say 15 are Killed at Hospital and Market,” New York Times, May 8, 1999)

Even the pro-war editorial board of the New York Times, while boasting “This page has been supportive of the war in Afghanistan since it began,” acknowledged on Feb. 4, 2019, that, “Tens of thousands of Afghan civilians have been killed, maimed and traumatized. Millions of people are internally displaced or are refugees in Iran and Pakistan.”

“These things happen in war,” Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said casually referring to the now infamous “methodical” execution-style massacre of 24 men, women, and children in Haditha, Iraq, Nov. 19, 2006. Yes, the murder of innocents occurs in war, inevitably, every time, without exception, which is why anti-war activists are so keen to prevent it, condemn it, and to end it once it’s been started.

As the late Yale psychiatrist and author Robert Lifton has shown, all wars are “atrocity producing situations,” and the series of headlines that follows, edited for space, illustrates arguably criminal U.S. military conduct in recent wars and can provide prosecutors in The Hague a basis for launching investigations.

Headlines sketch U.S. war crime spree

“How the U.S. Hid an Airstrike That Killed Dozens of Civilians in Syria,” New York Times, Nov. 13, 2021

“Lethal U.S. Airstrike on Afghan Drug Labs is Disputed: Bombs Killed Civilian Workers, not Taliban, a UN Report Says,” New York Times, Oct. 10, 2019

“U.S. Drone Kills 30 Civilians, Afghans Say; Target Was ISIS,” New York Times, Sep. 20, 2019, p. A6

“U.S. Airstrikes and Raids Killed 120 Civilians in 2018, Pentagon Says,” New York Times, May 3, 2019

“U.S. and Afghan Forces Killed More Civilians in Early 2019 than Taliban did, U.N. Finds,” New York Times, Apr. 25, 2019

“Claiming Atrocities by Leader, SEALS Were Told to ‘Let It Go’,” New York Times, Apr. 24, 2019, p. A1

“For Afghan Civilians, 2018 Was the Deadliest in a Decade” (“Among the dead last year were 927 children”), New York Times, Feb. 25, 2019

“U.S. Airstrikes Said to Kill at Least 10 Afghan Civilians,” New York Times, Feb. 11, 2019

“U.S. Airstrikes and Raids Killed 120 Civilians in 2018,” Pentagon Says, New York Times, May 3, 2019

“American Airstrikes Kill Civilians, Including Children, Afghans Charge,” New York Times, Jan. 26, 2019

“Civilians Killed in U.S.-Afghan Operation,” New York Times, Nov. 29, 2018

“Decorated Navy SEAL Is Accused of War Crimes in Iraq,” New York Times, Nov. 15, 2018

“Report: 3,301 Civilians Killed in U.S.-led Strikes in Syria Since 2014,” Duluth NewsTribune, Sep. 24, 2018
“Study: U.S. Killed 500 Civilians,” (“Pentagon may be grossly undercounting”), Minneapolis StarTribune, June 3, 2018

“More Afghan Civilians are Victims of Targeted Attacks, U.N. Says,” New York Times, Feb. 16, 2018

“Afghan Pedophiles Get Pass from U.S. Military, Report Says,” New York Times, January 24, 2018

“American Airstrikes in Afghanistan Stir Debate Over Who Was Killed,” New York Times, Nov. 11, 2017

“U.S. Airstrikes Kill at Least 13 Civilians,” Minneapolis StarTribune, Nov. 5, 2017

“Airstrike Kills at Least 25 at Street Market in Yemen,” New York Times, Nov. 2, 2017

“Civilian Deaths From U.S.-led Strikes on ISIS Surge Under Trump Administration” (“over 3,800”), Guardian, June 6, 2017

“3 Children Among Dead in a Raid in Somalia,” New York Times, Aug. 26, 2017

“Afghans Say U.S. Strike Hit Civilians,” New York Times, Aug. 12, 2017

“Civilian Deaths a Windfall for Militants’ Propaganda,” AP/Minneapolis StarTribune, Apr. 2, 2017

“U.S. Strike Reportedly Killed 30 Syrians,” New York Times & Minneapolis StarTribune, March 23, 2017

“U.S. Military Says Fight with Taliban Killed 33 Civilians,” Minneapolis StarTribune, Jan. 13, 2017

“U.S.-led Strikes in Iraq, Syria Have Killed at Least 188 Civilians, Military Says,” Duluth NewsTribune, Jan. 3, 2017

“U.S. Admits its Airstrikes Likely Killed Afghan Civilians,” Minneapolis StarTribune, Nov. 6, 2016

“U.S. Drones Hit Civilians, UN Says,” New York Times, Sep. 30, 2016

“Residents Say U.S. Strike Killed Civilians,” Wall Street Journal, Sep. 29, 2016

“Pentagon: Errors Led to Hospital Strike,” (“which killed 42 people”), Minneapolis StarTribune, May 1, 2016

“Airstrike on Afghan Hospital Stirs Fury,” Minneapolis StarTribune; & “19 Die in Apparent U.S. Airstrike on Afghan Hospital,” Los Angeles Times, Oct. 4, 2015

“U.S. Practiced Torture After 9/11, Nonpartisan Review Concludes,” New York Times, Apr. 16, 2013

“U.S. Marine Pleads Guilty to Urinating on Corpse of Taliban Fighter in Afghanistan,” Guardian, Jan. 16, 2013

“U.S. Troops Posed with Body Parts of Afghan Bombers,” Los Angeles Times, Apr. 18, 2012

“Drones at Issue… Raids Disrupt Militants, but Civilian Deaths Stir Outrage,” New York Times, Mar. 18, 2012

“G.I. Kills 16 Afghans, Including 9 Children in Attacks on Homes,” New York Times, Mar. 12, 2012

“Commission Alleges U.S. Detainee Abuse,” Minneapolis StarTribune, Jan. 8, 2012

“American Soldier Is Convicted of Killing Afghan Civilians for Sport,” New York Times, Nov. 11, 2011

“G.I. Killed Afghan Journalist, NATO Says,” New York Times, Sep. 9, 2011

“Cable Implicates Americans in Deaths of Iraqi Civilians,” New York Times, Sep. 2, 2011

“Civilians Die in a Raid by Americans and Iraqis,” New York Times, Aug. 7, 2011

“Libya Effort Is Called Violation of War Act,” New York Times, May 26, 2011

“Raid on Wrong House Kills Afghan Girl, 12,” New York Times, May 12, 2011

“Photos of Atrocities Seen as Threat to Afghan Relations,” St. Paul Pioneer Press, March 22, 2011

“Missiles Kill 26 in Pakistan” (“most of them civilians”), New York Times, March 18, 2011

“Afghans Say Attack Killed 52 Civilians; NATO Differs,” New York Times, July 27, 2010

“Afghans Die in Bombing, as Toll Rises for Civilians,” New York Times, May 3, 2010

“Marines Used ‘Excessive Force’ in Afghan Civilian Deaths,” New York Times, Apr. 14, 2007

“Sergeant Tells of Plot to Kill Iraqi Detainees,” New York Times, July 28, 2006, p. A8

“U.S.-led Raid Kills Nine at House,” Omaha World Herald, June 13, 2006

“The Bombing Killed at Least 35 Civilians…” when U.S. warplanes struck the village of Tolokan, Aghanistan, New York Times, June 11, 2006

“Murtha Says Probe Has Found Marines Killed Innocent Civilians,” Omaha World Herald, May 19, 2006

***

On Sep. 16, 2004, a BBC correspondent questioned U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan about the unprovoked U.S. bombardment and invasion of Iraq asking, “It was illegal?” Annan answered, “Yes. I have indicated it is not in conformity with the U.N. Charter. From our point of view and from the Charter point of view, it was illegal.” Likewise, Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah said March 28, 2007, “In the beloved Iraq, the bloodshed is continuing under an illegal foreign occupation….”

The 1946 Nuremberg Judgment comes to mind, especially as it was drafted by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson and enforced by U.S.-led allies: “The charges in the indictment that the defendants planned and waged aggressive wars are charges of the utmost gravity. War is essentially an evil thing. Its consequences are not confined to the belligerent states alone, but affect the whole world.”
_______________
[1] Amnesty International, “NATO/Federal Republic of Yugoslavia: ‘Collateral damage’ or Unlawful Killings? Violations of the Laws of War by NATO During Operation Allied Force,” June 6, 2000, p. 44.

[2] Human Rights Watch, “U.S. Using Cluster Munitions in Iraq,” Apr. 1, 2003; The Lancet, “Pressure Groups Condemn U.S. Use of Cluster Bombs in Afghanistan”, Nov. 3, 2001; UN International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, “Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia,” (undated), paragraph 27.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Uncategorized, War

June 21, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

U.S. Still Buying Russian Uranium in Spite of War on Ukraine

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2022
By Bob Mayberry

 

Uranium Pellets, wikimedia.org

 

It’s ironic to contemplate, devastating to realize, that while the U.S. has banned Russian oil, coal, and gas imports, we continue to buy uranium for our nuclear reactors from Moscow. How much are we spending on reactor fuel? Estimates differ wildly. Senator John Barrasso, R-Wyo., claims the U.S. is “underwriting Putin’s war machine” to the tune of $100 million a month. But Sen. Barrasso has reason to exaggerate since uranium mining revenues in his state might increase following a ban on Russian imports.

The Washington Post reported that International Trade Commission figures for 2016 show the U.S. spending just over $1 billion on Russian uranium, but that figure shrank to $568 million in 2020. However, even those figures aren’t certain. Post reporter Glenn Kessler located a Senate Energy Committee webpage showing sales to the U.S. from Rosatom, Russia’s state-owned nuclear power company, totaled $784 million in 2020.

Clearly the U.S. is spending between five hundred million and a billion dollars annually on Russian uranium. Interestingly, Rosatom was founded by Vladimir Putin in 2007. And, according to The Verge, it now produces 20% of the world’s reactor fuel.

According to Reuters, the U.S. relies on Russia, and its allies Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, for roughly half of the uranium used to fuel our 93 reactors. Those units are responsible for nearly 20% of U.S. electricity. The Biden administration exempted uranium from the bans on Russian imports in part to keep electricity prices low.

Meanwhile, Sen. Barrasso and others are lobbying to add uranium to the Russian import ban, while simultaneously trying to kick-start uranium mining in states like Wyoming, Utah, Texas and Arizona, where large reserves are found. Uranium mining was largely abandoned in the U.S. due to the dangers of radioactive pollution. Thousands of abandoned uranium mines on the Navajo Reservation in Arizona have led to high levels of radioactive metals in the bodies of the women living on the reservation, according to a recent report from the University of New Mexico’s Navajo Birth Cohort Study.

While Sen. Barrasso and others call for renewed uranium mining, Native Americans demand long-overdue cleanup of abandoned mines, mills, and mountains of tailings scattered across the western U.S. that continue to emit dangerous radiation and contaminate water on Indigenous lands.

Transitioning to renewable energy would avoid uranium imports and cut toxic and radioactive pollution.

—Bob Mayberry is a retired English and Theatre Professor at Cal State University-Channel Islands.

Calma, Justine, “The US Can’t Seem to Quit Russian Uranium,” The Verge, 31 March 2022; Daniel, Will, “The U.S. is Miles Away from True Energy Independence, and It’s Not Because of Oil,” Fortune, 29 March 2022; Kessler, Glenn, “Does Russia Sell Nearly $1 Billion in Uranium to the U.S. a Year?,” Washington Post, 20 April 2022;  Navajo Birth Cohort Study, University of New Mexico College of Pharmacy

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Uncategorized, Uranium Mining, War

June 21, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Nuclear goodbye: The future must be solar, wind, battery and LED/efficiency

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2022
By Harvey Wasserman

The nuclear industry has been pushing the fantasy of yet another “renaissance” of nuclear power, based on the absurd idea that atomic reactors — which operate at 571 degrees Fahrenheit, resulting in substantial greenhouse gas emissions and, periodically, explosions — can somehow cool the planet.

The fact is that no more big, old-style light water reactors are likely to be built in the United States, and today’s 93 licensed U.S. reactors (there are 400-plus worldwide) grow increasingly dangerous every day.

As a green power advocate since 1973, I’ve visited dozens of reactor sites throughout the U.S. and Japan. The industry’s backers portray them as high-tech black boxes that are uniformly safe, efficient and reliable, ready to hum for decades without melt-downs, blow-ups or the constant emissions of heat, radiation, chemical pollution, and eco-devastation that plague us all.

In reality, the global reactor fleet is riddled with widely varied and increasingly dangerous defects. These range from inherent design flaws to original construction errors, faulty components, fake replacement parts, stress-damaged (“embrittled”) pressure vessels, cracked piping, inoperable safety systems, crumbling concrete, lethal vulnerabilities to floods, storms and earthquakes, corporate greed, and unmanageable radioactive emissions and wastes — to name a few.

Heat, radiation, and steam have pounded every reactor’s internal components. They are cracked, warped, morphed, and transmuted into rickety fossils virtually certain to shatter in the next meltdown.

Twice-bankrupt Pacific Gas & Electric of California has been found guilty in the 2010 burning deaths of eight San Bruno residents caused by under-maintained gas pipes. The company was also convicted in the deaths of more than eighty people when its faulty wires ignited whole northern California forests and towns in a series of fires.

Today, the utility’s two uninsured Diablo Canyon reactors threaten more than ten million people (living downwind) with potential catastrophes made possible by any of a dozen nearby earthquake faults (including the San Andreas).

Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, San Luis Obispo County, Cali.

 

In 2003, [Ohio’s] Perry and Davis-Besse power reactor operators blacked out 50 million homes in southern Canada and the northeastern United States. The FBI has linked them to a $61-million-bribe handed to the majority leader of the Ohio House of Representatives, and possibly tens of thousands more to the former chair of the state Public Utilities Commission.

The industry’s “regulators” have turned blind eyes to crumbling concrete at the Seabrook and Davis-Besse facilities, whose “hole-in-the-head” defects almost brought Chernobyl to the shores of Lake Erie. When Diablo Canyon’s resident site inspector warned that the reactors could not withstand a likely seismic shock, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission shut him up and moved him out.

The industry’s four most recent reactor construction projects include two at South Carolina’s Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Generating Station — totally abandoned after over $10 billion was spent — and two at Georgia’s Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, years late and costing more than $30 billion. Plagued by corruption, incompetence, design flaws, and labor problems, Plant Vogtle might never open — especially in light of the astonishing advances in renewable and efficiency technologies, which have completely buried any economic or ecological justification for atomic power, new or old.

Desperate atomic cultists including Bill Gates are now touting small modular reactors. But they’re unproven, can’t deploy for years to come, can’t be guarded against terrorists, and can’t beat renewables in safety, speed to build, climate impacts, price, or job creation. Our energy future should consist of modern solar, wind, battery and LED/efficiency technologies, not nuclear reactors. Let’s work to guarantee that none of them explode before we get there.

— Harvey Wasserman co-convenes the weekly Election Protection 2024 Zoom. His People’s Spiral of U.S. History is at www.solartopia.org. Reader Supported News.

This column was produced for Progressive Perspectives, which is run by The Progressive magazine and distributed by Tribune News Service.

 

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Renewable Energy, Uncategorized

May 12, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

British Jurors Acquit Protesters who Toppled Racist Monument

Nukewatch Quarterly Spring 2022
By John LaForge

Anti-racism, civil rights, and human rights activists celebrated the Jan. 6, 2022 decision of a jury to acquit four protesters who toppled the statue of slave trader Edward Colston. Jake Skuse, Rhian Graham, Milo Ponsford, and Sage Willoughby acknowledged pulling down the eyesore and throwing it in the River Avon in Bristol, England during a Black Lives Matter protest in 2020, but they contested the charges of criminal damage to government property.

The defendants argued that the statue was so indecent and potentially abusive that its existence constituted a crime, the Guardian Weekly reported. The Epoch Times noted that the Colston statute “glorified a slave trader involved in the enslavement of over 84,000 black men, women, and children as a ‘most virtuous and wise’ man.”

Attorney General Suella Braverman responded to the verdict by saying she was considering an appeal to “clarify the law” because the not guilty verdict was “causing confusion.” The acquittals cannot be overturned and there cannot be a retrial without fresh evidence. Nile Gardiner, a former aide to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and director of the Margaret Thatcher Centre for Freedom at the Heritage Foundation, told the Telegraph that the verdict had set “an extremely dangerous precedent” that gives mobs a green light to “tear down statues across the country,” begging the question: “Dangerous to what?”

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Uncategorized

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 12
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Facebook

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2023 · Nukewatch