Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
    • Workshops
  • Donate

July 31, 2023 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Leaks at Minnesota Reactor

By North American Water Office
Photo Credit: Mar 17, 2023 Valley News KVLY

Events having the potential to affect public health and safety are occurring at Xcel Energy’s Monticello single nuclear power reactor, about 35 miles up the Mississippi River from Minneapolis. Primary cooling water containing tritium (radioactive hydrogen) has been leaking into the ground at least since last November.

Xcel Energy and the Minnesota Department of Health didn’t bother to report the Monticello leak of about 400,000 gallons until mid-March, and then announced, with much fanfare, that there is no risk to public health and safety and that the leak had not reached the Mississippi River. Then, a few days later Xcel Energy announced a second leak of several hundred gallons because the tank into which contaminated water had been collected overflowed. Not bad, for a clown show.

While state and corporate officials say not to worry, the problem is that these same people fail to consider the authority of the National Academy of Sciences in its 2006 report BEIR VII — the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation. The book-length BEIR VII conclusively reported that there is no safe dose of ionizing radiation, no level of exposure that can be declared harmless. Every exposure, no matter how small, carries a potential for causing cancers and other mutations.

Considering that the radioactive half-life of tritium is just over 12 years, and that it takes about 10 half-lives before a radioactive substance becomes relatively benign biologically, it is probably premature to speculate about public health and safety impacts. In fact, there are three pathways for leaked radiation to affect the public: it can migrate to the river, which supplies most of the drinking water for Minneapolis; it can migrate into groundwater off-site, where it becomes available for private and municipal water pumps; and it can evaporate. There is no doubt that during the next 120 years, some fraction of the leakage will follow each of these pathways and then affect biological activity. Of course, nobody will ever know how much contamination went where, or know what it did when it got there, because radiation monitoring at Monticello, as well as at the rest of the global commercial nuclear fleet, is mostly incapable of detecting radiation in any of these pathways. It makes better PR to just say there is no threat to public health and safety.

This Monticello pipe leak could be an omen of things to come. The leak occurred because a pipe carrying primary cooling water broke. Primary cooling water circulates through the reactor and thereby becomes radioactive. This radioactivity bombards the pipe through which it flowed with neutrons, and over time, this neutron bombardment causes metals to get brittle. Arguably, the pipe broke because it had become embrittled and something jarred it. The problem here – as with all nuclear reactors — is that every bit of metal at Monticello that is part of the primary system, which contains and controls the nuclear reaction, has also been subjected to this same neutron bombardment. All these metals are at some elevated state of embrittlement, now that the reactor is over 50 years old. As a result, we all now get to sit around and wait to see which components will be next in line to brake, and what the consequences of that breakage will be. That could get real exciting very quickly.

— Additional news on Minnesota reactor troubles can be found at Water for Life, the newsletter of the North American Water Office (nawo.org)

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste, Uncategorized

July 31, 2023 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Plutonium Spread Long Distances from Fukushima

Photo Credit: Shohei Miyano/Kyodo News via AP
By John LaForge

Very few reports of the Fukushima catastrophe have mentioned plutonium contamination. Yet plutonium was used in fuel rods in Fukushima’s reactor 3 which was destroyed by meltdown and several hydrogen explosions.

Following the March 14, 2011 explosion at reactor 3, experts worried about the release of the extremely dangerous radioactive substances. Then a week later, on March 21 and 22, Tepco announced that it had detected plutonium in soil collected from its compound.

Plutonium is one of the most toxic substances known to science, and fine particles are far more biologically hazardous than larger particles.

Now, studies published in the journals Science of The Total Environment, Nov. 15, 2020, and Chemosphere, July 2023, report that researchers found that cesium and plutonium “were transported over long distances,” and that deposits of them were recorded in “downtown Tokyo,” about 142 miles from the meltdowns.

According to the authors, very high concentrations of radioactive cesium were released during the accident as particles referred to as “cesium-rich microparticles” (CsMPs). The researchers say CsMPs they found are mainly composed of silicon, iron, zinc, and cesium, and minor amounts of radioactive tellurium, technetium, molybdenum, uranium, and plutonium.

The studies, involving scientists from six countries and led by Associate Professor Satoshi Utsunomiya, a researcher at Kyushu University, found that “plutonium was included inside cesium-rich microparticles that were emitted from the site.”

Radioactive CsMPs released from Fukushima are a potential health risk through inhalation. “Given the small size of the particles, they could penetrate into the deepest parts of the lung, where they could be retained,” Utsunomiya wrote. “The route of exposure of greatest concern is inhalation,” the authors reported, because plutonium, lodged in the lungs, can “remain for years.”

Utsunomiya summed up his team’s work saying, “It took a long time to publish results on particulate Pu from Fukushima … but research on Fukushima’s environmental impact and its decommissioning are a long way from being over.”

Filed Under: Environment, Fukushima, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste, Uncategorized

January 15, 2023 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Prison reflections by U.S. nuclear resister John LaForge

~ from Billwerder Prison, Hamburg — Posted by The Nuclear Resister January 19, 2023 ~ January 15, 2023

At left, volunteer attorney Anna Busl of Bonn represented LaForge at trial in Koblenz.

This month has three important political anniversaries, anti-war and anti-nuclear holidays if you will, events I’ll celebrate privately for a change, since I’m temporarily cooling my heels in a German prison on the west end of Hamburg. It’s not that I killed or robbed very many people, but I have acted contemptuously toward the court system here and have refused to cooperate with its deeply corrupt and thoroughly dishonest protection of the nuclear weapons establishment.

Because Susan Crane and I had the gall to occupy the top of a nuclear weapons bunker that holds U.S. hydrogen bombs here in Germany, and then refuse to apologize by paying a fine for trespassing, the court has decided that seven weeks in this modern prison ought to mend my ways, or at least discourage other abolitionists.

The three war-weary events are Martin Luther King Day, January 16; the second anniversary of the Entry into Force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, January 22; and the yearly setting of the “Doomsday Clock”, January 24 — that weirdly formulaic gauge of nuclear Armageddon’s likelihood concocted by a group of scientific nuclear eggheads.

LaForge, wearing ‘Weapons Inspector’ sign, and Susan Crane , behind light post, were detained after their ‘go-in’ action Aug. 6, 2018, and later convicted of trespass and damage to property.

The establishment of the MLK holiday and of the TPNW were both monumental achievements made against fierce, wealthy, bigoted and colonialist forces of reaction. Advocates of nonviolent action and campaigners for a world free of nuclear weapons this Monday and next Sunday, then get back to work Tuesday when the alarm goes off again on the Doomsday Clock. Of course, the clock’s “up one year, down the next” assessment of nuclear war risks has been ignored as a worn-out rewrite of the Chicken Little tale. Yet the five metric tons of plutonium dust that was lofted into the upper atmosphere by nuclear weapons tests is all making its way back down to earth. So yes Mr. Watson, in fact the worst part of the sky is falling.

Dr. King and opposition to nuclear weapons will always be connected in my mind because MLK said, “We have guided missiles and misguided men” and “the ultimate logic of racism is genocide,” and because nuclear weapons are nothing if not genocidal.

Dr. King’s books, and the hard-won triumphs of the fearlessly nonviolent Civil Rights Movement, inspired a group of us in the 1980s to repeatedly blockade the entrance to the Grand Forks air force base in North Dakota which then controlled 150 land-based, long-range nuclear-armed missiles. Over a ten-year period, our band of nuclear resisters served enough county jail time after staging so many marches, protests and stunts – once pouring blood across the 100-ton concrete lid of a locked-and-loaded Minuteman III missile silo – that when the air force later decided to eliminate over half of its land-based missiles, the Grand Forks nukes were some of the first to go.

Our small group efforts were encouraged back then by news of hundreds of thousands across Europe who took to the streets demanding — successfully it turned out — the ouster of U.S. Cruise and Pershing missiles. Any prospective use of the weapons was almost universally viewed in Europe as suicidal.

We never know if our demands will be realized only that nothing is gained without venturing. Anti-nuclear marchers in the ‘80s never guessed they’d see the U.N. General Assembly vote 122-to-3 to endorse a treaty banning nuclear weapons. This overwhelming majority of the world’s governments have agreed that nuclear weapons can only produce massacres, that any chance of a successful medical response to their effects is impossible, that these effects would illegally cross neutral borders, do long-term criminal damage to the environment, and then recoil to maim and destroy the very militaries that unleash them. (That’s why I wrote “B61 = Suicide” on the weapons bunker just before being detained.)

Today, the groundbreaking TPNW has permanently shamed and stigmatized the nuclear weapons states as hypocrites, scofflaws and rogues who ridicule and ignore the treaty’s means, while cynically claiming to desire its ends.

The nine-member thermonuclear cartel, like a gang of coldblooded mobsters, acts outside and above the law by rewarding their judicial, police and prison authorities for the cover they provide, authorities who then wink and pretend that the protection racket is necessary and that the Bomb is legal.

Maybe our marching, our rebellion and the law of nations can’t denuclearize the cabal of atomic weaponeers. Maybe the nuclear mobsters won’t re-direct their war chests to useful purposes before they run our earthly train off the rails. But then nothing changes unless we demand it.

— John LaForge, Billwerder Prison, Hamburg GERMANY

Filed Under: B61 Bombs in Europe, Direct Action, Nuclear Weapons, Uncategorized, US Bombs Out of Germany, War, Weekly Column

June 22, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2022

Click the links below to access articles from the Summer 2022 Quarterly Newsletter. Page numbers take you to the pdf of each page as they appear in the print version. Individual articles are also tagged by issue category.

Page 1

Sen. Markey: ‘It’s possible they don’t know what they’re doing’
Get in Line: Investigate U.S. Atrocities First

Page 2

U.S. Still Buying Russian Uranium in Spite of War on Ukraine
We Need an International Antiwar Movement, and Not Cheerleaders for the Weapons Industry

Page 3

Ukraine in the Age of Self-Delusion

Page 4 

2022 Summer of Anti-Nuclear Revival
New Study: Cancer Epidemic is Result of Internal Fallout Radiation, Grossly Miscalculated

Page 5

New Office in Justice Dept. to Fight Environmental Racism
Zero-Emission Canada Possible
U.S./German Radioactive Waste Importation on Hold
U.S. Renewable Energy Output Surges Ahead of Nuclear
Nukewatch Welcomes Lindsay Potter  
Congress Approves Two- year Extension of Radiation Exposure Compensation Act

Page 6

Can Nuclear Power Be the Answer?
Nuclear goodbye: The future must be solar, wind, battery and LED/efficiency

Page 7

Nuclear Shorts

Page 8

Get in Line: Investigate U.S. Atrocities First

 

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Uncategorized

June 21, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Get in Line: Investigate U.S. Atrocities First

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2022
By John LaForge

The global outpouring of legitimate, agonized grief for civilian victims of Russia’s illegal war on Ukraine has brought countless calls for war crimes charges against the perpetrators. Before Russia’s criminal outrages are taken to the International Criminal Court, there are scores of alleged U.S. atrocities that must be investigated.

The U.S. military has a long record of apparently criminal conduct committed during its military assaults and unprovoked wars of aggression or occupation in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Pakistan, Yugoslavia, Somalia, and elsewhere. Like Russia in Ukraine, U.S. crimes include bombing hospitals, desecrating corpses, torturing and executing prisoners, using banned cluster bombs, and willfully attacking civilians and civilian objects.

A still from a video of smiling U.S. Marines urinating on dead Taliban fighters, from Jan. 16, 2013. Staff Sgt. Edward Deptola admitted multiple charges at a court martial, including desecrating remains. Reuters photo.

But unlike today’s wall-to-wall news coverage of Russia’s every move in Ukraine, the U.S. media mostly withdrew from and stopped reporting on U.S. military occupations as the wars dragged on, and generally chose not to present many photos or film of either U.S. war dead or alleged U.S. crimes. Like news censorship inside Russia, the U.S. media’s blind eye helped maintain public support for U.S. wars-of-choice. Generalized calls to “support our troops” overwhelmed most reports of unlawful, excessive, or criminal acts by officers or soldiers. Eddie Gallagher, the Navy SEAL platoon chief who was convicted of posing for a photo with the corpse of the 17-year-old detainee who other SEALs testified Gallagher had stabbed to death, was freed from his sentence by Donald Trump.

Some of the most notorious and well-documented U.S. war crimes have involved torturing prisoners. “It is indisputable that the United States engaged in the practice of torture,” concluded a panel of experts for the Constitution Project in 2013. The group’s 577-page report found that President George W. Bush and other administration officials bore responsibility for the crimes. (“U.S. Practiced Torture After 9/11, Nonpartisan Review Concludes,” New York Times, April 16, 2013)

Hardly less criminal, on Feb. 12, 2010, in an atrocity kept secret for a month, U.S. Special Forces in Afghanistan killed a teenage girl, a pregnant mother of 10, a pregnant mother of six, a police officer, and his brother, and were accused of trying to cover up the killings by digging bullets out of the victims’ bodies, washing the wounds with alcohol, and lying to superior officers. (“U.S. Admits Role in February Killing of Afghan Women,” New York Times, Apr. 4, 2010)

U.S. jets bombed and rocketed an allied Pakistani military base for two hours Nov. 26, 2011, killing 26 members of a force called the Frontier Corps and wounding dozens more. (“NATO Strikes Kill Pakistani Forces, Raising Tensions,” New York Times, Nov. 27, 2011.)

During the war in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, U.S. pilots deliberately bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade May 7, 1999, using five GPS-guided bombs. President Bill Clinton, CIA Director George Tenet, and Defense Secretary William Cohen all claimed it was a mistake. (“NATO bombed Chinese deliberately; NATO hit embassy on purpose,” Guardian Oct. 16, 1999).

On April 23, 1999, the U.S. rocketed the central state broadcasting offices in Belgrade, destroying the building, killing 16 civilian employees, and wounding 16. Human rights groups around the world said the attack was a war crime.[1]

The United States used cluster bombs widely in its wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the former Yugoslavia, according to reports by Human Rights Watch, The Lancet, and the UN International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.[2] In one case, U.S.-led NATO forces attacked the main hospital complex in Nis, Serbia with cluster bombs May 7, 1999, killing three outside the hospital, three on the operating table, and nine at an adjoining market. (“Serbs Say 15 are Killed at Hospital and Market,” New York Times, May 8, 1999)

Even the pro-war editorial board of the New York Times, while boasting “This page has been supportive of the war in Afghanistan since it began,” acknowledged on Feb. 4, 2019, that, “Tens of thousands of Afghan civilians have been killed, maimed and traumatized. Millions of people are internally displaced or are refugees in Iran and Pakistan.”

“These things happen in war,” Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said casually referring to the now infamous “methodical” execution-style massacre of 24 men, women, and children in Haditha, Iraq, Nov. 19, 2006. Yes, the murder of innocents occurs in war, inevitably, every time, without exception, which is why anti-war activists are so keen to prevent it, condemn it, and to end it once it’s been started.

As the late Yale psychiatrist and author Robert Lifton has shown, all wars are “atrocity producing situations,” and the series of headlines that follows, edited for space, illustrates arguably criminal U.S. military conduct in recent wars and can provide prosecutors in The Hague a basis for launching investigations.

Headlines sketch U.S. war crime spree

“How the U.S. Hid an Airstrike That Killed Dozens of Civilians in Syria,” New York Times, Nov. 13, 2021

“Lethal U.S. Airstrike on Afghan Drug Labs is Disputed: Bombs Killed Civilian Workers, not Taliban, a UN Report Says,” New York Times, Oct. 10, 2019

“U.S. Drone Kills 30 Civilians, Afghans Say; Target Was ISIS,” New York Times, Sep. 20, 2019, p. A6

“U.S. Airstrikes and Raids Killed 120 Civilians in 2018, Pentagon Says,” New York Times, May 3, 2019

“U.S. and Afghan Forces Killed More Civilians in Early 2019 than Taliban did, U.N. Finds,” New York Times, Apr. 25, 2019

“Claiming Atrocities by Leader, SEALS Were Told to ‘Let It Go’,” New York Times, Apr. 24, 2019, p. A1

“For Afghan Civilians, 2018 Was the Deadliest in a Decade” (“Among the dead last year were 927 children”), New York Times, Feb. 25, 2019

“U.S. Airstrikes Said to Kill at Least 10 Afghan Civilians,” New York Times, Feb. 11, 2019

“U.S. Airstrikes and Raids Killed 120 Civilians in 2018,” Pentagon Says, New York Times, May 3, 2019

“American Airstrikes Kill Civilians, Including Children, Afghans Charge,” New York Times, Jan. 26, 2019

“Civilians Killed in U.S.-Afghan Operation,” New York Times, Nov. 29, 2018

“Decorated Navy SEAL Is Accused of War Crimes in Iraq,” New York Times, Nov. 15, 2018

“Report: 3,301 Civilians Killed in U.S.-led Strikes in Syria Since 2014,” Duluth NewsTribune, Sep. 24, 2018
“Study: U.S. Killed 500 Civilians,” (“Pentagon may be grossly undercounting”), Minneapolis StarTribune, June 3, 2018

“More Afghan Civilians are Victims of Targeted Attacks, U.N. Says,” New York Times, Feb. 16, 2018

“Afghan Pedophiles Get Pass from U.S. Military, Report Says,” New York Times, January 24, 2018

“American Airstrikes in Afghanistan Stir Debate Over Who Was Killed,” New York Times, Nov. 11, 2017

“U.S. Airstrikes Kill at Least 13 Civilians,” Minneapolis StarTribune, Nov. 5, 2017

“Airstrike Kills at Least 25 at Street Market in Yemen,” New York Times, Nov. 2, 2017

“Civilian Deaths From U.S.-led Strikes on ISIS Surge Under Trump Administration” (“over 3,800”), Guardian, June 6, 2017

“3 Children Among Dead in a Raid in Somalia,” New York Times, Aug. 26, 2017

“Afghans Say U.S. Strike Hit Civilians,” New York Times, Aug. 12, 2017

“Civilian Deaths a Windfall for Militants’ Propaganda,” AP/Minneapolis StarTribune, Apr. 2, 2017

“U.S. Strike Reportedly Killed 30 Syrians,” New York Times & Minneapolis StarTribune, March 23, 2017

“U.S. Military Says Fight with Taliban Killed 33 Civilians,” Minneapolis StarTribune, Jan. 13, 2017

“U.S.-led Strikes in Iraq, Syria Have Killed at Least 188 Civilians, Military Says,” Duluth NewsTribune, Jan. 3, 2017

“U.S. Admits its Airstrikes Likely Killed Afghan Civilians,” Minneapolis StarTribune, Nov. 6, 2016

“U.S. Drones Hit Civilians, UN Says,” New York Times, Sep. 30, 2016

“Residents Say U.S. Strike Killed Civilians,” Wall Street Journal, Sep. 29, 2016

“Pentagon: Errors Led to Hospital Strike,” (“which killed 42 people”), Minneapolis StarTribune, May 1, 2016

“Airstrike on Afghan Hospital Stirs Fury,” Minneapolis StarTribune; & “19 Die in Apparent U.S. Airstrike on Afghan Hospital,” Los Angeles Times, Oct. 4, 2015

“U.S. Practiced Torture After 9/11, Nonpartisan Review Concludes,” New York Times, Apr. 16, 2013

“U.S. Marine Pleads Guilty to Urinating on Corpse of Taliban Fighter in Afghanistan,” Guardian, Jan. 16, 2013

“U.S. Troops Posed with Body Parts of Afghan Bombers,” Los Angeles Times, Apr. 18, 2012

“Drones at Issue… Raids Disrupt Militants, but Civilian Deaths Stir Outrage,” New York Times, Mar. 18, 2012

“G.I. Kills 16 Afghans, Including 9 Children in Attacks on Homes,” New York Times, Mar. 12, 2012

“Commission Alleges U.S. Detainee Abuse,” Minneapolis StarTribune, Jan. 8, 2012

“American Soldier Is Convicted of Killing Afghan Civilians for Sport,” New York Times, Nov. 11, 2011

“G.I. Killed Afghan Journalist, NATO Says,” New York Times, Sep. 9, 2011

“Cable Implicates Americans in Deaths of Iraqi Civilians,” New York Times, Sep. 2, 2011

“Civilians Die in a Raid by Americans and Iraqis,” New York Times, Aug. 7, 2011

“Libya Effort Is Called Violation of War Act,” New York Times, May 26, 2011

“Raid on Wrong House Kills Afghan Girl, 12,” New York Times, May 12, 2011

“Photos of Atrocities Seen as Threat to Afghan Relations,” St. Paul Pioneer Press, March 22, 2011

“Missiles Kill 26 in Pakistan” (“most of them civilians”), New York Times, March 18, 2011

“Afghans Say Attack Killed 52 Civilians; NATO Differs,” New York Times, July 27, 2010

“Afghans Die in Bombing, as Toll Rises for Civilians,” New York Times, May 3, 2010

“Marines Used ‘Excessive Force’ in Afghan Civilian Deaths,” New York Times, Apr. 14, 2007

“Sergeant Tells of Plot to Kill Iraqi Detainees,” New York Times, July 28, 2006, p. A8

“U.S.-led Raid Kills Nine at House,” Omaha World Herald, June 13, 2006

“The Bombing Killed at Least 35 Civilians…” when U.S. warplanes struck the village of Tolokan, Aghanistan, New York Times, June 11, 2006

“Murtha Says Probe Has Found Marines Killed Innocent Civilians,” Omaha World Herald, May 19, 2006

***

On Sep. 16, 2004, a BBC correspondent questioned U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan about the unprovoked U.S. bombardment and invasion of Iraq asking, “It was illegal?” Annan answered, “Yes. I have indicated it is not in conformity with the U.N. Charter. From our point of view and from the Charter point of view, it was illegal.” Likewise, Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah said March 28, 2007, “In the beloved Iraq, the bloodshed is continuing under an illegal foreign occupation….”

The 1946 Nuremberg Judgment comes to mind, especially as it was drafted by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson and enforced by U.S.-led allies: “The charges in the indictment that the defendants planned and waged aggressive wars are charges of the utmost gravity. War is essentially an evil thing. Its consequences are not confined to the belligerent states alone, but affect the whole world.”
_______________
[1] Amnesty International, “NATO/Federal Republic of Yugoslavia: ‘Collateral damage’ or Unlawful Killings? Violations of the Laws of War by NATO During Operation Allied Force,” June 6, 2000, p. 44.

[2] Human Rights Watch, “U.S. Using Cluster Munitions in Iraq,” Apr. 1, 2003; The Lancet, “Pressure Groups Condemn U.S. Use of Cluster Bombs in Afghanistan”, Nov. 3, 2001; UN International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, “Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia,” (undated), paragraph 27.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Uncategorized, War

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 12
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Facebook

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2023 · Nukewatch