Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

August 1, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Unavailable, Unethical, Unhinged: U.S. H-bomb Unit in Germany Should be First to Go

Anti-nuclear activists placed sunflowers, a symbol of nuclear disarmament, in the fence at Germany’s Büchel air base Thur., July 24, marking the 30th anniversary of protests at the base. Photo by Luthar Lange.

For the last four years, the U.S. hydrogen bombs stationed in Germany have been stranded at Büchel Air Force Base, southeast of Cologne, unavailable to the fighter jets and pilots that are rehearsed and ready to detonate them against Russia. These WMD have been unusable for nuclear attacks or threats — i.e. ‘deterrence’ — since 2022 because the base is getting a makeover.

The deterrence that the U.S. and Germany say the nuclear weapons provide disappeared in 2022 when massive remodeling of the base began. A total rebuild of its runway and more forced the base’s 46 Tornado fighter jets to be moved to Nörvenich Air Base, 28 miles away, to practice their take-offs, attacks, and landings.

Because the base’s reconstruction has left the ‘nuclear deterrent’ unavailable for years, the unoccupied and redundant U.S. Air Force’s 702d Munitions Support Squadron (or MUNSS) should be the first unit withdrawn from Germany under Trump’s recent orders.

The Department of War says the 702d MUNSS is needed because it ‘receives, stores, maintains, controls, and employs war reserve munitions in support of [Büchel’s] 33rd Tactical Air Wing’s role in NATO’s strike mission.’ This, of course, has been mission impossible for at least four years, a pause that means relief from the self-destructive threat of nuclear strike missions aimed at Russia.

The ‘Commander’s Welcome Letter’ for new arrivals, on Büchel’s website, explains: ‘The 702d consists of approximately 170 personnel across 26 different Air Force Specialties, responsible for maintaining, operating, and securing $6B [billion] in Protection Level-1 assets….’ And according to a Shaw Air Force Base manual, ‘Protection Level 1’ resources ‘include nuclear weapons and … systems critical to the success of active nuclear missions….’

Büchel’s nuclear mission involves twenty U.S. B61 H-bombs — the only remaining nuclear weapons in Germany — which are polished on base by the 702d MUNSS. This arsenal is the crux of a so-called ‘nuclear sharing’ arrangement between the United States and Germany (and four other NATO countries). But neither ‘active nuclear missions’ nor any other kind have flown out of Büchel since 2022, leaving the 702d on holiday.

Declaring he would reduce Germany’s U.S. military presence, Trump said May 2, “We are going to cut way down, and we’re cutting a lot further than 5,000.” Liana Fix reported for the Council on Foreign Relations that 5,000 troops were about one-seventh of the roughly 38,000 GIs currently stationed in Deutschland. Secretary Hegseth promptly had the Pentagon claim that the decision on withdrawals had followed a ‘thorough review of the force posture in Europe.’

The actual fatuous reason for the potential drawdown was a Trump tantrum over German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s derisive public assessment that the U.S. was being ‘humiliated’ by Iran. Merz said to students last April, ‘[T]he Iranians are … letting the Americans travel to Islamabad and then leave again without any result. An entire nation is being humiliated by the Iranian leadership’, The Guardian reported. Trump’s reactionary fit opens a door to the long-sought-after removal of U.S. nuclear weapons from Germany, something that the Parliament/Bundestag — moved by mass public pressure — formally instructed the government to pursue in March 2010.

For decades, Tactical Air Force Wing 33 has reportedly been operating 46 Tornado jet fighters. The Tornados are flown by German pilots who train to carry the U.S. H-bombs and to detonate them against Russia if a U.S. president so orders. While the Tornados returned to Büchel this year, the first F-35s are set to replace them starting in 2027.

Indeed, the two billion Euros being spent on the Büchel rebuild (widening taxiways and airfield intersections; new runway; new cargo apron; and a new so-called fighter jet ‘campus’), is in preparation for the delivery of new U.S. ‘B61-model 12’ thermonuclear bombs, and the arrival of new F-35A fighter-jets to carry them.

The F-35s from Lockheed Martin cost Germany over ten billion euros, or $11.4 billion, according to Aero.de, Dec. 12, 2022. And Aero reported June 24, 2025, that the F-35s are ‘intended to support Germany’s so-called “nuclear sharing” program — a NATO deterrence strategy under which allies have access to U.S. nuclear weapons in the event of war.’

If there is any seriousness to Trump’s erratic outburst about troop withdrawals from Germany, nothing could be more reassuring, more stabilizing, and more de-escalatory than throwing out the 702d MUNSS along with its nuclear suicide mission.

John LaForge is a Co-director of Nukewatch, a peace and environmental justice group in Wisconsin, and edits its newsletter.

Filed Under: Direct Action, Military Spending, Nuclear Weapons, Social Issues, US Bombs Out of Germany, War

June 21, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Spring/Summer 2026 Quarterly

Click the links below to access articles from the Spring/Summer 2026 Quarterly Newsletter. Page numbers take you to the pdf of each page as they appear in the print version. Individual articles are also tagged by issue category.

Page 1

European States, Vatican Reject U.S. War on Iran

Proximity to Nuclear Reactors Associated with Increased Cancer Deaths

Monticello Reactor Leaks Oil to Mississippi while Shut Down for Repairs

Page 2

What Ever Happened to My ‘World-Class’ Nuclear Regulator? U.S. Showcases Dangerous Nuclear Reactor Designs

Page 3

No More ‘New START’ Nuclear Weapons Numbers Treaty May Have Been Worse than Useless

Cesium Contamination of Some Imported Consumer Goods Brings Criminal Charges

Page 4 

Supreme Court Clears Path for “Mobile Chernobyls”

Canada’s Reactor Safety Commission Slammed for Ignoring Offsite Emissions

Radiation Rule Changes Would Increase Allowable Exposures

Page 5

Biggest Arms Dealers Break Sales Record

China Reaffirms Nuclear No-First-Use Policy

Russian Nuclear-capable Oreshnik Missiles in Belarus

Opposition to More Nuclear Waste in Utah

Executive Order and Global Hegemony

Nuclear Power Fails Another Year in the Global Marketplace

White House Offers Cash Bribes to States to Host High-level Rad Waste Dump

U.S. and Israel Strike Iran Nuclear Reactor

Page 6

Reviving nuclear power in Vermont — or anywhere — would be a health hazard

A History of Scientists’ Warnings About Radiation Exposures

Page 7

Fukushima Meltdowns 15 Years On

Page 8

Mississippi River Coalition Commemorates 15 Years Since Fukushima Reactor Meltdowns

From the archives: 1971 Monticello Reactor Releases Led to Mpls Water Shutoff

 

 

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter

June 21, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

European States, Vatican Reject U.S. War on Iran

By John LaForge

Advisory warns of 'heightened threat environment' in US after Iran ...

Spain and Austria have refused to allow their airspace to be used by U.S. warplanes in the bombardment of Iran. Additionally, Italians so overwhelmingly oppose the U.S. and Israeli war, that even their right-wing Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has spoken out.

Meloni told Parliament March 14, “Threats are becoming more and more frightening. They’re multiplying, and the unilateral interventions carried outside the perimeter of international law — which is where we must place the American and Israeli intervention against the Iranian regime — interventions in which I say immediately, at the expense of any mistake, Italy will not take part and does not intend to take part.”

Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez was more emphatic, calling the war “absurd, cruel and illegal,” and saying on March 25: “Of course we are going to put all the resources of the state at the service of the people, to protect them from a war, a war on Iran which is not endorsed by the government of Spain. And I say to the right, and the far-right, that they cannot be supporting those who set fire to the world and then complain about the smoke….”

Mark Botanga, a Belgian Member of European Parliament outraged by the killing of children, said in Parliament March 11: “Most of you don’t condemn and even support Trump’s & Netanyahu’s war on Iran, yet claim to stand with the Iranian people. Now I dare you to say that to the eyes of that 7-year-old girl … that was killed when a U.S. Tomahawk missile hit her elementary school. Dare to admit to the 167 other victims in that school that you are offering European bases to U.S. killing machines. Tell the families of Tehran, a city of 10 million people, that you support the chemical warfare of Israel as it poisons the air with toxic fires and black rain that will cause cancers for decades…. Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Iraq: your bombs never brought democracy and never will. They bring chaos, death, destruction, and the unbearable silence of children who will never come home.”

And António Costa, President of the European Council, wrote on social media, “Any targeting of civilian infrastructure … is illegal and unacceptable.”

Pope Rebukes Hegseth’s War Prayer

During a March 29 Palm Sunday mass in St. Peter’s Square, Pope Leo denounced the U.S. and Israeli war on Iran as “atrocious” and indirectly rebuked U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth for a war prayer delivered in Washington, D.C.

Quoting a passage from the Christian Bible, the Pope said: “‘Even though you make many prayers, I will not listen: your hands are full of blood.’”

Hegseth ⸺ a white supremacist and religious fundamentalist tattooed with the papal Crusader cross, who titled his book “American Crusade,” and who paid $50,000 to a woman who accused him of sexual assault in 2017 ⸺ used a March 25 “Christian” worship service for military and civilian workers in Washington to pray for merciless killing. Hegseth prayed: “Let every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness and our great nation. Give [U.S. warriors] wisdom in every decision, endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”

In his apparent rebuttal four days later, Pope Leo told tens of thousands of worshippers, “This is our God: Jesus, king of peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war. He does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them.”

In March, when Trump demanded military help in forcing open the Strait of Hormuz, even Nigel Farange, the leader of Britain’s right-wing Reform UK party, said England shouldn’t participate in “another foreign war.” Italy’s Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini bluntly refused saying, “Italy isn’t at war with anyone.” And when Trump asked allies for naval help, Boris Pistorious, Germany’s defense minister said “This is not our war; we have not started it.”

Elsewhere around the world, Oman declared the U.S. war a violation of international law and warned of regional destabilization. Algeria called it a “flagrant violation of sovereignty” and “American-Zionist aggression.” On April 2, over 100 U.S.-based international law experts signed an open letter calling the war “a clear violation of the UN Charter” involving possible violations of international humanitarian law, and “potential war crimes.” Detailing profound concerns about the war, the letter was signed by senior professors, leaders of prominent international law associations, non-governmental organizations, and legal clinics, former government legal advisors, and military law experts including former (U.S. military) Judge Advocates General.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, War

June 21, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Proximity to Nuclear Reactors Associated with Increased Cancer Deaths

By Maya Brownstein

BOSTON, Mass. — U.S. counties located closer to operational nuclear power plants (NPPs) have higher rates of cancer mortality than those located farther away, according to a new study led by the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

The study is the first of the 21st century to analyze proximity to NPPs and cancer mortality across all NPPs and every U.S. county. The researchers emphasized that the findings are not enough to establish causality but do highlight the need for further research into nuclear power’s health impacts.

The study was published Feb. 23, 2026, in the journal Nature Communications.Where Is the Largest Nuclear Power Plant in the U.S.? Top 20 for 2025 ...

Numerous studies on the potential link between NPPs and cancer have been conducted around the world, with conflicting results. In the U.S., these studies have been rare and limited in their scope, focused on a single NPP and its surrounding community.

To expand the evidence base, the researchers conducted a national assessment of NPPs and cancer mortality between 2000 and 2018 using “continuous proximity.” They used advanced statistical modeling that captured the cumulative impact of all nearby NPPs, rather than just one. The locations and dates of operation of U.S. NPPs — as well as some nearby in Canada — were obtained from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, and county-level data on cancer mortality was obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The researchers controlled for potential confounders [that might effect data] in each county, including educational attainment, median household income, racial composition, average temperature and relative humidity, smoking prevalence, BMI [body mass index], and proximity to the nearest hospital.

The study found that U.S. counties located closer to nuclear power plants experienced higher cancer mortality rates, even after accounting for socioeconomic, environmental, and health care factors. The researchers estimated that over the course of the study period, roughly 115,000 cancer deaths across the U.S. (or about 6,400 deaths per year) were attributable to proximity to NPPs. The association was strongest among older adults.

“Our study suggests that living near a NPP may carry a measurable cancer risk — one that lessens with distance,” said senior author Petros Koutrakis, Professor of Environmental Health and Human Habitation. “We recommend that more studies be done that address the issue of NPPs and health impacts, particularly at a time when nuclear power is being promoted as a clean solution to climate change.”

The researchers noted that the results are consistent with the results of a similar study they conducted in Massachusetts, which identified elevated cancer incidence among populations living closer to NPPs.

They also noted some limitations to the study, including that it did not incorporate direct radiation measurements and instead assumed equal impact by [emissions from] all NPPs.

— Maya Brownstein is the Media Relations Manager in the Office of Communications, Chan School of Public Health.

— Link to Harvard report is here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-69285-4

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

June 21, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Monticello Reactor Leaks Oil to Mississippi while Shut Down for Repairs

The 55-year-old Monticello nuclear reactor owned by Xcel Energy was unexpectedly shut down February 20, 2026 to “perform maintenance” and to “determine appropriate repairs,” according to The Monticello Times. The reactor was restarted on April 3 after being offline 43 days.

No Minneapolis, regional, or national news service made mention of the reactor outage in spite of the “over 1 million users” that rely on its electricity (according to Xcel’s website). The reasons for the outage were not made public by the company, which did not name the equipment or sorts of systems that need repair.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission also made no announcement of the shutdown, and its regional Public Affairs Officer Victoria Mitlyng wrote in an email to Nukewatch February 26, “The shutdown at Monticello was a planned maintenance shutdwon (sic) and did not require formal notifications. It’s a routine practice for nuclear plants.” The lack of a public NRC notification may explain why news services made no mention of the shutdown.

According to Xcel spokesperson Theo Keith, who spoke to The Monticello Times, the shutdown “is not related to the tritium leak” from the reactor and made public in 2023. Tritium is the radioactive form of hydrogen, and Mr. Keith’s reference is to the leak of 829,000 gallons of highly radioactive coolant that contaminated groundwater under the reactor site, some of which eventually reached the Mississippi River, a drinking water source for Minneapolis, St. Paul, and millions more downstream.

Xcel explained to the press that the regional electrical power grid draws from multiple generators across the Midwest, and that the mix of providers allows uninterrupted service even when individual systems are taken offline.

Myths Busted by Monticello Reactor Shutdown

Monticello’s unplanned 43-day shutdown debunks two myths endlessly repeated in nuclear propaganda: that it produces electricity 24/7, 365 days a year; and that nuclear’s electricity generation is needed.

First, the myth that nuclear power provides uninterrupted electric generation is boasted about on the Nuclear Energy Institute’s website, where its page-1 slogan is: “Only nuclear has the power to deliver 24/7/365.” But as the NRC’s Mitlyng emailed Nukewatch, “It’s a routine practice” for nuclear reactors to shut down. They are taken offline regularly and repeatedly by emergencies, by unexpected repair work, by refueling outages, and by emergencies and accidents that plague the industry. Historically, major nuclear reactor accidents occur early on following their start up, and late in their operational lives. At 55, Monticello is the sixth oldest of 94 reactors in the United States.

Second, promoters of commercial nuclear reactors say their electricity “is needed to keep the lights on.” This is BS again, as Xcel told the press that it “does not anticipate any impact to electric service while the plant is offline.”

Imagine a nuclear-free Mississippi River watershed. Xcel’s Monticello reactor isn’t needed to keep the lights on, and it’s so old that it can’t operate without major equipment repairs severe enough to gut Xcel’s profit-taking for months at a time.

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor, Quarterly Newsletter

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 262
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch