Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Weekly Column
    • Depleted Uranium
    • Direct Action
    • Lake Superior Barrels
    • Environmental Justice
    • North Korea
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
    • Workshops
  • Donate

May 4, 2015 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Fracking’s Radioactive Waste: North Dakota Considers Weakened Landfill Rules, Less Oversight

Nukewatch Quarterly Spring 2015
By John LaForge

Radioactive waste produced by hydraulic fracturing or “fracking” is making headlines all over gas land. The cover story of Nukewatch’s summer 2014 Quarterly reported some of the illegal dumping by fracking companies—on Indian Reservations no less—in North Dakota where a gigantic gas fracking boom is underway in the Bakken oil field.

National news coverage of the scandal led North Dakota’s legislature to consider changes to radioactive waste control law so that fracking’s contaminated wastes can be dumped in ordinary landfills.

One bill under consideration would permit fracking radioactive waste in state landfills to be contaminated with ten times the radioactivity that state law currently allows—as long as it’s covered with 10 feet of soil. The rad’ waste that’s not being haphazardly and illegally discard—no Victoria, nefarious dumping probably hasn’t ended—is now being trucked out of state at some expense.

House Bills 1113 and 1114—reportedly requested by the ND State Health Department—are being contested by some law makers and journalists who have questioned the right of the department to set its own rules.

The ND Newspaper Association and the ND Broadcasters Association complained that the bill eliminates requirements for public hearings and instead permits them “when appropriate” and even cancels public notification of the permitting process for disposition of radioactive materials.

Dave Glatt of the State Health Department told the Bismarck Tribune that the SHD commissioned Argon National Laboratory in Chicago to study the question and make recommendations. The department wanted to know “radiation limits that would be safe for workers and the public.” Glatt forgets that there are only legally permitted doses, no safe ones.

Radioactive isotopes that contaminate fracking industry waste and its machinery include radon, uranium-238, and thorium-232. According to the Health Department’s website, these long-lived pollutants come in six forms:

1) “Produced water,” which is injected underground but later brought to the surface as waste; 

2) “Sulfate scales,” which are hard, insoluble deposits that accumulate on frack sand and inside drilling and processing equipment;

3) Sludge and “filter cake” solids of mud, sand, scale and rust that precipitate or are filtered out of contaminated “produced water.” They build up in waste water storage tanks and in “filter socks”;

4) Filter socks, contaminated by “produced water”;

5) Synthetic “proppants” or sand; and 

6) Contaminated soil and machinery.

Locals are Worried

“We don’t want to have when this oil and coal is gone, to be nothing left here, a wasteland, and I’m afraid that’s what might happen” said Underwood farmer Gene Wirtz to KXNET News Reporter Ben Smith in January. Wirtz is worried about the increased radioactivity in local landfills. “Any amount of radiation beyond what you’re already getting is not a good thing,” he said to Smith.

A case in point came Jan. 6, 2015, when three-million gallons of waste water sprang from a North Dakota pipeline rupture, in Williams County north of Williston, the biggest ever in the current Bakken oil rush. Attempted containment of the leak was underway January 23 as berms were set up across Blacktail Creek to prevent the waste water from flowing into the Missouri River. The New York Times reported that the leaked waste water “may contain residue from hydraulic fracturing.” 

“Potential for harm” called “no problem” by Forbes

Writing Jan. 26 in Forbes online, James Conca turned upside-down the results of a recent Pennsylvania study of the risks of radiation exposure from gas fracking wastes.

The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection studied so-called “Technologically-Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material,” or TENORM, and analyzed the levels of radioactivity associated with oil and gas extraction in the state.

Mr. Conca’s column was headed, “Radiation from Fracking? No Problemo.” And Conca wrote that the PDEP study found there is “no concern of radiation exposure from fracking wells for oil or gas.”

On the contrary, the PDEP study explicitly warns of increased radiation risk from various aspects of fracking. In particular, the PDEP report warned of:

• Limited potential for radiation exposure to the public and workers from the development, completion, production, transmission, processing, storage, and end use of natural gas;

• Potential radiological environmental impacts from fluids if spilled; and

• Little potential for radiation exposure to the public and workers from landfills receiving waste from the oil and gas industry.

The PDEP report recommended additional study of radiological impacts from the use of “brine” or “saltwater” waste, called “produced water” by the ND Health Dept., from the oil and gas industry currently used for dust suppression and road stabilization.

Although the Forbes article trivializes and distorts Pennsylvania’s findings, it did say this: “With 15 million Americans living within a mile from a fracking well, this is an important result.”

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

May 4, 2015 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Fukushima Updates

Nukewatch Quarterly Spring 2015
Officials Push Additional Mass Dumping of Tainted Water

The head of Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority said contaminated water stored at the Fukushima complex should be released into the ocean to ensure safe decommissioning of the reactors. Shunichi Tanaka, Chair of the NRA, made the comment Dec. 12. “I was overwhelmed by the sheer number of tanks (holding water tainted with radioactive substances),” Tanaka told reporters, indicating they pose a danger to decommissioning work. “We have to dispose of the water.”

Likewise, inspectors with the International Atomic Energy Agency said Feb. 17 that the roughly 160 million gallons of contaminated water stored on-site pose massive logistical challenges and strongly urged Japan to discharge it to the Pacific Ocean once it is treated. The conditions per liter of water reportedly are: that radioactive cesium is less than 1 Becquerel; radioactive substances that emit beta rays are less than 3 Becquerels; and the level of tritium is less than 1,500 Becquerels. —Asahi Shimbun, Dec. 13, 2014, & Jan. 22, 2015; & Los Angeles Times, Feb. 17. 2015

Waste Fuel Removed from Vulnerable Cooling Pool

After almost four years of anxiety, Tepco announced it had removed all the highly radioactive waste “spent” fuel from the damaged cooling pool above reactor 4. The building was wrecked by a powerful hydrogen explosion March 15, 2011, and since then experts have warned that another major quake could cause massive radiation releases. Each of the 1,533 fuel assemblies holds 60 to 74 fuel rods, so all 91,980 to 113,442 rods have been transferred to a less vulnerable area of the compound, the company said. Tepco faces the prospect of removing melted fuel wreckage from the cores of units 1, 2 and 3; fuel so badly mangled and emitting so much radiation that removal will take over 40 years. Some experts say removal is not even possible, only entombment. —New York Times, Dec. 20, 2014

Fukushima Radiation Plume Reaches US West Coast

A radiation plume from the March, 2011 accident in Fukushima, Japan took about 2.1 years to cross the waters of the Pacific Ocean and reach the shores of North America, according to a study published December 29 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The study said that peak concentrations of Fukushima fallout in the Pacific could come this year and in 2016. The report claimed that levels of cesium-137 in the Pacific “are still well below natural levels of radioactivity in the ocean,” but cesium does not occur in nature and is found in the oceans only as a result of nuclear bomb testing. The bomb tests dispersed roughly 36 million curies of cesium-137. Emergency radiation monitoring by the US lasted only from March until May 2011, and no federal agencies monitor offshore waters for radiation. —Santa Cruz Sentinel, Dec. 26; Christian Science Monitor, & Washington Post, Dec. 29, 2014

A crane removes debris at the No. 3 reactor building at Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant on Februray 23, 2012. Yomiuri Shimbun Photo
Towns to Store Cesium-Tainted Soil “Temporarily”

The mayors of Futaba and Okuma and the Governor of Fukushima Prefecture have agreed to conditional, “temporary” storage of radioactively contaminated soil and waste collected during clean-up work in the exclusion zone.

The mayors agreed to the construction of “interim” storage sites in exchange for large sums of cash and a legal commitment to again move the material somewhere outside the prefecture for final disposal within 30 years. The two towns will share about $645 million for research and construction of the sites. About 29 million cubic meters of surface soil tainted with cesium, an area the size of Luxemburg, may need permanent storage space. —World Nuclear News, March 3, 2015

Spike in Ocean-Dumped Waste Water

Cleanup crews at Fukushima monitoring a drainage gutter Feb. 22 detected a huge spike in radiation levels in wastewater pouring into the Pacific Ocean. Tepco later said the water was 70 times, or 7,000 percent more radioactive than what is allowably dumped into the sea. The company said it stopped up the drainage because of the extremely high radiation levels, and four days later admitted it first learned of the leak in April, 10 months ago. Bone-seeking strontium-90 in the water measured up to 7,230 Becquerels per liter, when 5 Bq/L is the legal limit. —Global Research, Mar. 1; Japan Times, Feb. 22; & NHK Public TV, Feb. 24, 2015

Sailors’ Lawsuit Vs. Tepco & GE

Several hundred US sailors are suing Fukushima operator Tepco and reactor builder General Electric for $1 billion in damages, alleging the illnesses they suffer come from exposure to radiation that contaminated the USS Ronald Reagan during relief operations. In a report to Congress last summer the Pentagon confirmed that, “the Ronald Reagan encountered the radioactive plume from Fukushima … on March 13,” but added, “We believe it is implausible that these low-level doses are the cause of the health effects reported by the … sailors.”

Attorney Charles Bonner, who represents more than 200 sailors and Marines, says the Navy is just wrong. “The fallacy of that is that low levels of radiation are just as dangerous as high levels…. And even at 100 nautical miles they were taking on 30 times more radiation than is normal,” he said. The 2014 Pentagon report admitted it is still finding and removing radiation from the USS Reagan.

On Feb. 12, GE asked the judge to dismiss the suit, arguing the sailors are asking for “something extraordinary and unprecedented”—compensation under domestic law for exposure to radiation emitted by a foreign nuclear power. Lawyers for the sailors lashed out at GE’s motion March 3, saying the GE reactors’ “design defects contributed to the meltdowns and, by extension, to plaintiffs’ harms.” Judge Janis Sammartino’s decision is pending. —KOMO TV News, Feb. 12; Law360, Mar. 3, & Feb. 12, 2015

Filed Under: Fukushima, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

March 2, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Authorities Dismiss Coldwater Creek Cancer Cluster

February March 2013 Nukewatch Quarterly

When it comes to understanding the incredible concentration of cancers, birth defects, and other serious ailments related to a Manhattan Project-era radioactive waste dumping ground in north St. Louis County, Facebook has proven a far better resource for current and former residents than the State of Missouri.

A report released by the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services in March concluded that elevated cancer rates near Flourissant, Missouri, are probably not linked to the radioactive waste dumped in the area from 1947 through the 1970s. Researchers studied the prevalence of 27 types of cancer among those who lived within six zip codes surrounding Coldwater Creek from 1996 to 2004. Though epidemiologists did identify an elevated incidence of some cancers among the population, they attributed those higher rates to socioeconomic factors such as smoking, lack of exercise, poor diet, and diabetes.

Flourissant natives Janell Rodden Wright and Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach, who are part of the Facebook group that connects residents of the Coldwater Creek area affected by illness, called the study “completely uninformative” in a recent piece published in the St. Louis Beacon. They point out that according to the American Community Survey from 2007-2011, over 75% of those who live in one of the zip codes studied moved there after 1990 – when clean-up efforts were already underway. The study did not account for any cases of cancer in those who were diagnosed after they moved outside the area, which Wright and Schanzenbach say is the case with most of their classmates. State cancer registries only record a patient’s address at the time of diagnosis. Also ignored by the Department of Health report were the many cases of cancer among current residents diagnosed after 2004, as well as many non-cancer health issues.

When Wright, Schanzenbach, and their childhood friends swam in Coldwater Creek near their homes in Flourissant, MO, in the 1970s and 1980s, they had no idea they were immersing themselves in water tainted with radioactive waste. In fact, until Wright and her classmates began to investigate the strange prevalence of rare cancers and other diseases among their peer group in 2011, they had no idea the area where they grew up had served as a dumping ground for radioactive waste produced by Mallinckrodt Chemical Works at its downtown St. Louis plant, which purified uranium that the U.S. used to create atomic bombs in the 1940s.

Wright became suspicious when two of her friends were diagnosed with appendix cancer within a few months of each other. Both were told this disease is very rare, afflicting one in a million people. She reached out to others who grew up in the area through Facebook, and the results are astonishing. Among those who had lived within a four square mile area near the creek, over 2,000 cases of cancers, autoimmune disorders, thyroid disease, birth defects (including three cases of conjoined twins), and health issues among children (including seven children of Wright’s classmates who had their thyroid removed before age 10) have been reported. Twenty-two cases of appendix cancer have now been reported.

The group’s google map showing the residence or former residence of those who have died or fallen ill shows an alarming cluster of cases around Coldwater Creek and the St. Louis Airport Site (SLAPS), Hazelwood Interim Storage Site (HISS), Futura Property, and West Lake Landfill where waste was dumped or stored. Once elevated levels of radioactive materials were discovered in Coldwater Creek in 1989, the Army Corps of Engineers was charged with its clean-up, which they report is nearly complete. As Nukewatch reported in the Winter 2012 article “Cold War Era Dumps Heating Up St. Louis,” the West Lake Landfill, where 20 acres of radioactive waste was illegally dumped in 1973, contains over 15 feet of radioactive waste, and its temperature is rising at an alarming rate. The landfill’s neighbors complain of terrible smells and emissions that burn eyes and cause headaches. Current and former residents of the Coldwater Creek area had hoped that a conclusive cancer cluster study would help them qualify for the same “downwinder” status granted to those affected by atomic bomb testing in Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah, which would have given them access to medical assistance.

Three separate groups of affected residents have brought lawsuits against Mallinckrodt Chemical, which is now owned by Covidien Pharmaceuticals, seeking damages comparable to those awarded to the company’s former St. Louis plant workers, who are eligible for coverage of medical expenses plus $150,000. On March 27, a federal judge dismissed seven of the suits’ eight claims. The single remaining claim will require residents to prove their injuries occurred no more than five years before the suits were filed, based on Missouri’s statute of limitations laws. Still, the groups’ lawyers are optimistic that justice will be served. In a statement released after the judge’s dismissal, lead counsel Marc Bern said, “We expect to prevail for these innocent victims and end this terrible nightmare for so many people.”

Though their plight remains unrecognized by the government, those affected by the Coldwater Creek radiation are taking grassroots action to uncover the truth and serve as resources for each other. Their Facebook page, “Coldwater Creek – Just the Facts Please,” is a testament to the power of grassroots organizing: its members share legal and medical resources, coping strategies, action alerts, and an unwavering commitment to helping each other deal with an enormous tragedy that comprises only a very small portion of the U.S. government’s atomic bomb legacy.

Sources: KSDK News, St. Louis, Feb. 1; St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Mar. 21, Mar. 29; St. Louis Beacon, Mar. 26

Filed Under: Direct Action, Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

December 2, 2012 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Cold War Era Dumps Heating Up St. Louis

Winter 2012 Nukewatch Quarterly

By Bonnie Urfer

Imagine living next to a landfill containing household garbage, industrial chemicals and jet fuel. Then picture an unlined radioactive waste dump next to and on top of the landfill. Finally, consider that the landfill’s temperature is unnaturally rising and that the heat may affect buried radioactive material.

This is the situation at the 200-acre West Lake Landfill (WLL) in Bridgeton, Missouri, northwest of Lambert Airport in St. Louis. The West Lake Co. accepted waste from the Hazelwood area east of the airport in the early 1970s in a typical industry shell-game. Mallinckrodt Chemical Co., Contemporary Metals, the Cotter Corporation, Dow Chemical and other firms were involved in Cold War uranium processing here and dumped their wastes haphazardly.

Neighbors complain of terrible smells and emissions that burn eyes and cause headaches. An investigation has not uncovered the cause of the problem, although authorities report that the dump’s temperature is rising and threatens to disturb the radioactive waste buried there. Phoenix-based Republic Services now operates the landfill and has drilled wells to allow gases and vapors to escape, but the same wellheads show a dramatic increase in temperatures over the past four months. WLL, with its mass of radioactive and toxic waste 15 feet deep, is just two miles from the Missouri River and sits in its broad flood plain.

Residents of Bridgeton have met to determine what can be done about the 20 acres of radioactive refuse dumped illegally in 1973. The Environmental Protection Agency promises public meetings in January to address the situation. The EPA and Republic favor keeping the dump as is, since the contamination is so widespread that any attempt to move it could make the situation worse and cost $400 million.

Other dumps around St. Louis facing lawsuits over cleanup include the Madison Site, just across the Mississippi River in Illinois; the North St. Louis County Site; the St. Louis Downtown Site; the St. Louis Airport Sites and Coldwater Creek.

— KMOV TV, Oct. 29; KTVI News, St. Louis, Nov. 13; St. Louis Post Dispatch, Mar.14, 2012; Washington University, Feb. 18, 2010; Missouri Dept. of Natural Resources, “West Lake Landfill,” Hazardous Waste Program, undated report.

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Facebook

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2021 · Nukewatch