Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

July 15, 2015 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Struggling Areva Corp. Scraps More Reactor Plans

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2015

French nuclear giant Areva billed its European Pressurized Reactor (EPR) design as one of the safest yet, with plans to build a “worldwide fleet” of EPRs—starting in Olkiluoto, Finland in 2005. The Olkiluoto project is currently nine years behind schedule and three times its original $3.3 billion budget. In May, Finnish utility TVO lost patience with Areva and canceled plans for a second reactor.

Areva abandoned the last of four unrealized US EPR plans in February, citing a more profitable market in China. But now China’s two EPR projects are on hold, as Areva has to check their steel components for flaws. Recently, work was halted at Areva’s half-built Flamanville EPR project in France, because unacceptably high levels of carbon were found in the steel used to make its pressure vessel. Parts for the China reactors were made in the same French forge as the compromised Flamanville steel.

England is currently the only country moving forward with EPR plans, but those seem unlikely to continue until at least one of the four Areva EPRs now under construction can be shown to work. The company has not sold a new reactor since 2007, and it has not shown a profit since 2010. Areva lost $5.38 billion in 2014, and 85 percent of the company is now owned by the French government.

—Climate News Network, May 28; New York Times, May 9, 2015

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

July 15, 2015 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

 NRC Approved Seismic Safety Report for Diablo Canyon Before Seeing Results

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2015

In 2008, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) began replacing steam generators and reactor vessel heads at its Diablo Canyon station near San Luis Obispo, California. In 2011, they realized that proper testing for seismic activity hadn’t occurred. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission missed this oversight. While the company had run tests for seismic instability and loss-of-coolant accidents, they did not run them simultaneously—the deadly combination of failures that led to the Fukushima reactor disaster.

After the revelation PG&E began doing their own tests. Two weeks before the disclosure of the results, the NRC prepared talking points approving the reactor as earthquake-safe. The internal commission memo was discovered by environmental groups through public records act requests. Instead of issuing fines on PG&E, the NRC preemptively approved the utility’s unsubstantiated analysis of safety and permitted amendments to the seismic safety section of the operating license without public hearings, the latter of which prompted Friends of the Earth to file a lawsuit.

In March, the US Geological Survey reported a much higher probability of a major earthquake hitting California in the next 30 years than previously expected. Diablo Canyon is located between 1,000 feet and 45 miles from four different faults. If the hazards of long term safety of nuclear waste storage aren’t enough to close this reactor as opponents have demanded since its original construction, new knowledge about the geologic volatility should render this reactor closed and not a candidate for special favors by the government. —US Geological Survey, Mar. 10; San Francisco Chronicle, Mar. 12 & Apr. 15, 2015

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

July 15, 2015 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

World Uranium Symposium: Leave it in the Ground 

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2015

Over 500 participants from 20 countries joined the World Uranium Symposium in Quebec City in April. In its final communiqué, the gathering called for a worldwide ban on uranium exploration, mining, milling, and processing, and a halt to reprocessing of radioactive waste.

Reaffirming declarations made at conferences in 1992, 2006 and 2010, the statement demands that “Uranium and its associated radioactive substances must remain in their natural location.”

Pointing to “the growing awareness that nuclear power is not a cost-effective, timely, practical or safe response to climate change, and applauding the enormous expansion of the use of renewable energy and the significant strides made in recent years to phase out nuclear power,” the communiqué recommends that all governments, industries and Peoples “eliminate nuclear power generation and use, and dedicate themselves to the development and use of intelligent energy services based on sustainable, safe and renewable energy resources.”

The notice decries “the unique health, environmental and social dangers present at all stages of the nuclear fuel chain, from the exploration, mining and milling of uranium, to nuclear power generation, the development of nuclear weapons and the storage of radioactive waste.” The signers urged responsible parties “provide full, fair and equitable redress to all those harmed by uranium- and nuclear-related activities and to ensure that those responsible are held accountable for their actions and failures.”

—The full Communiqué is at: http://uranium2015.com/en/news/quebec-declaration-uranium.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste, Renewable Energy, Uranium Mining

July 15, 2015 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Double Standards Seen in NRC Evacuation Rules

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2015

Towns located within 50 miles of US nuclear reactors are not required to develop emergency evacuation plans in the case of reactor disasters. The federal Nuclear Regulatory Agency (NRC) requires that communities within only a 10-mile radius of operating reactors plan for evacuations in the case of radiation disasters.

The discrepancy was highlighted in April by the nonprofit organization Disaster Accountability Project, which called on communities inside the larger area to prepare for a reactor accident, citing the NRC’s 2011 recommendation to US citizens in Japan. When the Fukushima-Daiichi disaster began March of that year, the NRC advised people within 50 miles to evacuate, the Wall Street Journal reported April 15.

The Disaster Accountability Project study notes that a 50-mile radius around the Indian Point reactors in Westchester, New York includes the New York City metropolitan area and parts of New Jersey, Connecticut and Pennsylvania.

In May last year, the NRC told the owner of the Indian Point reactors to re-evaluate how prepared the facility is to withstand an earthquake. The NRC listed Indian Point reactors 2 and 3 among 10 reactors in the eastern US that have the highest need to renew its emergency preparedness plans. In 2011, after evaluating all 100 operating US reactors, the NRC named Indian Point’s Unit 3 the reactor most vulnerable to severe earthquake damage.

—The Wall Street Journal, Apr. 14, 2015; (Lohud) Journal News, May 9, 2014; NBC News, March 17, 2011

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

July 15, 2015 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Chernobyl and the Fire Next Time

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2015
By John LaForge 

The April 26, 1986 Chernobyl disaster was remembered unhappily the world over. In Germany, 29 years after the fact, the ancient custom of wild boar hunting is still prohibited because the animals remain too contaminated with Chernobyl’s long-lived radioactive fallout.

Government warnings of Chernobyl’s dispersed cancer agents are nearly forgotten today, but a May 14, 1986 bulletin from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)said, “[A]irborne radioactivity from the Chernobyl nuclear accident is now so widespread that it is likely to fall to the ground wherever it rains in the United States.”

A week later, Minnesotans read, “For the second time since the [Chernobyl disaster] last month, a slightly elevated level of radioactive iodine has been found in a Minnesota milk sample, state health officials said. … The amount of iodine-131 in the air also increased slightly [May 19] after several days of decline, health officials said.” (“Slight rise in radioactivity found again in state milk,” Duluth News-Tribune & Herald, May 22, 1986)

The AP reported May 15, 1986, “State authorities in Oregon have warned residents dependent solely on rainwater for drinking that they should arrange other supplies for the time being.” Likewise, regarding the triple reactor meltdowns at Fukushima, Forbes reported on April 11, 2011: “Radiation from Japan has been detected in drinking water in 13 more American cities, and cesium-137 has been found in American milk—in Montpelier, Vermont—for the first time since the Japan nuclear disaster began, according to data released by the EPA late [April 8].”

Wildfires put contamination back in the air 

Chernobyl exploded and burned out of control for weeks. The French Nuclear Energy Agency’s “2002 Update of Chernobyl,” noted that “[C]ontinuing low-level releases occurred … for up to 40 days after the accident, particularly on 15 and 16 May, attributable to continuing outbreaks of fires or to hot areas in the reactor.…”

Demonstrating nuclear power’s capacity for whole-earth poisoning, the catastrophic consequences are still spreading three decades later.

The dispersion of large amounts of radioactive cesium-137—which persists in the environment for at least 300 years—was especially concentrated in Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia, where half the spewed radiation fell. The other half spread to every country in the Northern Hemisphere. The American Geophysical Union reported in 2009 that radioactive cesium-137 dispersed by Chernobyl wouldn’t “disappear” from the environment through decay for up to 320 years.

Cesium has heavily contaminated forested areas of Chernobyl’s Exclusion Zone, an area of some 1,000 square miles surrounding the reactor where access and habitation are severely limited. When the forests catch fire, radioactive materials including cesium are again dispersed to the winds.

For two months in the summer of 2010, wildfires in Russia burned over 2 million acres and caused at least 50 deaths. The August 10, 2010 the New York Times noted that “dozens of fires have been burning in contaminated zones.” Two days later, the AP and the Agency France Presse cited government reports that at least six wildfires had been extinguished “this week” in the heavily-contaminated Bryansk region.

About the 2010 wildfires, Time magazine reported that Russian leaders had removed maps of likely radiation-contaminated fires from web sites maintained by the national forestry agency. (Taking a lesson from the Russians, the US government halted its emergency radiation monitoring of water and milk on the West Coast a mere two months after the start of Fukushima’s three explosions and meltdowns.)

In 2002, dozens of peat fires and wildfires again spread across heavily-contaminated Belarus. The AP reported July 22, 2002 that “Belarusian Emergency Minister Valery Astapov said radiation levels in the fire zone are elevated…”

The Washington Post and AP reported in April 1996 that a wildfire had “spread quickly through five villages in the exclusion zone, carried by strong winds blowing toward Kiev and its 2.6 million residents. It burned pines and buildings in one of the areas most heavily contaminated with radioactive cesium.”

“Eight percent” of radioactive fallout re-suspended—but eight percent of what? 

The latest news of cesium spreading from Chernobyl comes from a team of researchers led by Timothy Mousseau, a biologist at the University of South Carolina. According to Dr. Mousseau’s report, published in Ecological Monographs, wildfires that burned in the exclusion zone in 2002, 2008 and 2010 have together redistributed approximately eight percent of the original amount of cesium-137 released by the 1986 disaster—the world’s worst accidental airborne release. The researchers warned that large blazes in the future could spread significant amounts of radioactive soot across Europe, leading to contamination of food crops, the New York Times reported April 6, 2015.

In 2006, The Other Report on Chernobyl (TORCH, by Ian Fairlie and David Sumner) concluded that about 30 percent of the reactor’s radioactivity was distributed over the reactor building and surrounding areas and about 1–2 percent was ejected into the atmosphere. The sum total of radioactivity released was about 324.3 million curies. All of the reactor’s radioactive gases (xenon and krypton) were released.

In 2005, the Chernobyl Forum—comprised of more than 100 scientists, eight UN agencies and the governments of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine—estimated that the total release over the first 10 days reached 378.3 million curies. (Bob Edwards, “Major UN report counts human cost of Chernobyl,” New Scientist, Sept. 5, 2005.)

The Lawrence Livermore National Lab suggested in 1986 that 50 percent of the core’s radioactivity was spewed—4.5 billion curies, according to Science, June 13, 1986. In 1991, Vladimir Chernousenko, a fellow of the Institute of Theoretical Physics of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences and chief scientific supervisor of “clean up” in the 10-kilometer zone around the demolished reactor, noted that independent experts estimated that 80 percent of the reactor’s radioactivity escaped—over 6.4 billion curies.

According to Mousseau, forests covered 50 percent the Chernobyl exclusion zone before 1986, but trees and brush now cover 70 percent of the no-go area. Mousseau’s team reports that as climate change increasingly heats and dries the region, wildfires are expected to rage more often and more fiercely.

Asked by the Times what the consequences of this dispersion of radioactive materials might be, Mousseau was circumspect and grim. “There is never a positive consequence of having increased amounts of mutagenic materials in our environment,” he said. “It’s always negative.”

Filed Under: Chernobyl, Environment, Fukushima, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 231
  • 232
  • 233
  • 234
  • 235
  • …
  • 266
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch