Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

January 15, 2015 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Accidental Uranium Release at Honeywell Site in Illinois

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2014

In November, the Honeywell corporation’s Metropolis Works (HMW) uranium processing factory in southern Illinois reported a “plant emergency” when it began spewing clouds of poisonous gas that have since been declared harmless by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Uranium hexafluoride (UF6) leaked from inside the site’s Feed Materials Building at 8:24 p.m. on Oct. 26. Uranium hexafluoride is extremely toxic, is corrosive to most metals and reacts violently with water.

The facility processes raw uranium, or yellowcake, into uranium hexafluoride, or UF6, which is enriched at other facilities into uranium fuel for commercial nuclear reactors.

According to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s accident report, on Sunday Oct. 26, an employee “put on a respirator and confirmed the leak at 8:24 p.m.” Onsite emergency responders shut down operations, and Honeywell declared a “plant emergency” rather than an official “Alert”—the lowest NRC emergency classification for fuel facilities. The Nov. 13 report by the NRC says that the leak began at 7:24 p.m. Sunday, that, “No one was injured and Honeywell declared ‘all clear’ status at 2:16 a.m. Monday,” Oct. 27.

People outside the factory reported that a cloud was visible coming from the building well before mitigation spray towers were activated, the NRC reported. Indeed, the United Steel Workers posted a video online that shows clouds of gas billowing from the building for six long minutes before fire hoses were used to douse the plume.

Honeywell and the NRC claim that the gas spewing from the Feed Materials Building was not uranium hexafluoride but hydrogen fluoride gas, produced when UF6 reacts with water or water vapor.

(The Honeywell factory is on the Ohio River just downstream from the notoriously contaminated Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Paducah, Kentucky.)

After interviewing Honeywell employees, reviewing records and examining the affected areas, the NRC concluded:

1) The leaking UF6 vaporized and interacted with moisture inside the Feed Building, which converted it into UO2F2 (a solid form of uranyl fluoride, a yellow powder).

2) The uranyl fluoride was contained within the Feed Building and settled within a few feet of the cold trap leak.

3) The chemical conversion process also produced hydrogen fluoride gas, some of which was visible emanating from the building.

4) A potential violation was identified related to the emergency classification of the event and remains under agency review.

In response to questions raised by community members and the United Steel Workers Union, the NRC said Nov. 14, “[T]he leaking UF6 vaporized and solidified and fell to the floor near the leak inside the [Feed Materials Building]. Note that Honeywell is not a zero release facility. All [radiation] readings taken at the fence line and at the nearest residence were well within Honeywell’s regulatory limits. There are HF and radiation monitors onsite and the readings from them were carefully analyzed by the NRC.”

NRC inspectors concluded that Honeywell failed to recognize that the release of hydrogen fluoride gas warranted an emergency classification of “Alert.” Honeywell eventually agreed to the correction. The NRC also reported that Honeywell “determined that if any hydrogen fluoride travelled beyond their property it would have been of such low concentration as to pose no public safety hazard.” After that the NRC reviewed Honeywell’s calculations on the amount of HF released and its subsequent plume estimate, the agency concluded Honeywell’s assessment “reasonable.”

Since 1958, the Metropolis Works has been the nation’s only uranium conversion factory.

—JL

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste, Uranium Mining

January 15, 2015 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

European Reactor Improvements Opposed by US and Russia

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2014

In the wake of the Fukushima disaster, Europeans want to change the Convention on Nuclear Safety to require countries to illustrate how they’ll manage emergency response in the event of another radiation disaster in which reactors run out of control and catastrophically meltdown.

The European Union’s efforts to strengthen the treaty’s requirements are opposed by the United States and Russia, whose representatives said in October that the improvements sounded too expensive.

Diplomats familiar with proposal, who spoke to Bloomberg News, on condition of anonymity, said they’re ready to compromise with the US and Russian and would drop demands to legally amend the convention in exchange for “binding commitments” to take safety more seriously in the future.

In Belgium, the future of the Doel-3 and Tihange-2 reactors has been challenged since cracks were found in their pressure vessels in 2012. Over half the world’s 438 power reactors are over 30 years old, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. Reactor vessel cracks are a generic failure among old reactors and cracks have also been found in several old US units.

While the cracks pushed US regulators to examine reactors here built from the same materials, the Belgian flaws didn’t cause any US facilities to be closed. US reactor operators reviewed records and did computer modeling, but not direct and more costly ultrasonic inspections, as was done in Belgium.

Rebecca Harms, Co-President the of the European Parliament’s Green-European Free Alliance, which wants more rigorous reactor testing, told Bloomberg, “I would not like to see France investing $13 billion on improvements in nuclear safety and only around $3 billion in the US. This is obviously unbalanced.”

—Bloomberg News, Dec. 1, 2014

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

January 15, 2015 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Muslim Countries the United States has Bombed or Occupied Since 1980

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2014
By Glenn Greenwald 

Barack Obama, in his post-election press conference, announced that he would seek an Authorization for Use of Military Force from the new Congress, one that would authorize Obama’s bombing campaign in Iraq and Syria—the one he began three months ago. If one were being generous, one could say that seeking congressional authorization for a war that commenced months ago is at least better than fighting a war even after Congress explicitly rejected its authorization, as Obama lawlessly did in the now-collapsed country of Libya.

When Obama began bombing targets inside Syria in September, I noted that it was the seventh predominantly Muslim country that had been bombed during his presidency (that did not count Obama’s bombing of the Muslim minority in the Philippines). I also previously noted that this new bombing campaign meant that Obama had become the fourth consecutive US president to order bombs dropped on Iraq. Standing alone, these are both amazingly revealing facts.

US violence is so ongoing and continuous that we barely notice it. [In november], a US drone launched a missile that killed 10 people in Yemen, and the dead were promptly labeled “suspected militants,” which actually just means they are “military-age males.” Those killings received almost no discussion.

To get a full scope of US violence in the world, it is worth asking a broader question: How many countries in the Islamic world has the US bombed or occupied since 1980? That answer was provided in a recent Washington Post op-ed by the military historian and former US Army Col. Andrew Bacevich:

As US efforts to “degrade and ultimately destroy” Islamic State militants extend into Syria, Iraq War III has seamlessly morphed into Greater Middle East Battlefield XIV. That is, Syria has become at least the 14th country in the Islamic world that US forces have invaded or occupied or bombed, and in which US soldiers have killed or been killed—and that’s just since 1980.

Let’s tick them off: Iran (1980 & 1987-1988), Libya (1981, 1986, 1989 & 2011), Lebanon (1983), Kuwait (1991), Iraq (1991-2011, & 2014-), Somalia (1992-1993, 2007-), Bosnia (1995), Saudi Arabia (1991 & 1996), Afghanistan (1998 & 2001), Sudan (1998), Kosovo (1999), Yemen (2000 & 2002-), Pakistan (2004-) and now Syria.

Col. Bacevich’s count excludes the bombing and occupation of still other predominantly Muslim countries by key US allies such as Israel and Saudi Arabia, carried out with crucial US support. It excludes coups against democratically elected governments, torture, and imprisonment of people with no charges. It also, of course, excludes all the other bombing and invading and occupying that the US has carried out during this time period in other parts of the world, including in Central America and the Caribbean, as well as various proxy wars in Africa.

—Excerpted from investigative journalist Greenwald who wrote this piece for The Intercept, Nov. 7, 2014

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, War

January 15, 2015 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Coordinates Needed for Clean-up of Dangerous Sites in Iraq

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2014

The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) has submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the Department of Defense and the State Department on behalf of itself and Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) seeking the firing coordinates of weapons used in Iraq that contained depleted uranium.

As the US launches new military actions in the Middle East, the groups say getting information about the military’s use of DU in weaponry and its long-term effects is as urgent as ever. According to “In a State of Uncertainty,” a report by the Netherlands-based organization PAX, Iraq has been subject to the largest use of DU munitions of all areas of conflict and test sites, conservatively estimated to be at least 440 metric tons, though the UN Environment Program has estimated an amount up to five times that based on satellite imagery. Iraqi civilians thought to have been exposed to DU and remaining debris have suffered high rates of cancer and birth defects and US veterans report unexplained illnesses.

“DU is but one example of the toxic legacy left by our wars in Iraq,” said CCR Attorney Jeena Shah. “Veterans who served in Iraq are suffering side effects, while many Iraqis still live surrounded by piles of metal debris left over from the war and with soil and ground water potentially contaminated by DU. The only way to deal with its effects and to ensure it is cleaned up is to have a full accounting of where weapons containing DU were deployed.”

DU is a by-product of enriching uranium and is used in armor-piercing weapons due to its high density. When DU hits a target, its fragments burn and vaporize into a fine dust. If a person inhales, ingests, or is exposed to radiation by DU, radioactive material can be absorbed into the lungs, bone, kidney, skeletal tissue, reproductive system, brain, and other organs. A report recently published by the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons concluded after reviewing approximately fifty peer-reviewed studies on DU that it is clearly a genotoxic agent, known to be involved in the development of cancer and potentially responsible for genetic damage. Some of the wreckage left behind from the war has entered the unregulated trade in scrap metal, sometimes even made into cooking pots. No safe levels of exposure to DU have been established, and researchers advise that all exposure should be avoided.

Said Maggie Martin, Organizing Director of IVAW, “Veterans have been fighting for decades to have our injuries recognized by the US government—from Agent Orange to Military Sexual Trauma. We were promised health care in return for our service, and we deserve to know if we’ve been exposed to depleted uranium. This is an important matter of health for over two million veterans and for the people of Iraq and Afghanistan who are experiencing the worst of the toxic legacy of war.”

“Laid to Waste,” a report by Wim Zwijnenburg of PAX, details the difficulty of limiting civilian exposure to DU in the absence of reliable information about locations where it was used and the limited efforts to address the issue.

“In addition to regular bombardment, our country and our communities have been left with a toxic legacy from decades of US war in Iraq,” said Yanar Mohammed, President of the Organization of Women’s Freedom in Iraq. “If the US is truly concerned about civilian well-being, it should assist in a full accounting of DU contamination and rigorous study of its health effects by making public the locations where weapons containing DU were deployed.”

CCR and IVAW are seeking this information as part of the Right to Heal Initiative, which they launched together with the Organization of Women’s Freedom in Iraq and the Federation of Workers Councils and Unions in Iraq. Visit ccrjustice.org to learn more about the Right to Heal Initiative.

—Center for Constitutional Rights, Sept. 25, 2014

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

January 15, 2015 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

US A-10 Gunships Armed with Depleted Uranium Re-Join  War on Iraq

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2014

A squadron of twelve US A-10 gunships has arrived in the Middle East and is being made ready for airborne attacks against ISIS in Iraq. The Pentagon previously confirmed that the warplanes will use depleted uranium (DU) weapons “if they need to.” Earlier this summer, Iraq called for a global ban on the toxic and radioactive munitions and asked for help from the international community in dealing with DU contamination left from 1991 and 2003.

The aircraft arrived with 300 US airmen from the 122nd Fighter Wing at Fort Wayne Air National Guard Station, Indiana.

An A-10 gunship’s nose-mounted Gatling gun fires 3,900 rounds per minute.

The US Air Force announced Nov. 24 that the 163rd Expeditionary Fighter Squadron, which previously provided close air support for the war in Afghanistan, had arrived with “several A-10 Thunderbolt IIs.” It did not disclose the precise number. “They’re going over there because there’s a need … to be postured for a combat rescue mission,” said Jennifer Cassidy, an Air Force spokeswoman.

The Air Force declined to say where the A-10s would be stationed. However Janes Defense Weekly reported that they are based in Kuwait, a country familiar with cleaning up DU and one where the unauthorized use of DU on training ranges has caused political and diplomatic tension in the past.

In a report to the United Nations Secretary General earlier this year, Iraq urged: “[T]he United Nations, the specialized agencies (International Atomic Energy Agency, World Health Organization and UN Environment Program), all state members of the UN and non-governmental organizations to adopt a proactive approach towards the danger of the use of depleted uranium in armaments and ammunitions and to condemn such use…efforts should be made to draft a binding and verifiable international treaty prohibiting the use, possession, transfer and trafficking of such armaments and ammunitions.”

DU is classed as a Group 1 Carcinogen by the World Health Organization, and there has been a dramatic jump in miscarriages and premature births among Iraqi women, particularly in areas where heavy US military operations occurred, such as Fallujah in 2004, and Basra during the 1991 US war on Iraq.

“The US’s utter disregard for the views of the government of Iraq, which it claims to be helping, is staggering,” said International Campaign to Ban Uranium Weapons Coordinator Doug Weir. “It has done everything possible to avoid responsibility for historical contamination in Iraq and continues to oppose efforts to clean up and determine the public health impact of the weapons—even as it builds on that hazardous legacy by deploying the weapons once again.”

On Dec. 2, the United Nations, for the second time in two months voted overwhelmingly for a resolution urging member states to provide assistance to states affected by DU contamination. The vote was 150 to four, with only the US, France, Israel and England voting against. On Oct. 31, the same resolution passed 143 to four.

—Al Jazeera, Nov. 29; International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons, Nov. 27, 2014

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, War

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 240
  • 241
  • 242
  • 243
  • 244
  • …
  • 266
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch