Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

July 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Global Medics Call for Abolition, Say Nuclear Weapons’ Use “Makes Medical Assistance Impossible”

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2014

NAYARIT, Mexico — The Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement has again demanded that governments must never again use nuclear weapons and called for the elimination of the world’s nuclear arsenals. The medics’ declaration came at a meeting of civil society groups in Nayarit, Mexico Feb. 13, 2014.

The Movement issued its demand in view of growing world-wide awareness of the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of nuclear explosions.

The Red Cross/Red Crescent declaration reiterates a similar call made at an Oslo conference last year. Participants at both meetings emphasized that casualties and devastation in the aftermath of a nuclear attack would be so far-reaching that it would be impossible to provide adequate medical assistance.

The weapons’ health and environmental consequences result from the heat, blast and radiation unleashed by an explosion and the long distances over which these effects spread. Detonation of a nuclear warhead can destroy medical infrastructure and services, making the provision of aid and assistance all but impossible, as was the case in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The United States officially denies this view and claims, as it did before the UN’s International Court of Justice in 1996: “Nuclear weapons can be directed at a military target and can be used in a discriminate manner.”

In 2011, the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement made an historic appeal when it first urged nuclear-armed states to never again use such weapons, regardless of their views on their legality, and to immediately negotiate the prohibition and abolition of nuclear weapons through a legally binding international treaty.

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

July 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

US Nuclear Missiles Rely on “Battlestar Gallactica”-Style Cyber Security

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2014

CHEYENNE, Wyoming — On April 28, CBS correspondent Lesley Stahl gained unprecedented media access to an underground control room at an Air Force launch control facility in charge of ten intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) tipped with nuclear warheads. Stahl’s 60 Minutes report on the aging ICBM arsenal, broadcast from the F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Cheyenne, Wyoming, revealed that the US’s 450 land-based nuclear missiles are still controlled by 1960s computers, with a launch system that relies on eight-inch floppy disks.

Give me that old-time security: A recent 60 Minutes report revealed that the US land-based nuclear ICBM control system relies on primitive computers that date back to the 1960s — complete with floppy disks. CBS Photo.

Officials claim the outdated equipment keeps the nuclear weapons system safe from potential hackers, as it is not connected to the internet. As one commentator pointed out, this Air Force strategy is similar to one employed by the crew of the Battlestar Gallactica in the popular science fiction TV series, where the ship was saved from a disabling virus because its computers weren’t networked.

The security benefits apparently come with a sacrifice in functionality, as one missileer told Stahl about problems with the facilities’ analog phone systems.

“They’re awful. You can’t hear the other person on the other end of the line. Sometimes you can’t dial out, which makes it very difficult if you’re trying to do your job,” the officer stated.

In an apparent public relations backfire, Stahl said she suspected the Air Force granted her access to the facility to reassure the public in the wake of a widespread cheating scandal involving over 90 nuclear

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

July 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

“Please Disobey Orders for Nuclear Attack from the President” — Secretary of Defense

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2014

BALTIMORE, Maryland — According to an obituary by Robert McFadden, James R. Schlesinger became so alarmed by President Nixon’s unstable behavior in the days leading to his August 1974 resignation, that Schlesinger “instructed the military not to react to White House orders, particularly on nuclear arms, unless cleared by him or Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.” Schlesinger, an influential Cold War hawk who served Presidents Nixon and Ford as Secretary of Defense, CIA director, and chief of the Atomic Energy Commission, and later as Jimmy Carter’s Secretary of Energy, died March 27.

According to research by Scott Sagan and Jeremy Suir, “From Oct. 10, 1969, through the rest of the month, the US military was ordered to full global war readiness alert, without any provocation, and with no explanation to US commanders as to the alert’s purpose.” Nuclear-armed fighter jets were dispersed, ICBM countdowns were initiated and ballistic missile submarines were deployed. “On Oct. 27, the Strategic Air Command was ordered to dispatch B-52 bombers, loaded with H-bombs, toward the Soviet Union … in an operation named Giant Lance. ‘The bombers crossed Alaska,’ Sagan and Suri wrote, ‘were refueled in midair by KC-135 tanker aircraft, and then flew in oval patterns toward the Soviet Union and back, on 18-hour vigils over the northern polar ice cap.’ This was all done in total secrecy — not from the Soviets, of course, since they knew quite well what was happening, but from the American people.”

— New York Times, March 28, 2014; James Carroll, “Nixon’s Madman Strategy,” Boston Globe, June 14, 2005

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

July 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Most Cancers Caused by Toxic Pollutants

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2014

BETHESDA, Maryland — The National Cancer Institute (NCI) says most human cancers are caused by environmental pollutants.

John Apsley’s book Fukushima Meltdown & Modern Radiation: Protecting Ourselves and Future Generations (Temit Nosce Publications 2011), reminds readers that, “The NCI has determined that 80 percent to 90 percent of our cancers arise from the air we breathe, the food we eat and the water we drink.” This information flies in the face of much conventional Western medicine which focuses on cancer victims’ family history, lifestyle and genetic makeup.

The NCI’s targeting of pollution as the principle cause of cancer is reported, if meekly and mildly, in “Majority of Cancers are Linked to the Environment,” in NCI’s journal Benchmarks, Vol. 4, Issue 3, of June 17, 2004. Writer Nancy Nelson interviewed Aaron Blair, Ph.D., Chief of the Occupational Epidemiology Branch in NCI’s Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics.

Nelson asked, “As far back as the 1960s, several studies have concluded that by acting on what we know about the causes of cancer, we could prevent the majority of cancers. Some reports even estimate that we could reduce the incidence of cancer by as much as 80-90 percent.”

Dr. Blaire replied: “Most epidemiologists and cancer researchers would agree that the relative contribution from the environment toward cancer risk is about 80-90 percent. When I use the word ‘environmental,’ I mean it in a broad sense to include both lifestyle factors … as well as radiation, infectious agents and substances in the air, water, and soil. This information comes from studies that have been around for a long time.”

— Access the whole article at: https://web.archive.org/web/20041020183954/http:/cancer.gov/newscenter/benchmarks-vol4-issue3/page1

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

July 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Duluth, Minn. Joins 52 Great Lakes Cities Opposed to Canadian Radioactive Waste Dump

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2014

DULUTH, Minnesota — On May 12, Duluth, Minnesota City Councilors Sharla Gardner and Joel Sipress successfully introduced a resolution putting the city of 80,000 on record against a proposed radioactive waste dump on Lake Huron now under consideration by the Canadian government.

The resolution “to protect the Great Lakes, and its tributaries” rejects the rationale for a Deep Geologic Repository (DGR) and opposed “any other proposition for the construction of a nuclear waste repository within the Great Lakes Basin.” The additional sweep of the resolution is a reference to ongoing Canadian deliberations over the plausibility of four other radioactive waste dumps along the St. Lawrence Seaway. Duluth’s action was adopted by a vote of 8-to-1.

The move makes Duluth the 53rd city in the Great Lakes Watershed to formally reject the dump proposal. In addition, the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative — a group of over 100 cities in Canada and the United States — formally agreed in May 2013 that “the project should not move forward at this time.”

Chaired by Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, the Great Lakes cities initiative complained there was insufficient time to study the proposal and prepare comments, inadequate outreach to the Great Lakes community, and that “consideration of only one site that is one kilometer from Lake Huron” makes the plan unsupportable. — JML

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 247
  • 248
  • 249
  • 250
  • 251
  • …
  • 266
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch