Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Activists at New Kansas City Plant Seek Nuclear-Weapons-Free World

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013
By Jane Stoever

KANSAS CITY, Missouri — On July 13, about 80 people rallied, sang and spoke out against a new facility in the US nuclear weapons complex under construction here. Twenty- four of the protesters walked onto the property, were quickly arrested and detained by local police, and then released over the next few days. 

The five-building “Kansas City Plant” will by next year replace the current, 70-year-old Kansas City Plant, where 85 percent of the non-nuclear parts for US nuclear weapons are made or procured. 

During a brief ceremony, the protesters pledged to strive for peace and seek to be peacemakers in daily life, to persevere in nonviolence of the mind and heart, and work to abolish war and the causes of war from the face of the Earth. 

With the assembly singing “Open the Door,” which was written for the occasion, 24 people stepped onto federal property through a mock door marked “Open the door to a nuclear-weapons-free world” — the slogan of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. 

Anti-nuclear activists crossed the line at the Kansas City Plant, July 13.

The 24 who crossed the line were Rev. Carl Kabat, Chrissy Kirchhoefer, and Anneliese Stoever all of St. Louis, William Antone, of Washington, D.C., Sr. Cele Breen, Jim Everett, Lauren Logan, Sr. Theresa Maly, Rev. Lu Mountenay, Brother Louis Rodemann, Nehemiah Rosell, Kelsey Schmidt, Ann Suellentrop, Georgia Walker and yours truly, all of Kansas City, Frank Cordaro, Ed Bloomer, and Jessica Reznicek of Des Moines, William Bichsel, of Tacoma, Washington, Cassandra Dixon of Wisconsin Dells, Paul Freid of Lake City, Minnesota, Betsy Keenan of Maloy, Iowa, Janice Sevre-Duszynska of Lexington, Kentucky, and Rev. Jerry Zawada of Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 

The line-crossers were arrested, fingerprinted, photographed and then detained by Jackson County Police. Some were released on July 13, some July 14, and some not until July 15. The resisters were given several different trial dates, but attorney Henry Stoever said he would try to secure a single trial date for them all. 

Rev. Zawada, when asked why he crossed the line, said, “It’s the children! And the future of the world. People are blind and deaf to the fact that we’re producing these horrible bombs and creating an atmosphere of fear. It threatens the whole world.” He quoted a declaration from the late Rev. Richard McSorley: “It’s a sin to build a nuclear weapon.” Zawada also said he wanted to accompany Rev. Kabat in this action. Kabat has spent 17 years in prison for acts of civil resistance to nuclear weapons. Referring to Kabat and the worldwide community of people seeking a nuclear weapons-free world, Zawada said, “It takes passion and perseverance.”

Sr. Maly reflected, “I hope people that have positions of power, the ability to make decisions about nuclear weapons, hear our message.” 

In court September 4, those who pleaded “guilty” were sentenced to community service, and those who entered “not guilty” pleas were told that trial dates would be set later. Some activists refused the order for community service. 

—  Jane Stoever is a PeaceWorks-KC board member and volunteer at the Holy Family Catholic Worker.

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Army Studies Radioactive Bunker at Ft. Bliss

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

It took a tip from a retired member of the Air Force to alert the Army that one of its bunkers at Fort Bliss, Texas is contaminated with radioactive debris. The Air Force used “Bunker 11507” for the assembly and storage of nuclear weapons during the Cold War and reportedly buried contaminated rags and other residue in the area. When it transferred the facility to the Army in 1966, the Air Force did not share information about the radiation risk or the location of the buried waste. 

In May, the unnamed veteran contacted authorities with concerns about an Army plan to build new housing units, saying he had worked with unsealed nuclear weapons in the area during his career at Ft. Bliss on the Texas/New Mexico border. On July 16, federal officials announced that they were investigating the allegations and the possible effect that radiation exposures have had on people who regularly work in the bunker. Alpha and beta particles have been detected on the floor of the bunker, although contamination levels are still unclear. The Air Force had initially sealed the interior of the building with epoxy paint to contain the radioactivity, but the paint has since chipped off the walls. 

In addition to the personnel who work in the bunker, soldiers who used the weapons stored there could have been exposed. As a Ft. Bliss official told KFOX TV, “We don’t know the scope of the issue, we don’t know, again, if it’s nothing or fairly substantial… We are being cautious.” 

The investigation is expected to take several months and will rely on old documents and anecdotal evidence from former workers to uncover the locations of the buried radioactive waste. Ft. Bliss spans an area of more than 1,700 square miles and is home to 32,000 soldiers and 11,000 civilian employees. Because of the base’s immense size, authorities say they can only search for contamination in areas where they have been alerted to a potential issue. — Washington Post, July 16; RT News, July 17; Associated Press, July 19; El Paso Times, July 21, 2013 —ASP

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Radiation Comes to Janesville

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013
By Paul Vos Benkowski

JANESVILLE, Wisconsin — Back in 2009, Representative Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., voted against the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, as the stimulus package is known. Despite Ryan’s fiscally rightwing views, the chairman of the powerful House Budget Committee is happy to use stimulus funds to prop up his business constituents in Wisconsin’s First Congressional District. One such business, SHINE Medical Technology, plans to ship radioactive waste in and out of Janesville, in southwest Wisconsin. 

SHINE, or Subcritical Hybrid Intense Neutron Emitter — a euphemism for an isotope generator — is the name of the planned $84 million, 50,000-square-foot manufacturing plant. Ten million of the total is reportedly coming from the federal stimulus program. About 150 well-paying jobs have been touted in press releases about the project, set to be running by 2015. What has been overlooked in all the hoopla is what SHINE does and how they do it. 

SHINE produces an isotope called molybdenum-99 (Mo-99) which in turn is processed at medical facilities to produce technetium-99m (tech-99m), a dangerous radioactive metal used to detect heart disease and determine stages of cancer. Because Mo-99 has a short half-life of 2.75 days, it is shipped worldwide to hospitals by specialized radiopharmaceutical companies. Tech-99m produced onsite has a half-life of just 6 hours, yet once the decay occurs the remaining isotope has a half-life of 212,000 years. 

Unlike a reactor, the SHINE machine does not create a self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction. Instead it uses a particle accelerator driven by electricity to produce neutrons using deuterium particles. The process produces free neutrons and the resulting Mo-99. 

SHINE’s dangers include the likelihood of spills, transport accidents and missteps in the handling of radioactive waste. Company officials claim that only one truckload of waste per month will be shipped to either Utah or Texas for disposal. Details about the low-enriched uranium that will be delivered to the facility, where it comes from, or how often are unknown. The factory is an experiment but looks good on paper. The money behind the project and the promise of new jobs makes it an easy sell in Janesville. Unfortunately, the poor track record behind the production of Mo-99 can be seen in the shutdown reactor at Chalk River in Ottawa, Ontario and the corrosive remains of the leaky reactor in Patten, in The Netherlands. Both were once producers of medical isotopes. 

— Wisconsin State Journal, Jan. 24, 2012; National Public Radio, Aug. 16, 2012; and Janesville Gazette, May 9, 2012 & June 23, 2013 

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Nukewatch Installs 10kW of Renewable Solar Power

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

 

 

A snapshot of solar electricity production during the month of August, from Nukewatch’s 10 kW photovoltaic installation on the Plowshares Land Trust outside of Luck, Wisconsin. The green shaded area represents electricity sold back to the local electric co-op through a net-metering program.

This edition of the Quarterly is a special one — it’s the first newsletter we’ve researched, written and edited using solar energy! Since August 2, Nukewatch’s 10 kW photovoltaic solar panel array has been supplying clean, renewable electricity to the office and nearby buildings through a grid-tied system. In its first month of energy production, the array has produced over 1,320 kWh of electricity, about 900 kilowatt hours of which powered neighboring homes and shops. This excess electricity was sold to the local electric cooperative through a net-metering program which has already earned the Plowshares Land Trust over $100. A real-time graph showing our energy use vs. production is available online at <http://egauge5626.egaug.es/> (also linked from our website at www.nukewatchinfo.org) — check it out! (A snapshot of August’s production graph is shown at left.)

Nukewatch’s 10 kW photovoltaic array and our mascott Rags.

Nukewatch’s investment in this solar energy system was made possible by a generous gift from the Ethel and Carl Sanjines Trust. We could not think of a better way to make use of this substantial donation than one that for decades supports a permanent, safe alternative to nuclear and fossil fuel-based electricity — and reduces greenhouse gas emissions by about 13.8 tons per year.

We expect the project to pay for itself after 12 years, if not sooner (depending on electricity prices), and the panels are rated to last at least 25 years. This payback period would have been even shorter if we were a for-profit business taking advantage of the federal solar tax credit. The credit is not available to 501(c)(3) non-profits like Nukewatch.

Kris Schmid installing the system

The installation was done by Kris Schmid and his team from Legacy Solar of Frederic, Wisconsin. Its 39 panels (each able to produce 255 watts of electricity) were made in the US by SolarWorld of Portland, Oregon. The array is in an open field a few hundred yards from the office, set on racks made by US Solar Mounts in Sparta, Wisconsin. A large inverter converts the direct electric current from the panels into alternating current that is fed to the electric grid.

As an organization, we’re glad to have this opportunity to take an active role in the renewable energy solution to problems of climate change, fossil fuel pollution, dangerous nuclear power and the legacy of nuclear waste. We welcome visitors, so if you’d like to come and see the installation, please call Nukewatch at (715) 472-4185. — ASP 

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter, Renewable Energy

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

US Nuclear Collapse: Out with the Old & the New

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

In the past year, major US utilities have announced permanent shut downs at five existing nuclear reactors and canceled plans for building seven more:

1) Vermont Yankee, Vermont — 1 reactor — shut down announced August 27, 2013: After years of pressure from protestors and lawmakers, Entergy announced plans to permanently close its Vermont Yankee facility by the end of 2014. See back page for details.

2 & 3) Levy County, Florida — 2 reactors — August 1, 2013: Duke Energy canceled plans for its Levy County reactors as part of a settlement with the state after a law allowing utilities to charge customers for nuclear projects that may never be built was revised. Customers could still face a bill of up to $1.5 billion for the initial costs of the project, which never provided them with electricity.

4 & 5) Calvert Cliffs, Maryland & Nine Mile Point, New York — 1 reactor each — canceled July 30, 2013: Owned by Electricite de France (EDF), the operating licenses for new reactors at Calvert Cliffs and Nine Mile Point were denied in August 2012 because of an Atomic Energy Act law prohibiting foreign ownership of US reactors. EDF announced July 30 that it would pull its interest out of new reactors in the US, with its chief executive saying, “The circumstances for the development of nuclear in the US are not favorable at the moment. We are a major player in nuclear, but we are not obsessed by nuclear. Our development in the US will focus on renewable energy; that will be our vector of growth in the US.”

6 & 7) San Onofre, California — 2 reactors — shut down June 7, 2013: After new but seriously flawed equipment caused Edison to pull both reactors offline in January 2012, an unfavorable judicial decision moved the company to close them permanently. (See Page 4 for details.)

8) MidAmerican, Iowa — 1 reactor — canceled June 4, 2013: MidAmerican Energy canceled plans to build a new reactor in Iowa after completing a two-year feasibility study funded by its ratepayers. The company blamed environmental regulations, and the uncertainty of the untested “small modular” reactor technology that it had planned to use, for the cancelation. MidAmerican plans to invest $1.9 billion in wind energy in Iowa instead.

9) Kewaunee, Wisconsin — 1 reactor — shut down May 7, 2013: Dominion announced in October 2012 it would retire Kewaunee early for economic reasons.

10 & 11) Shearon Harris, North Carolina — 2 reactors — canceled May 2, 2013: Duke Energy announced it would not add two new reactors to its Shearon Harris site, where one reactor has been running for 25 years. Duke cited slow demand growth as a reason for its decision, saying the power produced by the new units would not be needed for another 15 years. The site was originally built for four reactors, and three of its four cooling pools are used to hold highly radioactive waste fuel, making the site one of the nation’s largest concentrations of radioactive waste.

12) Crystal River, Florida — 1 reactor — shut down Februray 5, 2013: After a 2009 accident resulted in a cracked containment building, Duke Energy decided to permanently close the reactor less than a year after it acquired the unit in 2012.

In addition to the above cancelations, Exelon announced June 12th that it had canceled major power upgrades for two reactors at its Limerick site in Pennsylvania and two at its LaSalle site in Illinois, “based on market conditions,” and Xcel canceled an upgrade for its Prairie Island reactor in Minnesota last October. — ASP

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 262
  • 263
  • 264
  • 265
  • 266
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch