Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Weekly Column
    • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
    • Depleted Uranium
    • Direct Action
    • Lake Superior Barrels
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
    • Workshops
  • Donate

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Cleanup or Cover-up: Japan’s Improvised Management of Reactor Meltdown Disaster Denied Ongoing Ocean Contamination 

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013
By John LaForge 

On Aug. 20, Tepco acknowledged that 300 tons of highly radioactive water had leaked from one of at least five of the 1,000 storage tanks it has hastily constructed to hold contaminated water (top photo, below). The waste water is generated by the continuous watering-down of extremely hot uranium fuel that has melted through the bottom of three destroyed Fukushima reactors and the hot waste fuel rods stored for decades in the now earthquake-damaged cooling pools. 

Tepco also reported August 20 that measurements of radioactive tritium in seawater near reactor No. 1 are the highest ever recorded — higher than at the height of the company’s deliberate, last-resort dumping of 11,500 tons of primary reactor coolant directly into the ocean in March and April 2011. 

The water is poisoned with cesium, strontium, americium, tritium and other ferociously radioactive isotopes. Tepco says it has not found the spot in the 1,000-ton steel tank from which the water was still leaking, but was transferring the water from the bad tank and removing contaminated soil. 

The company estimated that the radioactivity in the 300 tons amounted to 24 trillion becquerels, or 80 million becquerels per-liter. Reuters interviewed professor emeritus Michiaki Furukawa of Nagoya University who said, “That is a huge amount of radiation. The situation is getting worse.” Hideka Morimoto, a spokesman for Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority, told the AP “We are extremely concerned.” 

The leaking tanks were constructed with rubber seams intended to last about five years, and were bolted together rather than welded. According to Tepco, 350 of the 1000 tanks were similarly built on the cheap rather than using welded joints which are more expensive and more watertight.

Continuous ocean contamination, unstoppable leaks 

Tepco’s August acknowledgement of major tank leaks came a month after the company’s belated admission that 300 tons of highly contaminated water have been pouring into the Pacific every day ever since the March 11, 2011 disaster began. These 300 tons of contaminated water per day amounts over 30 months to at least 270,000 tons of water-borne radionuclides, a hemorrhage that continues unabated. 

The company admitted it has no idea where the leaks are located. On July 26, Tepco president Naomi Hirose confessed, “If you asked whether we have adequately learned the lessons of the disaster, the answer would be that we haven’t.” 

The Tokyo daily Asahi Shimbun, reported last December that “A huge volume of highly radioactive water, used to cool down the fuel, has since been leaking from the reactor” and the sources of the leaks were unknown. 

Disaster “out of control” — Tepco executive 

Tepco executive Kazuhiko Yamashita, said Sept. 13, “I think the current situation is that it is not under control.” 

Yamashita’s blunt condemnation flatly contradicted Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s testimony to the International Olympic Committee, given a week earlier, in which the PM claimed “the situation is under control.”

Tank leaks pouring contaminated water into Pacific 

The unprecedented ocean contamination stems from the colossal power of the March 11, 2011 magnitude 9.0 Great Eastern Japan Earthquake — the worst in Japanese history — and the consequent 52-foot tsunami — which smashed the six-reactor Fukushima-Daiichi compound, causing explosions and three reactor meltdowns. 

The meltdowns began spewing a colossal amount of cesium, strontium, plutonium, iodine-131 and other deadly elements to the atmosphere and to the Pacific and in some respects never stopped doing so. 

The bizarre phenomenon of about 400 tons of contaminated groundwater running into the reactor buildings every day is a consequence of the giant quake and its destruction of the six-reactor complex’s underground infrastructure, piping, trenches, tanks and buildings. But because the company’s system of partial decontamination only filters about 100 tons of water per day, 300 tons are running through the destroyed reactor complex and into the Pacific. 

Millions of gallons of water are continuously being poured into the three wrecked reactors and into cooling pools that store tens of thousands of extremely hot and highly radioactive waste fuel rods (“spent fuel”). This cooling water along with groundwater is moving through the massive cracks, breaks and faults and spreading to the sea. 

The company has announced an improved, expensive, untested “freezing” of a one-mile-long section of ground that could block the run-off, but which will not be completed until 2015. It’s also injecting a chemical solution into the coastline embankment as a “solidifying” experiment.

From bad to worse 

In a front-page New York Times article September 4, Martin Fackler called the crisis a “worsening situation.” Fackler is the author of Credibility Lost: The Crisis in Japanese Newspaper Journalism After Fukushima. 

Long before Tepco made its August admission, the magazines Science and Nature reported (in October 2012) that the initial dispersal of radioactivity from Fukushima — both as atmospheric fallout and direct discharges to the Pacific — represented the largest accidental release of radiation to the ocean in history — ten to 100 times more than the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear catastrophe in Ukraine. Co-authored by oceanographer Ken Buesseler, a senior scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts, the report said that contamination in fish in the area was so high that large, ongoing releases of radioactively contaminated water must be taking place. 

Buesseler’s allegations were denied for months by both Tepco and the Japanese government. Tepco rebuffed the information even after the chief of Japan’s federal nuclear watchdog agency said the site had probably been leaking contaminated water since the March 2011 disaster began. 

Tepco’s denials and delays have been condemned by experts in harsh terms. According to the Nation August 19, Dale Klein, a past chair of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission blasted Tepco executives, “These actions indicate that you don’t know what you are doing, and that you do not have a plan.” 

Over 430,000 thousand tons of highly contaminated water is being stored in tanks at the site, as Tepco floods the reactors’ cores using an improvised system to cool the melted fuel. Water from the cooling scheme runs into basements and trenches that were cracked open by the earthquake and which have been leaking since the disaster began.

Tank farm radiation leaks at deadly levels 

Tepco said Sept. 3 that it detected a radiation level of 2,200 millisieverts-per-hour near one storage tank — up from a previous high of 1,800 millisievert/hr on August 31. Both levels are high enough to kill an unprotected person in a few hours. Tepco’s earlier radiation estimates of 100 milliseiverts/hr were highly inaccurate because, according Dr. Arjun Makhijani speaking on PBS News Hour, monitors used for the earlier reports maxed out at 100 milliseiverts per hour. 

Thousands of workers occupy the contaminated grounds doing remediation work. Tepco acknowledged in July that 11 times the number of its employees than it had earlier told the World Health Organization have been exposed to high levels of radiation. Tepco now says 10 percent of the workers are at risk of developing thyroid cancer.

Fish stocks contaminated 

With thousands of tons of contaminated water gushing from the reactors, the groundwater and from storage tanks, radioactive contamination is inexorably destroying the fishing industry in Eastern Japan. On September 5, South Korea banned all fish imports from a large area around Fukushima Prefecture. The news sent shock waves through a staggered fishing community that has already suffered several billion in losses. 

Fish of all kinds are being found contaminated with cesium-137 and iodine-131 from the ongoing contamination. In 2011, the Japanese allowed 2,000 becquerels-per kilogram (bq/kg) to contaminate seafood, vegetables, dairy products and mushrooms. In April 2012, the government tightened the limit to 100 bq/kg. 

In July, sea bass caught near Hitachi, Ibaraki, 55 miles southwest of Fukushima, were found contaminated at 1,037 bq/kg — 10 times the 100 bq/kg government limit. Last year, shipments of contaminated Pacific cod were halted by the government. Black sea bream caught 60 miles north of Fukushima had 3,300 bq/kg of cesium; greeling within 12 miles of the site were found with a record 25,800 bq/kg. Indeed, all bottom-feeding or demersal fish “consistently showed the highest counts” of cesium, said Ken Buesseler in a Science article last year. The demersal include cod, conger eel, flounder, halibut, pollock rockfish, skate and sole. 

Bad fish aren’t limited to Japanese water. Albacore tuna caught off Washington and Oregon last Oct., and Blue fin tuna off of California were also found contaminated with Fukushima cesium. 

Tepco has said it will take 40 years to containerize all the radioactive equipment, melted fuel, high level waste and waste water at the site. This is likely an underestimate, as owners of Wisconsin’s Kewaunee reactor have said it will take 40 years to decommission that unit which is undamaged.

Government limits on cesium poisoning allowed in food vary widely. Below in becquerels-per-kilogram, as of Dec. 27, 2011: 

Drinking water Milk General foodstuffs Baby food

Japan 10 50 100 50

United States 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200

European Union* 1,000 1,000 1,250 400

Codex (UN) 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

*Only applied to items produced within the EU. When Japanese agricultural products are imported to the EU, Japan’s provisional limits are applied. Source: http://www.japanprobe.com/2011/12/27/japans-new-limits-for-radiation-in-food-20-times-stricter-than-american-and-eu-standards/

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Santa Susana: Meltown Coverup Uncovered

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

The partial meltdown of a nuclear reactor in 1959 at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) in southern California put the 2,850-acre site on the list of environmental “dead zones.” Decontaminating the soil and groundwater in the area, which borders the Simi Valley community 30 miles north of Los Angeles, could take centuries. Groundwater could remain radioactive in perpetuity.

Santa Susana began operating in the 1940s and 10 small nuclear reactors and a plutonium production factory were put to use. Fires in 1957 and 2005 resulted in massive radiation releases. Another fire in 1971 involved highly radioactive primary reactor coolant. At least four reactors, none with containment structures, had malfunctions that intensified radioactive saturation of the grounds. Radioactive sodium-contaminated components were burned in open pits. Barrels of volatile toxic materials were exploded using gunfire.

The DOE covered up the July 12, 1959 meltdown of the Sodium Reactor Experiment, but University of California students uncovered the secret two decades later. Secrecy and poor record keeping still hamper the search for information. The destroyed reactor was dismantled although thousands of pounds of radioactive sodium coolant have never been recovered. Researchers estimate that 500,000 gallons of trichloroethylene, a cancer causing solvent, lie beneath the surface and dioxin, perchlorate, tritium, plutonium-238, plutonium-239, iodine-131, strontium-90, cesium-137, cobalt-60, thorium-228 and uranium-235 contaminate the soil and water. If high cleanup standards are maintained, 126,421 truckloads of waste will be taken somewhere else.

Prior to its purchase by Boeing Corp., Rocketdyne, Inc. conducted research and development for the space program, rocket engines, liquid metals and nuclear reactors. SSFL did work for the SNAP-10A, the only nuclear reactor ever launched into low orbit above the Earth.

Boeing is responsible for clean-up, but by 2006 had violated toxic discharge permits more than 80 times. The corporation allowed chromium, dioxin, lead, mercury and other toxins to pollute Bell Creek and the Los Angeles River. Environmental groups have filed suit in an attempt to halt Boeing’s dumping of demolished buildings into unlicensed area landfills. Some 4,888 tons of radioactive debris have gone to dumps and recyclers. On-site operations include removing 50,000 cubic yards of tainted soil and junk. More than 400 monitoring wells on and off site have been installed. In October 2007, Boeing turned over 2,400 acres to the state for park land earmarked for “limited use.”

The EPA claims no radiation migrated off property, but American Jewish University sits along the property line on the northeast and in 2012 its well water tested positive for radioactivity. The Santa Susana Advisory Panel concluded that up to 1,600 deaths may be attributable to radiation exposure from the site.

In 2005, Boeing paid restitution to 100 families affected with cancer. A study released in November 2012 shows a 10 to 20 percent increase in cancer among nearby women compared to the rest of California’s female population.

More than 150,000 people live within five miles of SSFL, and half a million within 10 miles. — BLU

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Great Lakes Citizens Succeed in Halting Radioactive Shipments

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

In a show of authentic precautionary ethics — and in response to broad-based public opposition — Canadian authorities on July 26 canceled plans to transport 16 over-sized, radioactively contaminated steam generators from aging reactors, each weighing 100 tons, through the Great Lakes. Operators of the giant Bruce Power reactor complex in Owen Sound, Ontario, intended to ship the decommissioned nuclear power scrap through the Great Lakes, the St. Lawrence Seaway and across the Atlantic to the Studsvik facility in Sweden for “recycling.” 

Gordon Edwards, a co-founder of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility (CCNR), said in a July 27 post, “Concerted efforts by an unusually diverse and powerful movement of ordinary citizens led to an unequivocal victory….” 

“This outcome is entirely due to public opposition, since Bruce Power had received all the necessary authorizations — including a Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission license — to proceed with the shipments,” Edwards said. 

Mike Bradley, Mayor of Sarnia, Ontario on the southernmost tip of Lake Huron, also claimed victory. “It’s a real testament to citizen power.… We’re fighting a very large and powerful organization,” he said to the Sarnia Observer. The paper reported that the mayor “has been a vocal critic of the move, along with a growing list of Ontario mayors, coalition groups, environmental activists and US Senators.” 

Extensive delays of the proposed shipments were caused by public criticism of the threats such unprecedented transports posed for potentially disastrous fresh water radiation accidents. Critics called the long-distance transport proposal “reckless endangerment” and dubbed it the “Edmund Fitzgerald Plan.” 

A coalition of hundreds of community and environmental groups, led by indigenous First Nations, the CCNR, the Canadian Environmental Law Association, the Great Lakes Cities Initiative, and the Sierra Club of Canada — and 300 municipalities which passed resolutions opposing the shipments — had challenged the plan for two years. Ontario Regional First Nation Chief Angus Toulouse said in a news release then, “The Union of Ontario Indians and the Mohawk communities of Kahnawake, Akwesasne and Tyendinaga are at the forefront of opposing the shipment and the Chiefs of Ontario will support them.” 

Bruce Power is the largest single nuclear reactor operation in the Western Hemisphere, with eight reactors on the eastern shore of Lake Huron. Bruce Power authorities had earlier said that they would eventually decommission 64 of the steam generators. Its plan was to set a precedent by moving the school-bus-sized behemoths by rail to Owen Sound (on the Georgian Bay of Lake Huron), then transfer the giant devices to ships for the water-borne journey through Lake Huron, Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and out the Seaway — passing through the major cities of Montreal and Quebec City on the way to the Gulf of St. Lawrence and around New Brunswick and Nova Scotia to the Atlantic. 

Edwards noted that, “The idea of shipping 1,600 tons of radioactive waste through the Great Lakes and along the St. Lawrence River was the main rallying point for most people. But the idea of blending [industrial] nuclear waste materials into scrap metal for general commercial use, without even any labeling to indicate that the “recycled” metal contains [radioactive] waste, was another powerful motivator driving many to oppose the Bruce Power plan.” 

For its part, Bruce Power holds out some hope of another try. James Scongack, Bruce Power’s Vice President of corporate affairs, told the Sarnia paper, “We’ve indicated that if we ever decide that shipping steam generators is an initiative that we want on a certain timetable that we would reapply through the licensing process to do that.” In January 2011, spokesman John Peevers said, “We remain convinced and believe that this is the right thing to do and recycling these steam generators is going to reduce our environmental footprint.” 

Some 40 million people living along the lower Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence Seaway watershed, including 106 First Nation communities, depend on its fresh water for drinking and municipal services. The Great Lakes hold about 20 percent of the world’s freshwater. — JL

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Red Cliff’s Lake Superior  Barrel Project to Ship Explosives to Incinerator

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

RED CLIFF, Wisconsin — Melanee Montano, Environmental Director at the Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, reports that the Band’s Lake Superior Barrel Project intends to retrieve “overpack” barrels from Lake Superior beginning September 9, weather permitting. 

The Band’s nine-year-long investigation of the dumping, between 1957 an 1962, of nearly 1,500 barrels of Honeywell, Inc.’s toxic military waste into the lake succeeded in recovering 25 barrels last summer. Twenty-two of the drums held explosive parts of what the Band said were cluster bombs (previous documentation of the contents reported they contained grenade parts). However, because the recovery project had not secured permits required to transport explosives, the band’s contractors onboard the research vessel Blue Heron placed the 15,000 explosive parts in 85-gallon “overpack drums” and put them back into the lake in about 200 feet of water. 

Montano told Nukewatch August 30 that once the overpacks are recovered they will be transported under US Coast Guard authority to Cheboygan, Michigan where the cluster bomb parts are to be incinerated. — JL

Filed Under: Environment, Lake Superior Barrels, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Palisades Leaks Endanger Lake Michigan 

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

How many leaks does it take before a sieve of a reactor is forced to shut down in the interest of public health, safety and the environment? Palisades, built in 1971 on the shore of Lake Michigan near South Haven, has become a fountain of radioactive pollution. The system’s Safety Injection Refueling Water Tank (SIRWT), containing 300,000 gallons of radioactively contaminated water, sprang leaks in June, August and September last year and then sprang more leaks in 2013. Some of the water has seeped into the reactor’s control room from the ceiling and onto a control panel. When the tank lost 90 gallons of water per day — up from 38 — Entergy, the owner, finally did something about it. Some welding repairs stopped the leak for a while. 

The reactor was shut down for five weeks beginning May 5, 2013 due to another leak from a 1/8 inch crack in a nozzle in the floor of the SIRWT which was previously repaired and welded. What started as a 1-gallon-per-hour leak of radioactive water entering Lake Michigan increased to a single 82-gallon spill to the lake, according to the Huffington Post. Yet another leak occurred during repair work and for a second time some of it “poured” into the control room through the ceiling. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) said Entergy needed to repair its ceiling after the second dousing. The level of radioactivity released to Lake Michigan is unknown. The bottom of the 300,000 gallon tank was replaced after leaks exceeded the 38-gallons-per-day. 

The NRC said about the 82-gallon spill to Lake Michigan that it amounted to only “1/50,000th of permissible levels.” Evidently, a leak 50,000 times bigger — that is, 82 gallons times 50,000 — or 4,105,000 gallons of radioactive water, would be permissible under NRC rules 

Palisades has been shut down nine times since 2011. 

The repairs that followed the May leak uncovered construction flaws dating from the 1960s. The NRC is investigating why a bed of sand and grout rings had not been used under the SIRW tank. The sand acts as a cushion and the grout rings as support, and their absence is the reason for the tank’s failure. Inspections by the NRC have increased but so have the leaks. In spite of its faulty operations and frequent shutdowns, Entergy just keeps rebooting the 42-year-old reactor. 

— Huffington Post, May 6; Fred Upton Press Release, May 7; Grist, Aug. 6; Kalamazoo Gazette, July 17; Herald-Palladium, July 19, 2013; Michigan Public Radio, July 15, 2013 & July 12, 2012; South Bend Tribune, June 13, 2012 — BLU, and Kevin Kamps of Beyond Nuclear contributed reporting.

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Facebook

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2022 · Nukewatch