Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Swiss Reactor Contaminates Lake 

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

Even renowned Swiss engineering can’t prevent radiation releases from nuclear reactors, it appears. The Muehleberg reactor near Bern has contaminated Lake Biel, which is used for drinking water, in the northeast town of Biel. Cesium-137 has settled into the 9-mile long lake after traveling down the Aare River from the reactor 12 miles upstream. University of Geneva geologists discovered the contamination while conducting research. Authorities say cesium contaminated the river during two incidents in 1998 and 1999. However, according to press reports, the reactor routinely releases contaminated water to the River Aare. The 1986 Chernobyl disaster has also been blamed for cesium-137 deposits in lakes throughout the country. Numerous communities exist along the Aare as it flows into the southern end of Lake Biel. The Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate reports that the Muehleberg reactor operates with fissures in the core cover. Following the German example, the Swiss government has vowed to permanently shut down all five Swiss reactors by 2034. 

— The Local, July 16; PressTV & Pan European Networks, July 15; Agence France Presse, July 14; Reuters, Mar. 28, 2013

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Short Circuit Scares Palo Verde 

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

On July 2, Palo Verde’s Unit 1 in western Arizona powered down to 58 percent of capacity for three days, after to a short-circuit toasted an electrical switching box. The electrical equipment where the arc occurred sends power to the turbine building. A Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspection found that the load center had been blackened by the flash which disrupted operation of a main feedwater pump supplying the reactor’s steam generators. The inspectors saw no sign of a bigger problem and labeled it a “minor” incident. The cause of the explosion is still under investigation, but operators of the station’s three reactors blamed the powerful electrical short on rain water. 

— Associated Press, Aug. 5; Reuters, July 3; NEWSOK.com (Oklahoma City), July 5; Arizona Republic, Mar. 8, 2013

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Palisades Leaks Endanger Lake Michigan 

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

How many leaks does it take before a sieve of a reactor is forced to shut down in the interest of public health, safety and the environment? Palisades, built in 1971 on the shore of Lake Michigan near South Haven, has become a fountain of radioactive pollution. The system’s Safety Injection Refueling Water Tank (SIRWT), containing 300,000 gallons of radioactively contaminated water, sprang leaks in June, August and September last year and then sprang more leaks in 2013. Some of the water has seeped into the reactor’s control room from the ceiling and onto a control panel. When the tank lost 90 gallons of water per day — up from 38 — Entergy, the owner, finally did something about it. Some welding repairs stopped the leak for a while. 

The reactor was shut down for five weeks beginning May 5, 2013 due to another leak from a 1/8 inch crack in a nozzle in the floor of the SIRWT which was previously repaired and welded. What started as a 1-gallon-per-hour leak of radioactive water entering Lake Michigan increased to a single 82-gallon spill to the lake, according to the Huffington Post. Yet another leak occurred during repair work and for a second time some of it “poured” into the control room through the ceiling. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) said Entergy needed to repair its ceiling after the second dousing. The level of radioactivity released to Lake Michigan is unknown. The bottom of the 300,000 gallon tank was replaced after leaks exceeded the 38-gallons-per-day. 

The NRC said about the 82-gallon spill to Lake Michigan that it amounted to only “1/50,000th of permissible levels.” Evidently, a leak 50,000 times bigger — that is, 82 gallons times 50,000 — or 4,105,000 gallons of radioactive water, would be permissible under NRC rules 

Palisades has been shut down nine times since 2011. 

The repairs that followed the May leak uncovered construction flaws dating from the 1960s. The NRC is investigating why a bed of sand and grout rings had not been used under the SIRW tank. The sand acts as a cushion and the grout rings as support, and their absence is the reason for the tank’s failure. Inspections by the NRC have increased but so have the leaks. In spite of its faulty operations and frequent shutdowns, Entergy just keeps rebooting the 42-year-old reactor. 

— Huffington Post, May 6; Fred Upton Press Release, May 7; Grist, Aug. 6; Kalamazoo Gazette, July 17; Herald-Palladium, July 19, 2013; Michigan Public Radio, July 15, 2013 & July 12, 2012; South Bend Tribune, June 13, 2012 — BLU, and Kevin Kamps of Beyond Nuclear contributed reporting.

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Mexico’s Fraud and its Cracked & Leaking Laguna Verde 

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

Mexico’s two Laguna Verde (LV) reactors, on the Gulf of Mexico 40 miles north of Veracruz, operate behind a shield of fraud, bid-rigging and government secrecy, according to a May article by Talli Nauman in Counterpunch. They are owned and operated by Comisión Federal de Electricidad, the national electric company owned by the Mexican government. 

The World Association of Nuclear Operators has documented inadequate personnel training, poor management and the use of obsolete equipment, and whistleblowers have reported widespread corrosion of giant condensers and pipes in the cooling system. Professor Bernardo Salas Mar, a well-known mathematician and physicist who previously worked at LV, was fired after having revealed environmental cesium and cobalt contamination — and other problems. 

Rafael F. de la Garza was a manager at LV and responsible for vetting the company’s bidding on a reactor “upgrade” project, which was designed to increase the reactors’ generating capacity by 20%, from 1,365 megawatts to 1,638 mW. De la Garza hired the French company Alstom Mexico and Iberdrola Ingenería, a Spanish company that employed his son as Director. Iberdrola got the job in spite of the fact it had no expertise in reactor operations. The upgrade lasted five years and cost over $600 million. 

Professor Salas Mar alleges that Iberdrola and Alstom bilked Mexicans out of the half billion and had charged that the contractors were incapable of satisfactorily carrying out the work. Current employees have also complained about the upgrade project and, in a letter sent to the presidential administration, called it “unreliable, risky and overpriced.” 

Iberdrola announced completion of the upgrade on February 21, 2013, but it has been a complete bust. Not only has reactor output failed to increase, but the National Commission for Nuclear Safety and Safeguards refused to grant an upgrade license. The information came to light as a result of Salas Mar’s persistent Federal Information Access Institute requests. 

The World Information Service on Energy in Amsterdam reports that 50 miles of coastline along the Gulf of Mexico is contaminated with effluent from the two General Electric Mark II reactors. (Three reactors that caused explosions and suffered meltdowns at Fukushima, Japan are identical models.) Releases to the sea of cobalt, strontium and other isotopes have been detected in marine life. Locals have of course been urging the government to shut down the reactors. 

Investigative journalist Alex Backman reports that the Federal Commission of Electricity has suggested that a hydrogen leak last fall could have caused an uncontrolled fire. A shutdown that occurred in January 2013 may have been caused by fractures in cooling water pumps, although government confirmation has not been forthcoming. The leaks, shutdowns, and the lack of quality control and accountability has led to a civil law suit demanding that utility customers be exempt from LV’s electric bills. Up until 2010, Mexico planned to build ten new reactors, but those plans have been scrapped. 

— Counterpunch & Journal Presence, May 18; MS Noticias, Alcalorpolitico.com & Informants in Red, Apr. 29; World Nuclear News, Feb. 21, 2013; Plumas Libres, Oct. 24, 2012; Bloomberg, Nov. 3; Inter Press Service, Mar. 30, 2011; WISENews Comminique, Feb. 12, 1993 — BLU

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

US Nuclear Collapse: Out with the Old & the New

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

In the past year, major US utilities have announced permanent shut downs at five existing nuclear reactors and canceled plans for building seven more:

1) Vermont Yankee, Vermont — 1 reactor — shut down announced August 27, 2013: After years of pressure from protestors and lawmakers, Entergy announced plans to permanently close its Vermont Yankee facility by the end of 2014. See back page for details.

2 & 3) Levy County, Florida — 2 reactors — August 1, 2013: Duke Energy canceled plans for its Levy County reactors as part of a settlement with the state after a law allowing utilities to charge customers for nuclear projects that may never be built was revised. Customers could still face a bill of up to $1.5 billion for the initial costs of the project, which never provided them with electricity.

4 & 5) Calvert Cliffs, Maryland & Nine Mile Point, New York — 1 reactor each — canceled July 30, 2013: Owned by Electricite de France (EDF), the operating licenses for new reactors at Calvert Cliffs and Nine Mile Point were denied in August 2012 because of an Atomic Energy Act law prohibiting foreign ownership of US reactors. EDF announced July 30 that it would pull its interest out of new reactors in the US, with its chief executive saying, “The circumstances for the development of nuclear in the US are not favorable at the moment. We are a major player in nuclear, but we are not obsessed by nuclear. Our development in the US will focus on renewable energy; that will be our vector of growth in the US.”

6 & 7) San Onofre, California — 2 reactors — shut down June 7, 2013: After new but seriously flawed equipment caused Edison to pull both reactors offline in January 2012, an unfavorable judicial decision moved the company to close them permanently. (See Page 4 for details.)

8) MidAmerican, Iowa — 1 reactor — canceled June 4, 2013: MidAmerican Energy canceled plans to build a new reactor in Iowa after completing a two-year feasibility study funded by its ratepayers. The company blamed environmental regulations, and the uncertainty of the untested “small modular” reactor technology that it had planned to use, for the cancelation. MidAmerican plans to invest $1.9 billion in wind energy in Iowa instead.

9) Kewaunee, Wisconsin — 1 reactor — shut down May 7, 2013: Dominion announced in October 2012 it would retire Kewaunee early for economic reasons.

10 & 11) Shearon Harris, North Carolina — 2 reactors — canceled May 2, 2013: Duke Energy announced it would not add two new reactors to its Shearon Harris site, where one reactor has been running for 25 years. Duke cited slow demand growth as a reason for its decision, saying the power produced by the new units would not be needed for another 15 years. The site was originally built for four reactors, and three of its four cooling pools are used to hold highly radioactive waste fuel, making the site one of the nation’s largest concentrations of radioactive waste.

12) Crystal River, Florida — 1 reactor — shut down Februray 5, 2013: After a 2009 accident resulted in a cracked containment building, Duke Energy decided to permanently close the reactor less than a year after it acquired the unit in 2012.

In addition to the above cancelations, Exelon announced June 12th that it had canceled major power upgrades for two reactors at its Limerick site in Pennsylvania and two at its LaSalle site in Illinois, “based on market conditions,” and Xcel canceled an upgrade for its Prairie Island reactor in Minnesota last October. — ASP

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch