Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

July 6, 2019 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

White House Wants Reactor Operators to Self-Regulate

Trump Deregulation Frenzy Endangers Health & Safety

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2019

Note: This segment is excerpted from a far longer piece by Emily Atkin in The New Republic for April 5, 2019.

[On April 2, 2019] … the Senate Environment and Public Works committee held an oversight hearing for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) … in part, to discuss a new safety regulation designed to protect [US] nuclear reactors from earthquake and flooding events, like the one that caused the 2011 [triple reactor] disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi [station] in Japan.…

The draft version of the rule, released by the NRC in 2016, required all nuclear [reactor] owners to do two things: re-assess all flood and earthquake risks, [and] then implement new safety measures taking the re-assessment into account. But in January 2019, with Trump appointees making up a majority of the commission, [the NRC] approved a final version of the rule making the safety measures voluntary. Nuclear [reactor operators], in other words, will still have to do new risk assessments—but now they can choose whether they want to prepare for those risks or not.

The nuclear industry is also pushing the NRC to cut down on safety inspections and rely instead on [reactor owners and operators] to police themselves. The NRC “is listening” to this advice, the Associated Press reported last month. “Annie Caputo, a former nuclear-energy lobbyist now serving as one of four [NRC] members appointed by President Trump, told an industry meeting this week that she was ‘open to self-assessments’ by [reactor] operators, who are proposing that self-reporting by operators take the place of some NRC inspections.” …

There’s obvious appeal to self-regulation. It’s extremely costly to the taxpayer to ensure that industries aren’t hurting or killing Americans. …

But time and again, industries have proven that they will skimp on safety and cheat the rules if the government has made clear that it’s not watching. Sometimes that causes millions of Americans to lose their jobs and homes. Sometimes it causes thousands of people to get sick. And sometimes it causes hundreds to die. Trump is doing everything in his power to increase the chance of all of the above.

—Atkin is a Staff Writer for The New Republic.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

July 6, 2019 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

3rd US Delegation to Join German Peace Camp

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2019
A blockade of the main gate at Büchel June 2, had a mock B61-12.

Nukewatch and the German disarmament group Nonviolent Action to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, have organized a third delegation of US peace activists to the peace camp near Germany’s Büchel Air Base. In 2017, 2018 and again this summer, US peace activists will join the camp’s “International Week,” July 8 to 16, when disarmament campaigners from around the world convene there to confront US and German nuclear war preparations, and demand the ouster of US nuclear weapons from Germany.

The nationwide German coalition “Büchel Is Everywhere! Nuclear Weapons-Free Now!”—a “campaign council” of 68 groups and organizations—has worked for years to rid Germany of the 20 remaining US nuclear weapons, known as B61s, still deployed at the base, located about three hours west of Frankfurt. The coalition, which this year welcomed Nukewatch as its first international member group, demands that the government permanently remove  the US nuclear weapons, reject the replacement of the bombs with the planned B61-version 12, and ratify the new Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear weapons. At present, a classified “nuclear sharing” agreement allows the transfer of US nuclear weapons to Germany, where its Tornado fighter jet pilots threaten and train to drop the B61s if orders come from a US president.

CeeCee Anderson, from College Park, Georgia and representing the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability, shown here marching near the base last July, will join the delegation to Germany for a second time this summer.

This summer’s delegation includes Brian Terrell, of Maloy, Iowa, representing Voices for Creative Nonviolence; Col. Ann Wright (USAF Ret.) of Veterans For Peace, Hawaii; Cee’Cee’ Anderson, from College Park, Georgia for Women’s Action for New Directions and the watchdog group Alliance for Nuclear Accountability; Susan Crane from the Redwood City Calif. Catholic Worker; Andrew Lanier, Jr., from the San Jose, Calif. Catholic Worker; Ralph Hutchison, Kevin Collins & Cindy Collins, all from the Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance in  Knoxville, Tennessee; Richard Bishop from the Missoula Montana Catholic Worker; and Fred Galluccio from Physicians for Social Responsibility in Orange County, California.

Spring “Go-In” Action Sees 17 Nuclear Resisters Defy Air Base’s New Fence

Seventeen peace activists acting in two groups conducted a “go-in” protest April 30th at the base, near the city of Cochem, Germany. The nonviolent action was part of a long-running series of civil protests against the deployment and threatened use of at least 20 US nuclear gravity bombs at the German base. Part of the group of 17 dug under the newly erected second perimeter fence and occupied the space between the two barriers. A second group clipped through both fences and were met inside by German military security personnel.

The April action was the first major civil resistance at the base since authorities, over the winter, constructed the additional 16-kilometer fence around the base. Two fences now enclose the hilltop airport and fighter jet runway, bunkers for the nuclear weapons and jets, base housing, grammar school, and assorted infrastructure facilities.

Most of the 17 activists had participated in previous go-in actions at the base, and all of them were released after being issued “stay away” orders warning them to keep 200 meters distant from the fence line for 24 hours.

This year has seen an increase in court actions taken against the frequent resisters who have occupied the base. Court letters demanding civil forfeitures have been mailed to two dozen of the 70 people who cut or climbed into the base last year. The letters, arriving just before a statute of limitations deadline, can and have been contested by the abolitionists, who are later told to appear for trial.

Over the years, several intrepid resisters have been jailed for short periods for refusing to pay court-ordered fines. The judicial authorities light hand in charging political protesters is in stark contrast to US courts that charge multiple felonies and impose long prison terms for practically identical actions.

Air Force Websites Confirm Open Secret: US Nuclear Weapons Deployed in Germany

US and German military officials never officially admit in public that US nuclear weapons are deployed at the Büchel Air Base. The policy of “neither confirming nor denying” the location of nuclear weapons is a general one common to all nuclear-armed branches of the military. However, the Büchel Air Base website says it is home to the US Air Force’s 702nd Munitions Support Squadron or MUNSS. The  website also declares that the 702nd is “responsible for ownership, custody, maintenance, and release of a protection level 1 stockpile…” (Emphasis added.)

A “protection level 1 stockpile” is air force jargon for a stash of nuclear weapons, as its own open source documents show. The Shaw Air Force Base Instruction 31-102 6, of Dec. 6, 2012, is an Air Force instruction manual available online that openly defines protection level 1 (PL 1). In instruction 4.7.1., it says, “Examples of PL 1 resources include nuclear weapons and … systems critical to the success of active nuclear missions…”[1]

[1] https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/shawafb/publication/shawafbi31-102/shawafbi31-102.pdf

Filed Under: B61 Bombs in Europe, Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter, US Bombs Out of Germany

July 6, 2019 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Kings Bay Plowshares “Motion to Dismiss” Denied

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2019
By Patrick O’Neill
Four of the seven Kings Bay Plowshares with some of their lawyers.

It has now been 14 months since the Kings Bay Plowshares 7 entered Naval Station Kings Bay Trident submarine base in St. Marys, Georgia to “beat swords into Plowshares.”

Kings Bay, which is armed with enough nuclear weapons to destroy life as we know it on our planet, is a place of despair and horror.

Because of the positive economic impact of the Trident base in this southeast Georgia community, residents living in the shadow of Armageddon have been brainwashed to accept Trident and the nuclear threat as a normal course of their lives.

The seven of us, all Catholic pacifists, have been charged with three felonies and misdemeanor trespass. Three of our group—Fr. Steve Kelly, S.J., Elizabeth McAlister, and Mark Colville—remain incarcerated in the Glynn County Jail. Liz turned 79 and Steve turned 70 during incarceration. The others, Clare Grady, Martha Hennessy, Carmen Trotta, and myself, have been under house arrest (curfew) with electronic ankle monitors for more than a year.

The Kings Bay Plowshares chose to act on April 4, 2018, the 50th anniversary of the assassination of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. We cited King’s warning of the evil triplets of militarism, racism and materialism as our motivation to disarm Trident.

In an unprecedented legal move, our team of volunteer lawyers filed motions asking that our charges be dismissed under elements of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

After testimony from expert witnesses and all of the defendants last November, US Magistrate Benjamin Cheesbro on April 26 denied our motions to dismiss with an 80-page recommendation to US District Court Judge Lisa Wood who will preside over our trial.

However, the testimony of the seven of us did convince Mag. Cheesbro that our sincerely held religious beliefs did in fact lead us to engage in “Sacramental symbolic denuclearization” at Kings Bay.

And while the court found that our cause is a legitimately religious one and that our faith is sincere, Mag. Cheesbro concluded that imprisoning us for up to 20 years is “not a coercive response” to our faith-based actions, and that even if it is, such imprisonment is the government’s “least coercive response.”

We will appeal Mag. Cheesbro’s ruling to presiding Judge Wood, and our trial is expected to be scheduled for later this summer.

—Patrick O’Neill cofounded and lives at the Fr. Charlie Mulholland Catholic Worker House in Garner, NC. Learn more about the Kings Bay Plowshares and how to be in touch with them in jail.

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

July 6, 2019 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Refusing to Report on Church Rock, “the worst incident of radiation contamination in the history of the United States”

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2019
By Mark L. Taylor, Special to Nukewatch

Editor’s note: In New Mexico, the Church Rock Spill of July 16, 1979 has been called “the worst incident of radiation contamination in the history of the United States.” Catherine Caufield in “Multiple Exposures,” and Harvey Wasserman and Norman Solomon in “Killing Our Own,” reported that when the earthen dam holding radioactive uranium mine tailings burst, it released 93 million gallons of liquid wastes and more than 1,100 tons of solid wastes. “The wall of water backed up sewers and lifted manhole covers in Gallup, 20 miles downstream … and carried toxic metals … at least 70 miles downstream. … it left residues of radioactive uranium, thorium, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, sodium, vanadium, zinc, iron, lead and high concentrations of sulfates.”

The 32nd anniversary of the Church Rock spill was observed July 16, 2011 with an awareness march starting from the site of the spill, 20 miles upstream from Gallop, New Mexico. Navajo Times photo by Paul Natonabah.

In 1978, I was a few years out of college when I stumbled into a job as the editorial cartoonist for The Albuquerque Tribune, which was part of the once legendary Scripps Howard chain of papers. At its founding in 1878 by E.W. Scripps, the company was a feisty force for progressive reform. By the late 1970’s, not so much.

Before loading up the U-Haul and heading off to the southwest an uncle of mine from San Antonio sat me down to make sure I understood just what the newspaper business was all about. Uncle Gary, a former journalist, was a very successful newspaper consultant and broker.

Full of dreams and inspired by the legacy of Scripps Howard’s most famous journalist, World War II combat reporter Ernie Pyle, I was eyeing my new career with a reformer’s heart.

“Yeah, so all that stuff about covering the news and getting to the truth is important, but never forget this,” uncle Gary said. “Bottom line, it is always a business and a business is about making money.”

“Yeah, I know that,” I said aloud, while inside thinking, “But journalism is a different kind of business.”

I settled into my new job with the passion of a religious convert, cranking out editorial cartoons and illustrations, and reading all I could about New Mexico, which one colleague described to me as, “Being as close as you can get to living in the Third World and still be in the United States.”

Where E.W. Scripps had once warned cub reporters about never trusting an editor who belonged to a country club, the corporation now not only provided the editor Ralph Looney with a membership to the most established country club in the city, but also a membership to the swanky Petroleum Club, perched atop one of the city’s tallest bank buildings.

Editor Ralph regularly went to luncheons at the Petroleum Club and would casually mention how he had enjoyed yet another lovely dinner at the club with this or that banker, oil company executive, or big wig with one of the nuclear labs.

On July 16, 1979 any lingering illusions I had about corporate media were sandpapered out of me. Reports were coming in regarding a massive flood of liquid radioactive waste from a breached uranium mine tailings evaporation pond. A “state of the art” earthen dam had collapsed and a veritable avalanche of radioactive sludge, heavy metals, acids and other toxins was roaring down the Little Puerco River (Rio Puerco), right through the heart of the Navajo Nation.

The Rio Puerco is a tributary of the Little Colorado River, which runs to the Colorado River, which feeds Lake Mead—a source of drinking water for Los Angeles.

Initial reports of what came to be known as the Church Rock Spill were fragmentary, but details were coming in about millions of gallons of toxic radioactive liquid waste gushing into the Rio Puerco; a virtual tsunami of nuclear industry poison. There were reports of sheep along the banks dropping dead and people falling ill. But, of course, far out on the “rez’” all of that was “out of sight.”

I was tracking the scraps of information coming across the news wire. A friend at United Press International phoned me tidbits he was hearing. I was worked up about the story but the news editors were coolly dismissive. Of course, if the same thing were happening to the Rio Grande flowing through Albuquerque I had no doubt the news room would have jumped into action.

I went to Editor Looney. Surely an old news hound like him could see the importance of what was happening out on the Navajo land. This was a big story, just what newspapers are meant to cover. He knew Navajo elders and artists in Santa Fe, so surely, he would do something.

But Editor Ralph took me into his office and shut the door. A small, portly man, he had to hunch forward on his elbows with his hands clasped before him on the cluttered desktop. He sighed and gazed unblinkingly at me. Then he cleared his throat and said quietly, calmly, “Mark, you have to understand, the nuclear industry built New Mexico. We will not be covering that story.” And, with the exception of a few follow-up wire stories buried in the back end of the paper, we didn’t.

By the time the dam was patched up, between 93 and 100 million gallons had gushed downstream, along with 1,100 tons of radioactive waste, sludge, acids and heavy metals including arsenic, uranium, thorium, radium, polonium, cadmium, and molybdenum. Due to the rugged, remote landscape, much of the clean-up had to be done by crews with shovels, rakes, buckets and wheelbarrows. Pockets of remaining radioactive waste dotted the dry landscape waiting to be moved along in the next downpour or blown about in the wind. Later studies found the toxic brew had seeped as much as 30 feet into the alluvial soils and groundwater. The rate of illness and death went up for those living along the Rio Puerco.

The Navajo Nation Tribal Government asked then governor Bruce King to seek federal assistance to clean up the colossal radioactive mess. King rejected the request. Again, the Albuquerque Tribune had other stories to cover.

Three years after the disaster, United Nuclear Corporation closed up operations and walked away. Now 40 years on, I know that the corporate media is still not to be trusted when it comes to covering the nuclear, or any other area of the energy industry.

As E.W. Scripps once wrote:

The press of this country is now and always has been so thoroughly dominated by the wealthy few of the country that it cannot be depended upon to give the great mass of the people the correct information concerning political, economic, and social subjects which it is necessary that the mass of people shall have, in order that they shall vote and in all ways act in the best way to protect themselves from the brutal force and chicanery of the ruling and employing class.

But that was a long time ago.

—Mark Taylor is an independent illustrator and cartoonist.

For more on the Church Rock spill see Radiation’s and Colonialism’s Permanent Stamp on New Mexico.

Filed Under: Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste, Uncategorized

July 6, 2019 by Nukewatch 1 Comment

Xcel Wants to Run 48-Yr-Old Reactor to Age 59, or Even 69

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2019

On May 20, Minnesota Public Radio (MPR) and others reported that Xcel Energy, Inc. plans to seek a 10-year license extension for its old Monticello reactor, 35 miles northwest of Minneapolis.

Several crucial points were glaringly ignored by the radio report, including the fact that the reactor is 48 years old. MPR noted that with an extended license, Xcel could operate the reactor “10 years beyond the expiration of its current license”—a true statement, that is miserly with the facts.

Monticello’s “current license” is itself a 20-year license extension—expiring in 2030—which Xcel was granted in 2006. The reactor was designed, engineered, and built with parts intended to be retired in 2010. It has been operating beyond its design since Sept. 8 that year. If Monticello rattles, hisses, leaks, spews and vents along with making radioactive waste until 2040, it will then be 59 years old, nearly twice its intended retirement age. The Minneapolis StarTribune reported that in addition to its proposed 10-year extended license, Xcel executives will ask the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for “an option for 10 more years after that,” pushing the reactor’s dangerous make and model to its 69th year.

Monticello’s notorious design type was also ignored by the MPR news report which failed to mention that the reactor is a General Electric “Mark 1”—the same design, built by the same manufacturer, as the four reactors that failed catastrophically at Fukushima-Daiichi in Japan on March 11, 2011. Fukushima’s red hot masses of melted metallic radioactive “corium” are still venting radiation to the air, and pouring radioactive cooling water into the Pacific, eight years after the disaster which resulted from the worst earthquake in recorded Japanese history.

Adding to the risk-taking at the 671-megawatt Monticello unit, are its power rate increases, which were also ignored by the MPR news story. In 1998, Xcel was permitted to boost its power output, allowing the company to run the reactor 6.3% hotter and harder. In 2013, in spite of its age, it was even permitted a second power rate increase, pushing the old jalopy an additional 12.9% beyond its originally licensed limit.

MPR’s report did make me howl once. On the air, the reporter noted that Xcel, Inc. had agreed to install additional solar and wind electric generation systems, and added that more solar and wind “is good for environmental groups.” Again, saying that environmental groups benefit is true, but like saying the surface of the sun is “hot,” it understates the case by orders of magnitude. More solar and wind power are good in general for everybody, and for all groups in general.

—JL

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor, Quarterly Newsletter

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • …
  • 222
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch