Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Nukewatch Winter 2024-25 Quarterly

Click the links below to access articles from the Winter 2024-25 Quarterly Newsletter. Page numbers take you to the pdf of each page as they appear in the print version. Individual articles are also tagged by issue category.

Page 1

Protesters Vow to Shut Down Xcel’s Monticello Nuclear Reactor

NATO’s Own Nuclear Threats Against Russia

Page 2

On Guard! The Nuclear Industry is Up to Tricks Again

Canada’s Nuclear Waste Management Targets Site for Deep Geological Repository 

Page 3

Congratulations Susan Crane

European Human Rights Court Rejects Complaints by U.S. and German Nuclear Resisters

New UN Panel to Study Effects of Nuclear Attacks

Page 4 

Missing Data and Cover-ups: Final Environmental Impact Statement Issued for Monticello Nuclear Reactor

Page 5

The NRC and EPA’s Toxic Double Standard: Sacrificing Women, Children, and Decades of Health Research for Profit

Page 6

New Report on Gender and Radiation

Germany’s Biggest Industry Exec’s Dismiss Calls to Bring Back Nuclear Power

Hurricane Helene Floods Duke Reactor in Florida, Two Reactors in Georgia Powered Down

U.S. Troops Exposed to Enriched Uranium at Base in Uzbekistan Refused Compensation

“Mini Reactor” Project Firm is Bankrupt 

Harvard Prof to Study Cancer Rates and Radionuclides near Three New England Reactors

Germany Plans Roll Back of Military Funding to Ukraine

Page 7

Fukushima: Disaster Response is to Spread Radioactive Waste to the Commons

Page 8

Netanyahu to Biden: “Well, you dropped the atom bomb.”

Pine Gap Readies for U.S. Nuclear War

Are We at War with Russia? Stop Nuclear Threats!

 

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Protesters Vow to Shut Down Xcel’s Monticello Nuclear Reactor

Ta Pe’juta Wi’chac’pi Win, Erica Crazy Hawk (Star Medicine Women), member of the Crow Creek Sioux Tribe and Indigenous Earth Protectors, at the Rally at Xcel Energy offices in Minneapolis. Photo: Kelly Lundeen

Editor’s Note: Nukewatch is a founding member of the Coalition for a Nuclear-Free Mississippi River which held its first rally to commemorate the two-year anniversary of the most recent tritium leak at Xcel’s Monticello nuclear reactor at the Xcel Energy offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Ta Pe’juta Wi’chac’pi Win, Erica Crazy Hawk (Star Medicine Woman), member of the Crow Creek Sioux Tribe and Indigenous Earth Protectors, said of the radioactive leak that reached the Mississippi River and Bdote, the sacred Dakota site of creation: “We were driven from this sacred ground through genocide, a tragedy echoing in places like Palestine today. Now, to see these waters and lands poisoned with radiation adds another layer of unbearable desecration. It is my heartfelt prayer that someone will rise to the occasion and make the morally correct decision and action.”

By Sarah Martin

MINNEAPOLIS — On Thursday, November 21, 50 members of the newly formed Coalition for a Nuclear-free Mississippi River and their supporters rallied in front of Xcel Energy headquarters on Nicollet Mall in the heart of downtown. They demanded the energy company keep to its 2030 shutdown date for the Monticello nuclear reactor because of serious threats posed to public health, the Mississippi River, and drinking water for millions.

As rush hour traffic passed by, motorists and pedestrians saw protesters holding signs reading, “Don’t nuke our river.” Chants like “Xcel let’s be clear, Monticello reactor is not wanted here” were loudly amplified by the surrounding buildings. After chanting for a half hour, demonstrators heard from several speakers.

George Crocker, executive director of the North America Water Office and longtime anti-nuke activist, said, “We’re here today because Xcel Energy wants to continue nuclear operations at Monticello until 2050, and that is a really bad idea for a long list of reasons. There’s equipment failure issues, like what’s going on now after a pipe corroded to pieces and almost a million gallons of [water contaminated with] radioactive tritium leaked into the environment, some of which is now contaminating Minneapolis drinking water. The potential for cataclysmic equipment failure is not diminutive, and it is mounting as reactor components age. There’s nuclear waste issues, as there is no known technology or location capable of isolating irradiated fuel and other radioactively contaminated material from Earth’s biosphere for the required geological periods of time.”

John LaForge, longtime activist with Nukewatch, spoke about the dangerous radioactive leaks at the reactor and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and media misinformation, stating, “Over and over, Xcel and the NRC told the press that the radioactive tritium did not and could not reach drinking water. They lied, but the media dutifully repeated this lie many times on the radio, in the papers, on television. Any of the reporters could have found out that all the groundwater under the reactor moves toward the Mississippi — drinking water for 20 million people.”

LaForge continued, “The record is clear, but Xcel’s and the NRC’s public statements have been lies. Nothing they say to the press should be believed. As a coalition, we must see to it that the reactor’s 2030 expiration date be enforced, and that this leaky, dangerous, accident-prone nuclear jalopy be permanently shut.”

Whitney Wildman of the Climate Justice Committee stated, “We stand with groups organizing to shut down the Monticello Nuclear plant because we know that we can’t trust giant corporations to operate with the people’s health and safety in mind because that’s not their priority. We know that under capitalism these companies plan to exploit the land and its people to the breaking point, all in the name of profits.”

The program concluded with a lively, creative street theater piece depicting the cozy and alarming relationship between the NRC and the officials at the Monticello nuclear power reactor.

The coalition held a teach-in on the dangers of the Monticello reactor and nuclear power on December 4 at the New City Center in Minneapolis.

— Published by Fight Back! News, Nov. 25, 2024

⸺ See www.SaveTheMississippi.com, for more on the Coalition for a Nuclear-Free Mississippi River. Sign the petition to stop the license extension for the Monticello nuclear reactor.

Filed Under: Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Office News, Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor, Quarterly Newsletter

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

NATO’s Own Nuclear Threats Against Russia

By John LaForge

Western media reports every alarming statement from Russian President Putin and his commanders regarding their nuclear attack readiness. NATO’s nuclear weapons threats are never demonized in the same terms even though the alliance’s commanders’ readiness to launch their nuclear weapons is just as provocative, destabilizing, and potentially suicidal as Russia’s.

A case in point is NATO’s annual nuclear attack rehearsal known as “Steadfast Noon,” which ran from October 14 to 24 this year and involved thirteen NATO states, more than 60 warplanes from eight NATO air bases, and approximately 2,000 military personnel. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said in an October 11 announcement, “Nuclear deterrence is the cornerstone of allied security,” and “Steadfast Noon … sends a clear message to any adversary that NATO will protect and defend all allies.”

The complicated role-play of a NATO nuclear attack on Russia was coordinated to run simultaneously with the large-scale British-led maritime maneuver known as “Strike Warrior,” which was spearheaded by a British aircraft carrier “strike group” off the coast of Scotland. Thomas Newdick reported for The War Zone, on October 25, that “The combined drills sent a powerful message to Russia.”

Another powerful message — don’t call it a nuclear threat — was sent to Russia by Col. Daniel Bunch, Chief of Nuclear Operations for SHAPE, the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe, in Belgium. Col. Bunch said that coordinating the nuclear practice is “literally down to the minute of when we would put a weapon onto a target.” SHAPE said in the same announcement at the conclusion of the exercise that “Steadfast Noon offers a realistic training.” This is as bold and direct a threat to use nuclear weapons as anything President Putin has ever made.

Countries involved in the war games were the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Poland, Romania, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. The Royal Netherlands Air Force debuted newly purchased F-35A fighter jets. The jets have recently been “certified” to carry new B61-12 air-dropped H-bombs which are soon to be transferred from the U.S. to five NATO states, replacing older B61s.

Filed Under: B61 Bombs in Europe, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

On Guard! The Nuclear Industry is Up to Tricks Again

Opinion by Kelly Lundeen

A few short years ago the nuclear renaissance was a dream crushed by the reality of Fukushima’s meltdown, the ever-rising costs of licensing and constructing an operational reactor, and the increasing availability of more affordable renewable energy sources. Yet, the clever nuclear establishment has finagled a way to assure its preservation despite all common sense. Against this well-connected, highly-subsidized industry, the forces of truth, environmental justice, science, ethics, and ecological sustainability have a bigger challenge than ever to confront. This year’s vast giveaways and unabashed promotion of nuclear power have been the culmination of its proponents’ effective campaign on Capitol Hill.

How did they get away with it? As the nuclear power industry was facing an existential threat, its lobby machine and a few extremely wealthy backers found a new way to present itself, this time in environmentally friendly, sustainable wrapping paper.

Let’s look at the most recent wave of welfare. In 2016 reactors started getting bailed out in the billions of dollars at the state level after the industry newly labelled itself as “green.” Then in 2021 the federal government stepped in with the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), followed by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA), both of which were touted as major climate bills. Nuclear Information and Resource Service analyzed the bills and revealed the quantity of funding dedicated to the promotion of nuclear energy. The IIJA provided a whopping $11 billion for nuclear. The IRA went fiscally berserk and lavished the industry with a $134 billion handout.

In March 2024, the perpetrators of radioactive violence were gifted once again with the reauthorization of the Price-Anderson Act. This allows the nuclear industry to continue to freely produce the most toxic and dangerous catastrophes known to humankind without the burden of covering the cost of hundreds of billions of dollars per accident.

In June the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) expired after 34 years of providing necessary compensation for certain groups of people affected by radiation exposure. Extending Price-Anderson and ending RECA gave the industry a green light to continue poisoning air, water, and the food chain knowing there will be no consequences to the polluters and no compensation for the survivors.

Just when the industry thought it couldn’t get any better, they hit a grand slam with the passage of the Accelerating Deployment of Versatile, Advanced Nuclear for Clean Energy (ADVANCE) Act in July. While the implications of this sweeping bill are yet to be tested, Congress is forcing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to rewrite its mission statement to include promoting nuclear power in addition to its current goal of protecting the health and safety of the public and the environment. The bill’s backers hope it further degrades NRC authority by fast-tracking reactor licensing and small modular nuclear reactor development and weakening safety and security oversight.

As nightmares of Fukushima have now faded, the nuclear industry’s dreams may come true: extending licenses of decrepit nuclear reactors to 80 years, reviving closed reactors, and starting up new reactors. If so, it will mean more uranium mining, more destruction of land, more radioactive transport, more radioactive releases and accidents along the entire fuel chain, more high-level radioactive waste, more money in the pockets of the already-rich, more energy consumption, and less renewable energy.

Which way will it go: common sense protection of the Earth and its inhabitants or a bottomless tax-payer charity for private industry with no questions asked? The answers remain partly with a new administration — eager to promote fossil fuels but in favor of all things nuclear and very inclined to deregulate — and partly with the resilience of our anti-nuclear movement.

⸺ NRC, July 2024; Beyond Nuclear, Mar. 2024; NIRS “Summary of New Federal Incentives for Nuclear Energy,” 2022

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Canada’s Nuclear Waste Management Targets Site for Deep Geological Repository

Canada’s Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) announced November 28 that it had chosen the Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation and the Township of Ignace in northwest Ontario as the future site for Canada’s Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for the abandonment of all of Canada’s high-level radioactive waste reactor fuel.

The site is north of Lake Superior, 90 miles northeast of Minnesota’s Voyageurs National Park and 150 miles north of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness.

The NWMO’s public announcement does not mention that the “not-for-profit” NWMO is wholly owned by the three radioactive waste-producing utilities in Canada. These NWMO owners profit indirectly from Canada’s willingness to take possession and accept liability for the deadly, long-lived industrial waste material that was profitably produced by private corporations for decades.

The small town of Ignace (population 1,200) has given its consent for NWMO to build a DGR at the Revell Lake area. However, the Indigenous community of Wabigoon First Nation (population 800) has only agreed to study the proposal, announcing on November 18, “The yes vote does not signify approval of the project; rather, it demonstrates the Nation’s willingness to enter the next phase of in-depth environmental and technical assessments to determine safety and site suitability.”
Approval was neither sought from nor given by any of the communities along the 1,615-mile transportation corridor that would be used to ship the reactor fuel from New Brunswick, Quebec, and Southern Ontario over public roads, for half a century or more.

While Laurie Swami, NWMO President and CEO said in the announcement, “This project will solve an environmental issue.” The same press release says that the project has a “175-year timeline.”

The NWMO’s announcement claims, “There is international scientific consensus that a deep geological repository is the safest way to manage used nuclear fuel over the long term.” However, the watchdog group We the Nuclear-Free North (www.wethenuclearfreenorth.ca) reports, “The nuclear industry likes to portray the use of deep geological repositories as an accepted practice, asserting there is an ‘international consensus’ about their use. But that ‘consensus’ reflects agreement among proponents, not the public or independent experts. In fact, there is a list of technical and scientific uncertainties.” (See: https://nonuclear.se/files/rock-solid-a-scientific-review.pdf)

⸺ Thanks to Gordon Edwards, President of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility, and Brennain Lloyd with Northwatch and We The Nuclear Free North, for reporting.

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • …
  • 222
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch