Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Harvard Prof. to Study Cancer Rates and Radionuclides near Three New England Reactors

Petros Koutrakis, professor of environmental sciences at Harvard, is piloting two new studies of incidences of cancer and levels of radioactivity exposure around nuclear reactors in New England. In his first study, Koutrakis hopes to produce data illustrating the public health impacts of three nuclear power facilities: Pilgrim in Massachusetts, Seabrook in New Hampshire, and Yankee in Vermont. Pilgrim and Yankee are currently shut down. Seabrook is still operating. His second study will examine blood samples from people within 31 miles of Pilgrim, to look for biological indications, such as DNA damage, to illustrate the effects of wastewater evaporation at Pilgrim. Koutrakis will seek to better understand the public health risks of exposure to radionuclides, such as tritium, cesium-137, lead-210, and iodine-131, released into the air and water as a result of this evaporation.

Wastewater evaporation at Pilgrim began last February, so while the cancer data can show effects over a longer period, the blood samples hope to shed light on more immediate health effects. The first study will analyze cancer rates in Massachusetts from 2008 to 2017, and is awaiting more current data. The study hopes to have results compiled by Spring 2025.

Koutrakis emphasized that the public must demand policymakers require other disposal methods, such as storage or shipment of waste, though those still present health threats due to leaks, transportation accidents, and environmental justice issues, Koutrakis said. “But the thing I can tell you with certainty,” he added, “is that they should not evaporate or dump in the bay. So that should stop right now.”

⸺ Harvard HSPH News, Jan. 29; Vermont Public Radio, Jan. 25; Plymouth Independent, Feb. 16, 2024

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Germany Plans Roll Back of Military Funding to Ukraine

Germany is signaling it may slow its military support to Ukraine, showing little enthusiasm for two of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky’s demands: striking deep into Russia with German Taurus missiles and fast-tracking NATO membership.

Zelensky’s latest bid to bolster the war took him to the UK, France, Italy, and Germany. For now, Berlin will not send anymore of the requested Leopard 2 tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, or armored howitzers. The German Defense Ministry does not anticipate Kiev can launch a successful counteroffensive in the near future, according to reports in German news outlet Bild.

Although German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has promised to deliver 1.4 billion Euros of combined support alongside Belgium, Denmark, and Norway by the end of the year, Germany’s projected military aid to Ukraine for 2025 is half what it gave in 2024. So far, Germany has provided or pledged about 28 billion Euros in military funding for Ukraine.

Behind the U.S., Germany remains Ukraine’s second-largest source of military funding. Even Zelensky’s hard lines drawn earlier seem to be wavering as his administration considers swapping Ukrainian territories for a peace agreement with Russia. The specter of waning military assistance grows larger with the change in U.S. leadership and Germany’s new reticence.

⸺ BBC, July 17; Global Research, Oct. 14, 2024

Filed Under: Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, War

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Fukushima: Disaster Response is to Spread Radioactive Waste to the Commons

By John LaForge

Fourteen-million cubic meters of radioactive “fill” could be spread to the commons

Japan has doubled down on the nuclear industry’s historical practice of spreading radioactive pollutants to public air space and to common waterways.

In addition to the often-reported pumping of thousands of tons of radioactively contaminated cooling water to the Pacific Ocean from the Fukushima-Daiichi reactor complex, the government has announced its intention to spread around the country as much as 14 million cubic meters of radioactively contaminated soil, reportedly for road-building, construction projects, and even agricultural underlayment. Last September the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna — which promotes the nuclear reactor industry around the world — declared that the plan to disperse the waste “is consistent with international safety standards.”

The federal government in Tokyo announced a cabinet-level meeting set for December to discuss its plans to disperse the contaminated soil in public works projects. In 2016, a government study group outlined the plan to allow 14 million cubic meters of contaminated soil generated from decontamination in Fukushima prefecture, to be used for public works projects and agricultural land development nationwide, if it emits less than 8,000 becquerels-per-kilo of cesium-137.The becquerel is a measure of radioactivity, and vast areas were contaminated with wildly varying amounts of cesium-137 and other radio-isotopes which spewed from Fukushima’s three out-of-control reactors.

The contaminated soil was scraped up and removed from farms, school yards, public parks, and other green spaces during the government’s attempt to “decontaminate” thousands of square kilometers around the Fukushima-Daiichi site. These millions of bags have been kept in the open air for years at over 1,000 “temporary storage sites” in Fukushima prefecture.

The Japan Times reported in 2015 that there were then 22 million cubic meters of the poisoned soil in bags. Four years ago, the Indian daily The Hindu said that there were 20 million cubic meters, and that by early 2019 its collection and bagging had cost the government $27 billion.

Fukushima’s cesium fallout contaminated over 9,000 square kilometers (3,474 sq. miles) of forests, farmland, and residential areas, according to a 2019 European Geosciences Union (EGU)assessment of the decontamination work, that was published in the journal Soil. The Hindu reported in January 2020 that the EGU authors warned, “No decontamination activities are planned for the majority of forested areas, which cover about 75 per cent of the main contaminated area,” and that “outdoor workers in the special decontamination zone [a 1,117 sq. km area] may, as a group, be exposed to more than the government’s long-term suggested limit of radiation.”

The cesium-contaminated waste should be containerized and kept out of the environment for up to 300 years (after the cesium has decayed to other elements). But the government has arbitrarily decided that a certain amount of cesium-137 contamination will be permitted in “fill” for highway construction and other projects.

To make way for the public’s contamination with the radioactivity in public works and agriculture, the government has increased by 80 times the “allowable” cesium contamination in the collected soil. Hajime Matsukubo, with the Nuclear Information Centre in Tokyo, has warned that the standard for soil contamination was previously just 100 becquerels per kilogram. The new 8,000 Bq/kg limit goes “against their own recommendations,” according to Matsukubo, who said, “My fear is that once they relax this rule, they can then go on and ease all sorts of other rules.” (In a related case of weakening radiation standards, in 2023 the government shortened the list of radioactive materials it will measure in seawater near the Fukushima contaminated wastewater release site from 64 to 30. The new list removed 39 nuclides and added five.)

The daily Yomiuri Shimbun reported December 5, that the ministers will consider using soil “as a base for asphalt in road construction, after taking measures to prevent the radiation from spreading.” The paper noted that Tokyo actually tested the use of the contaminated soil in farm fields, “harvesting cucumbers and daikon radishes in fields where the [contaminated] soil has been covered with normal soil and using it to raise the ground level.”

Rain moving through the cesium-contaminated soil will of course move the long-lived radioactive material into groundwater.

Melted fuel: Under 1 gram removed, only 880 million grams to go

The first tiny morsel of melted reactor fuel has been removed by a remote-controlled robotic arm from inside unit #2 of the Fukushima-Daiichi triple disaster (earthquake, tsunami, meltdowns) in Japan. It could take up to a year to analyze the 0.7 grams (1/40th of an ounce) of lethally radioactive debris that was grasped by the 72-foot long robot, according to a Nov. 21, 2024 announcement by Fukushima’s owner/operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. (Tepco). Reactor #2 holds an estimated 237 tons of melted reactor fuel wreckage.

Tepco also said that studying this bit of waste — about one raisin worth — will “shed light” on the chemical structure of the estimated total 880 tonnes of ruined, radioactive, and hot reactor fuel now lost somewhere below the site’s three rubbished reactors. For perspective, there are 1 million grams in 1 metric tonne, so the 880 tonnes of melted reactor fuel amounts to 880 million grams.

In March of 2011, the three units lost all cooling capacity which caused their uranium fuel rods to overheat beyond control and melt. Some experts speak of the possibility of a “melt through,” in which the extreme temperature of the molten core causes it to burn through the bottom of the steel reactor vessel. This possibility has not been ruled out at Fukushima.

Fukushima-Daiichi’s first-ever triple-reactor meltdown followed the 2011 earthquake, the largest in Japan’s recorded history — which smashed the reactors’ foundations and wrecked off-site transmission lines, and produced the biggest tsunami in Japan’s recorded history, which then destroyed the site’s emergency diesel generators causing a “station
blackout.” The catastrophic March 11 earthquake killed or disappeared an estimated 20,000 people, and the resulting tsunami and meltdowns amounted to an astonishing and unheard-of triple terror of widespread earthquake destruction, devastating floodwaters, and vast plumes of radioactive gases and liquids spread around the Northern Hemisphere by the wind and throughout the Pacific Ocean by currents.

Now, 13 years since the events began, the Japanese government, Tepco, and Japan’s reactor industry need to convince the public that some 880 tonnes of reactor fuel inside or under the devastated reactors can be cooled, captured, and contained for hundreds of thousands of years — the period that the fuel remains lethally radioactive. Finding, removing, and packaging the melted uranium and plutonium fuel (6 per cent of the fuel in reactor #3 was plutonium) is likely an impossible mission, but officially remains a part of the government’s disaster response and decontamination process.

The time and expense of managing this volume of lethally radioactive waste will be so enormous that Japan will eventually decide instead to cover the deadly wreckage with a giant Quonset hut, like the Soviet Union and later Russia did at Chernobyl. At the site of the 1986 single-reactor disaster in Chernobyl, the then USSR simply abandoned the fuel
wreckage and rubble and built a covering to keep rain off of the highly radioactive materials. This first concrete cover degraded rapidly and was famously replaced in 2019 with a giant sliding cover at a cost of 1.5 billion Euros.

— For more information: A detailed evaluation of Japan’s deceptive plan to use contaminated soil in public works projects is now available from the Citizens’ Nuclear Information Center (Tokyo), at https://cnic.jp/english/?p=7917.

Filed Under: Environment, Fukushima, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Netanyahu to Biden: “Well, you dropped the atom bomb.”

Opinion by John LaForge

Israel’s ghastly genocidal destruction of Gaza drags on and is horrifyingly clear for all to see. The Israeli Defense Forces’ criminal mass murder is so blatant and unabashed that in December last year, even U.S. President Joe Biden challenged Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu. Speaking to an audience of campaign donors in Washington, D.C., including a former president of AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Biden said Israel was “starting to lose support by the indiscriminate bombing that takes place.”

According to Philip Weiss at mondoweiss.net, Biden went on to say that when speaking with Netanyahu himself, the Israeli leader justified the mass attacks by reminding Biden of U.S. massacres. Biden reportedly said to the donors:

“It was pointed out to me — I’m being very blunt with you all — it was pointed out to me — by Bibi [Benjamin Netanyahu] — that ‘Well, you carpet bombed Germany. You dropped the atom bomb. A lot of civilians died.’”

Such a face-to-face plastering of U.S. hypocrisy by a head-of-state is unheard of. Netanyahu’s smug spanking of a sitting U.S. president over U.S. massacres at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was absolutely unprecedented.

Netanyahu’s mass killing has garnered him an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court, yet that stinging global stigma is hardly enough of a condemnation in view of the 42,000 civilians his government has killed in Gaza. Netanyahu’s grizzly indiscriminate bombardment of schools, hospitals, churches, mosques, apartment buildings, open markets, and other civilian gathering points is such an open-and-shut case of criminal war-making, that only blindly obedient sycophants or collaborators can imagine any rationalization of it.

Bibi’s point in slapping Biden in the face with “you dropped the atom bomb” is that President Truman and his administration claimed to have “saved lives” by killing 210,000 civilians at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The guilt-ridden, self-righteous absurdity of Truman’s claim has always been clear to historians and outside observers. Dorothy Day, Albert Camus, and others immediately condemned the atomic bombings for what they were. Nothing excuses mass destruction of innocent non-combatants. Regardless of the circumstances, deliberately indiscriminate attacks on civilians and civilian objects have been a violation of universal laws of war since 1907.

The truth-telling thrown at Biden is that the United States of Amnesia has no moral authority to brandish, no superior standing of any kind from which to condemn Israeli atrocities or bemoan its multiple massacres in Gaza. Regardless of the IDF’s unjustified, unlawful, and criminal murder of civilians there, U.S. military action in WWII, in Korea, in Southeast Asia, in Afghanistan, and in Iraq, in Abu Ghraib, CIA Black Sites, and at Guantanamo Bay, has permanently erased any claim the U.S. government ever had as a defender of human rights or the so-called rules-based order.

Our U.S. high school history books’ vision of the U.S. as a “shining city on a hill” was always a fiction that drew groans from Native American descendants of genocidal U.S. Army raids of the 1800s, and from African American descendants of 300 years of slavery.

No wonder Netanyahu punched Biden in the nose. The U.S. has never even acknowledged the criminality of killing Japanese civilians in order to save soldiers’ lives, much less apologized for it. Yet for Netanyahu to call Biden a fraud is an indirect admission that his government has adopted the murderous metrics of historical U.S. militarism and made them its own. Massacres are just as criminal in Gaza as they were in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, War

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Pine Gap Readies for U.S. Nuclear War

With Australians still adjusting to the new AUKUS military agreement, the United States has been quietly expanding and refocusing its satellite surveillance base at Pine Gap, preparing to attack China with nuclear weapons.

By Peter Cronau

The rapid expansion of the Pine Gap satellite surveillance base near Alice Springs, Australia from 35 to 45 satellite dishes, is designed to give the U.S. the edge in a potential nuclear war with China.

Where desert oaks and spinifex tufts once baked in the Central Australian sun, three new white domes have mushroomed in a 14-hectare clearing along the western edge of the U.S.’s ‘most important surveillance base’ in the world.

Under huge plastic radomes, three of Pine Gap’s new satellite dishes have been built to receive information from a new generation of U.S. spy satellites that bring a heightened level of surveillance of China’s nuclear missile launch sites at a time of increasing confrontation between China and the U.S. and its allies.

Thermal imaging satellites presently used by the Pine Gap base are able to detect rocket and missile launches in the battlefields of Gaza and Ukraine, as I have earlier reported, but the greatest interest of the new satellite dishes at the base are missile launches from China.

A new generation of ‘eyes-in-the-sky,’ known as Overhead Persistent InfraRed (OPIR) satellites, will soon be launched by the U.S. military to augment the existing satellites of the Space-Based Infrared System (SBIRS). These satellites are designed to detect the thermal signatures of rocket and missile launches, using immensely sensitive infrared sensors.

The Rush to Catch Up

The U.S. Defense Department’s ‘Space Force’ is poised to launch five new ballistic missile early warning infrared sensor tracking satellites. The first
launch had been planned for 2025, but technical difficulties have seen it delayed until 2026. Three of the five new OPIR satellites will go into geostationary orbit at 35,000 kilometers altitude over the equator and two will orbit the poles.

The new Pine Gap dishes will use these OPIR satellites acting as ‘spotters’ to better detect heat signatures from ballistic missiles at the earliest stages of launch, to then send this data to low orbit tracking satellites, which aim to guide the targeting of the launch locations and of the incoming missiles.

They will aim to defeat the latest hi-tech maneuverable ballistic and hypersonic missiles which have been developed by China and Russia. As Declassified Australia reported in depth in 2022, the U.S. has no present infallible defense against hypersonic missiles, which can reach speeds of 12,500 kilometers per hour and carry either conventional or nuclear warheads.

Lacking any defense against the new missiles, developing new surveillance satellites therefore became urgent.

It became evident to U.S. military planners that the older SBIRS satellites were not up to dealing with the advanced hypersonic missiles — developing new surveillance satellites therefore became urgent.

As the new satellites were being developed to face the new hypersonic threat, new satellite dishes and electronics on the ground were also needed. That’s why they need to upgrade Pine Gap.

— Nexusnewsfeed, June 15 – 21, 2024

— Peter Cronau is an award-winning investigative journalist, writer, and film-maker. His documentaries have appeared on ABC’s Four Corners and Radio National’s Background Briefing. He is an editor and cofounder of Declassified Australia.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, War

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • …
  • 222
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch