Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

October 13, 2017 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Hurricane Winds & Reactor Risks

Hurricane Harvey on Aug. 29, 2017
Fall Quarterly 2017

On Tues., Aug. 29, three environmental groups jointly called for the immediate shutdown of the twin South Texas Project nuclear reactors near Bay City, Texas which was directly in the track of Hurricane Harvey. Instead, the reactors have been kept running at full capacity throughout the disaster. Karen Hadden of the Sustainable Energy & Economic Development Coalition in Texas said “There is plenty of reserve capacity on our electric grid, so we don’t have to run the reactors in order to keep the lights on.” Paul Gunter of Beyond Nuclear in Maryland said the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Reactor Oversight Project have both acknowledged the “credible threat of a severe accident initiated by a breach of the embankment wall that surrounds the 7,000-acre cooling water reservoir. It’s simply prudent that the operator put this reactor into its safest condition, cold shutdown.” And Susan Dancer of the South Texas Association for Responsible Energy said that after mandatory county-wide and Bay City evacuation orders, “It’s an outrageous and reckless decision that the nuclear reactors are still running….Where is the concern for employees and their families. Why is corporate profit being prioritized over caution and good judgment?”

Because some of the nuclear workers’ homes have been flooded, Buddy Eller, speaking for the reactor’s owners, said to BloombergMarkets.com Aug. 30, “The biggest issue is finding other employees who can safely make it back to the site.” Eller added that the reactors hadn’t been threatened by the rising waters and that hurricane force winds never reached them. However NuclearStreet.com reported, “The reactors kept operating despite the storm with wind gusts that peaked at 130 mph.” Hurricane strength is officially 74 mph.

As we go to press Hurricane Harvey, “could end up being the most costly weather disaster in US history, with its relentless rains flooding [tens of] thousands of homes, crippling the energy hub around Houston, and killing at least 46 people,” according to the Austin American-Statesman.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

October 13, 2017 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

South Korea will abandon nuclear power

Fall Quarterly 2017

President Moon Jae said June 18 that he had scrapped plans to build new power reactors and that he hopes to gradually replace the country’s 25 power reactors with renewable energy sources. “We will abolish our nuclear-centered energy policy and move towards a nuclear-free era,” the president said at a ceremony marking the shutdown of the country’s oldest reactor, Kori 1, in Busan on the country’s southeast coast. — The Telegraph, June 19; and the Olympian (Washington), June 18, 2017

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

October 13, 2017 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Spectacular Costs Force More Reactor Construction Halts

Fall Quarterly 2017

In a triumph toward true solutions to the environmental crisis, plans for three nuclear power reactors have been cancelled. On July 31, the nuclear power company Scana voted to suspend construction on the half-built V.C. Summer Units 2 and 3 in Jenkinsville, South Carolina. In a desperate attempt to keep the Summer construction alive, Scana requested and was refused $3 billion in aid from Energy Secretary Rick Perry. Then in late August, Duke Energy announced its cancellation of two reactor projects, the William States Lee III Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 in Gaffney, South Carolina and the Levy County Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 in Florida. Not surprisingly, Duke Energy is seeking permission to recover $368 million in pre-construction costs by means of a rate hike of 16.7% for residents in order to get their shareholders off the hook.

Following Westinghouse, Inc.’s declaration of bankruptcy in March, prospects for construction of its reactors has come into serious doubt. Now the fate of the three projects involving six untested Westinghouse “AP1000” reactors has been sealed. The only reactors still under construction in the US are part of another Westinghouse project, Plant Vogtle in Georgia. The owners at Southern Company are expected to announce soon whether construction can continue. The belated cancellations demonstrate, as Scana now admits, that nuclear power is “prohibitively expensive.” — Duke Energy, Aug. 29; Charlotte Business Journal, Aug. 25; Bloomberg, Aug. 11, 2017

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

October 13, 2017 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Renewable Generation Overtakes Nuclear Years Earlier Than Expected

Fall Quarterly 2017
By Lauren Tyler

The latest issue of the US Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) Electric Power Monthly (with data through April 30) reveals that renewable energy sources—including wind, solar, geothermal and hydropower—are now providing a greater share of the nation’s electrical generation than nuclear power, according to a new analysis from nonprofit SUN DAY Campaign.

For the first third of this year, renewables and nuclear power have been running neck-in-neck, with renewables providing 20.20% of U.S. net electrical generation during the four-month period (from January through April) compared to 20.75% for nuclear power. Yet, SUN DAY says that in March and April, renewables surpassed nuclear power for the first time and have taken a growing lead: 21.60% (renewables) versus 20.34% (nuclear) in March and 22.98% (renewables) versus 19.19% (nuclear) in April.

Although renewables and nuclear are each likely to continue to provide roughly one-fifth of the nation’s electricity generation in the near-term, SUN DAY claims the trend line clearly favors a rapidly expanding market share by renewables: Electrical output by renewables during the first third of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 has increased by 12.1%, whereas nuclear output has dropped by 2.9%.

In fact, the nonprofit says nuclear capacity has declined over the last four years—a trend which is projected to continue, regardless of planned new reactor startups. On the other hand, almost all renewable energy sources are experiencing strong growth rates, new records being set virtually every month. Comparing the first four months of 2017 to the same period in 2016, solar has grown by 37.9%, wind by 14.2%, hydropower by 9.5% and geothermal by 5.3%. Biomass has remained essentially unchanged—slipping by just 0.3%.

For the second month in a row, wind and solar combined provided more than 10% of the nation’s electrical generation. In March, those sources provided 10.04% of the nation’s electrical generation. That record was eclipsed in April, when wind and solar reached nearly 11% (10.92%) of total generation. And, for the first time, wind and solar combined have provided more electricity year-to-date—113,971 thousand megawatt-hours—than has hydropower—111,750 thousand megawatt-hours— according to SUN DAY.

As renewables’ share of electrical generation has grown, that of fossil fuels has declined. SUN DAY says electrical generation by fossil fuels (i.e., coal, natural gas, petroleum liquids and petroleum coke) dropped by 5.2% during the first third of 2017 compared to 2016.

“In light of their growth rates in recent years, it was inevitable that renewable sources would eventually overtake nuclear power,” notes Ken Bossong, executive director of the SUN DAY Campaign. “The only real surprise is how soon that has happened—years before most analysts ever expected.”

“Renewable energy is now surpassing nuclear power,” adds Tim Judson, executive director of the Nuclear Information and Resource Service. “This gulf will only widen over the next several years, with continued strong growth of renewables and the planned retirement of at least seven percent of nuclear capacity by 2025.”

— Lauren Tyler is the editor of NGT News, and also writes and edits for North American Windpower and Solar Industry.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter, Renewable Energy

October 13, 2017 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Nukewatch Quarterly Masthead

 

Nukewatch is a project of The Progressive Foundation a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization founded in 1979 by Samuel H. Day, Jr.
Progressive Foundation Board of Directors

Molly Mechtenberg-Berrigan, Michele Naar-Obed, Arianne Peterson, Jeff Peterson, Bonnie Urfer, Gail Vaughn

Nukewatch Staff

John LaForge, Arianne Peterson, & Kelly Lundeen

Volunteers

Bonnie Urfer, Sharon Cody, Kevin Brown, Cara Husnik, Martha Kaempffer, Jeff Peterson, Roger Lundeen, Julia Levine, Peter Quilligan, Liana Bratton, Nancy Stewart

Nukewatch Quarterly

Editor, John LaForge
Submission deadlines: Nov. 10, Feb. 10, May 10, & Aug. 10
Suggested subscription donation: $25/yr.
~ Printed on 100% recycled paper ~

The Progressive Foundation & Nukewatch

740A Round Lake Rd., Luck, WI 54853
Phone: (715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws / www.nukewatchinfo.org
ISSN: 1942-6305

In accordance with Title 17 USC, Sec. 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in it for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • …
  • 223
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch