Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Defective Reactor Parts Scandal in South Korea Sees 100 Indicted

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014
By John LaForge 

A vast conspiracy of bribery and faked certification of power reactor parts in South Korea has resulted in the indictment in October of 100 people, including a former top state utility official. 

At issue are what prosecutors say are fabricated quality reports concerning parts inside 14 (New York Times) or perhaps 20 (Wall St. Journal) of the country’s 23 commercial nuclear reactors. 

The scandal surfaced in November 2012, and five reactors were shut down following the discovery of the faked safety certificates. Several engineers and reactor parts suppliers were jailed for their involvement in the corruption. 

The scandal grew in May when two more reactors were found running with safety control cables that were approved using faked certificates. The government then began an investigation. Prosecutors have pledged to study over 120,000 test certificates issued over that last 10 years. 

Boxes of cash were found in the home of one Korea Hydro official, and officials of Hyundai Heavy Industries have been arrested on bribery charges. 

As a result of the May revelations, Kim Kyun Seop, President of South Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power, the country’s nuclear reactor operating firm, was dismissed, and the CEO of Korean Electric Power Corp. (Kepco) Engineering and Construction, An Seung-Kyoo, was also fired. Kepco runs all 23 of the country’s reactors, three of which are not in use. 

Earlier, South Korean President Park Geun-Hye reportedly called the corruption in the nuclear power complex “unpardonable” and likened the industry to a mafia. 

What AP news reports called “fabricated Environmental Qualification test reports” falsely verified the quality of cables that “control valves responsible for cooling nuclear fuel or preventing the release of radioactive materials during an emergency.” The Wall St. Journal reported Oct. 10 that parts suppliers are “suspected of bribing officials to accept their products with faked certification.” 

Armand Presentati

The cables reportedly failed nine of 12 tests of their ability to withstand changes in voltage and pressure during a “loss of coolant accident” — the sort of meltdown disaster that struck Three Mile Island, Pennsylvania, in 1979 and Fukushima, Japan, in 2011. 

In addition to the defective cables at the four shutdown reactors, counterfeit cabling was reportedly discovered at two reactors now under construction. 

The defective cables have been replaced at several of the reactors, and on Oct. 28 the government and Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power (KHNP) confirmed that $2.8 billion had been spent on the project. 

By November, the government had found that eight parts suppliers had sold KHNP 7,682 parts using forged quality certificates between 2003 and 2012. Last year the government said that over 10 years, more than 10,000 components were sold using fabricated warranties. One firm contracted to test reactor parts, Saehan Total Engineering Provider, skipped sections of exams, doctored test results and even certified parts that failed the tests. 

In June, 10 of the country’s 23 reactors were offline for various reasons. In October Reuters reported that three of six reactors currently under construction had been delayed by allegations of unsafe designs 

— CNN, Nov. 5; Reuters & New York Times, Oct. 28, Wall St. Journal, Oct. 12; and Agence France Presse, Aug. 13; and Bellona (Norway) June 11, 2013

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Radioactive Waste Truck Burns In Ohio

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014

A truck started on fire on Aug. 22, on Interstate-75 near Troy, Ohio. The cargo consisted of 12,000 kilograms of uranium hexafluoride, a radioactive heavy metal that turns into hydrogen fluoride (UF6) — an extremely corrosive and caustic gas — if it comes into contact with water or water vapor. In spite of the hazards posed by the radioactive cargo, the trucking company, RSB Logistic, of Saskatoon, was more worried about media exposure than radiation. The UF6 was in route from Cameco in Port Hope, Ontario, to Kentucky. In spite of the potential for wide-spread contamination, no rules exist in the US or in Canada mandating that the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission or the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission be informed of the incident. 

Brian Hanson of Alberta, Canada, was driving the truck when the brakes ignited. Hanson doused the fire using an extinguisher but didn’t get it completely extinguished. He drove for two miles with reignited flames shooting out of the truck before exiting the highway. At that point, with half the truck on fire, Hanson disconnected the cab from the trailer knowing that the UF6 is heat activated. The fire burned the hair off of Hanson’s arms as he uncoupled the rig. An Ohio Traffic Crash Report said the right side tires, fenders, mud flaps, air hoses, sleeper compartment and passenger side of the cab were destroyed by the fire. 

Hanson is quoted in the Toronto Star saying, “We’re so programmed and told about the danger of a load, and the media danger. We’re basically taught that the media’s like terrorism. We’re supposed to do everything we can to avoid media.” 

Hanson and his wife had to find their own way home from Ohio while RSB Logistic sent a new cab and driver to complete the shipment to Kentucky. 

Canada’s Nuclear Safety Commission absolved itself of all responsibility since the truck started burning in the US. US regulators say it was Ohio’s responsibility. Neither Ohio’s Bureau of Radiation Protection or state emergency management agency had been informed of the truck fire. 

The Toronto Star reported on Nov. 15 that one in seven trucks carrying radioactive materials are pulled off the road after inspection by the Ontario ministry of transportation. Faulty brakes, load security, flat tires, falsified logs, faulty air lines and lack of driver training are among the problems discovered during inspections. 

— Toronto Star, Oct. 31 & Nov. 15; Nuclear Street News Team, Nov. 1, 2013

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Italy’s Illegal Dumping Linked to Cancers 

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014

Nukewatch Quarterly has reported previously on illegal dumping of toxic waste by the Italian Mafia. Now, the environmental group Legambiente reports that about 31,000 environmental crimes were committed in 2010, and nearly half involved illegal disposal of radioactive and industrial waste. The majority of the waste was dumped in Campania, a region around Naples — Italy’s third largest city — and sadly the repercussions of this unregulated dumping are registering in the form of an increased number of cancers reported around the dumping area. 

The Italian Senate has begun an investigation into the rise in the number of tumors being diagnosed in Campania. The BBC reports, “Two decades ago doctors noticed that the incidence of cancer in towns around Naples was on the rise. Since then, the number of tumors found in women has risen by 40%, and those in men by 47%.” 

The details of the illegal dumping came to light when ex-Mafia boss Carmine Schiavone was overcome with guilt at the environmental damage he was causing and decided to turn informant. Schiavone turned on his cousin Francesco Schiavone — the head of Camorra, a secret society of criminals loosely based in Naples — and revealed that the mafia family had disposed of contaminated waste all over Southern Italy. They dumped in Lake Lucrino, coastal areas, pastures and 520 drums of toxic waste were even buried in a specially dug quarry. The BBC reported that Legambiente has alleged that 30 or more ships, stuffed with radioactive waste, may have been sunk off the Calabrian coast in suspicious circumstances over the past 20 years. Schiavone also said that radioactive sludge was brought in on trucks from facilities in Germany and dumped haphazardly in landfills at night. Schiavone said, “We disposed of … millions and millions of tons.” 

— The Independent, June 8; BBC, Oct. 29; and The (London) Daily Mail, Nov. 1, 2013 — PVB 

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

The Pentagon’s Renewable War Power

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014

The US military is the largest energy hog in the country in an unsustainable situation that even the Pentagon recognizes. 

In 2008, the Pentagon spent $24 billion on electricity and fossil fuel — 80% of the government’s energy consumption. In 2010, the military used more than 5 billion gallons of fuel. The military uses more than 125 million barrels of petroleum every year, at times costing $400 per gallon when delivered in Afghan and Iraqi war zones. The Navy alone uses 80,000 barrels of oil daily. 

A 2010 Pentagon and Energy Department Memorandum of Understanding says the Pentagon is “increasing its use of renewable energy supplies and reducing energy demand to improve energy security and operational effectiveness, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in support of US climate change initiatives, and protect the DoD from energy price fluctuations.” 

Since the 1970s, the Pentagon has been reducing its usage and increasing renewable energy production. Working with the Natural Resources Defense Council, the military aims to get 25% of its energy from renewables by 2025. Private sector investment of at least $7 billion is going into renewable projects on government property. Private companies pay for and install solar, wind, geothermal and biomass. In exchange for land use, the military gets electricity at a fixed long-term rate. Residual energy feeds the civilian electric grid. An entire neighborhood at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona sports roof-top solar panels. The development of renewables is necessary so the Pentagon gets a point for participation. War, on the other hand, will never be green. 

— Department of Defense press release, Nov. 20; SolarCity Corporation, July 24, 2013; American Council on Renewable Energy, Jan. 2012; CleanTechnica, Tina Casey, undated. — BU

Filed Under: Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Renewable Energy

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Nuclear Wa$te — of Billion$

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014
By Lisa Kasenow 

Editor’s note: 

Cancelled, unused and destroyed reactors give the lie to industry boosters who speak of its “24/7 reliability.” Shutdowns, fires, explosions, leaks, meltdowns and hugely expensive re-builds add up to a record of nuclear malfeasance. The industry has been such a financial failure that Forbes magazine thundered from its Feb. 11, 1985 cover, “The failure of the US nuclear power program ranks as the largest managerial disaster in business history, a disaster on a monumental scale. …only the blind, or the biased, can now think that most of the money has been well spent. … The scale of the US nuclear power program’s collapse is appalling: 75 plants cancelled since 1978, including 28 already under construction…” By 1999, a total of 121 reactors had been cancelled, squandering about $50 billion in 1995 dollars.* Lisa Kasenow sent Nukewatch an outline of the more recent financial disasters: 

1. Ten partially-constructed nuclear power reactors have been cancelled. All 10 were scrapped more than 10 years after they had been ordered, and half were cancelled 18-22 years into construction. Three possible terminations — Tennessee Valley Authority’s Bellefonte 1 & 2, and Watts Bar 2 — are still under construction today, even though these reactor orders date from 1970. 

2. Nuclear power units scratched before construction work had begun number 117, and in most cases the cancellations occurred years after the reactors were ordered. 

Of the 117 reactors abandoned after being ordered, half of them were stopped 4-10 years after being ordered, and 20% were halted 8-10 years after the order was made. 

The TVA wins the gold medal for nuclear wasted money, because it’s responsible for the abandonment of 10 and possibly 11 federally permitted reactors. Bellefonte 1 & 2; Hartsville A1, A2, B1 & B2; Phipps Bend 1 & 2; Yellow Creek 1 & 2 and possibly Watts Bar 2. 

3. There are 21 fully-constructed and licensed commercial reactors that no longer supply electricity. These 21 commercial reactors were in operation for an average of 17 years each. Of these, 14 have high-level radioactive waste (used fuel) on site. 

The longest operating time for one of these reactors is 34 years, while the shortest was under one year. More than half operated for less than 20 years. Twenty-eight percent were operational for less than 10 years. Three Mile Island Unit 2 operated for one year. Pathfinder in South Dakota ran for 30 minutes. Shoreham operated for less than one year and then closed. 

* Arjun Makhijani, The Nuclear Deception,1999, p. xiv. 

— Lisa Kasenow is a retired physics, chemistry & biology teacher and fulltime anti-nuclear activist in Florida.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 212
  • 213
  • 214
  • 215
  • 216
  • …
  • 223
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch