Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

January 2, 2021 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Germany’s US Bombs in Spotlight

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2020-2021
By Kelly Lundeen

In Germany this year, 41 peace activists have been put on trial for protest actions at Germany’s Büchel air force base, where the US stations 20 of its B61 H-bombs.

Nuclear abolitionists Dennis DuVall, a US Veteran for Peace now living in Dresden, and Margriet Bos, a Catholic Worker from Amsterdam, go on trial Dec. 7, 2020 in Cochem, charged with trespass and damage to the base’s fence. The trials will draw wide attention because a Dutch national television crew is reporting.

Pilots wave from a Tornado fighter jet.

Over a dozen resisters including DuVall are appealing their lower court convictions, and hope to win a judicial order condemning Germany’s “sharing” of US nuclear weapons—a policy that many contend violates binding international treaty law.

Nukewatch staffer and Quarterly editor John LaForge, who was similarly charged last year for actions in 2018 and 2019, is scheduled for trial February 1 in Cochem.

Just before trial, Margriet said in part, “Along with North American peace activists Susan Crane, Ralph Hutchison and Andrew Lanier, I entered the nuclear military base in Büchel to hinder and frustrate the machine of death and destruction that’s preparing a third world war with thermonuclear bombs. We cut the fence and walked towards the runway to prevent the Tornados from flying. Tornado jet fighters practice every weekday and expel 12,000 kilos of Co2 every hour they fly, the same amount as driving a diesel car nonstop for 62.5 days.”

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, US Bombs Out of Germany

January 2, 2021 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Growing Criticism of Unlawful Rad Waste Storage Plans

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2020-2021
By Christine Manwiller

Proposals targeting Texas and New Mexico for above-ground centralization of the nation’s high-level radioactive waste (dubbed Consolidated Interim Storage) under review by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), face broad opposition. In 2017, Holtec International and partners proposed what they call a “temporary” dump in New Mexico for the waste reactor fuel. The companies claims that storage of this waste will only last 40 years, but the fine print allows for 80 years of “renewals.” In 2018, Interim Storage Partners, Inc., and Waste Control Specialists (WCS) requested that the NRC “resume evaluation” of a separate proposal to store up to 40,000 tonnes of the waste, along with other radioactive waste referred to as “low-level,” in Andrews County, West Texas.

Beyond Nuclear, in Takoma Park, Maryland, notes that both the WCS and Holtec plans are proceeding unlawfully. Under the federal Nuclear Waste Policy Act (as amended), the federal government may not take title to high-level radioactive waste from commercial nuclear reactors until a permanent geologic dumpsite is operating. Under this law, the federal government cannot authorize funds for the transportation or “interim” storage of the waste, as Holtec and WCS propose, because there is no operating federal abandonment site. A license cannot be lawfully issued to WCS or Holtec until either a permanent site is operating, or the NWPA statute is again amended. Beyond Nuclear’s lawsuit in the case is on appeal.

Broad public resistance to the dumps was joined by Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott who wrote November 3 to the NRC outlining the plan’s negative consequences: the risks of allowing volatile waste to sit on the surface in casks; the danger of the waste being close to the “largest producing oilfield in the world”: the potential for the site to attract terrorist acts; and the likelihood of the waste remaining in Texas for much longer than the proposed limit.

Risky transport of such dangerous waste is also under attack, and 19 resolutions have been adopted by communities across Texas and New Mexico, several of which are municipal resolutions banning the transportation. —Carlsbad Current-Argus, Nov. 10; Office of Governor of Texas letter, Nov. 3, 2020

 

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

January 2, 2021 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Legal Fight Against Nuclear Navy Risktaking

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2020-2021
By Christine Manwiller

A lawsuit against the nuclear navy in Washington State’s Puget Sound began June 19, 2012, over the safety and environmental impact of a second Explosives Handling Wharf in Hood Canal, home of Bangor Trident submarine base. The $715 million wharf, 15 miles west of Seattle, is for loading and off-loading heavy nuclear-armed missiles. The Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action and Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility brought suit against the navy’s plan for failure to consider the risks of accidental explosions at the new wharf, in violation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

Can you spot the two submarines in the photo, each two football fields long? The combined total of 48 missiles on them hold rocket fuel with explosive force equal to 7.4 million pounds of TNT—their 240 nuclear warheads (5 on each missile) equal 114 million tons of TNT.

Navy officials did not even “comply with the navy’s own explosives-siting regulations,” Ground Zero reports, and the military’s Explosives Safety Board flat out denied permission to build the second wharf “in part, because the navy would not study the risk of a chain reaction explosion while loading two subs,” KOMO-TV news reported. “If both full subs explode [48 missiles in all], the equivalent power is 7.44 million pounds of TNT,” the ABC News affiliate said.

Glen Milner with Ground Zero told KOMO-TV, “They’ve doubled the amount of explosives. And they’ve doubled the number of times that missiles are being handled.” The lawsuit warns of the risk of one exploding missile igniting 47 others. According to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 85% of the weight of each missile is the highly explosive rocket fuel.

The lawsuit faced significant setbacks in 2012 when certain navy records were sealed after the navy claimed publication would place national security at risk. The records were sealed by the court and a gag order regarding their contents was imposed on the plaintiffs just a few days before a scheduled hearing where they were to be used as the basis of the peace group’s arguments.

In 2014, the NEPA lawsuit was dismissed by US District Court Judge Ronald Leighton, and the plaintiffs appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. While the Ninth Circuit shockingly ruled against the NEPA failure to assess risk claims, it struck down the gag order and the sealing of documents. Judge Leighton released the records and lifted the gag this past August 20. Another judge later ordered the navy to pay the two peace groups’ legal fees incurred to obtain the records and fight the gag order.

—Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action, Oct. 29, 2020; KOMO-TV News, Seattle, Oct. 28, 2013

 

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

January 2, 2021 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Treaty Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons Becomes Law

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2020-2021

WHAT YOU CAN DO on January 22, 2021 to Celebrate the Entry Into Force of the TREATY on the PROHIBITION of NUCLEAR WEAPONS

A letter from from the Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance, Nukewatch, The Nuclear Resister, and the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability:

Dear nuclear abolitionists,

Now that nuclear weapons are outlawed, it’s time to take action!

On January 22, 2021, people around the world will celebrate the day that the United Nations Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons enters into force, a day the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) describes so eloquently as “the beginning of the end of nuclear weapons.”

Please join us—the Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance, Nukewatch, the Nuclear Resister and the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability—to help maximize the global impact of this historic event with a wide variety of public actions across the US on January 22 and beyond. (See list in progress online at ICANw.org/events)

We envision organized, nationwide public actions that spotlight the treaty ban as a victory for humanity on this historic day, with coordinated publicity and documentation of these events. Places to act (including some where action planning is already underway) include: nuclear weapons facilities, military bases, federal buildings, congressional offices, churches, public squares, overpasses, financial institutions, corporate facilities, and academic institutions that are participating in nuclear weapons activities. See the materials produced by PAX/The Netherlands and ICAN available at ICANw.org.

We hope to develop an enduring collaboration with organizations who recognize that the treaty is an opportunity to renew the disarmament effort in the US.

Please join us!

If you have any questions or want more information contact: nuclearbantreatyEiF@gmx.com

Yes, celebrate—and organize. Any celebration should include an action item that raises the profile of the treaty ban in the United States. The first goal is to make people aware of the treaty. Goal 2 is to make sure they know that it is entering into force. And Goal 3 is to begin to use public awareness to pressure the government to recognize, sign, ratify and comply with the treaty ban. If that sounds like a lot it is, and it will take time. And it will never happen if we don’t make it happen.

What follows are several options that you can mix and match with your own ideas. Some can be done all by yourself, others work better with small groups —with pandemic precautions please.

And please, report back! This is crucial—even if your action seems like a simple one. We gain strength from working together and knowing that people all over are taking action. And your effort, large or small, is amplified when it is shared. We hope to build a database of actions and to demonstrate widespread support for the treaty across the country. You can post your actions on Facebook at the Nuclear Ban Treaty EIF group. We will publicize other sites as they become available.

  1. Everyone can learn about the treaty, and you don’t have to wait until January 22. A quick google search will turn up resources, some as brief as 90 seconds. Others are deep-dive webinars. There is a Fact Sheet with basic information here: https://orepa.org/nuclear-ban-treaty-entry-into-force-resources/.
  2. Hang or hold a banner in a public space. Activists will be hanging banners at nuclear weapons sites and nuclear military bases across the country. We have a template that you can use to have a banner made (around $50 if you go on-line) that you can hang or hold at any federal building, your local post office, federal courthouse, or representative’s office. You download the template here: https://orepa.org/nuclear-ban-treaty-entry-into-force-resources/

2b. Is a banner too much? Here is a template for a poster size version of the treaty that you can      hold or deliver or post in the place of your choice.

  1. Focus on the $$$. Our friends in Europe have been successful in pushing investment funds and corporations to divest from companies or investment funds that profit from nuclear weapons production—and the treaty gives us even more leverage. You can find a list of the companies and banks that invest in nuclear weapons at Don’t Bank on the Bomb. You can hold a poster outside the local Bank of America or Wells Fargo branch office. If your credit card is issued by a nuke-bank, you can change cards or write to the issuer and ask them to get out of the illegal nuclear weapons business. See: https://www.dontbankonthebomb.com/
  1. There is a list of US universities and colleges that are directly involved in supporting nuclear weapons production. Some of them even operate nuclear weapons sites! If your school is not on the list, you could find out where their endowment funds are invested—chances are there is a link to a nuclear weapons corporation or fund. See Schools of Mass Destruction at: https://universities.icanw.org/
  1. Write your representatives in the House and Senate. Tell them you expect their name to be on the first bill introduced in the new Congress that addresses the treaty ban. Tell them you’ll be watching.
  2. Write a letter to the editor. This is an important way to broaden your reach throughout the public arena. Mention your congressional representatives by name so their staff will clip the letter and show it to their boss.
  3. Share the news! If you use Instagram or Facebook or if you tweet, you can share ICAN’s pages and other news about the Entry Into Force.
  4. Donate! Please write a check or give on-line. There are dozens of groups around the country that are dedicating themselves to long-haul work to make the promise of the treaty a reality at home and around the world. They rely on donations and public support to keep going. Even a small contribution counts.
  5. Commit for the long haul. Find the group nearest and dearest to your heart and join so you can stay involved, track the progress of the treaty, and learn about more things you can do to help make it a reality. Get on their mailing list, either on-line or on paper.
  6. Ask your local place of worship to ring its bell for peace on January 22 or place a notice in the bulletin.
  7. Ask your local government to join the ICAN Cities appeal—present a copy of the treaty and ask for a resolution calling on the United States to join.
  8. Deliver copies of the treaty in person or send via mail (link to printable format) to congressional representatives and other public officials, and business, financial and educational institutions with ties to nuclear weapons activities, with a warning of their unlawful complicity.
  9. Watch for more ideas: Please post your plans on the Nuclear Ban Treaty EIF Facebook group, and look at what others are planning to do.

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

January 2, 2021 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

US Minuteman III ICBM Test Made in Response to 50th Ratification of Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty 

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2020-2021

The US air force “Global Strike Command” launched a dummy Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile from Vandenberg air force Base in California early on October 29, just five days after the 50th ratification of the treaty ban was delivered. It was the third air force ICBM test since August. The Pentagon says its missile tests are planned months in advance, but the decision to not cancel October’s needless demonstration was charged with contempt for civil society. Rick Wayman, CEO of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, in Santa Barbara, said October 28, “In addition to undermining the treaty through threatening letters, the US government demonstrated its active defiance of the treaty’s provisions by testing a nuclear-capable missile.” Wayman’s mention of “threatening letters” was reference to letters sent from the White House urging treaty ban signers to withdraw their ratifications. “While most of the world’s countries are evolving to a view that nuclear weapons are unacceptable under all circumstances, the United States is testing a nuclear missile built to fight the Cold War, one which is designed to cause the indiscriminate slaughter of hundreds of thousands of people,” he said.

—JL

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • …
  • 223
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch