Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Great Lakes Citizens Succeed in Halting Radioactive Shipments

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

In a show of authentic precautionary ethics — and in response to broad-based public opposition — Canadian authorities on July 26 canceled plans to transport 16 over-sized, radioactively contaminated steam generators from aging reactors, each weighing 100 tons, through the Great Lakes. Operators of the giant Bruce Power reactor complex in Owen Sound, Ontario, intended to ship the decommissioned nuclear power scrap through the Great Lakes, the St. Lawrence Seaway and across the Atlantic to the Studsvik facility in Sweden for “recycling.” 

Gordon Edwards, a co-founder of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility (CCNR), said in a July 27 post, “Concerted efforts by an unusually diverse and powerful movement of ordinary citizens led to an unequivocal victory….” 

“This outcome is entirely due to public opposition, since Bruce Power had received all the necessary authorizations — including a Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission license — to proceed with the shipments,” Edwards said. 

Mike Bradley, Mayor of Sarnia, Ontario on the southernmost tip of Lake Huron, also claimed victory. “It’s a real testament to citizen power.… We’re fighting a very large and powerful organization,” he said to the Sarnia Observer. The paper reported that the mayor “has been a vocal critic of the move, along with a growing list of Ontario mayors, coalition groups, environmental activists and US Senators.” 

Extensive delays of the proposed shipments were caused by public criticism of the threats such unprecedented transports posed for potentially disastrous fresh water radiation accidents. Critics called the long-distance transport proposal “reckless endangerment” and dubbed it the “Edmund Fitzgerald Plan.” 

A coalition of hundreds of community and environmental groups, led by indigenous First Nations, the CCNR, the Canadian Environmental Law Association, the Great Lakes Cities Initiative, and the Sierra Club of Canada — and 300 municipalities which passed resolutions opposing the shipments — had challenged the plan for two years. Ontario Regional First Nation Chief Angus Toulouse said in a news release then, “The Union of Ontario Indians and the Mohawk communities of Kahnawake, Akwesasne and Tyendinaga are at the forefront of opposing the shipment and the Chiefs of Ontario will support them.” 

Bruce Power is the largest single nuclear reactor operation in the Western Hemisphere, with eight reactors on the eastern shore of Lake Huron. Bruce Power authorities had earlier said that they would eventually decommission 64 of the steam generators. Its plan was to set a precedent by moving the school-bus-sized behemoths by rail to Owen Sound (on the Georgian Bay of Lake Huron), then transfer the giant devices to ships for the water-borne journey through Lake Huron, Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and out the Seaway — passing through the major cities of Montreal and Quebec City on the way to the Gulf of St. Lawrence and around New Brunswick and Nova Scotia to the Atlantic. 

Edwards noted that, “The idea of shipping 1,600 tons of radioactive waste through the Great Lakes and along the St. Lawrence River was the main rallying point for most people. But the idea of blending [industrial] nuclear waste materials into scrap metal for general commercial use, without even any labeling to indicate that the “recycled” metal contains [radioactive] waste, was another powerful motivator driving many to oppose the Bruce Power plan.” 

For its part, Bruce Power holds out some hope of another try. James Scongack, Bruce Power’s Vice President of corporate affairs, told the Sarnia paper, “We’ve indicated that if we ever decide that shipping steam generators is an initiative that we want on a certain timetable that we would reapply through the licensing process to do that.” In January 2011, spokesman John Peevers said, “We remain convinced and believe that this is the right thing to do and recycling these steam generators is going to reduce our environmental footprint.” 

Some 40 million people living along the lower Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence Seaway watershed, including 106 First Nation communities, depend on its fresh water for drinking and municipal services. The Great Lakes hold about 20 percent of the world’s freshwater. — JL

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Red Cliff’s Lake Superior  Barrel Project to Ship Explosives to Incinerator

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

RED CLIFF, Wisconsin — Melanee Montano, Environmental Director at the Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, reports that the Band’s Lake Superior Barrel Project intends to retrieve “overpack” barrels from Lake Superior beginning September 9, weather permitting. 

The Band’s nine-year-long investigation of the dumping, between 1957 an 1962, of nearly 1,500 barrels of Honeywell, Inc.’s toxic military waste into the lake succeeded in recovering 25 barrels last summer. Twenty-two of the drums held explosive parts of what the Band said were cluster bombs (previous documentation of the contents reported they contained grenade parts). However, because the recovery project had not secured permits required to transport explosives, the band’s contractors onboard the research vessel Blue Heron placed the 15,000 explosive parts in 85-gallon “overpack drums” and put them back into the lake in about 200 feet of water. 

Montano told Nukewatch August 30 that once the overpacks are recovered they will be transported under US Coast Guard authority to Cheboygan, Michigan where the cluster bomb parts are to be incinerated. — JL

Filed Under: Environment, Lake Superior Barrels, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Swiss Reactor Contaminates Lake 

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

Even renowned Swiss engineering can’t prevent radiation releases from nuclear reactors, it appears. The Muehleberg reactor near Bern has contaminated Lake Biel, which is used for drinking water, in the northeast town of Biel. Cesium-137 has settled into the 9-mile long lake after traveling down the Aare River from the reactor 12 miles upstream. University of Geneva geologists discovered the contamination while conducting research. Authorities say cesium contaminated the river during two incidents in 1998 and 1999. However, according to press reports, the reactor routinely releases contaminated water to the River Aare. The 1986 Chernobyl disaster has also been blamed for cesium-137 deposits in lakes throughout the country. Numerous communities exist along the Aare as it flows into the southern end of Lake Biel. The Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate reports that the Muehleberg reactor operates with fissures in the core cover. Following the German example, the Swiss government has vowed to permanently shut down all five Swiss reactors by 2034. 

— The Local, July 16; PressTV & Pan European Networks, July 15; Agence France Presse, July 14; Reuters, Mar. 28, 2013

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Palisades Leaks Endanger Lake Michigan 

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

How many leaks does it take before a sieve of a reactor is forced to shut down in the interest of public health, safety and the environment? Palisades, built in 1971 on the shore of Lake Michigan near South Haven, has become a fountain of radioactive pollution. The system’s Safety Injection Refueling Water Tank (SIRWT), containing 300,000 gallons of radioactively contaminated water, sprang leaks in June, August and September last year and then sprang more leaks in 2013. Some of the water has seeped into the reactor’s control room from the ceiling and onto a control panel. When the tank lost 90 gallons of water per day — up from 38 — Entergy, the owner, finally did something about it. Some welding repairs stopped the leak for a while. 

The reactor was shut down for five weeks beginning May 5, 2013 due to another leak from a 1/8 inch crack in a nozzle in the floor of the SIRWT which was previously repaired and welded. What started as a 1-gallon-per-hour leak of radioactive water entering Lake Michigan increased to a single 82-gallon spill to the lake, according to the Huffington Post. Yet another leak occurred during repair work and for a second time some of it “poured” into the control room through the ceiling. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) said Entergy needed to repair its ceiling after the second dousing. The level of radioactivity released to Lake Michigan is unknown. The bottom of the 300,000 gallon tank was replaced after leaks exceeded the 38-gallons-per-day. 

The NRC said about the 82-gallon spill to Lake Michigan that it amounted to only “1/50,000th of permissible levels.” Evidently, a leak 50,000 times bigger — that is, 82 gallons times 50,000 — or 4,105,000 gallons of radioactive water, would be permissible under NRC rules 

Palisades has been shut down nine times since 2011. 

The repairs that followed the May leak uncovered construction flaws dating from the 1960s. The NRC is investigating why a bed of sand and grout rings had not been used under the SIRW tank. The sand acts as a cushion and the grout rings as support, and their absence is the reason for the tank’s failure. Inspections by the NRC have increased but so have the leaks. In spite of its faulty operations and frequent shutdowns, Entergy just keeps rebooting the 42-year-old reactor. 

— Huffington Post, May 6; Fred Upton Press Release, May 7; Grist, Aug. 6; Kalamazoo Gazette, July 17; Herald-Palladium, July 19, 2013; Michigan Public Radio, July 15, 2013 & July 12, 2012; South Bend Tribune, June 13, 2012 — BLU, and Kevin Kamps of Beyond Nuclear contributed reporting.

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Mexico’s Fraud and its Cracked & Leaking Laguna Verde 

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

Mexico’s two Laguna Verde (LV) reactors, on the Gulf of Mexico 40 miles north of Veracruz, operate behind a shield of fraud, bid-rigging and government secrecy, according to a May article by Talli Nauman in Counterpunch. They are owned and operated by Comisión Federal de Electricidad, the national electric company owned by the Mexican government. 

The World Association of Nuclear Operators has documented inadequate personnel training, poor management and the use of obsolete equipment, and whistleblowers have reported widespread corrosion of giant condensers and pipes in the cooling system. Professor Bernardo Salas Mar, a well-known mathematician and physicist who previously worked at LV, was fired after having revealed environmental cesium and cobalt contamination — and other problems. 

Rafael F. de la Garza was a manager at LV and responsible for vetting the company’s bidding on a reactor “upgrade” project, which was designed to increase the reactors’ generating capacity by 20%, from 1,365 megawatts to 1,638 mW. De la Garza hired the French company Alstom Mexico and Iberdrola Ingenería, a Spanish company that employed his son as Director. Iberdrola got the job in spite of the fact it had no expertise in reactor operations. The upgrade lasted five years and cost over $600 million. 

Professor Salas Mar alleges that Iberdrola and Alstom bilked Mexicans out of the half billion and had charged that the contractors were incapable of satisfactorily carrying out the work. Current employees have also complained about the upgrade project and, in a letter sent to the presidential administration, called it “unreliable, risky and overpriced.” 

Iberdrola announced completion of the upgrade on February 21, 2013, but it has been a complete bust. Not only has reactor output failed to increase, but the National Commission for Nuclear Safety and Safeguards refused to grant an upgrade license. The information came to light as a result of Salas Mar’s persistent Federal Information Access Institute requests. 

The World Information Service on Energy in Amsterdam reports that 50 miles of coastline along the Gulf of Mexico is contaminated with effluent from the two General Electric Mark II reactors. (Three reactors that caused explosions and suffered meltdowns at Fukushima, Japan are identical models.) Releases to the sea of cobalt, strontium and other isotopes have been detected in marine life. Locals have of course been urging the government to shut down the reactors. 

Investigative journalist Alex Backman reports that the Federal Commission of Electricity has suggested that a hydrogen leak last fall could have caused an uncontrolled fire. A shutdown that occurred in January 2013 may have been caused by fractures in cooling water pumps, although government confirmation has not been forthcoming. The leaks, shutdowns, and the lack of quality control and accountability has led to a civil law suit demanding that utility customers be exempt from LV’s electric bills. Up until 2010, Mexico planned to build ten new reactors, but those plans have been scrapped. 

— Counterpunch & Journal Presence, May 18; MS Noticias, Alcalorpolitico.com & Informants in Red, Apr. 29; World Nuclear News, Feb. 21, 2013; Plumas Libres, Oct. 24, 2012; Bloomberg, Nov. 3; Inter Press Service, Mar. 30, 2011; WISENews Comminique, Feb. 12, 1993 — BLU

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch