Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

November 5, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Environmental Review Begins for Massive Project to Produce New Nuclear Weapon Cores

By John Burroughs

In 2021, this billboard was installed on Interstate 25, facing traffic traveling toward Albuquerque, New Mexico, and seen by 451,000 drivers per month. What do nuclear weapons cores or “pits” cost these days? At least $50 million each. Photo: Los Alamos Study Group, lasg.org

The United States is planning to establish an infrastructure capable of producing at least 80 plutonium pits for the W87-1 nuclear warhead per year. The project is well described and criticized in a comprehensive report released in May by the Union of Concerned Scientists. In the current approach, facilities would be located at Los Alamos National Laboratory, in New Mexico, and the Savannah River Site, in South Carolina. In a settlement of a lawsuit brought by activist groups, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) agreed to conduct programmatic environmental review of this major project. This summer the NNSA accepted public comments on the scope of the review.

Many Non-Governmental Organizations submitted comments, including the groups that brought the lawsuit resulting in the review: Savannah River Site Watch of Columbia, South Carolina; Nuclear Watch New Mexico of Santa Fe, New Mexico; Tri-Valley Communities Against a Radioactive Environment, based in Livermore, Calif.; and the Gullah/Geechee Sea Island Coalition of coastal Georgia. Other submissions included one from Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy and Western States Legal Foundation. Their comment focused on the nuclear disarmament obligation under Article VI of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and argued that the NNSA must consider a true no-action alternative of no pit production.

According to the comment: “If the United States and other nuclear-armed states, in particular China and Russia, in accordance with Article VI, take a negotiated path to the global elimination of nuclear weapons in the foreseeable future, there will be no need, perceived or real, for plutonium pit production. While the current international landscape is not conducive to that enterprise, it should not be assumed that pit production will take place over the next several decades. The negotiation of the abolition of nuclear arms is a legal obligation of extraordinary practical and moral importance. The PEIS [Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement] should not assume non-compliance with the obligation.”

The comment also observed: “Additionally, a sometimes-overlooked element of Article VI is cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date. Production of pits for new-design warheads on a new delivery system, the Sentinel ICBM, and on submarine-based ballistic missiles, has aspects of nuclear arms racing, both in reality and, importantly, as it is perceived by rival nuclear-armed states. If the W87-1 serves to enable the placement of multiple warheads [on] the Sentinel ICBM, it would contribute to quantitative arms racing; it also would be destabilizing. Moreover, according to the Department of Defense, the Sentinel ICBM will have enhanced capabilities and thus its development and deployment amounts to qualitative arms racing. It also appears that the W93 warhead for submarine-based missiles will add some military capability….”

It concluded: “The PEIS should not rule out the possibility that nuclear arms racing will cease and nuclear disarmament will be implemented in accordance with Nonproliferation Treaty Article VI….”

⸺ John Burroughs is the Senior Analyst of the Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy, and Board Member, Western States Legal Foundation. This article appeared in “Currents,” the newsletter of Abolishing Nuclear Weapons for Peace and Justice.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, Uncategorized, War

November 5, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Community Halts Denver Airport’s Small Modular Reactor Proposal in 48 hours

The mayor and airport chief of Denver, Colorado, chose the 80th anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombing of Hiroshima to host a news conference proposing to spend $1.5 million on a small modular nuclear reactor (SMR) at the Denver International Airport.

Plans were then paused amid the uproar from local city council members, area residents, reporters, and environmental advocates. The community was not consulted before the decision to launch the feasibility study. Constituents questioned the huge expenditure on a technology that: is not commercially operating anywhere; has a track record of enormous cost overruns; has no assessment of the draw on local water or other resources; and is guaranteed to generate radioactive waste that must be stored on site for eons with no long-term solution.

The nearby Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge and Superfund site represents one toxic legacy already carried by this community.

Local officials and the airport CEO expressed hopes an SMR would move tech giants to build data centers near the airport and create a “Silicon Valley of nuclear technology,” an goal that is blind to the environmental threats to local community.

⸺ The Colorado Sun online, Aug. 20; Denverite online, Aug. 11, 2025

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Uncategorized

November 5, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Summer Heatwaves Force French and Swiss Nuclear Reactors to Shut Down ⸺ Again

Summer river water temperatures in France and Switzerland were nearing or exceeding 80 degrees Fahrenheit. Between the high heat and a marine jellyfish bloom, at least seven reactors were shut down and several others had to reduce output. Most nuclear reactors pump cooling water from nearby rivers or the sea, returning heated water to the environment. This can harm biodiversity as the hotter water has less oxygen, can be subject to algal blooms, and can cause large kills of fish and other organisms.

Extreme temperatures caused by global warming can mean that reactors are sometimes unable to be cooled as the water bodies become too hot, or that reactors must shut down in order to prevent raising the water temperature to unsafe levels.

Both France and Switzerland have safeguards intended to curtail reactor operations when river temperatures reach a certain level. However, during a major 2022 heatwave, both countries allowed reactors to continue operating with water hotter than the allowed maximum, in order to avoid electricity shortages.

Simultaneously, numerous swarms of jellyfish, expanding due to warmer waters, clogged water intake systems and caused four reactors in France to shut down in August.

Reactors have been forced to reduce output or shut down on several occasions in recent years. Switzerland, which produces about one third of its energy from four nuclear reactors, plans to phase them out by 2033. France’s 56 reactors account for about 65% of the country’s electricity.

A 2024 report by the Cour des Comptes, a French administrative court tasked with auditing government spending, projected the “country may see the amount of electricity lost because of climate-related shutdowns triple or quadruple by 2050.”
⸺ Euronews.com, July 2, 2025; New York Times July 3, 2025

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Uncategorized

November 5, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Shrimp Sold at Walmart, Kroger and Elsewhere Across 29 States Recalled over Radioactive Contamination

Source of carcinogenic, reactor-borne cesium-137 under investigation

By John LaForge

In a story unprecedented in Nukewatch Quarterly memory, multiple cargo containers carrying shrimp from Indonesia to U.S. grocers were found contaminated with dangerously radioactive
cesium-137 (Cs-137)

None of the dozens of reports reviewed by Nukewatch explained how the cancer-causing isotope Cs-137⸺ a human-made radionuclide only produced inside nuclear reactors ⸺ spread to multiple cargo containers.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) alerted the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) August 19 about the contamination of the containers and shrimp products processed in Indonesia. The tainted containers and shrimp were found at the U.S. ports of Los Angeles, Houston, Miami, and Savannah (Georgia), and delivered to Walmart and Kroger stores.

The cesium scare has expanded broadly. The FDA’s August 19 Import Alert and recall recommendation focused on frozen raw shrimp, but the FDA later added cocktail shrimp and cooked medium peeled tail-off shrimp to its list of at-risk products. Initially applied to 13 states, the FDA later expanded its recall recommendation to 29 states.

Cartoon by Nukewatch’s Bonnie Urfer

Radioactively Contaminated Shrimp

The Wall St. Journal reported August 29 that the recall included 26,460 packages of Great Value cocktail shrimp sold at Walmart stores between July 28 and August 16, and 18,000 bags of Kroger’s Mercado frozen cooked shrimp.

California-based Southwind Foods recalled frozen shrimp bagged and sold under the brands Sand Bar, Arctic Shores, Best Yet, Great American Seafood Imports, and First Street, or Walmart’s Great Value brand.

Tens of thousands of packages of imported shrimp sold at Mariano’s were also recalled. Other affected stores include AquaStar, Baker’s, Gerbes, Jay C, Metro Market, Pay Less Supermarkets, Pick ‘n Save and Beaver Street Fisheries, according to the FDA, which told consumers to dispose of shrimp purchased at specific times in July and August. “If you have recently purchased raw frozen shrimp from Walmart that matches this description, throw it away,” the FDA said in a statement. The FDA did not recommend any special disposal system for radioactively contaminated material.

The FDA notification said, “All containers and product testing positive or alerting for Cs-137 have been denied entry into the country.” Neither the FDA nor the CBP have reported how many containers were found to be contaminated.

All the recalled shrimp came from Indonesia’s giant seafood processor PT Bahari Makmur Sejati, doing business as BMS Foods. The FDA has now targeted the firm with a new “import alert” to stop all its products from coming into the U.S.

The potentially hot shrimp was available from July 17 to August 8, 2025, at dozens of stores in Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.

Is the cesium permitted in U.S. food safe?

The legally permitted level of Cs-137 contamination in U.S. food is 1,200 Becquerels per-kilogram (Bq/kg) ⸺ even for children. Japan’s permitted level for children is 50 Bq/kg, and 100 Bq/kg for adults. A Becquerel is a standard measure of radioactive decay.

In the United States, the same level of cesium contamination in food is allowed for women, girls, and infants, in spite of the well-established fact that they are far more vulnerable to radiation harm than men and boys.

Radiation and health expert Cindy Folkers of Beyond Nuclear in Tacoma Park, Maryland, reported in 2013 that, “As cesium passes out of your body, its radioactivity starts to damage your kidneys and your bladder, which in turn damages your body’s ability to rid itself of the cesium.” Folkers also noted that Cs-137 and Cs-134 do not occur in nature but are only created in nuclear reactors operated by the military, by industry, and by university researchers.

The FDA’s Import Alert warned about the Cs-137:

[R]adionuclides such as Cs-137, a radioisotope of cesium, can be present in many places around the world as a result of contamination produced high in the atmosphere during nuclear testing. Cs-137 is created via nuclear reactions, such as occurring in nuclear power plants and is also commonly used in medical and other industrial applications. Elevated amounts of Cs-137 can be present at locations where contamination settled from accidents such as Chernobyl in 1986 and Fukushima in 2011.

The Import Alert also described the health risks created by exposure to low doses of Cs-137:

Cs-137 emits beta particles and gamma radiation that are associated with adverse health effects. Potential for health concerns following Cs-137 exposure depends on the dose and the duration of exposure. High doses lead to acute radiation syndrome. However, exposure to low doses spread out over a period of time may not cause immediate apparent adverse effects but may still be harmful. The primary health effect of concern following longer term, repeated low dose exposure (e.g., through consumption of contaminated food or water over time) is cancer, resulting from damage to DNA within living cells of the body.

Where’d the cesium-137 come from?

Beyond Nuclear.org reported that the FDA is still investigating, “but contamination could be from nuclear industries in China, releases from the ruined Fukushima reactors, or somewhere else.”

Dr. Gordon Edwards, President of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility (CCNR), wrote September 10, 2025, “It is possible that the cesium-137 contamination came from a “food irradiation” plant, as the two radioactive substances most used in “irradiation” facilities are cobalt-60 and cesium-137.

Both cobalt-60 and cesium-137 are powerful gamma radiation emitters and are used to sterilize medical equipment, and to sterilize certain food items in “food irradiation” facilities. These plants use “very large quantities of cobalt-60 or cesium-137. Shrimp is one such food item,” Edwards wrote. For background on food irradiation see the CCNR website at https://ccnr.org/food_ccnr.html as well as https://ccnr.org/food_irradiation.html.

Kimberly Robertson, Program Director for the Fukushima Fallout Awareness Network, wrote August 26: “UK-based marine biologist Tim Deere-Jones stated, ‘Given the very low reported levels of Cs-137 in Indonesian marine environments, there is a strong possibility that the food fed to the [fish farmed] shrimp is the source of elevated cesium-137…. I consider it likely that such material, often harvested by ‘pirate fishers,’ could be contaminated with Fukushima-derived Cs-137, at endemically high levels in some Pacific Sea areas. It is strongly advised that the source/origin of the foodstuffs fed to the shrimps is investigated with the utmost rigor.’”

It is also possible that the contaminated shipping containers could have come into close contact with radioactive waste being shipped in the other containers on the same ship. It’s also possible, although highly unlikely and extremely scandalous, that the same containers used to ship the shrimp had earlier been used to transport radioactive waste.

Kimberly Robertson concluded her post urging: “Regardless of the exact source of the radioactive
contamination, [R.F.] Kennedy, as Secretary of the Dept. of Health and Human Services, must direct the FDA to lower the current allowable levels of cancer-causing Cs-137 in food. The shrimp radiation levels were detected at 68 Bq/kg, which would not have been allowed in Japan [due to its] 50 Bq/kg level for kids. U.S. kids, however, are allowed 1,200 Bq/kg, the same as adults. That must change.”

Sign and share the sign-on letter widely at https://nislappdc.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/FFAN-letter-to-HHS.pdf, and call the FDA at 1-888-SAFEFOOD to voice your concerns.

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Uncategorized

July 14, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Uranium Mining, Milling, and Ablation, Oh My!

By Leona Morgan

In November 2023, from the other side of the planet, then President Biden announced that the United States would commit to tripling nuclear power by 2050, claiming it’s a solution to climate change, thereby igniting a new wave of uranium interests and continued resource colonialism worldwide. Since then, more than 30 countries have followed suit, prompting a new uranium boom, or more likely a new uranium bubble.

Uranium is a necessary component for both nuclear energy and weapons. From cradle to grave, fossil fuels are used for production and transport of nuclear materials. Because the carbon output of front-end and back-end processes are not counted in the carbon footprint of nuclear development, states have been passing new laws proclaiming that nuclear is a “carbon-free” or “clean energy” resource ⸺ fueling this nuclear propaganda fire.

Trump has issued several executive orders pushing for bad energy projects including more nuclear, as well as shrinking National Monuments and fast-tracking mines. This puts all communities near uranium deposits and abandoned uranium mines (AUMs) at risk of new and continued radioactive contamination and exposures.

New uranium mining started in the Southwest in late 2023, with uranium ore stockpiling near the Grand Canyon, beginning in January 2024, at Energy Fuels’ Pinyon Plain uranium mine. Uranium transport between the Grand Canyon and the Four Corners areas, from the mine to the mill, started in July 2024 and was temporarily paused for six months.

“Haul No!” is a Diné-led campaign focused on stopping transport of uranium through Diné traditional homelands. Due to impacts still endured by Diné residents from the Manhattan Project, the Navajo Nation has a law prohibiting new uranium mining on the reservation. The Navajo Nation also had a law prohibiting uranium transport, which was recently amended from banning transport to regulating transport.

Haul No! used community organizing and social media to boost awareness and inspire resistance to new mining and transport. The campaign was successful in getting the Navajo Nation government involved, which garnered support from Governor Hobbs of Arizona to pause the transport. Unexpectedly, the Navajo Nation ended up going into business with Energy Fuels, allowing transport from both the Pinyon Plain mine and another proposed uranium mine in New Mexico. The Roca Honda mine is at the base of sacred Tsoodził, also known as Mt. Taylor. Under the guise of “cleanup,” the tribe is also allowing additional transport from AUMs to Energy Fuel’s White Mesa Mill in southeast Utah, exacerbating impacts to the Ute Mountain Ute nation.

The Navajo Nation has at least 523 AUMs and several uranium mills scattered throughout and around Diné Bikeyah (traditional homelands), none of which are properly cleaned up, creating health risks for local communities. In a misguided attempt to remediate these AUMs, the Navajo Nation is looking to Disa Technologies, a company proposing “ablation,” which uses water to separate more radioactive wastes [using high-pressure water to separate usable uranium from mine waste] for removal to White Mesa Mill, leaving other non-profitable contamination on Navajo. However, ablation, as a means of uranium production, violates Navajo Nation law. In addition to AUMs, four former uranium mills located on Navajo are ongoing sources of surface and groundwater contamination, also not adequately addressed by the federal government.

Like the proposed copper mine threatening sacred Apache Oakflat in Arizona, hard rock mines established under the 1872 mining law exist by design to steal Indigenous homelands. With this old law and new push for domestic energy independence, Indigenous nations are working around the clock to protect their communities and sacred places from various extractive industry and energy projects: from lithium, hydrogen and rare earth elements production to pumped storage hydropower, renewed coal mining and beyond.

Uranium mining is just one part of a larger fight against resource exploitation, racism, genocide, capitalism, imperialism, and greenwashing, all under the umbrella of nuclear colonialism.

This year, several new mining and milling proposals are on the table in the Intermountain West region, using both conventional and in situ leach methods. The Velvet-Wood uranium and vanadium mine in Utah was green lit by the Trump administration in only fourteen days! With the price of uranium exceeding $100/pound (USD) last year, and the onslaught of Trump’s push for critical minerals and national security, this uranium bubble has just begun. In order to fight nuclear colonialism, the front-end of both nuclear energy and weapons needs to be stopped.

— Leona Morgan (she/her), co-founder of Haul No!, is a Diné activist and community organizer fighting nuclear colonialism, based in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 15
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch