Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

May 4, 2015 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Cree Youth Walk Over 500 Miles to  Stand Against Uranium Extraction

Nukewatch Quarterly Spring 2015

A group of about 20 young people from the Cree Nation walked almost 530 miles over three weeks this winter to deliver a message to Montreal’s environmental protection agency: “We stand against uranium mining.” The young people endured frigid conditions and covered about the distance of a marathon each day on their journey. The Stand Against Uranium Walk started in the community of Mistissini in northern Quebec on November 24 and culminated with the group’s participation in a public hearing on uranium mining in Montreal, December 15.

Youth leaders expressed their concerns about uranium mining to government officials in Quebec. Photo by Julia Page, CBC News

The group opposes a plan by the firm Strateco Resources that has been exploring uranium extraction in the Mistissini area since 2006. The company claims it has invested $120 million in its Mistissini uranium project over the last 10 years. In 2013, the Quebec government issued a moratorium on uranium mining and exploration. Now, Strateco is suing the province for its investment mistake, and Quebec has been holding public hearings on the subject.

Stand Against Uranium walkers reported overwhelming support for the ban among people they encountered on their long journey. The walkers passed through several towns affected by uranium mining, broadening the base of support for their efforts.

“Some people understand the effects of uranium, but there’s such a large number who just aren’t aware of this project. We’re the ones taking the initiative to be ambassadors to Quebec, Canada and the world,” said Youth Grand Chief Joshua Iserhoff.

“We’re protecting the land for future generations, not just for the Cree people or Aboriginal people, but for everybody.”

—ASP

—CBC News, Dec. 5 & Dec. 14; Red Power Media, Dec. 19, 2014

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter, Uranium Mining

January 15, 2015 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Accidental Uranium Release at Honeywell Site in Illinois

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2014

In November, the Honeywell corporation’s Metropolis Works (HMW) uranium processing factory in southern Illinois reported a “plant emergency” when it began spewing clouds of poisonous gas that have since been declared harmless by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Uranium hexafluoride (UF6) leaked from inside the site’s Feed Materials Building at 8:24 p.m. on Oct. 26. Uranium hexafluoride is extremely toxic, is corrosive to most metals and reacts violently with water.

The facility processes raw uranium, or yellowcake, into uranium hexafluoride, or UF6, which is enriched at other facilities into uranium fuel for commercial nuclear reactors.

According to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s accident report, on Sunday Oct. 26, an employee “put on a respirator and confirmed the leak at 8:24 p.m.” Onsite emergency responders shut down operations, and Honeywell declared a “plant emergency” rather than an official “Alert”—the lowest NRC emergency classification for fuel facilities. The Nov. 13 report by the NRC says that the leak began at 7:24 p.m. Sunday, that, “No one was injured and Honeywell declared ‘all clear’ status at 2:16 a.m. Monday,” Oct. 27.

People outside the factory reported that a cloud was visible coming from the building well before mitigation spray towers were activated, the NRC reported. Indeed, the United Steel Workers posted a video online that shows clouds of gas billowing from the building for six long minutes before fire hoses were used to douse the plume.

Honeywell and the NRC claim that the gas spewing from the Feed Materials Building was not uranium hexafluoride but hydrogen fluoride gas, produced when UF6 reacts with water or water vapor.

(The Honeywell factory is on the Ohio River just downstream from the notoriously contaminated Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Paducah, Kentucky.)

After interviewing Honeywell employees, reviewing records and examining the affected areas, the NRC concluded:

1) The leaking UF6 vaporized and interacted with moisture inside the Feed Building, which converted it into UO2F2 (a solid form of uranyl fluoride, a yellow powder).

2) The uranyl fluoride was contained within the Feed Building and settled within a few feet of the cold trap leak.

3) The chemical conversion process also produced hydrogen fluoride gas, some of which was visible emanating from the building.

4) A potential violation was identified related to the emergency classification of the event and remains under agency review.

In response to questions raised by community members and the United Steel Workers Union, the NRC said Nov. 14, “[T]he leaking UF6 vaporized and solidified and fell to the floor near the leak inside the [Feed Materials Building]. Note that Honeywell is not a zero release facility. All [radiation] readings taken at the fence line and at the nearest residence were well within Honeywell’s regulatory limits. There are HF and radiation monitors onsite and the readings from them were carefully analyzed by the NRC.”

NRC inspectors concluded that Honeywell failed to recognize that the release of hydrogen fluoride gas warranted an emergency classification of “Alert.” Honeywell eventually agreed to the correction. The NRC also reported that Honeywell “determined that if any hydrogen fluoride travelled beyond their property it would have been of such low concentration as to pose no public safety hazard.” After that the NRC reviewed Honeywell’s calculations on the amount of HF released and its subsequent plume estimate, the agency concluded Honeywell’s assessment “reasonable.”

Since 1958, the Metropolis Works has been the nation’s only uranium conversion factory.

—JL

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste, Uranium Mining

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Black Hills Again Threatened by Uranium Mining

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

RAPID CITY, South Dakota — With just one “no” vote, the Rapid City Council passed a resolution “expressing grave concern” over uranium mining in South Dakota’s Black Hills, an area near Edgemont held sacred by the Great Sioux Nation. Concerned citizens flooded the council chambers August 14 after learning that the mayor and three council members met privately with employees of Canadian mining company Powertech. 

Protecting the water supply topped the list of concerns for residents. Radioactive and heavy metal contamination from such mining would poison the land for eons — uranium’s half-life is 4.4 billion years. If the mine becomes operational, up to 9,000 gallons of water from the Madison and Inyan Kara Aquifer — which supplies Rapid City — would be used every minute. A Powertech spokesman said that 98 percent of its waste water would be “recycled.” Mine opponents fear a dangerous boom of uranium mining in the Black Hills if the Powertech dig is allowed to proceed. 

Critics also point out that Powertech influence has weakened South Dakota’s regulatory oversight of mining, claiming state rules duplicate federal safety standards. According to KOTA TV news, Powertech managers say “uranium mining is safe, and water contamination in the Black Hills would be impossible,” adding, “the aquifers go around the Black Hills.” In order to move ahead, the Powertech project still needs federal and state approval. 

— Rapid City Journal, Aug. 20 & 15; KOTA News, Aug. 19, 2013

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste, Uranium Mining

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch