Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Weekly Column
    • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
    • Depleted Uranium
    • Direct Action
    • Lake Superior Barrels
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
    • Workshops
  • Donate

July 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

NRC Denies Petition to Improve Reactor  Disaster Response

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2014

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on April 9 formally denied a petition to make modest improvements in emergency planning for nuclear reactor accidents, saying the current zones are sufficient.

The petition called for increasing the size of the existing Emergency Planning Zone around commercial nuclear reactors from 10 to 25 miles, to create a new, 50-mile “Emergency Response Zone, and to expand the “Ingestion Pathway Zone” — where drinking water and food could become contaminated — from 50 to 100 miles.

The petition, filed Feb. 15, 2012 by the Nuclear Information Resource Service (NIRS) — 11 months after the start of the triple melt-through and massive radiation releases in Fukushima, Japan — was supported by 37 US environmental groups including Nukewatch. Over 3,200 people signed on as co-petitioners, and out of 5,993 comments sent to the NRC on the petition, 5,953 supported the proposal. The NRC denied the petition in its entirety.

“The NRC has failed the American people,” said Michael Mariotte of NIRS. “Rather than learn from Fukushima and act appropriately to protect the public, the agency has chosen to protect the nuclear power industry yet again.”

NIRS explained in the petition that the Ingestion Pathway Zone is meant to protect against the distribution of contaminated water, milk and other food. At Fukushima and Chernobyl, these basic necessities were intercepted from well over 100 miles away — in Chernboyl’s case, more than 1,000 miles. Yet the NRC insisted that its 50-mile zone is adequate.

As the Pottstown, Pennsylvania daily Mercury pointed out at the time of the Fukushima disaster, US officials told US citizens in Japan to evacuate a 50 miles radius around the triple reactor radiation catastrophe.

In addition, as NIRS reported in its petition, Japan was spared a far worse radiation disaster since 80 percent of the airborne radiation released at Fukushima — nearly 100 percent the first critical days — never passed over land. It was sent by the wind out over the Pacific Ocean.

Mariotte said, “The United States should not have to rely on favorable wind patterns as an emergency response measure.”

Tim Judson, NIRS’s Acting Executive Director, said in a press release, “Over the last 35 years, five nuclear reactors have had catastrophic accidents, all requiring evacuations, and four involving massive releases of radiation that have left large areas of land unsafe for human habitation. The Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents required much larger evacuations and emergency response measures than nuclear power stations and state and local governments in the US are currently prepared for.” 

— NIRS press release, April 9; Cape Cod Times online, May 2 & Apr. 10; & (Pottstown, PA) Mercury, May 2, 2014

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Facebook

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2023 · Nukewatch