Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Weekly Column
    • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
    • Depleted Uranium
    • Direct Action
    • Lake Superior Barrels
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
    • Workshops
  • Donate

July 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Russian Expansion Sparks Nuclear Regression

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2014
By Paul Vos Benkowski

Russia’s recent annexation of Crimea in Ukraine has led to a rush for nuclear “protection” in the region. Many neighboring countries are changing their tunes from 2010 when President Obama, speaking in Prague after a NATO summit, outlined his vision for eliminating nuclear weapons. NATO countries applauded the sentiment and sought to remove the 180 US nuclear weapons from Europe. But on April 2, NATO suspended cooperation with Russia, ending the NATO-Russian Council which was established in 2002. NATO members and Russia had sought to “work towards achieving a true strategic and modernized partnership with the aim of contributing to the creation of a common space of peace, security and stability.” Not so much anymore.

Stanislaw Koziej, head of Poland’s National Security Bureau, has said, “Although there’s a very small risk of Russia acting against Poland, that risk is much bigger now than it was just a few weeks ago. The most important deterrence is NATO solidarity and the presence of the US military in Europe. Nuclear deterrence is a very important factor that NATO has at its disposal, and it’s becoming increasingly important.” Jiri Schneider, the Czech deputy foreign minister until earlier this year added to the concern, “nobody is expecting a large-scale Russian invasion but what Russia is doing is provocation, and we have to show some muscle.”

These fears are the same that led to the nuclear buildup during the Cold War. The deployments of US nuclear weapons in Europe are not the only ones in the region. France has 300 nuclear weapons and Britain possesses 225 submarine-mounted warheads. Germany has floated plans to end its “nuclear sharing” duties, hoping to retire its nuclear-capable aircraft by the year 2020. That leaves Russia with some 2,000 short-range warheads in its European territories and it has some neighboring countries more than a little nervous.

In order to assuage central European fears, the US has moved fighter planes from its base in Aviano, Italy to Poland and US Army and Navy units have been deployed to the Baltic States. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has asked NATO to station 10,000 troops on its soil. While these moves have been made public, the idea of bolstering certain countries with nuclear weapons has remained a secret. Polish National Security Chief, Koziej reportedly said, “In nuclear deterrence, the most important aspect is keeping your adversary in the dark about your plans, so it’s best not to talk about where it would be suitable to base US nuclear weapons.”

Russia’s interest in Ukraine is largely military. Ukraine is home to 50 factories that manufacture much of Russia’s military hardware. The city of Zhovti Vody provides 20 percent of all natural uranium currently used by the nuclear industry. The Washington Post reported that “Russian troops don’t just threaten Ukraine: They rely on it too.”

Hopefully NATO countries will recall the purpose of their alliance and remain committed to the peaceful resolution of disputes. As the Cold War has shown us, there are no winners in a nuclear arms race, only the toxic remains of rampant paranoia and bluster serving no one. 

— Newsweek, Apr. 15; Washington Post, May 9, 2014 

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, War

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Facebook

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2023 · Nukewatch