Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

The Pentagon’s Renewable War Power

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014

The US military is the largest energy hog in the country in an unsustainable situation that even the Pentagon recognizes. 

In 2008, the Pentagon spent $24 billion on electricity and fossil fuel — 80% of the government’s energy consumption. In 2010, the military used more than 5 billion gallons of fuel. The military uses more than 125 million barrels of petroleum every year, at times costing $400 per gallon when delivered in Afghan and Iraqi war zones. The Navy alone uses 80,000 barrels of oil daily. 

A 2010 Pentagon and Energy Department Memorandum of Understanding says the Pentagon is “increasing its use of renewable energy supplies and reducing energy demand to improve energy security and operational effectiveness, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in support of US climate change initiatives, and protect the DoD from energy price fluctuations.” 

Since the 1970s, the Pentagon has been reducing its usage and increasing renewable energy production. Working with the Natural Resources Defense Council, the military aims to get 25% of its energy from renewables by 2025. Private sector investment of at least $7 billion is going into renewable projects on government property. Private companies pay for and install solar, wind, geothermal and biomass. In exchange for land use, the military gets electricity at a fixed long-term rate. Residual energy feeds the civilian electric grid. An entire neighborhood at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona sports roof-top solar panels. The development of renewables is necessary so the Pentagon gets a point for participation. War, on the other hand, will never be green. 

— Department of Defense press release, Nov. 20; SolarCity Corporation, July 24, 2013; American Council on Renewable Energy, Jan. 2012; CleanTechnica, Tina Casey, undated. — BU

Filed Under: Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Renewable Energy

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Nuclear Wa$te — of Billion$

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014
By Lisa Kasenow 

Editor’s note: 

Cancelled, unused and destroyed reactors give the lie to industry boosters who speak of its “24/7 reliability.” Shutdowns, fires, explosions, leaks, meltdowns and hugely expensive re-builds add up to a record of nuclear malfeasance. The industry has been such a financial failure that Forbes magazine thundered from its Feb. 11, 1985 cover, “The failure of the US nuclear power program ranks as the largest managerial disaster in business history, a disaster on a monumental scale. …only the blind, or the biased, can now think that most of the money has been well spent. … The scale of the US nuclear power program’s collapse is appalling: 75 plants cancelled since 1978, including 28 already under construction…” By 1999, a total of 121 reactors had been cancelled, squandering about $50 billion in 1995 dollars.* Lisa Kasenow sent Nukewatch an outline of the more recent financial disasters: 

1. Ten partially-constructed nuclear power reactors have been cancelled. All 10 were scrapped more than 10 years after they had been ordered, and half were cancelled 18-22 years into construction. Three possible terminations — Tennessee Valley Authority’s Bellefonte 1 & 2, and Watts Bar 2 — are still under construction today, even though these reactor orders date from 1970. 

2. Nuclear power units scratched before construction work had begun number 117, and in most cases the cancellations occurred years after the reactors were ordered. 

Of the 117 reactors abandoned after being ordered, half of them were stopped 4-10 years after being ordered, and 20% were halted 8-10 years after the order was made. 

The TVA wins the gold medal for nuclear wasted money, because it’s responsible for the abandonment of 10 and possibly 11 federally permitted reactors. Bellefonte 1 & 2; Hartsville A1, A2, B1 & B2; Phipps Bend 1 & 2; Yellow Creek 1 & 2 and possibly Watts Bar 2. 

3. There are 21 fully-constructed and licensed commercial reactors that no longer supply electricity. These 21 commercial reactors were in operation for an average of 17 years each. Of these, 14 have high-level radioactive waste (used fuel) on site. 

The longest operating time for one of these reactors is 34 years, while the shortest was under one year. More than half operated for less than 20 years. Twenty-eight percent were operational for less than 10 years. Three Mile Island Unit 2 operated for one year. Pathfinder in South Dakota ran for 30 minutes. Shoreham operated for less than one year and then closed. 

* Arjun Makhijani, The Nuclear Deception,1999, p. xiv. 

— Lisa Kasenow is a retired physics, chemistry & biology teacher and fulltime anti-nuclear activist in Florida.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

The Streamline 72

Through the Prism of Nonviolence
Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014
By John Heid 

Among the thousands of photos taken at a bus blockade in Tucson in early October one picture, taken by an Al Jazeera photographer, crystallizes the moment starkly and simply. The image leaves an indelible, if not iconic impression. 

Through the grimy, barred windows of a private prison bus, a young Latino can be faintly seen bowing with folded hands. His shackles drape, like a priest’s stole, from wrist to waist to unseen ankles. His barely visible face is solemn, his gaze dignified. Who is this man? What has he done? How did he come to this fate? Why is he chained? Why is he headed, or rather herded, to federal court and “Operation Streamline”? (For more information on Operation Streamline, visit www.EndStreamline.org, or see the Fall 2012 Nukewatch Quarterly.) 

Is he a member of one the 17 million US families separated by immigration policy and law? Is he one of the 70% of those crossing the border to return to his family? Could he be one of the two-thirds of those without “status” who have lived in the US over a decade? He’s wearing a Shell Oil Co. shirt. Was he snatched on his way to work, or while on the job? 

Is this man another casualty of immigration enforcement, or is he part of a vanguard of a social transformation movement? Or is he just a guy trying to make a living, support his family and live in peace? Does he bow supplication or solidarity? 

Once again the workhorse of motor vehicles, a bus, becomes the flash point of a human rights campaign, vaguely reminiscent of civil rights days and the accessibility rights movement. This time, the issue is not about equal access to public transportation. The issue is why people are on the bus in the first place — chained to the benches. The heart of the story is contained within the buses, not with the protesters locked-down underneath them. Thus, the action has appropriately taken on the moniker the Streamline 72, the number of men held in the two blocked vehicles. 

Media and public curiosity were immediately drawn to the canary yellow-shirted activists that for four hours immobilized two G4S private security buses en route from an immigration detention facility to the federal courthouse — and to those who simultaneously locked down the parking lot of the federal complex. Yet, as the aforementioned photo intimates, the back story belongs to the manacled passengers. 

Yes, one can celebrate that the wheels of injustice were halted for a proverbial minute. A momentary monkey wrench in the judicial gristmill called Operation Streamline. And yes, one can be amused by the “all the king’s horses and all the king’s men” approach of the police trying to figure out how to sever the “dragon sleeves” that held the buses in place. And certainly we are grateful that the 72 bus riders were not branded with criminal charges that day. Still they were deported post haste through distant ports of entry. 

So, after a deep breath, we look to dismantling the apparatus that was interrupted for a day, which is to say shutting down “Streamline” and ultimately ending all deportations. As the popular chant declares: “Not one more deportation.” 

The action, consistent with the philosophy and practice of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., created a tension “so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half-truths to the unfettered realm of creative analysis and objective appraisal.” (“Letter From A Birmingham Jail”) While those on the bus are palpably in bondage, it is our “filthy rotten system” that binds all of us, heart, mind and soul. For many US citizens, the chains are invisible. The blockade served to raise local and national awareness, but the story remains woefully incomplete, even inaccurate, if we do not acknowledge that we too are bound by Streamline. 

That October morning we merely joined a human rights struggle and its contemporary vanguard — those bus riders in chains. They are the primal revolutionaries. They are the ones who envision a continent, and a world, where work is shared along with wealth, where borders are not walls but way stations. Theirs is a story of human passion and persistence which began years ago and miles away. It is humanity’s story. They are the ones who at risk of life and liberty struggle for a “new world in the shell of the old” for all of us. Those of us around and under the bus were an ad hoc affinity group for those inside. Those who engage in human rights work are supporting the vision of those who have been in this justice struggle across generations. It is a vision we share in and outside the bus. That October morning a peculiar, powerful solidarity was reaffirmed, and sealed in chains, as we all left the scene in cuffs. 

Above my desk the anonymous man in the Al Jazeera photo peers out at me, into me. His visage is seared into my psyche. I look back at the photo and ask, as Gandhi advised, if my next steps will be of any use to this person. “Will it restore him to a control over his life and destiny?” (the Gandhi “Talisman”) 

I notice the rider in chains is bowed, but unbowed. He knows where he’s going because he knows where he’s been. So, as I contemplate the trajectory and character of my next step, the query reads more like: Is the next step I take going to make any difference in my life, let alone his? Our fates are ultimately interwoven, aren’t they? After all, we’re all passengers on the same bus. Life. 

— John Heid lives and works at the Casa Mariposa Community in Tucson, Arizona.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Through the Prism of Nonviolence

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Drone War Resisters Acquitted

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014

In a major victory for peace activists working to stop US drone atrocities, five Catholic Workers were acquitted Oct. 24 of disorderly conduct charges incurred after they blocked an entrance to Hancock Air Base in Syracuse, New York. Linda Le Tendre, Ellen Grady, Carmen Trotta, and Catholic Priests Bill Frankle-Streit and Bill Pickard committed the civil resistance action Feb. 13 to draw attention to US drone killings of civilians in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere.

“These strikes are illegal and immoral,” the group’s statement said. “Under international agreements which the US has signed, the killing of civilians, extra-judicial murders, violations of national sovereignty and violations of due process are all illegal acts.” Hancock Air Base is home to the 174th Attack Wing of the Air National Guard and is a “Reaper” drone hub where pilots remotely control missile-firing drones over Afghanistan.

Representing themselves at the trial, the five convinced DeWitt Town Court Judge Robert Jokl that their action was one of crime prevention, to uphold rather than break the law. They cited Article 6 of the US Constitution, which declares US treaties the “supreme law of the land.” They testified to the effects of drone strikes and the relationships their friends had established with the people under attack.

Recent reports by Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International confirm that US drones have killed scores of civilians in Yemen and Pakistan. A Bureau of Investigative Journalism report counted as many as 1,000 civilian deaths, 200 of them children, by US drone war just in Pakistan since 2004.

“We pray that the children of Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, and all countries will someday soon be without the terror of drones or any wars,” defendant Ellen Grady said.

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, War

October 18, 2013 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Vermont Yankee Joins Landslide of Falling Reactors 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2013

Campaigning for the shut down of the faulty Vermont Yankee reactor, thousands participated in rallies, parades, public hearings, nonviolent sit-ins, lockdowns and blockades. It will close next year. See the story on the back page. 

From left to right, top: July 1, 2012, 38 people were arrested with a “Trojan Cow”; Mar. 23, 2012, mimes joined a protest where 130 were arrested; The “Expandable Brass Band” in Brattleboro, Apr. 16, 2013. Middle: Linda Pon Owen assists Frances Crowe in chaining shut the driveway, Oct. 19, 2012; Robin Panagakos and Gregg Crawford joined 1,000 protesters Apr. 14, 2012; A flotilla about water pollution, Connecticut River, Sept. 19, 2012; the relentless Shut it Down Affinity Group, Sept. 21, 2010. Bottom: New Year’s day blockade, 2011; banner at the main gate, Dec. 13, 2011; a parade on Mar. 21, 2012; a 2001 protest. 

Below: An exterior transformer fire erupted June 18, 2004; and a worker leaked this photo of the famous Aug. 21, 2007 cooling water system collapse.

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 256
  • 257
  • 258
  • 259
  • 260
  • …
  • 266
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch