Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

August 6, 2024 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Nukewatch Summer Quarterly 2024

Click the links below to access articles from the Summer 2024 Quarterly Newsletter. Page numbers take you to the pdf of each page as they appear in the print version. Individual articles are also tagged by issue category.

Page 1

Aging Monticello Nuclear Reactor Endangering Human Health 

NRC Apologizes, Admits: Monticello’s Leaked Tritium Reached the Mississippi River

Page 2

Fukushima’s Endless Quagmire of Radiation Hazards

Page 3

Weakening NRC Would be a Bad Move

Nuclear Justice in Maohi Nui

We Need a ‘No Nukes’ Comeback

Page 4 

“Picking Losers:” Choosing nuclear over renewables and efficiency will make climate crisis worse

Nuclear Power: Ill-Advised

Hundreds of Groups for Climate Action Reject Nuclear Power

Page 5

Monticello Draft EIS Ignores Climate Change, Federal Law

Environmental Group Issues Demands on Monticello License Extension Process

NRC Froze Data Gathering Same Day Tritium Tests Near Mississippi River Topped Drinking Water Limits

Page 6

5th Circuit Vacates Holtec Rad Dump License

New Nuke Infrastructure on the Rise

Iran Reduces Enriched Uranium Stockpile

NATO’s Biggest European Base, Next to Ukraine

New Report on Massive Global Nuke Spending

Biden Approves Extension of Price-Anderson Act

“Gigantic Subsea Nuclear Graveyard”

Page 7

Canadians Fight Dump Near Ottawa River

Emerging AI Use in the Nuclear Industry

Radiation-Exposed Communities Vow to Fight On

Page 8

Ten Arrested in Protest at Honeywell Corp. Nuclear Weapons Factory in Kansas City

Two More to Prison for Nonviolent Actions at Germany’s Büchel Airbase

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter

August 6, 2024 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Aging Monticello Nuclear Reactor Endangering Human Health

By Joseph J. Mangano

The Monticello nuclear reactor, one of the oldest in the world, has requested permission from federal regulators to extend its license for 20 years. If approved, the reactor in Monticello, Minn. could stay open for up to 80 years after its 1970 launch.

An 80-year-old reactor is an unknown quantity. Only a few, including Monticello, have even passed the 50-year mark. But federal regulators have approved all six requests for U.S. reactors to remain active up to 80 years, and are considering 10 others. Approvals are expected for all, as federal regulators have never rejected an extension.

A nuclear reactor is a complex array of mechanical parts. Over time, these parts become brittle and corrode. Aging at a reactor like Monticello presents multiple threats to safety and health, including:

1. The chance of a catastrophic meltdown increases; with over 3 million persons living within 50 miles of Monticello, many thousands would suffer from radiation poisoning or cancer.

2. The amount of highly radioactive waste that must be stored at each site — forever — in deep pools of water or steel and concrete casks would increase; currently, Monticello waste is nearly equal to the amount released during the Chornobyl meltdown.

3. Routine releases of over 100 radioactive particles and gases, only created when a reactor operates or a nuclear weapon explodes, are likely to increase; these toxic products enter bodies of nearby residents through breathing and the food chain.

These concerns are a reality at Monticello. In November 2022, a leaky pipe released large amounts of water contaminated with radioactive tritium at the site. Xcel Energy, which owns the reactor, failed to report this for four months — until a second large leak occurred — while trying to fix the first leak. The total amount of contaminated water is greater than an Olympic-sized swimming pool. Any entry into local drinking water from these enormous spills is a health risk.

U.S. reactors have operated over six decades, but federal regulators have only conducted one study of cancer in local residents. That report used statistics before 1985, and is thus outdated. No studies are currently planned.

Monticello is in Wright County, close to the border of Sherburne County. Almost all residents of these counties live within 25 miles of the reactor, and are most vulnerable to exposures from environmental releases. These counties are fast-growing areas just outside of the Twin Cities, with a current population of more than 250,000.

In the late 1960s and early 1970s, before and just after the Monticello reactor started up, the two-county death rate was 6 to 7% below that of other Minnesota counties — for cancers, and for all causes combined. This pattern is expected in an area with low rates of people who lack health insurance, who are disabled, or who live in poverty.

By the late 1970s, the two-county death rate exceeded the state rate for all causes, and has remained high ever since. If the local rate had remained 6-7% below the state, over 4,000 fewer deaths would have occurred. Cancer death rates are also high; in the two most recent years (2022 and 2023), the local rate was 9% and 20% above the state, respectively.

Many factors can account for an elevated risk of death. But one clue that Monticello releases may have been one factor is cancer mortality among children – who are much more likely to be harmed by a dose of radiation than are adults. Prior to the early 1990s, local child cancer mortality was 37% below the state, but has been 14% above ever since.

The push to keep the Monticello reactor running does little as a solution for future energy needs, as it only accounts for 9% of Minnesota’s electricity. However, safe and renewable sources accounted for 31% of the state’s electricity in 2022, most of it wind power, a number that is rising each year.

Unlike nuclear power, the wind and sun pose no cancer risk, and will last forever. The application to keep Monticello open should be denied, and the reactor should close in 2030, the end of its current license period.

— Joseph J. Mangano, MPH MBA, is an epidemiologist and Executive Director of the Radiation and Public Health Project.

Filed Under: Environment, Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

August 6, 2024 by Nukewatch 1 Comment

NRC Apologizes, Admits: Monticello’s Leaked Tritium Reached the Mississippi River

The blue outlined area is the “extent of tritium-impacted groundwater as of August 2023,” from the leaked, radioactive coolant water at Xcel Energy’s Monticello nuclear reactor. The blue shaded area marks tritium concentrations above the EPA safe drinking water limit, extending to the Mississippi River bank. Source: Xcel Energy, NRC Draft Environmental Impact Statement
By Nukewatch Staff

At a public hearing in Monticello, Minnesota, on May 15, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) apologized for public claims made by its staff that radioactive tritium in a massive 2022 leak of cooling water from the Monticello reactor, had not reached the Mississippi River. The river is the drinking water source for 20 million people including the Minneapolis/St. Paul metro area.

In opening remarks to the NRC-sponsored hearing at the Monticello Community Center, Senior Environmental Project Manager Stephen Koenick apologized for the NRC’s often-repeated assurances that the leaked tritium from the 53-year-old reactor had not been detected in the Mississippi.

In his shocking yet underreported public apology, Koenick said: “I would like to take a moment to address and clarify some miscommunication regarding the presence of detectable tritium in the Mississippi River. I know we … reported there were no indication[s] of [a] tritium leak [which] made it to the Mississippi. However … in our Draft Environmental Impact Statement, we … conclude there were some very low concentrations of tritium in the Mississippi River.” Koenick went on to say, “So we apologize for this miscommunication.”

As far as Nukewatch can tell, only the weekly Monticello Times reported on the rare public apology and the eyebrow-raising admission that radioactive tritium from the plume caused by the 2022 leak had contaminated the Mississippi. The paper published a report by Nukewatch’s Kelly Lundeen and John LaForge on the front page of its June 6 issue under the headline “NRC apologizes, changes its stance on tritium leak: Now says low concentrations got into Mississippi River.”

Xcel Energy’s 2023 “Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report” says on page two, “Tritium was detected in newly developed MW-33A [monitoring well-33A] and MW-37A which resulted in MNGP [Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant] reporting an abnormal discharge to the Mississippi River.”

What Koenick meant by “miscommunication” were claims repeatedly made to the press that no tritium had been found by Xcel’s testing of the river. On March 18, 2023, NRC spokesperson Victoria Mitlyng even told the press, “There is no pathway for the tritium to get into drinking water.” As recently as May 7, 2024, NRC presenters at an NRC-sponsored public hearing, also held in Monticello, said on the record that Xcel had found “no detectable levels” of tritium in the Mississippi. Xcel Energy, which owns the reactor, made many similar misstatements. A company website posting still online says, “We test the river regularly for tritium and have not found any, indicating that if it is present, it is at such low levels, and is dispersing so quickly, that it cannot be detected by highly sensitive instruments.” This directly contradicts well test results that Xcel submitted to the NRC on December 18 proving they found detectable tritium levels in the Mississippi River at several points over the summer of 2023. Xcel has applied for a second operating license extension which, if granted, would allow the Monticello reactor to run until the age of 80.

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

August 6, 2024 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Fukushima’s Endless Quagmire of Radiation Hazards

“The final issue that remains is how to deal with radioactive waste that continues to be produced even as decommissioning of the plant progresses.” — Tepco Representative, January 2024

By John LaForge
Japan’s Ocean Dumping Violates IAEA Rules

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has given its stamp of approval to Japan’s ocean dumping of Fukushima wastewater, claiming that its effects would be “negligible” and declaring that the practice complies with international norms.

Arjun Makhijani is president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research and a member of the Pacific Islands Forum Independent Expert Panel on Tepco’s Fukushima radioactive water dumping proposals. In June 2023, Makhijani published a scathing critique of the IAEA’s approval of Japan’s dumping. The report discloses that Japan’s dumping of treated radioactive water violates essential provisions of the IAEA’s own General Safety Guide.

After describing Japan’s system of processing and diluting the radioactive wastewater, Makhijani reports, “At that point the water would contain mainly tritium, but also small concentrations of other radionuclides like carbon-14, strontium-90, cesium-137, and iodine-129.”

The IAEA’s statutory General Safety Requirements demand that: “Facilities and activities that give rise to radiation risks must yield an overall benefit.” Proof of “overall benefit” is required, Makhijani found, because, “There will be some radiation dose, even if small. … Tepco estimates that … the main radiation exposure is estimated to come from ingestion of fish.”

Yet there is no identifiable benefit to dumping 1.3 million metric tonnes of radioactive wastewater in the ocean. As Makhijani wrote, “Countries in the Pacific region, such as members of the Pacific Islands Forum, South Korea, China, and the Philippines, will receive no benefit from the proposed dumping.”

Because “radiation doses will not be zero,” and because “every increment of radiation dose produces an excess cancer risk with no threshold below which the risk is zero,” Makhijani wrote, “countries and people in the Pacific region will suffer some radiation harm. … Some of that harm will go on for decades (e.g., tritium), some for centuries (e.g., strontium-90 and cesium-137), and some essentially forever (iodine-129).

“As a result of the above considerations, the harm to Pacific region countries will outweigh the benefits; indeed, there are no benefits to them. This means that, from a transboundary perspective, the proposed Tepco dumping plan is not justified.”

The IAEA is also violating its binding mandate regarding the required “justification” for potentially harmful actions. Makhijani reported, “During the 8/9 June 2023 virtual meeting with the Pacific Islands Forum and its Expert Panel, at which [I] was present, the IAEA explicitly stated that ‘we are not involved in the justification’ and ‘we are not reviewing any justification.’

“By rejecting its responsibility for key parts of [General Safety Guides and General Safety Requirements] the IAEA is also rejecting the corresponding requirements … and the related fundamental safety principles … on justification.”

In his critique, Makhijani emphasizes: “The rejection means that the IAEA has effectively abandoned the safety and protection interests of the countries of the Pacific region, including the many IAEA member states in the region.

“The IAEA should declare officially that the Tepco plan does not meet key protection and safety requirements and therefore cannot be declared safe. [T]he IAEA has basically jettisoned the interests of Pacific region countries, including non-Japanese IAEA member countries, in favor of Tepco and the government of Japan.”
Earthquakes Routinely Threaten Reactor Site

The dumping of radioactive wastewater from the rubbished Fukushima nuclear reactor site was suspended for a day last March 15 after a 5.98-magnitude earthquake struck off the coast of Fukushima, the Malaysia Star and Arab News Japan report. Tepco said through a spokesperson that it halted operation of its liquid waste filtering system (“ALPS”), but that “no abnormalities were detected,” and no leak of radiation “was detected.” The comic choice of words implies that dumping of radiation-emitting wastewater into the Pacific Ocean is not abnormal and that its radioactive tritium, strontium, carbon, and cesium can’t be detected. The dumping system was restarted later the same day after Japan’s Meteorological Agency said there was no threat of a tsunami. The shutdown was the first time Tepco’s radioactive waste dispersal was interrupted by earthquake activity.

Radioactive Wastewater Leaks and Promises of Improvement

On Feb. 7, 2024, the faulty wastewater filtering system at Fukushima leaked more than 1.5 tons of highly radioactive cooling water. The worker-caused blunder forced Tepco to promise in April that it will install new piping and ventilation intended to direct any future wastewater spills to fall inside the building. The plan puts workers in danger, and the vent ports would release radioactive gases to the open air. Last October, an accident at the same liquid processing site sprayed five workers, directly exposing them to radioactive materials in the water likely including tritium, carbon-14, strontium, cesium, iodine, cobalt, and other deadly radionuclides. China’s Xinhjua News Agency reported: “Amid raging credibility and safety concerns among the Japanese public following a series of accidents at the crippled plant, Tepco and the Japanese government have been frequently challenged for the ocean discharge as the decommissioning process remains ambiguous.” — Xinhua News Agency, https://english.news.cn/20240407/25ce21ee4ba042f1bf4ab348bff8aca7/c.html

Extracting Melted Fuel and Wreckage from Radioactive Hellscape

Reactors 1, 2, and 3 at Fukushima-Daiichi in Japan — wrecked in 2011 by Japan’s worst-ever recorded earthquake, a devastating tsunami, and a string of explosions — have about 880 tons of melted fuel either burned into or through the three reactors’ foundations. Tepco and Japan’s government intend to remove this fiercely radioactive wreckage and abandon it somewhere else. The melted fuel and the surrounding irradiated structures are so ferociously hot and radioactive that remote-controlled robots have repeatedly broken down in the harsh, underwater environment. (Water is continually poured over the fuel melt to keep it from overheating further.) Last March, Japan’s Nuclear Damage Compensation and Decommissioning Facilitation Corporation came forward with three ideas for removing the wrecked fuel, etc., something never before attempted at a site smashed by the earthquake-tsunami-meltdown. Japan’s formal “wrecking crew” has recommended: 1) removing debris while exposed in the air, and 2) solidifying debris in place using a “filler” like concrete. The suggestions also included a plan to submerge entire reactor systems under water after constructing a giant pool-like structure around them. Robots would theoretically then approach, grasp, and withdraw the debris while the water partially shielded workers from radiation. — Arab News, 9 Mar 2024, https://www.arabnews.jp/en/japan/article_117203/

G-7 Leaders Offer Political Cover for Dumping

The Group of Seven colonial corporatist states (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the U.K., and the U.S.) endorsed Japan’s dumping of radioactive water into the ocean at their summit in Italy on June 15, 2023, in an off-agenda move widely seen as a winking promise to protect the global nuclear reactor industry. “We support Japan’s safe, transparent, and science-based process to responsibly manage the discharge,” the G-7 statement said. Millions of people and more than 20 countries around the Pacific Rim have objected to Japan’s dumping over the next 40 years. The discharge is so patently unsafe, so shrouded in long-term unknowns, and so clearly in violation of the IAEA’s own scientific guidelines, that the G-7’s nod can be seen as industrial push-back against the protests in Japan, China, Russia, South Korea, and the Pacific Island Forum of 17 states. — Nippon News Agency, June 15, 2024, https://www.nippon.com/en/news/yjj2024061500119/

Landslide Threat Endangers Cooling Pool

Earthquakes routinely strike the Fukushima area, threatening 1,000 large tanks holding 1.3 million metric tonnes of contaminated wastewater, and endangering the structural integrity of cooling pools holding extremely radioactive used fuel rods (called “spent fuel” by the industry). In January 2024 alone, there were over 18 earthquakes in the Fukushima region with magnitudes of between 2.8 and 3.7. In February there were at least 23, with one measuring magnitude 6.1.

Quakes pose another threat to the devastated reactor site. According to Nuclear Engineering International, a landslide from a massive mountain slope could shut down the adjacent large waste fuel cooling pond. The pool holds 5,197 waste fuel assemblies, and Akira Ishiwatari, a geologist and federal Nuclear Regulation Authority commissioner, told the magazine, “A landslide could occur on the slope in the event of a minor earthquake or even without any tremor.” The authority “is concerned that if sediment from a landslide flowed into the pool, the nuclear fuel would no longer be cooled and, in the worst-case scenario, could eventually melt,” the magazine said.

Tepco said a landslide would not affect the cooling pond but, to avert the danger, announced plans to excavate 100,000 cubic meters from the slope over the next ten years. — Nuclear Engineering Int’l, 17 April 2024, https://www.neimagazine.com/news/newstepco-to-excavate-major-slope-near-fukushima-daiichis-used-fuel-pool-11688881

Far-Off Prefecture Wants Halt of Wild Food Shipments after Radioactive Cesium Found

Another prefecture in Japan has asked for a halt to shipments of a popular edible wild food after it was found contaminated with high levels of cesium-137, a radioactive toxin dispersed in large quantities by the triple Fukushima meltdowns of March 2011. Cesium-137 stays in the environment for 300 years and was spread long distances from the disaster site. Kitaibaraki village in Ibaraki prefecture is 134 miles from Fukushima, yet the government found cesium contamination in popular angelica tree shoots at twice the level allowed by Japanese authorities. Restrictions on shipping wild mushrooms and koshiabura, a species of edible flowering plant, are still enforced across wide areas of the prefecture. Cesium testing began after the meltdowns that followed the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami. In the Spring 2024 Quarterly we reported that edible foods up to 292 miles from Fukushima were still being found highly tainted with cesium. — Mainichi Japan, April 13, 2024, https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20240413/p2a/00m/0na/002000c

— On Aug. 17 at 8pm Eastern/5pm Pacific, Nukewatch is co-sponsoring the “Don’t Nuke the Pacific, Protect Our Ocean” webinar to stop the Fukushima wastewater dumping. Register at mp-nuclear-free.com.

Filed Under: Environment, Fukushima, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

August 6, 2024 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Weakening NRC Would be a Bad Move

By David Kraft

An article in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists by Dr. Allison Macfarlane, former chairwoman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), should ring alarm bells for officials — especially those promoting another round of nuclear building.

Macfarlane, no anti-nuclear ideologue, expressed shock that the heavily pro-nuclear Biden administration recently withdrew the re-nomination of NRC Commissioner Jeff Baran. His opponents in the nuclear industry and their political allies accused Baran of the heinous offense of — being too concerned about nuclear safety. That Sens. Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema agree should send shivers down the spine of any state governor.

Simultaneous with this political capitulation, news accounts described efforts by certain members of Congress to reform the NRC, giving it a new mission — “fundamentally changing the NRC, in leadership and policy,” according to Politico. The goal is to “streamline regulations at the NRC and potentially adjust the agency’s mission statement” to speed up the development and propagation of new, experimental small modular nuclear reactors.

The universe sometimes has a very perverse sense of humor. On the same day the news of the proposed
Congressional “reform” broke, the nose landing gear of a Delta Air Lines jet collapsed on takeoff. What’s the connection?

Weak oversight leads to disasters

The Delta incident is the exclamation point to a litany of disasters that demonstrates the results of weakening regulatory oversight of critical industries, industries where huge numbers of lives might be at stake. What happens when watchdogs become lap dogs for the industries they’re supposed to regulate?

Two crashed Boeing 737-MAX airliners, result of industry self-regulation; death toll: 346.

The East Palestine Norfolk Southern train derailment, contaminating an entire community that is still feeling the health effects of the disaster and receiving little compensation, the result of lobbyists and grifting politicians preventing implementation of safety recommendations.

The in-flight blowout of an emergency exit door on a Boeing 737 airliner — no injuries but revelations that 1,800 reports of shoddy manufacture and maintenance went unheeded by federal regulators.

And now members of Congress are attempting to deregulate the NRC so that it would be easier to construct new reactors with unproven experimental designs. What could possibly go wrong?

Allowing the nuclear industry and its political allies to continually erode the regulatory framework turns the NRC into trade show promoters, not regulators. With a next-generation of reactors being ramrodded down the throats of Americans, [we] cannot afford any relaxation of nuclear regulation.

— David Kraft is director of Nuclear Energy Information Service, a 42-year-old nuclear power watchdog and safe energy advocacy organization. This piece is excerpted from an op-ed in the Chicago Sun Times, March 19, 2024.

Filed Under: Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • …
  • 266
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch