Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

May 12, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Senator Calls Nuclear Fallout an Act of War

Nukewatch Quarterly Spring 2022
By John LaForge

Rhode Island U.S. Senator Jack Reed, the Democratic chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, reportedly said on March 23 that if Putin used a nuclear against Ukraine “there would be consequences,” adding that radioactive fallout from such a detonation could drift across nearby NATO countries and be considered an attack on NATO. (New York Times, March 23, 2022)

Senator Reed’s warning partly explains why nuclear weapons must not be detonated for any reason. Radioactive fallout from nuclear bomb test explosions is notorious for traveling long distances on the wind — sometimes around the world — and has indiscriminately contaminated far-off countries of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres.

Bikini Lagoon, bombed by the United States July 1, 1946.

The fallout from nuclear weapons blasts has been scrutinized extensively by military analysts, who have known about its deadliness for decades.

In his 2017 book The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner, whistle-blower Daniel Ellsberg of The Pentagon Papers fame, reports that he and other nuclear war theorists in the Pentagon had estimated in the 1960s that “we would kill every European, a hundred million Europeans, without a single U.S. or Soviet warhead landing on West Europe” [emphasis added].

“Just from the fallout of the attacks we were planning on Russia and East Europe. One hundred million.…”, Ellsberg wrote. The estimate illustrates the self-destructive consequences of nuclear weapons detonations, and the fact that military officers planning war with nuclear weapons have known for decades that they are devastating boomerangs that cannot be used without destroying the people and the territories being defended.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, War

May 12, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

IAEA Says Missile Hit Radioactive Waste Area in Kyiv

Nukewatch Quarterly Spring 2022
By John LaForge

The State Nuclear Regulatory Inspectorate of Ukraine (SNRIU) informed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) February 27 that missiles hit the site of a radioactive waste disposal facility in Kyiv over night, and “there were no reports of damage to the building or any indications of a radioactive release,” IAEA’s Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said in a statement.

The IAEA’s alert then noted that “SNRIU said it expects to soon receive the results of on-site radioactive monitoring.”

The carefully worded report is deceptively telling. It first declared that there are “no indications” and “no reports” of a radioactive release. But this reassurance was given before any data from radiation monitors had been reviewed, making the statement simultaneously true, and completely meaningless.

Bob Alvarez, a former senior advisor and deputy assistant secretary in the Energy Department, and a long-time critic of nuclear reactor operations, reported, “Given that war is raging at or near the Chernobyl reactor site, more than 21,000 waste nuclear fuel assemblies are currently held in a pool inside of a crumbling building. Several waste fuel assemblies are bent, broken, and cracked. Efforts to remove and place the waste fuel into dry storage have stopped. [An additional] 4,000 cubic meters of high-level waste, resulting from the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, are stored in shallow, “engineered trenches” that may also be vulnerable to bombing and artillery fire. The loss of water and destruction of the waste fuel pool storage building, or the destruction of any of the trenches holding high level waste, could result in a catastrophic release.”

The Kyiv radioactive waste incident came a day after Ukraine’s SNRIU reported that a similar disposal facility near the north-eastern city of Kharkiv had been damaged, but again “without any reports of a radioactive release.”

Director General Grossi said, “These two incidents highlight the very real risk that facilities with radioactive material will suffer damage during the conflict, with potentially severe consequences for human health and the environment.”

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-5-iaea-director-general-statement-on-situation-in-ukraine

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-4-iaea-director-general-statement-on-situation-in-ukraine

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste, War

May 12, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Reactors in War Zones

Nukewatch Quarterly Spring 2022
By John LaForge

In June 2019, we reported on “Project Dilithium,” a U.S. Army proposal to build small, portable nuclear reactors that could be hauled to remote military outposts to provide electricity. The Army said the reactors could reduce the number of diesel tanker caravans, could shorten military supply lines, and could eliminate some easy targets. Popular Mechanics and the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists warned at the time that putting a reactor in a warzone exchanges one easy target for another, one that risks catastrophic health and environmental damage from core meltdowns. With Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine threatening its 15 nuclear reactors, we trust the U.S. Army will scrap its plans for battlefield units.

Now in the context of Russia’s war in Ukraine, two Massachusetts Institute of Technology professors, Kate Brown and Susan Solomon, have penned a powerful warning against nuclear power in the Washington Post. The piece — “One thing nuclear power plants weren’t built to survive: War”—  is excerpted below for space reasons.

“Military strategists commonly target the enemy’s electrical grid. That’s a problem when combat is in a nuclearized country like Ukraine. … The world is watching the first war in a nuclearized country — and combat has already reached active reactors.

“Even without a direct hit on a reactor, we are learning of the fragility of nuclear power [reactors]. … it is vulnerable not only to terrorism but to war.

“As power was cut to the Chernobyl [complex in March], nuclear engineers explained the importance of the electricity grid — even for plants that have been out of operation for decades. Chernobyl’s molten radioactive lava self-heats inside the belly of the blown reactor. Without ventilation, which requires electricity, hot air forms condensation that rains down inside the building, corroding and damaging equipment.

“Chernobyl’s [waste] fuel is another danger. Left to its own devices, it can heat up to 1,000 degrees Celsius. At high temperatures, the zirconium sleeves covering the fuel can ignite. After the Chernobyl accident in 1986, Soviet liquidators hastily built huge basins to store highly radioactive [waste] fuel rods. Water pumped into the basins cools the fuel and blocks radioactive gamma rays that emanate from the irradiated uranium. Now 20,000 fuel rods are stored in Chernobyl basins designed for 17,000.

“Even more troubling is the fact that the 15 active nuclear power reactors in Ukraine are still operating or were shut down only recently. They are chock-full of extremely radioactive, hot nuclear fuel, both inside the reactors and in cooling ponds. As nuclear materials expert Claire Corkhill explained to the BBC, if electricity is cut to those plants as it was to Chernobyl, we could face a meltdown of multiple reactors similar to the catastrophe at Fukushima.”

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, War

May 12, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Secret Blown: U.S.-Armed Nuclear NATO

Nukewatch Quarterly Spring 2022
By John LaForge

With a U.S. flag imposed over half of Belgium, the insignia (above) of the U.S. Air Force’s 701st Munitions Support Squadron, was mistakenly posted on social media. The 701st maintains twenty or so U.S. B61 hydrogen bombs stationed at Kleine Brogel airbase in Belgium. While the transfer of nuclear weapons to other countries is never officially acknowledged by the United States or their NATO recipients, the insignia graphically boasts that U.S. bombs are part of the Belgian airbase’s arsenal. The “open secret” of U.S. nuclear weapons being stationed at five European countries has often been accidentally revealed, made public in the press, and acknowledged by host country parliamentarians.

– Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, Aug 18, 2021; De Morgen (Antwerp), July 16, 2019, Ann De Boeck, “Finally in black and white: there are American nuclear weapons in Belgium”; The Stimson Center, August 15, 2016, “US Nuclear Weapons in Turkey at Risk of Seizure by Terrorists, Hostile Forces”; The Washington Post, July 19, 2016 , “The U.S. stores nuclear weapons in Turkey. Is that such a good idea?” by Dan Lamothe; “Green Party MEPs arrested in Belgium nuclear weapons protest”, BCC, 20 February 2019; Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 67, No. 1, online Nov. 27, 2015, pp. 64-73, “U.S. tactical nuclear weapons in Europe, 2011.”

 

–

“Within the context of NATO, the United States deploys approximately 150 nuclear weapons in Europe, most notably B61 free-fall bombs, which can be deployed by both US and allied aircraft. These bombs are stored in six American and European bases: Kleine Brogel in Belgium, Büchel in Germany, Aviano and Ghedi-Torre in Italy, Volkel in the Netherlands and Inçirlik in Turkey.” [From the official statement of the NATO Parliament.] (De Morgen).

 

Filed Under: B61 Bombs in Europe, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter

May 12, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Germany to Buy U.S. F-35s to Carry New B61 Nuclear Bombs

B61 – 12 in production
Nukewatch Quarterly Spring 2022
By John LaForge

Ending years of debate, Germany’s minister of defense said March 14 that the country will purchase U.S.-made F-35 fighter jets to replace the Germany’s PA 200 Tornado jet bombers, EurAsian Times reported March 16.

The F-35s can carry the U.S. nuclear weapons that are stationed in Germany under a program called “nuclear sharing.” Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht said, “With the F-35 aircraft type, the task of nuclear sharing will be guaranteed in the future. The goal is to replace the Tornado by 2030.”

Earlier reports suggested that Germany will buy 35 of the Lockheed Martin F-35s, at a cost of approximately $80 million each, according to NBC News. Germany could have to pay over $2.8 billion for the 35 warplanes which have been plagued with design, engineering and testing problems.

In a related event, the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration, the Los Alamos National Lab and the Sandia National Lab announced in December 2021 that the first production model of the new nuclear gravity bomb called B61-12 had been completed, and that full-scale production would begin in May 2022 and run through 2026.

David Wiegandt, a senior manager on the program at Sandia Lab said, “The first production unit is the first War Reserve B61-12 built at Pantex [Texas] that meets all customer requirements….” The customer is the U.S. air force.

“There’s something really special about this program,” Wiegandt said in a Sandia press announcement. “It has really solid team members who believe in how to do sound engineering and really bring the future of safety and security into modern nuclear weapons.”

Germany and four other NATO members plan to replace their current B61s with the new “model 12” bomb. The Eurasian Times reported that, “Germany stores 20 or fewer U.S. B61 nuclear gravity bombs at the Büchel airbase.”

—EurAsian Times, March 16; DOE/Sandia National Lab, Feb. 2, 2022; and NBC News, March 7, 2021

Filed Under: B61 Bombs in Europe, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • …
  • 266
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch