In September, the Caribbean Astronomy Society detected an unattributed “military test” when either a U.S. or U.K. nuclear-powered submarine fired a 130,000-pound Trident missile from near Puerto Rico. The missile, a Trident II D5, is an intercontinental-range ballistic missile with a yield of 7 to 95 kilotons. Regularly, the U.S. military publicly announces its missile tests in advance. In January, Lockheed Martin won a $383 million contract for the Trident II D5 Life Extension program to “modernize” the Trident arsenal, providing missiles for the Navy’s new Columbia-class submarines and the U.K.’s Dreadnought-class submarines. Each of the Trident II D5 missiles currently built by Lockheed Martin costs about $30.9 million and each missile can carry up to 12 independently targeted warheads. The Trident II D5 is described by the U.S. Navy as “the planet’s most lethal, accurate, and reliable sea-based strategic deterrent.” Fourteen Ohio-class submarines in the U.S. Navy and four Vanguard-class British submarines each carry 20 and 16 of these missiles per sub respectively. — Interesting Engineering, Sept. 22, 2025; Hans Kristensen & Matt Korda, “United States nuclear forces, 2019,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, April 29, 2019, https://nuclearcompanion.com/data/trident-ii-d-5-missile/

Photo: The National Interest

By Robert Dodge

We have the answer to realize significant cost savings, while simultaneously promoting sound fiscal policies that benefit us all and don’t threaten the survival of the human race.

In April our 2024 taxes were due in order to fund the fiscal year 2025 federal budget and thus our nation’s priorities. This year’s budget represents the final Joe Biden budget. It comes at a time when our country is in a deliberate state of chaos instituted by the current administration. Under the non-elected efforts of the Department of Government Efficiency and current cabinet, we find punitive and seemingly random disjointed cutting of essential services, vital programs, and international aid.

The U.S. Congress has just passed a budget resolution requiring $1.5 trillion in savings to be realized over the next 10 years. Ultimately, budgets are moral documents. How do the current cuts, in addition to planned cuts in entitlement programs such as Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security, address our needs and follow a moral compass? How does funding nuclear weapons factor in when addressing our needs and priorities?

This year’s federal tax expenditure for all nuclear weapons programs will be $110.3 billion (including funding, environmental cleanup, and legacy issues). This figure was released on Tax Day by the Nuclear Weapons Community Cost Project. That amounts to $3,499 per second. This year will see an increase of roughly $15.8 billion over FY 2024. Congress prides itself on being fiscally responsible. Yet when cities like Detroit are spending over $114 million on nuclear weapons programs, Atlanta over $245 million, Chicago over $961 million, and the impoverished Navajo Nation of roughly 113,000 people are spending over $18 million, where is the rationale, fiscal responsibility, and sanity?

The continuation of this out-of-control escalation is fueled by the myth of deterrence with dramatic increases in weapons delivery systems and missile defeat and defense expenditures. The latter is the present-day version of former President Ronald Reagan’s “Strategic Defense Initiative” or “Star Wars.” Today’s version continues the elusive and easily outfoxed goal of hitting a bullet with a bullet to defend us coupled with a complex early detection system. With roughly 12,331 nuclear weapons in today’s global arsenals, the world remains closer to nuclear war than at any point in the past 80 years since the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists puts our current risk at 89 seconds to midnight and nuclear Armageddon. That risk assessment comes from the current geopolitical turmoil; climate change; and evolving disruptive technologies that increase the risk of nuclear war either by intent, miscalculation, or accident presenting a very real and present danger. Everything and everyone we care about is threatened with the distinct possibility of annihilating the human race.

Unlike a nuclear missile that cannot be recalled after launch, the nuclear arms race and existing arsenals can be reversed and nuclear weapons can be eliminated. What is needed is the political will. The people need to speak, and when the people lead, the leaders will follow.

Fortunately, there is a U.S. grassroots campaign, Back From the Brink (BFTB), demanding elimination of nuclear weapons. BFTB calls on the United States to take a leadership role in bringing together the world’s nuclear powers to negotiate a time-bound, verifiable, and complete elimination of nuclear weapons. It includes four precautionary measures to safeguard against nuclear war until abolition is achieved: 1) renouncing the first use of nuclear weapons; 2) ending the sole, unchecked authority of U.S. presidents to launch a nuclear attack; 3) taking U.S. weapons off of hair-trigger alert; and 4) canceling plans to replace the U.S. nuclear arsenal with enhanced weapons.

Anyone can endorse this campaign. Presently 495 organizations, 78 municipalities and counties, eight state legislative bodies, 430 municipal and state officials, and 44 members of Congress have endorsed this campaign.

In April, Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., introduced H.R. 317, which would reform U.S. nuclear weapons policy and promote a world free of nuclear weapons. In addition to supporting the policy points of BFTB, this resolution supports: the maintenance of a de facto global moratorium on nuclear testing, protecting communities and workers affected by nuclear weapons by fully remediating their deadly legacy of environmental contamination past and present, and peace conversion of the entire nuclear cycle without loss of jobs.

With life itself hanging in the balance, we must all demand a meeting with our legislative leaders, urging them to endorse this legislation. If they refuse, we must ask why they are willing to put everything at risk?

— Robert Dodge, a family physician, serves as President of Physicians for Social Responsibility-Los Angeles, & is a steering committee member of Back from the Brink.