Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

April 7, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Raytheon Pushes Doomsday Clock Closer to Midnight

Elizabeth Murray and John Heid of the Pacific Life Community were arrested on March 5, 2025 when they crossed onto the property of Tucson, Arizona’s Raytheon weapons factory to share their Ash Wednesday message for a nuclear-free future with workers. John Heid stated, “While there are many pressing issues in these times, the doomsday clock keeps ticking. The nuclear weapons industry quietly metastasizes before our very eyes. If we don’t pay attention and resist, nukes will have the last word. The very last.” Photo: Nuclear Resister

Opinion by Jack Cohen-Joppa

TUCSON, Ariz — In Tom Lehrer’s classic Cold War ditty, “So Long Mom,” a nuclear bomber pilot sings, “I’ll look for you when the war is over, an hour and a half from now.”

It’s darkly funny, because even though we don’t talk much about it, we all know it’s true. Planned or imagined, nuclear war scenarios rarely last longer.

But how much time have we got before then? How near is that threat of omnicide today?

The Doomsday Clock is a visual metaphor created by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists back in 1947 to illustrate how close we are to global calamity from nuclear weapons and other looming threats to civilization as we know it. Originally set at seven minutes to midnight, in 2023 it advanced to 90 seconds to midnight, largely due to nuclear threats from the war in Ukraine.

Now, with wars still raging in Ukraine and the Middle East, escalating climate chaos, and increasing biological and artificial intelligence threats, the clock has been pushed to just 89 seconds to midnight, the closest it’s been in history.

And Raytheon Corp. keeps pushing us closer.

In April 2020 — Raytheon, with more than 12,000 local employees and the bulk of its research, development, and production based in Tucson — was awarded a sole-source contract to produce about 1,000 new nuclear-armed, air-launched cruise missiles. Known by the bland acronym LRSO (Long Range Stand-Off), the missile is arguably both redundant and destabilizing in a time of disappearing nuclear diplomacy.

Not only that, but because of its work on both the LRSO and Tomahawk cruise missiles, Raytheon is now seen as the leading contender to produce even more nuclear weapons in the form of new sea-launched nuclear cruise missiles. This further escalation would represent a huge setback to hard-won nuclear arms control progress, when nuclear-armed Tomahawks were removed from submarines over 30 years ago.

Why aren’t we talking about it? Despite near-universal condemnation of nuclear weapons by leaders of the world’s religions, we could use more local political and religious leaders speaking out against this blasphemous enterprise in our backyard. It’s not as if it’s a military secret. The industry press has recently carried reports of LRSO flight tests, budget allocations, production schedules, and more. Yet local media have not kept up.

Raytheon also has nothing to say. Usually, southern Arizona’s largest employer and exporter is mighty boastful of the panoply of products in their military portfolio. Their website is filled with fulsome bragging and lurid photos of deadly hardware. But the baddest boy of the bunch is missing in action. The nuclear-armed LRSO only pops up in a handful of financial reports. Raytheon’s original press release heralding the multibillion-dollar contract was posted on its website and quoted by the Tucson media in April 2020. But now it’s gone, simply deleted from its media archive.

Perhaps management has realized that there is nothing to be gained by crowing about their only product that, if used as intended, would be the instrument of multiple war crimes and crimes against humanity (incomprehensible death and devastation, disproportionate civilian casualties, lasting contamination of land and water, etc.). Raytheon’s “products” are certainly nothing I’m proud of as a Tucsonan.

This is the same Raytheon/RTX that last November was fined nearly $1 billion for defrauding the government (i.e., the taxpayer) and paying multiple bribes to promote business with the government of Qatar.

Experts debate whether the LRSO is intended for a nuclear surprise attack, or just another layer of“deterrence.” But if it isn’t meant to be used first, that just makes it fit into plans for a full-scale nuclear war. All ninety minutes of it. Shouldn’t we all pay more attention, and demand that our elected leaders resist this insanity?

— Jack Cohen-Joppa is a husband and father and a Tucson resident since 1986. He is co-coordinator since 1980 of the Nuclear Resister, www.nuclearresister.org. This piece was written for the Arizona Daily Star January 31.

Raytheon was awarded a $2 billion contract to build 1,000 redundant and destabilizing new nuclear-armed, air-launched cruise missiles. Cost estimates have since risen to $13 million per missile according to Military News. Photo: airandspaceforces.com

Filed Under: Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, War

April 7, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Boondoggle Boost to Military Budget Busting

By Nukewatch Staff

The right-wing Washington Times reports: in 2023, the U.S. spent $916 billion, or 3.4% of its gross domestic product (GDP), on military expenditures, while China spent $296 billion, or 1.7% of its GDP, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. U.S. House Armed Services Committee Chair Mike Rogers, R-Ala., has said military spending is at its lowest level as a percentage of GDP since the end of World War II and his goal is to get it back above 4%. Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker, R-Miss., who wants to see a $1 trillion military budget, wants spending to jump to 5% of GDP. He and Senate Committee Budget Chair Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, have discussed a goal of including an additional $200 billion in new military funding in the reconciliation legislation. — Military.com, Feb. 21; Washington Times, Jan. 16, 2025

Filed Under: Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, War

April 7, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Italian Bank Chief: Weapons Building is “Development in Reverse”

By Nukewatch Staff

The head of Italy’s Central Bank, Fabio Panetta, declared in January that weapons production does not lead to long-term economic growth. In a speech in Bologna, Panetta confronted European Union consideration of increased military spending, saying, “War cannot bring prosperity,” Reuters reported.

Perhaps not the sage he sounds like, Panetta put forth the very reasonable rationale that any money made in the short-term from weapons manufacturing paled in comparison to the much longer-lived costs of war. Costs likely not tallied in lives lost and trauma inflicted, but rather in the dollar-wise damage to infrastructure, machinery, raw materials, and the supply chain — which is no doubt the predominant language understood on the European Central Bank’s governing council, of which Panetta is a member.

Fabio Panetta, Governor of the Bank of Italy

“The manufacturing of war equipment does not help increase a country’s growth potential. Development comes from productive investment, not from arms,” Panetta said. “Moreover, it is misleading to attribute technological progress to military expenditure,” he added. Though he fell short of declaring war as anathema to both human survival and the development of a healthy and sustainable civilization, Panetta at least named war “a form of development in reverse,” one that the U.S., NATO allies, and their whole “developed” circus have certainly crowned as the most holy deserved squandering of modernity’s precious resources. — Yahoo.com, Feb. 28; Reuters, Jan. 16, 2025

Filed Under: Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, War

April 7, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Daft Trump Officials Fire/Rehire Nuclear Weapons Staff Unaware They Oversee U.S. Arsenal

By Nukewatch Staff

On February 14, Reuters reported that the unchartered Department of Government Efficiency had laid off about 325 employees of the National Nuclear Security Administration which controls the U.S. nuclear arsenal. The overzealous know nothings with Elon Musk’s DOGE, “did not seem to know this agency oversees America’s nuclear weapons,” according to CNN.

On February 18th, the BBC reported that “more than 300 NNSA staff were let go” but that the Department of Energy had objected, telling CNN that “less than 50 people” were dismissed from NNSA, including staff at sites where nuclear weapons are built.

The chaotic Trump administration has since reversed the firings but was struggling to reach the laid-off employees because they had been locked out of their federal email accounts. After an outcry from Congress, NNSA emailed a memo to staff, obtained by NBC News, which read: “The termination letters for some NNSA probationary employees are being rescinded, but we do not have a good way to get in touch with those personnel.” — Reuters, Feb. 16; CNN, Feb. 14; BBC, Feb. 18, 2025

Filed Under: Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Germany Plans Roll Back of Military Funding to Ukraine

Germany is signaling it may slow its military support to Ukraine, showing little enthusiasm for two of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky’s demands: striking deep into Russia with German Taurus missiles and fast-tracking NATO membership.

Zelensky’s latest bid to bolster the war took him to the UK, France, Italy, and Germany. For now, Berlin will not send anymore of the requested Leopard 2 tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, or armored howitzers. The German Defense Ministry does not anticipate Kiev can launch a successful counteroffensive in the near future, according to reports in German news outlet Bild.

Although German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has promised to deliver 1.4 billion Euros of combined support alongside Belgium, Denmark, and Norway by the end of the year, Germany’s projected military aid to Ukraine for 2025 is half what it gave in 2024. So far, Germany has provided or pledged about 28 billion Euros in military funding for Ukraine.

Behind the U.S., Germany remains Ukraine’s second-largest source of military funding. Even Zelensky’s hard lines drawn earlier seem to be wavering as his administration considers swapping Ukrainian territories for a peace agreement with Russia. The specter of waning military assistance grows larger with the change in U.S. leadership and Germany’s new reticence.

⸺ BBC, July 17; Global Research, Oct. 14, 2024

Filed Under: Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, War

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 21
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch