Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

February 4, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

German Government to Weaken Criticism of Nuclear Power

At a Ministerial Council meeting in France last August, French and German delegates declared support for the “equal treatment” of both nuclear power and renewable electricity sources within the European Union (EU). The news came as a shock to environment and policy observers, because Germany has strenuously opposed nuclear power for years. The reversal was noticed in May when German Chancellor Merz and French President Macron agreed to “end discrimination” against nuclear power at the EU level, and in June when German Energy Minister Katherina Reiche attended a meeting of pro-nuclear states. Ms. Reiche, a former gas industry lobbyist, said she intends to slow the pace and reduce promotion of renewable energy expansion. Even Germany’s anti-nuclear Environment Minister Carsten Schneider has been silent on the turnaround.

EU negotiations on its multi-annual financial “framework” (for the years 2028 to 2034) are ongoing, but in June a first draft was issued which, for the first time, allows the funding of research on mini reactors, and permits the construction of new nuclear reactors to be directly eligible for funding. Such funding would reverse the EU’s current policy, and, in Germany, taxpayers’ money would flow to international nuclear power projects in spite of the country’s complete reactor phase-out. Without clear opposition from Germany, support for nuclear power will increase, and investments in wind and solar projects will become less attractive. — Broadcast, newsletter of Together Against Nuclear Energy, Germany, October 2025, https://www.ausgestrahlt.de/

Photo: Clean Energy Wire

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Renewable Energy

February 4, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

$80 Billion U.S. Gov’t Deal with Westinghouse for Ten New Reactors

VC-Summer-Nov-20-2020-RMI00137-CU-scaled.jpg
Westinghouse’s project in South Carolina that cost taxpayers $9 billion and generated no electricity – shutting down construction after bankrupting the company. Now, riding the coattails of the White House and Big Tech’s “nuclear renaissance,” Westinghouse is trying to forget its failed reactor project. Photo: FITS News

In October, the U.S. government signed on to an $80 billion deal with Westinghouse Electric Company to construct ten new large nuclear reactors. The plan hopes to see all ten reactor projects break ground by 2030 featuring the Westinghouse AP1000 design. The deal is sweetened for the U.S. through the promise of a 20% stake in Westinghouse after the company doles out an initial $17.5 billion to private shareholders. AI, Big Tech, and the military-industrial complex are all behind this administration’s push to bring the U.S. to the “forefront of the nuclear renaissance” — as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick put it. — Trading View, Oct. 28, 2025

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

February 4, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Wisconsin Reactors Approved to Run Until 80 Years Old

Point Beach Reactor, on Lake Michigan, in Wisconsin. In September, the two reactors on site were awarded license extensions to run until 2050 and 2053. Photo: reddit

On September 29, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced the much-delayed approval of the license renewals for Point Beach nuclear reactors, units 1 and 2. They are located in Manitowoc County near Two Rivers, Wisc. on the shore of Lake Michigan. The license renewal included a generic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) without addressing current and future climate impacts at the Point Beach site in violation of the National Environmental Policy Act, as pointed out in a lawsuit filed by several non-profit organizations. A public pressure campaign by Physicians for Social Responsibility-Wisconsin and other groups, including Nukewatch, raised serious concerns with aging at the facility and the daily release of 915 million gallons of heated water into Lake Michigan. In 2013, the NRC designated Point Beach unit 2 as one of the most embrittled reactors in the country. Being one of the most likely to crack did not stop the renewal of the license. NextEra submitted an updated EIS in April 2025, and five months later Point Beach units 1 and 2 were licensed to operate through 2050 and 2053, respectively, when they will reach their 80th birthday. — Fox 11 TV, Sept. 29; Physicians for Social Responsibility-WI, Apr. 14, 2025

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

February 4, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Plans for Unlawful New Mexico Radioactive Waste Dump Terminated

Many are celebrating the termination of Holtec International’s proposal “to construct and operate the world’s largest high-level radioactive waste dump,” according to Beyond Nuclear, part of a coalition that led the fight against the so-called “consolidated interim storage facility (CISF).” For eight years, this grassroots coalition battled the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and took its complaints against CISFs to federal courts and the U.S. Supreme Court. Among the major victories won through the coalition’s hard work, decades of Holtec’s planned shipments of highly radioactive waste will no longer be moving across the country by barge, road, or rail. Beyond Nuclear’s Kevin Kamps said temporary dumps “automatically double transport risks, as irradiated fuel would have to be transferred from interim storage to a permanent disposal site someday.” Under the federal Nuclear Waste Policy Act, temporary storage dumps are only permitted after a permanent repository is operational. — New Mexico Political Report, Oct. 14; Beyond Nuclear press release, Oct. 13, 2025

We Don't Want It JPG

 

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

February 2, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

First Nation Stalls Planned Canadian Radioactive Waste Dump Near Ottawa River

According to the Journal de Montréal, the 365 Anishinabeg residents of the Kebaowek First Nation reserve in Abitibi-Témiscamingue, have halted the multi-million-dollar Canadian radioactive waste dump sited on their homelands. The intended permanent abandonment site, which would hold up to one-million cubic meters of radioactive and other toxic wastes including plutonium, was conceived of by a consortium of multinational corporations hired by the federally-owned corporation Atomic Energy of Canada. The proposal would sandwich the waste in a mound of clay, sand, and an insufficient membrane close to the surface and near the Ottawa River, drinking water for many downstream. The mound is engineered to last 550 years, but Gordon Edwards of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility points out that 19 of the 29 radioactive substances destined for the dump have half-lives of more than 5,500 years. In February, Federal Courts ruled that the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission did not obtain free, prior, and informed consent of affected Indigenous communities — required by the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples — before green-lighting construction. In March, Federal Courts found the dump threatens several at-risk species. The proposed dump is opposed by 130 Quebec municipalities. — Gordon Edwards, Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility, Sept. 22; Journal de Montréal, Sept.19, 2025

We the Nuclear Free North – Join us to oppose nuclear waste burial in ...

We the Nuclear Free North – Join us to oppose nuclear waste burial in Northwestern Ontario

Filed Under: Environment, Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • …
  • 94
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch