Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

December 10, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

 “Is it time to reduce the triad to a diad, removing the  land-based missiles?”  —Gen. James N. Mattis 

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2016-2017

The general nominated by Donald Trump to be the next Secretary of Defense has questioned the purpose of the long-range missile system, the Air Force’s 450 Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).

In remarks to the US Senate Armed Services Committee in January 2015, four-star Marine Corps General James N. Mattis asked, “Is it time to reduce the triad to a diad, removing the land-based missiles? This would reduce the false alarm danger.”

General Mattis joins an influential group of high-ranking military commanders and civilian experts who have slammed the ICBM system including General James Cartwright, a former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and former Secretaries of Defense William Perry and Chuck Hagel.

Gen. Mattis questioned the need for US land-based nuclear-armed missiles on the grounds that they represent a higher risk than other weapons of being launched on bad information, the same risk that retired Gen. Cartwright raised in 2012 as a reason to eliminate all the Minuteman IIIs.

Gen. Mattis also suggested to the Senate committee that the US should limit the threatened use of the nuclear arsenal to deterring nuclear attack, a change of targeting policy that would repeal Clinton Administration policy that allows for nuclear attacks—even against non-nuclear states—in retaliation for merely conventional or chemical weapons attacks on US forces or its allies. “[F]undamental questions must be asked and answered,” Mattis told the Senate armed services committee in January 2015. “We must clearly establish the role of our nuclear weapons: do they serve solely to deter nuclear war?”

—The Guardian, Dec. 4; CBS News online, Dec. 1, 2016.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter

December 10, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

South Australia Citizens Reject International Rad Waste Dump 

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2016-2017

A Citizen’s Jury in South Australia delivered a blow to a plan to construct a radioactive waste dump in their state. Importing 138,000 metric tons of high-level radioactive waste and 390,000 cubic meters of intermediate level nuclear waste had been among government recommendations in a report by the South Australia Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission. Premier Jay Weatherill convened a citizen-led jury to gain public input into the proposal. A majority of the jury members voted that “under no circumstances” would they support importing the waste. “This is a strong decision from a randomly selected and very diverse group of South Australians who have had the benefit of studying the Royal Commission Report … It was positive to hear the jurors acknowledging the need for [Aboriginal] Traditional Owner’s voices to be heard,” said the chairperson of Yankunytjatjara Native Title Aboriginal Corporation, Karina Lester (above left in photo).

Two primary concerns emerged as reasons for opposition to the dump: mistrust of the government, and lack of aboriginal consent. Some of the jury felt as if they were part of a process that was created to manufacture consent for the Royal Commission recommendations. Conflicts of interest were apparent when the government appointed nuclear advocates to head the Royal Commission who, in turn relied solely on a report co-authored by a pro-nuclear lobbying group ARUIS (Association for Regional and International Underground Storage).

Premier Weatherill is expected to decide on whether to respect the Jury’s verdict by the end of this year. “There’s no doubt that there’s a massive issue of trust in government, I could sense that,” he said. “That’s why we started the whole citizen’s jury process, because there is no way forward unless we overcome those issues.” His decision will have an impact on whether the mistrust of the government is affirmed.

—Nuclear Monitor, Nov. 9; No Dump Alliance, Nov. 7; Adelaide Now, Nov. 6, 2016

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

October 7, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Plowshares Land Trust

Established July, 1992

The Plowshares Land Trust consists of 57 acres of land dedicated to peace, justice and sustainability located 10 miles east of Luck, Wisconsin. The Trust is home to a number of projects and organizations including Open Circle community, Anathoth Community Farm and Nukewatch.

The Land Trust has two off-grid solar homes and is powered by a 10,000 watt solar panel array.

Visit us.

Directions to Plowshares Land Trust

Filed Under: On The Bright Side

October 7, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

On The Bright Side

sundaysmallNuclear disarmament and safe, cheap alternatives to nuclear power are in the news. Japan is getting along without 54 of 54 reactors using simple conservation and efficiency mandates. Nuclear is not necessary.

This page is dedicated to the happy news.


 

Contact us for related articles and information.

Filed Under: On The Bright Side Tagged With: nuclear, nuclear power

July 11, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Cambridge City Council Votes to Divest $1 Billion from Nuclear Weapons

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2016

In March, a unanimous vote of the Cambridge, Massachusetts City Council declared that the city would withdraw any portion of its $1 billion pension fund from “any entities that are involved in or support the production or upgrading of nuclear weapons systems.”

Cambridge-area activists, university scientists, and students drew on the annual report of financial institutions involved in nuclear weapons manufacturing compiled through the Don’t Bank on the Bomb initiative of Netherlands-based peace group PAX to make the case for a divestment resolution to the City Council.

Cambridge Mayor Dianne Simmons announced the decision, saying, “Not in our name! It’s my hope that this will inspire other municipalities, companies and individuals to look at their investments and make similar moves.”

Divestment policy examples and resources are available at dontbankonthebomb.com. —Huffington Post, Apr. 4; TruthOut, Apr. 11, 2016

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • …
  • 27
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch