Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

July 23, 2024 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

NRC Froze Data Gathering Same Day Tritium Tests Near Mississippi River Topped Drinking Water Limits

By Nukewatch Staff

To prepare its Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) regarding Xcel Energy’s license extension application for its Monticello reactor, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission had to establish a formal information-gathering period. The data collection time-frame officially ended on August 18, 2023.

According to Xcel Energy and NRC documents reviewed by Nukewatch, the NRC seems to have coincidentally picked for its end date the very day that radioactive tritium contamination in a groundwater test well near the Mississippi River exceeded the federal EPA safe drinking water limit.

In Xcel’s December 18, 2023 response to an NRC information request on its relicense application, Xcel submitted a table documenting the results of monitoring well tests between November 21, 2022 and August 18, 2023. Xcel’s table notes that the level of tritium in monitoring well (MW)-37A between July 27, 2023 and August 18, 2023 grew five-fold until, on August 18, it exceeded the EPA safe drinking water limit of 20,000 pico-curies-per-liter (pCi/L).

The NRC is currently considering Xcel’s application for a second 20-year license extension which, if granted, would allow the Monticello reactor in Minn., to run until 2050, when it would be 80 years old.

The classic Scream, by Edvard Munch, visits the Monticello nuclear reactor.

The NRC’s data collection cut-off date omits the critical time-frame immediately after August 18, when tritium levels near the Mississippi River were still increasing.

Similarly, Xcel’s “2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report” fails to provide precise data on monitoring well test results following August 18, 2023, noting only in general terms that tests done after that date found no unsafe levels of contamination. “The NRC should demand that Xcel provide well test results from August 18, 2023, through December 31, 2023, and should then enter these into the Federal Register for public consideration,” said Nukewatch’s Lindsay Potter, who discovered the coincidence. “The DEIS and license renewal process is incomplete without this information and should not move forward without it,” she said.

The reactor caused a leak to onsite groundwater of some 829,000 gallons of tritium-contaminated cooling water beginning in November 2022. In the same reply to the NRC December 18, 2023, Xcel reported that it had doubled its estimated volume of tritium-contaminated cooling water that had leaked to 829,000 gallons, not 400,000 gallons as it first reported.

The NRC acknowledges in its DEIS: “From available sampling data … tritium activity in wells MW-29A and MW-37A, which are near the river, were above the 20,000 pCi/L drinking water standard and trending in an upward direction as of August 2023.”

Tritium is a radioactive form of hydrogen — impossible to remove from water — which crosses the placenta and can cause cancer if ingested or inhaled.

Filed Under: Environment, Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

April 18, 2024 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Is Leaked, Radioactive Tritium in Mississippi River Drinking Water?

By John LaForge

Xcel Energy’s Monticello nuclear reactor on the Mississippi River has leaked some 829,000 gallons of wastewater contaminated with radioactive tritium into the groundwater on site,1 more than double the 400,000 gallons Xcel first estimated. The company has since replaced two leaking pipes, built an underground retaining wall, and is cleaning up after a second spill and its temporary reactor shutdown. Yet according to WCCO TV, for July 20, 2023, Xcel said a “small amount of leaked water may have reached the Mississippi River.”2

On March 18, 2023, the Associated Press (AP) reported that a representative of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) told them that the tritium-contaminated wastewater from the reactor couldn’t contaminate the water people drink. The AP reporters quoted NRC spokesperson Victoria Mitlyng, writing: “Mitlyng said there is no pathway for the tritium to get into drinking water.”3

In fact, there are two pathways for the tritium leak to get into drinking water. First, the tritium in the 829,000-gallon leak is now in a groundwater plume that can move beyond Xcel’s Monticello site and reach private or public drinking water wells.

Second, the groundwater plume, which moves toward the Mississippi,4 will contaminate the river which supplies drinking water to one million-plus people in the Twin Cities and their suburbs and 38 million people downstream.

Legend – The Nuclear Regulatory Commission defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear reactors: a “plume exposure pathway zone” with a radius of 10 miles (dark yellow circle at center), concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination; and an “ingestion pathway zone” of about 50 miles (pale yellow circle), concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity. Numbers and red circles indicate approximate county population at risk. Arrows indicate wind direction.
Map Fine Print – Zone definitions: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Population data: U.S. Census 2020 block groups with centers inside respective exposure zones. Wind data: National Weather Service 2023 daily summaries. Map by Carl Sack, 2024.

Perhaps Mitlyng was misquoted, since the NRC and the AP have both reported that the plume of tritium-contaminated groundwater can move outside Xcel’s boundary. In fact, both agencies have reported that Xcel’s stated purpose in hastily building an underground steel wall between the reactor and the Mississippi is to prevent the radioactive groundwater from entering the river.5

The AP reported March 24, 2023 that Chris Clark, the president of Xcel Energy,
acknowledged that the radioactive pollution can reach the Mississippi. The AP reported: “Even if the tritium reached the river, which Clark assured wouldn’t happen, it would dissipate within a few yards.”6 Clark’s assurance is either a mistake or a deliberate fib, because “dissipate” means to disappear or vanish. However, tritium contamination in water lasts 123 years.

Further, there is no way to remove tritium from water once it’s contaminated — as the 1.5 million tons of tritiated wastewater being pumped into the Pacific Ocean from the three-reactor earthquake/tsunami/meltdown site at Fukushima proves.

Why is Xcel’s tritium in the groundwater and the Great River such a threat to the people and animals that rely on it? As the NRC says, “This is because tritium travels as a form of water through the soil faster than other radionuclides.”7 The city of Minneapolis proudly declares, “Our water comes from the Mississippi River. Roughly 21 billion gallons of water are pumped from the river each year, and 57 million gallons of drinking water delivered every day.”8

We can’t say, “There’s nothing we can do.”

Everyone can comment to the government regarding the risks posed by Monticello’s operations, when Xcel issues (this spring) its draft supplemental environmental impact statement (DSEIS) regarding the firm’s request to extend its license and run the 54-year-old reactor until 2050, when it will turn 80.

The comment period will last four to six weeks and open after the DSEIS is released. Check Nukewatch’s website to learn when the period has opened. Use one of Nukewatch’s sample comments or your own. Plan to make your voice heard in person once the NRC schedules a public hearing on the license extension. nukewatchinfo.org/monticello.

Notes:

[1] Xcel Energy, “Subsequent License Renewal Application Response to Request for Additional Information and Request
for Confirmation of Information – Set 1 Part 2,” p. 6, Dec. 18, 2023, https://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webSearch2/main.jsp?AccessionNumber=ML23352A081

and The Monticello Times, “Xcel groundwater recovery enters final phase,” Dec. 21, 2023, https://www.hometownsource.com/monticello_times/xcel-groundwater-recovery-enters-final-phase/article_7e834ce8-9ea3-11ee-8e03-9f36a6b5d962.html

[2] CBS Minnesota, WCCO Staff, “Xcel Energy: Small amount of leaked water may have reached the Mississippi River,”
July 20, 2023, https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/xcel-energy-small-amount-of-leaked-water-may-have-reached-
the-mississippi-river/

[3] Associated Press, “Regulators: Nuclear plant leak didn’t require public notice,” by Michael Phillis and Amancia Biraben, March 18, 2023, https://apnews.com/article/xcel-energy-nuclear-leak-tritium-6e522afbb12ad26925c40d833853088d

[4] Doug Wetzstein of the Minn. Pollution Control Agency told WCCO television last March, “The groundwater beneath
the facility … moves in the direction of the Mississippi River.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5c6j7UZZA0&ab_channel=WCCO-CBSMinnesota

[5] Nuclear Engineering International, “Xcel Energy to build underground barrier to contain radioactive water leak at Monticello NPP, August 22, 2023, https://www.neimagazine.com/news/newsxcel-energy-to-build-underground-barrier-to-contain-radioactive-water-leak-at-monticello-npp-11090330; Xcel illustration of its wall is at https://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/Blog.aspx?IID=59; WCCO Staff, CBS Minnesota, “Xcel Energy to begin construction on underground barrier at Monticello nuclear plant,” August 18, 2023, https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/xcel-energy-to-begin-construction-on-underground-barrier-at-monticello-nuclear-plant/

[6]Associated Press, “Minnesota nuclear plant shuts down for leak; residents worry,” by Trisha Ahmed and Matthew Daly, March 24, 2023, www.apnews.com/article/minnesota-nuclear-plant-leak-6b72b6f9cd2a1141aadd985b68654e04

[7] “NRC List of Leaks and Spills at Operating U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants,” https://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webSearch2/main.jsp?AccessionNumber=ML23284A16

[8] www.minneapolismn.gov, Treatment and Delivery Process, “Our water comes from the Mississippi River,” https://www2.minneapolismn.gov/government/departments/public-works/water-treatment-distribution/treat-deliver/

Filed Under: Environment, Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

April 18, 2024 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Trouble on the Water

By John LaForge

Xcel Energy owns the Monticello nuclear reactor on the Mississippi River, 40 miles upstream of Minneapolis. This 54-year-old General Electric reactor, one of the three oldest in the country, was originally designed and built to last 40 years. It should have been decommissioned in 2010.

On Nov. 22, 2022, Xcel reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that radioactivity was found in groundwater from an onsite monitoring well. Xcel’s notice said nothing about the leak’s volume, its source, or its level of radioactivity, but it did claim without evidence that, “There was no impact on the health and safety of the public or plant personnel.” The public was not informed of this “harmless” radioactive pollution until March 2023, four months later. Xcel then said that 400,000 gallons contaminated with radioactive tritium had leaked from underground pipes into the groundwater.

Placement of steel underground “groundwater barrier” built at Xcel’s Monticello nuclear reactor on the Mississippi River. Graphic: Xcel Energy 9/28/23.

The company said the concentration of tritium in its leakage was “five million picocuries-per-liter,” a very high concentration at the level of primary reactor coolant. Very few tritium leaks from U.S. nuclear reactors had more tritium per liter.

At 400,000 gallons (1,761,953 liters), with five million picocuries of tritium per liter, the leak contained roughly eight curies of radioactivity. This is no small matter. The partial reactor meltdown at Three Mile Island, one of the worst in U.S. history, released 14 curies of radioactive iodine-131. As noted below, 14 curies of tritium is now Xcel’s latest radioactive pollution estimate.

This tritium is a direct threat to the Mississippi River and the people and animals that rely on it, because, as the NRC says: “After a radioactive leak or spill … tritium travels as a form of water through the soil faster than other radionuclides.”

Leak Estimate Doubled

On Dec. 18, 2023, Xcel reported to the NRC that its first leak estimate was grossly in error. Xcel now estimates that 829,000 gallons of radioactive water has leaked into the ground — not 400,000. Xcel also reported the leaking started earlier than originally thought. Xcel noted that its estimate of radioactivity leaked into the groundwater is now 14 curies.

In a May 10, 2023 letter to the NRC, Xcel also confirmed that more radioactive materials than tritium were in the 829,000-gallon leak. Xcel wrote that samples from Monticello’s laboratory “detected iodine-131, iodine-133, iodine-135, xenon-133, and xenon-135 in [monitoring well-9a].”

Uninspected 54-year-old, Corroded Pipes Leak

The wastewater leaked from two old underground pipes between the reactor building and the turbine building, which were later replaced. The company announced in March 2023 that the leak had been stopped. Later, it admitted that the fix failed when a collection system overflowed, dumping tritium-contaminated water into the ground again.

In a Nov. 9, 2023 letter to the NRC, Xcel reported that “The visual examination of the removed [carbon steel] piping sections showed that both of the CRD [control rod drive] pipes experienced severe corrosion of the external surfaces in the regions exposed to the ground water present between the buildings” and “[b]oth CRD pipes … were replaced with uncoated stainless-steel piping.” The same letter reports on Xcel’s plans for inspecting thousands of Monticello’s other underground pipes. Xcel says it “will inspect the underground stainless-steel piping … once every 10 years.”

In January 2023, two months after the original leak, Xcel applied to the NRC for an operating license extension to run Monticello until it is 80, even though the company would wait another two months before notifying the public of this pollution catastrophe and 12 months before reporting the true volume of the spill. This GE Mark I reactor is identical to the three melted and exploded Fukushima units in Japan. With Xcel’s stellar record of never endangering anyone’s health and safety, the NRC ought to rubber stamp the application, right?

— Originally published online on Feb. 2, 2024 at Counterpunch.org.

Filed Under: Environment, Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

March 19, 2024 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Nuclear Power Poisons the Planet-Shut Down Xcel’s Monticello Reactor

By Nukewatch and WILPF Earth Democracy Committee

Author and anti-nuclear activist Harvey Wasserman recently asked, “if atomic reactors can’t economically compete, can’t be insured, operate un-inspected, worsen climate chaos, are sitting ducks for terror attack, and so much more….why are they still running?

The answer is clear: they are the unspoken infrastructure for our nation’s bomb-making machine.”

Nuclear power is the flipside of nuclear weapons and carries its own dangers.

The latest propaganda craze pushing nuclear power is riding the wave of the climate change movement, greenwashing nuclear power as if it were “clean and carbon-free.” New theoretical nuclear reactor designs are being promoted as real and improved, of which they are neither. Old reactors are getting license renewals rubber stamped to run until the ripe old age of 80 years by the federal government and bailed out to the tune of tens of billions of dollars by taxpayers. The U.S. and international partners recently committed to tripling nuclear energy production by 2050. Uranium mining in the U.S. is being revived.

Nuclear power comes with high risk to water, Earth, and all of life: risk of allowable and accidental radioactive releases, accumulation of radioactive waste which sits on river banks, and all the waste heat (thermal pollution) produced by the reactor. The high-level radioactive waste created at reactors is dangerous for a million years. Every storage siting solution that gained political support has been an environmental justice catastrophe, always earning the opposition it deserved from Indigenous and other local communities.

The benefits of nuclear power could potentially outweigh these risks if it could actually solve our climate crisis, but on the contrary, it cannot even withstand climate change. As global water temperatures increase, reactors which rely on water to cool have had several shutdowns during heat waves over the last six years to avoid meltdowns. Proximity to cooling water is the reason reactors must be sited near water bodies, but that in turn puts the onsite radioactive waste in danger as sea levels rise.

That brings us to Xcel Energy’s nuclear reactor in Monticello, Minn. along the banks of the Mississippi River, 200 miles from the headwaters of the Great River and upstream from the source of drinking water for 20 million people, including those in Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minn.

This spring Xcel Energy is expected to issue its environmental impact statement regarding its application for a 20-year operating license extension to the operating life of the reactor. This begins a 30-day public comment period on the “Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement” (Draft SEIS), wherein anyone concerned with the continued operation of the leaking, accident-plagued, 54-year-old reactor can send comments to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in Washington, D.C. Once the comment period opens Nukewatch will provide sample comments you may submit at nukewatchinfo.org/monticello.

The Monticello reactor made national headlines in March 2023, when Xcel disclosed publicly that it had leaked cooling water contaminated with radioactive tritium, iodine, and xenon into the groundwater under the facility. Xcel and local news media reported that an extremely high concentration of radioactive tritium contaminated the leaked wastewater: 5 million picocuries per liter, or 250 times the allowable levels for drinking water. According to WCCO TV, Xcel said that a “small amount of leaked water may have reached the Mississippi River.”

The nuclear beast raises its head along the entire nuclear fuel chain – in newly operating uranium mines, at enrichment facilities, weapons testing sites, and power reactors. Right now, we have a unique opportunity to chime in on whether one reactor continues to run. Will you stand up and take this simple action today? Submitting public comments opposing the continued radioactive pollution from this nuclear reactor is something we can all do to stop the nuclear beast in one of its many forms.

For detailed information on the radioactive leak, the license extension, and sample comments to submit, see: nukewatchinfo.org/monticello.

Filed Under: Nuclear Power, Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor

January 18, 2024 by Nukewatch 1 Comment

Tritium Leaks at Monticello Nuclear Reactor: It Ain’t Just Hydrogen

Concentrations 1, 2, 3, and 4 according to Xcel website. Concentration 5 according to Minn. Public Radio, Apr. 24. Concentrations 6, 7 according to USGS.
By Kelly Lundeen

The word ‘tritium’ dotted regional headlines this year, accompanied by misleading information about the radioactive substance. The March 17, 2023 weekly edition of Monticello Times announced, “400,000 gallons of water contaminated with radioactive tritium leaked from Monticello nuclear power plant.” Again on March 23, the Times followed up, “Xcel, regulators knew of tritium leak four months before notice.” On March 16, the St. Paul Pioneer Press assured the public that “Regulators monitor tritium leak at Xcel Energy’s Monticello nuclear plant.”

The large radioactive water leak at a concentration of 5 million picocuries-per-liter (pCi/L) of tritium was discovered one year ago by the Monticello reactor’s operator, Northern States Power. Four months later a second leak appeared when the fix failed. This forced the reactor to be shut down for a week, prompting regulators to finally release information about the leak to the public.

Xcel claims to have fixed the leak and continues pumping and collecting the radioactive groundwater to store onsite for reuse. The firm is also building a 600-foot underground wall 20 feet from the Mississippi River to prevent the radioactive groundwater from entering the River, even though, on July 20, Minnesota Public Radio warned, “Xcel: Leaked groundwater containing tritium may have reached Mississippi River in Monticello.”

Xcel has dodged questions about how far the radioactive water could have spread. The company claims that no tritium has been detected beyond the reactor facility boundaries, nor entered the Mississippi River, yet it has never specified where its testing is being done. Groundwater moves between 1 foot-per-day and 1 foot-per-decade, but the Mississippi River in Minnesota flows about 12,000 cubic feet-per-second, which could quickly disperse the tritiated water. Groundwater typically provides about 40-50 percent of the surface water to rivers, meaning the contaminated groundwater could have entered the Mississippi without being detected depending on where water is tested.

What is tritium?

What is this radioactive isotope that made headlines in mainstream newspapers? Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen. Much of the news coverage about the tritium leak at the Monticello reactor is deceptively reassuring. Mainstream media parrot misleading myths about tritium peddled by industry and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

Myth # 1

“Tritium is safe because it is ‘naturally occurring’ in the environment,” Pioneer Press, March 16

While it is true that tritium occurs in nature, its only natural source is in the upper atmosphere. In the chart below you can see that estimated naturally occurring tritium in groundwater — deposited from the upper atmosphere — ranges from 6 to 26 pCi/L. Additional tritium has been dispersed due to atmospheric nuclear weapons tests and routine or accidental nuclear reactor discharges.

Myth #2

“Tritium emits a weak form of radiation, a low-energy beta particle,” NRC

Radiation from tritium is not low-energy, but rather low-range, and its emissions are concentrated in a small space. It can be eight times more biologically damaging than other types of radiation if ingested or inhaled, and can even incorporate into DNA molecules affecting chromosomes.

Myth #3

“Tritium is a mildly radioactive form of hydrogen that occurs naturally,” Minnesota Public Radio, August 17

Tritium atoms replace hydrogen atoms in water molecules making the water itself radioactive. It is not simply water with tritium, it is tritiated water. Once it is part of water it follows the water cycle, traveling through groundwater, absorbed by roots of plants and into our food, or evaporated into the atmosphere and returned to the Earth through precipitation.

The body cannot distinguish clean water from tritiated water, making it more dangerous than other radionuclides. Its capacity to be exchanged with hydrogen gives it the special ability to bind with organic materials in plants, food, humans, and other animals.

Hydrogen is one of the building blocks of the human body and of all life. Humans are about 60 percent water. Tritium, disguised as hydrogen, is therefore more dangerous due to its similarity to hydrogen, not less dangerous. When a fetus is growing, its tissue collects tritium at twice the concentration of maternal tissue.

Around nuclear power facilities, children are the ones who suffer the most. They are about one and a half times more likely to be born with embryonal cancer and have over double the likelihood of childhood leukemia, caused by standard operation alone. That doesn’t include the accidents.

Myth #4

“The tritium radiation does not travel very far in air and cannot penetrate the skin,” NRC

Soil, plants, and food grown near nuclear reactors have been found to be contaminated up to 60 miles from the reactor site. In the case of Monticello, this includes the entire Minneapolis/St. Paul metro area, a population of 4 million people.

Tritium is created as a byproduct in the coolant inside the reactor core. While it may not be able to penetrate skin, there are other points of exposure that make a protective layer of skin irrelevant. Tritium is released legally by regular operation of all nuclear reactors in the form of radioactive water vapor. As long as people living around the reactor breath, the tritium will be inhaled, easily bypassing the skin. It can also be ingested through consumption of food grown around the reactor.

This article would not have been possible without information collected from radiation classes offered by the Gender & Radiation Information Project and Beyond Nuclear. (genderandradiation.org/classes)

— Sources include: Xcel Energy Monticello Groundwater Status and Background, Nov. 21, 2022; Minn. Public Radio, April 24, 2023; United States Geological Society (USGS) National Ground-Water Monitoring Network 2008, 1998; “Treatise on Geochemistry,” Volume 5, 2003, Pages 319-364, published by USGS, 2003

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch