Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

November 5, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Partial Authorization for Holtec’s Restart of the Closed Palisades Reactor

Environmental coalition vows to fight on, given unacceptable risks to the Great Lakes Basin

By Kevin Kamps

On July 24, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a final notice to support the restart of power operations at the Palisades Nuclear Plant in Michigan which was retired in May 2022.

The “zombie reactor” restart scheme is unneeded, insanely expensive for the public, and extremely high risk for health, safety, security, and the environment. NRC staff has determined there are “no significant hazards” to consider. How about the catastrophic accident risks foisted on the Great Lakes Basin — 21% of the entire planet’s surface fresh water — and all who call it home?

A 1982 study commissioned by the NRC, and carried out by the Sandia National Lab — “Calculation of Reactor Accident Consequences” — estimated that a meltdown at Palisades would cause 1,000 acute radiation poisoning deaths, 7,000 radiation injuries, and 10,000 latent cancer fatalities, as well as (inflation adjusted) $168 billion in property damage.

The coalition challenging Holtec’s Palisades restart scheme includes Beyond Nuclear, Don’t Waste Michigan, Michigan Safe Energy Future, Nuclear Energy Information Service of Chicago, and Three Mile Island Alert of Pennsylvania. Terry Lodge of Toledo, Ohio, and Wally Taylor of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, serve as the coalition’s co-counsel. Nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen, as well as Stanford University professor and world-renowned climate mitigation researcher Dr. Mark Z. Jacobson, serve as the coalition’s expert witnesses.

Our environmental coalition first petitioned to intervene and request a hearing, in opposition to the Exemption Request in early December 2023. We did so again on October 7, 2024.

To learn more about Beyond Nuclear, visit their website at beyondnuclear.org

The NRC ruled against our coalition’s intervention petition and request for hearings, but we have appealed the adverse rulings and are awaiting a response. We also have challenged the adequacy of NRC staff’s “Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact” (EA/FONSI). Sixty-six organizations and 145 individuals submitted extensive comments on the draft EA/FONSI, and our coalition filed related contentions.

In addition, we have challenged the Holtec company’s proposed band-aid fixes to the reactor’s severely degraded steam generator tubes, a self-inflicted wound. Holtec — which has no reactor operating nor construction experience — neglected critical safety maintenance from 2022 to 2024, a “rookie error,” as our nuclear engineer expert witness Arnie Gundersen has called it, with potentially dire consequences. This neglect allowed corrosive chemical attacks on both the inside and outside of the exceedingly thin-walled steam generator tubes.

As Gundersen has testified in these proceedings, the failure of a single tube would result in a release of radioactivity to the environment. But a cascading failure of multiple tubes could cause a reactor core meltdown, and catastrophic release of hazardous radioactivity onto the winds and waves. He warned about the potential consequences more than a decade ago, when he first served as our expert witness at Palisades, concerning yet another still unaddressed pathway to reactor core meltdown: the worst neutron-embrittlement of a reactor pressure vessel in the country, and likely in the world.

Holtec recently submitted yet another request to postpone implementing fire protections that have also been neglected at Palisades for decades, despite related scandals, and the fact that fully half of all reactor core meltdown scenarios can be initiated by fire, according to retired Union of Concerned Scientists nuclear power safety director, David Lochbaum, a nuclear engineer.

For this reason, we will continue to resist Holtec’s Palisades zombie reactor restart scheme, enabled by a complicit and colluding NRC, at every opportunity. There is too much at stake to do otherwise.

— Kevin Kamps works with Beyond Nuclear, a nonprofit organization that aims to educate and activate the public about connections between nuclear power and nuclear weapons.

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

November 5, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Trump Budget Cuts Slam Hanford Plutonium Cleanup

By Adrian Monty

Cleanup at the Hanford site in eastern Washington state continues to be messy. Construction of the Hanford Waste Treatment, or Vitrification Plant (to solidify liquid radioactive waste in “glass logs”), has been in the works since 2002. The arduous process of vitrifying the 56 million gallons of radioactive waste at Hanford, produced throughout WWII and the Cold War, inches closer to being started.

A 3,500-foot pipeline running from the high-level waste tanks to the vitrification site was recently completed, the Tri-City Herald reported June 11.

Although missed deadlines for the work to commence have been decried by federal and state officials, contractors and workers at Hanford want to ensure that the dangerously complex can be done safely before proceeding. Crews have performed tests designed to mimic radioactive leakage to determine if their systems are capable of leak detection.

While the Biden administration was pushing to expand the budget for clean-up efforts at Hanford, the current administration is calling for cutbacks. Due to initiatives to cut federal spending by the Department of Government Efficiency and other executive orders, 50 of the 300 federal workers at Hanford have been dismissed, according to Nuclear Engineering International, March 4th. Much of the high-risk work at the facility is done by specialized contractors like Hanford Tank Waste Operations & Closure, and the Department of Energy (DOE) wants Hanford to reduce the number of contractors.

In addition to the waste being vitrified on-site at Hanford, the DOE has begun testing treatment and transportation of some of the radioactive waste to the Waste Control Specialists site in Andrews County, Texas and Energy Solutions in Clive, Utah and grouting it in cement as part of the “Test Bed Initiative.”

⸺ Adrian Monty works with the Oregon State University Downwinder Project. She is an environmental journalist with a focus on atomic issues.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

November 5, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

“The Beginning of Justice”: RECA Extended, Expanded

Youth from Polk Middle School in Albuquerque and Southwest Organizing Project join Tularosa Basin Downwinders Consortium co-founder Tina Cordova, left, at the 80th commemoration of the Trinity test with the newly unveiled historic marker. For the first time, Trinity downwinders are eligible for compensation for radiation exposure damage under the reauthorized RECA. Photo by Seth Sheldon, ICAN

By Danielle Prokop and Julia Goldberg

The July 16th 80th anniversary of the Trinity Test arrived in New Mexico at a poignant moment, and serves as just one example of the state’s nuclear legacy. Generations of survivors of the federal government’s nuclear testing program and the state’s uranium mining industry have waited for years for recognition from the United States as they watched their friends and families die from cancers.

The 1990 federal Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) — created to provide restitution to people sickened by exposure to radiation — excluded New Mexico’s downwinders and post-1971 uranium miners, and expired in 2024, after years of lobbying for expansion by victims and New Mexico’s elected leaders. Over the years, the coalition calling for
RECA’s expansion and extension has grown across states and become a bipartisan effort. In the end, Republican U.S. Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri got it over the finish line as a provision in Trump’s massive tax and spending bill.

“It was quite a relief, because we’ve waited so long,” said Tina Cordova, founder of the Tularosa Basin Downwinders Consortium, during a news conference. “Honestly, the acknowledgment is long past due,” she said. “But I also want to recognize…that we’re not there yet. We still have a lot of work to do.”

RECA’s two-year expansion “will not be long enough for us to get everybody enrolled,” Cordova said. The bill also provides $100,000 lump sum payouts but no longer includes health care coverage. “We will take the win, and we will continue our fight…. And we will also never forget that there are some very important people that have been left out: the people of Guam, the people of Colorado, the people of Montana, the remainder of Arizona and Nevada…. We will continue to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with our sisters and brothers from those places who we’ve come to love.”

— For updates and info’ on applying for RECA go to trinitydownwinders.com. This article was originally published at Source New Mexico and has been shortened for space.

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

November 5, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Serial Killers on the Loose: Cancer Death Rates Rising in Reactor Host Communities

Analysis of CDC data shows excess cancer deaths in counties that host the 16 oldest U.S. reactors

In commercial nuclear power reactors, after capital costs of construction are paid, which for the Monticello reactor in Minnesota was in the early 1990s, selling nuclear electricity is extremely profitable. Xcel Energy sells electricity for about $0.10/kWh. At this rate, every day that Monticello operates, it produces over $1.5 million that primarily pays Xcel Energy managers and shareholders.

Nuclear fission occurs in commercial nuclear reactors because uranium-235 atoms explode in chain reactions that produce atomic debris and extreme amounts of heat. Every element on the Periodic Table and all its radioactive isotopes are part of this debris, including gases such as radioactive helium, xenon, iodine, and krypton, and fine particulates like strontium-90. These materials are vented to the air or get absorbed by primary cooling water that circulates through reactor cores, and they must be removed in order for reactors to continue functioning.

The radioactive debris gets stripped out of primary cooling water, collected in holding tanks, and is held for some period. Due to the volume of these stripped materials, it is not profitable to contain them until they are no longer dangerous. So, after storing them for a designated period, they get released to the atmosphere under specified weather conditions. These are “routine radioactive releases.” Once these radioactive materials get released, they disperse into our biosphere. They are available for absorption, ingestion, and inhalation by living things, including humans.

Radiation monitoring at reactor sites is not designed, or intended, to detect these radioactive releases or to identify where they migrate or where they might accumulate. Radiation causes cancer. According to the 2005 National Academy of Sciences BEIR VII Report (Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation), every exposure to radiation has the potential to cause cancer. There is no safe dose. While infants, children and women are more susceptible than adult males, every molecule of radiation routinely released by nuclear facilities has potential to initiate cancer in a person.

Joseph Mangano, an epidemiologist with master’s degrees in Public Health and Business Administration, is sole or co-author of 41 peer-reviewed medical journal articles, including articles published by The Lancet and The British Medical Journal.

The Center for Disease Control (CDC) public health data analyzed by Mangano identifies cancer mortality over three time periods in counties that host 16 of the nation’s oldest nuclear power reactors. Mangano’s analysis compares CDC reported cancer mortality in host counties with state-wide cancer mortality averages. The bottom-line results of this analysis are presented on the map of “Excess Cancer Deaths” below. The first time period of Mangano’s analysis, 1968-1978, establishes the baseline for comparison and accounts for an initial cancer latency period, as the first of the 16 oldest nuclear reactors came on-line in 1969.

Mangano’s CDC data analysis finds significant excess cancer deaths for host counties for 15 of the 16 oldest nuclear facilities. Further, the analysis finds that excess cancer deaths are greater, often significantly greater, in the 1999-2020 time-period than between 1979 and 1998. This is not surprising, considering that more people were exposed for longer periods of time during the 1999-2020 time frame.

What is the value of a human life? The results of Mangano’s analysis of CDC county-by-county public health data are clear: commercial nuclear operations are killing residents at an accelerating and alarming rate. His analysis found that the Monticello reactor accounted for 328 excess deaths from 1999 to 2020.

Every two months in Wright and Sherburne counties, cancer kills three more people as a result of radiation released into the environment by Monticello nuclear operations. What would be the public response if every three weeks, news broadcasters identified a victim and announced that the Wright and Sherburne county “serial killer” had struck again? How long, as a society, would we find such killing to be acceptable? This death toll in exchange for expensive electricity and corporate profiteering is intolerable, so nuclear reactors must be phased out.

Projected excess cancer deaths, 2031-2050, in Minnesota’s Wright and Sherburne counties

The Monticello nuclear power reactor started operating in 1971, and its recently-extended license expires in 2051, meaning Monticello could operate for up to 80 years (the oldest U.S. reactors started 55 years ago). The NRC has approved six applications for reactors to extend licenses up to 80 years. It is currently reviewing 16 others, and expects at least 19 more.

Reactors were designed to last 40 years, based on deterioration of mechanical parts. Keeping reactors well past the 40-year mark raises safety and health issues. The more than 100 cancer-causing gases and metallic particles routinely released from Monticello into the environment, alongside those from accidental radioactive leaks, can enter human bodies by way of air, food, and water, potentially leading to higher cancer rates.

In 1968-1978, the age-adjusted death rate for Wright and Sherburne counties was 10.5% below the U.S. rate (wonder.cdc.gov). Since then, the two-county rate has steadily moved closer to equaling the U.S. rate. In the most recent 12-year period for which final data are available (2009-2020), the local rate was just 2.2% below the U.S. rate. Then, for the first time, the local rate exceeded the U.S. rate in 2015, 2017, 2020, 2022, and 2023.

The population of Sherburne and Wright counties increased between 1970 and 2020, from 115,527 to 180,270. Projected future numbers are 269,000 in 2030 and 343,000 in 2050. The estimated number of Sherburne and Wright county residents who will die of cancer in the two decades 2031-2050 is 10,010.

The proposal to extend the license for the Monticello reactor for 20 years starting in 2031 was approved by federal regulators. Numerous concerns over local safety and health have been raised. While regulators are not obligated by law to monitor trends in local disease and death rates near reactors, the routine release of radioactive isotopes into the environment raises the issue of excess cancers in this 20-year period.

Two models, each using a different assumption about future differences between local and national cancer death rates, estimate that between 831 and 1,662 excess local cancer deaths would occur in 2031-2050, or between 8.3% and 16.6% of all 10,010 estimated cancer deaths.

Many factors can contribute to cancer mortality, including exposure to environmental toxins such as radioactivity emitted from nuclear reactors like Monticello. The health risks of continued operation of an aging and corroding reactor up to 80 years is a new issue, as Monticello is one of the oldest in the U.S.

Any decision to renew Monticello’s license for an additional 20 years should have included a thorough review of health hazards by officials, followed by public discussion. The historical shift from Sherburne and Wright Counties from a low-cancer area to one nearly equal to the national rate ⸺ and the potential for this to continue or worsen in the future, in an area with a rapidly-rising population ⸺ must be considered as one criterion in this decision.

⸺ Map and analysis by George Crocker of the North American Water Office, and Joseph Mangano, the Director of the Radiation and Public Health Project. This article is taken from a longer brochure currently available from the Coalition for a Nuclear-Free Mississippi River. To learn more, visit the website and sign the petition to shut down the Monticello reactor at nuclearfreemississippi.wordpress.com.

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

November 5, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

“Temporary” Waste Dump Wins in Court, Loses in States

Supreme Court allows NRC license approval for highly radioactive waste dump in Texas to stand, but without addressing underlying questions.

By Beyond Nuclear

On June 18, in a 6-to-3 decision regarding NRC v. Texas, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s approval of a license for the Interim Storage Partners (ISP) consolidated interim storage facility (CISF) in Andrews County, Texas. The CISF targets west Texas for up to 40,000 metric tons of irradiated nuclear fuel and highly radioactive waste from commercial atomic reactors across the country. There is around 95,000 metric tons of highly radioactive waste stored at 94 operating, and 42 closed, nuclear reactors located in dozens of states.

The Supreme Court decision did not reach the underlying concern before the court ⸺ whether the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) had authority to issue private storage licenses like ISP’s. Instead, it held that the State of Texas and Fasken Land and Minerals were not parties eligible for judicial review. Because of this ineligibility, the court held that the ISP license could not be challenged.

The battle over ISP will continue outside the court. Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed into law a prohibition against the waste site in September 2021, just days before the NRC approved ISP’s construction and operating license. The state law would not allow needed state permits to be issued.

“A single rail car would carry as much plutonium as was in the bomb dropped on Nagasaki. Shipments would continue for 40 years or more. Waste that remains deadly for eons would move from nuclear reactor sites across the country, creating accident and contamination risks along the way. Exposure to radiation is known to cause cancers, genetic damage, birth defects and deaths,” said Diane D’Arrigo of Nuclear Information and Resource Service.

Late this summer, courts considered the impact of Supreme Court’s ruling on an even larger CISF, planned by Holtec International in southeastern New Mexico, just over 40 miles west of ISP’s site. Holtec’s dump would store up to 173,600 metric tons of radioactive waste.

On August 5, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected Beyond Nuclear’s July 16th appeal for a rehearing in Beyond Nuclear v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission submitted by co-counsel, Diane Curran, of Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg in Washington, DC, and Mindy Goldstein, Director of the Turner Environmental Law Clinic at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia. The appeal was regarding Holtec’s plans for the New Mexico CISF.

Since taking office in 2019, New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham has also opposed Holtec’s CISF. On March 17, 2023 ⸺ just weeks before NRC approved Holtec’s license ⸺ she signed into law a prohibition against the CISF for lacking the state’s consent. The new state law would also prevent the issuance of state permits needed for the dump’s opening.

“With the NRC as the gatekeeper, it is questionable whether any party will be able to challenge the NRC on important health and safety issues at any level,” said Karen Hadden of Texas Nuclear Watchdogs. “The proposed plans to consolidate the nation’s nuclear reactor waste put the public in danger, both with transportation and at the storage site. Opponents will continue to fight efforts to dump on Texas and New Mexico.”

⸺ Beyond Nuclear, August 7, July 18, and June 17, 2025. beyondnuclear.org

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • …
  • 222
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch