Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

July 11, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Cambridge City Council Votes to Divest $1 Billion from Nuclear Weapons

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2016

In March, a unanimous vote of the Cambridge, Massachusetts City Council declared that the city would withdraw any portion of its $1 billion pension fund from “any entities that are involved in or support the production or upgrading of nuclear weapons systems.”

Cambridge-area activists, university scientists, and students drew on the annual report of financial institutions involved in nuclear weapons manufacturing compiled through the Don’t Bank on the Bomb initiative of Netherlands-based peace group PAX to make the case for a divestment resolution to the City Council.

Cambridge Mayor Dianne Simmons announced the decision, saying, “Not in our name! It’s my hope that this will inspire other municipalities, companies and individuals to look at their investments and make similar moves.”

Divestment policy examples and resources are available at dontbankonthebomb.com. —Huffington Post, Apr. 4; TruthOut, Apr. 11, 2016

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter

July 11, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

 Major Indian Firm Quits Twin Reactor Project, Cites “Investment Exposure”

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2016

Nalco (National Aluminum Company Limited), the giant aluminum corporation and government of India enterprise, abruptly withdrew its interest in construction of two large power reactors at Kakrapara in the Northwestern state of Gujarat.

Prior to its withdrawal from the project, Nalco’s web site boasted that the company “has formed a Joint Venture (JV) with Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) for establishing two 700 MW nuclear power plants at an estimated investment of [$11.4 billion].” Nalco had planned a 26 percent stake in the new entity, NPCIL. The Government of India holds 80.93 percent equity of Nalco.

In 2012, the $7 billion aluminum company signed a memorandum of understanding with NPCIL to build the two new reactors at the Kakrapara Atomic Power Station. The cost of the project is currently estimated at $12 billion. The Pressurized Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs) would be the 3rd and 4th reactors at Kakrapara. Units 1 and 2, both 220 Mw reactors, went online in 1993 and 1995 respectively.

Unreported in the Business Standard report was any mention of the long-standing, large-scale public protests involving thousands of arrests and mass jailings of opponents that have confronted the project since its inception.

“We have decided to pull out of the [joint venture] with NPCIL following a change in technology of the project. Initially, it was decided to build the plant with indigenous technology. But later, it was decided to use foreign technology. The foreign technology will not only be more expensive, the gestation period of the project will also be more and we are [not] in a mood to wait that long with so much of investment exposure,” Nalco Chairman and Managing Director Tapan Kumar Chand told the press.

—Business Standard, May 30, 2016

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter

July 11, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Prince Tops Our Anti-Nuclear Playlist

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2016
By Kelly Lundeen

LUCK, WI—Four hours had passed in the Nukewatch office on April 21, 2016. I had been concerned with the scandals and disasters of nuclear weapons when I got a barrage of personal text messages. “I heard Prince passed on. Are you all okay?” Within an hour of the news of his death, I had five text messages in my inbox. I thought, “Why is the death of a pop star so important as to take me away from pondering the impending radioactive holocaust?”

The truth is I love Prince’s music and have been dancing to it since I was five, or maybe younger. But, why should I care? In the office the conversation shifted. “What did Prince have to say about nuclear weapons?” As a five-year-old, I was not cognizant that trying to keep up with my older sister—in musical trends and fascination with Prince—that I was also being exposed to the nuclear hysteria captured in the song “1999.”

“Everybody’s got a bomb / We could all die any day/ But before I’ll let that happen / I’ll dance my life away.”

It was all coming together. Prince had more to say about nuclear weapons than may be expected. Another more obviously political and lesser-known Prince song from 1981, “Ronnie, Talk to Russia,” makes a rational appeal to then-President Reagan for diplomacy during the Cold War. In a circus-gospel-rock tune Prince advises:

“Ronnie, talk to Russia before it’s too late / Before they blow up the world… / Dontcha. / Don’t you blow up my world.”

So, came the idea of a list of songs about nuclear weapons and, as it turns out, Nukewatch is not the first to compile such a list. There are far too many songs to include here, but these are some of our favorites—the serious, the depressing and the light-hearted—with an emphasis on the light-hearted. See nukewatchinfo.org for song links!

The Serious “99 Red Balloons,” Nena, 1983

This great 1980s pop song actually had a serious theme more blatantly anti-war in the English version of the song (Nena is German) in which balloons flying over the Berlin Wall (separating the ally-controlled West Germany from the Soviet-controlled East Germany) are taken for missiles provoking a nuclear war.

“Antinuclear,” Miguel Ríos, 1983

A Spanish rock singer wrote a tribute to Norman Mayer called Antinuclear. Mayer was an anti-nuclear protestor who worked to promote a large-scale debate about nuclear disarmament. That was his demand when he threatened to blow up the Washington Monument in 1982. He was killed by police and later found to have no explosives whatsoever. Ríos sang:

“The world wouldn’t listen… [They] made him an anti-nuclear martyr.” (KL translation)

“No More Weapons,” Steel Pulse, 2004

A roots reggae band better known for their anti-racist music directs this message to the former US president:

“There’s no time to beat around the BUSH…We no want no weapons of mass destruction.”

“Point Hope,” Indigo Girls, 2005

This folk song highlights the nuclear war the US government has waged here at home against indigenous people at the Nevada nuclear test site.

“We sit and watch the bombs blow… Them governmen boys had something so damn secret they had to hide it in the desert sand.”

The Ominous “The Priests of the Golden Bull,” Buffy Sainte-Marie, 1992

Cree rock singer Buffy Sainte-Marie tells us who wins and who loses the nuclear war.

“Who brought the Bomb wrapped up in business cards / and stained with steak? / Reservations are the nuclear frontline; uranium poisoning kills / You say silver burns a hole in your pocket / and gold burns a hole in your soul / Well Uranium burns a hole in forever / it just gets out of control.”

“Breathing,” Kate Bush, 1980

This eerie ballad is sung from the perspective of a fetus considering the polluted and radioactive world it will be born into pleading, “Leave me something to breathe! We are all going to die without…breathing.”

The Light-Hearted “Party at Ground Zero,” Fishbone, 1985

Referring to the original meaning of Ground Zero as the site of a nuclear explosion, this ska song may well be played at the Last Party along with “1999.”

“Johnny, go get your gun, for the commies are in our hemisphere today / Ivan, go fly your MIG, for the Yankee imperialists have come to play.”

“Atomic Nightmare,” Talbot Brothers of Bermuda, 1987

While Prince’s reflection on imminent nuclear war was urging for cool heads and dancing, the Talbot Brothers of Bermuda have another response captured in this upbeat calypso tune:

“Oh, you’ll run, run, run like a son of a gun / I don’t know where I’m going to go, but I’m really going to run.”

“Future’s So Bright I Gotta Wear Shades,” Timbuk3, 1986

References to nuclear annihilation were lost when this pop hit became the theme song for the 1980s sitcom “Head of the Class.” Only in the music video do these references become clear as it shows the nuclear flash marking an end to humankind with the synical twist that sunglasses might serve as protection.

“I’m doing all right, getting good grades / The future’s so bright I gotta wear shades.”

“So Long Mom, I’m Off to Drop the Bomb,” Tom Lehrer, 1965

The sarcastic lyrics to this piano tune say it all:

“But though I may roam, / I’ll come back to my home, / Although it may be / A pile of debris. / Remember, mommy, / I’m off to get a commie, / So send me a salami, / And try to smile / somehow.”

Nuclear Sí, Aviador Dro, 1979

A post-apocalyptic world is described in this song from the Spanish electronic band Aviador Dro which translates to “Nuclear, Yes!”

“Nuclear, yes! / Of course / Nuclear, yes! / Why not? / I want to bathe in seas of radiation / With clouds of strontium, cobalt and plutonium / I want to have lead casings / And mutant children riding motorcycles.” (KL translation)

After the last song has played, the only difference between a light-hearted and an ominous song about nuclear weapons is the tune and the tone. At Nukewatch the depressing guides us, while the light-hearted keeps us going. Rock on!

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter, Uncategorized

July 11, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

“Opportunity Cost” Killing  Nuclear Power Future

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2016
Excerpted from Umair Irfan analysis in Scientific American, June 3, 2016

“‘All three generations of nuclear technology that are out there today require babysitting,’ said Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates during a panel last month in Washington, D.C. ‘The nuclear industry has never designed an inherently safe product.’ …

“However, existing reactors are tacking into the wind, in terms of economics and politics. Vermont [socialist] Sen. and Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders has laid out a plan to decommission every reactor in the United States. …

“Mark Jacobson, an energy researcher at Stanford University who found that it’s feasible for much of the world to run on wind, water and sunlight, acknowledged that nuclear energy has some carbon benefits but said it has an insurmountable drawback of opportunity costs, namely the billions of dollars needed upfront and the decades it takes to plan and build reactors. [See: “Stanford scientist unveils 50-state plan to transform US to renewable energy,” Stanford Report, Feb. 26, 2014.]

“‘If you’re looking at just one technology in isolation, maybe you don’t care about that opportunity cost,’

[Jacobson] said. ‘But when you’re comparing the two technologies, that becomes relevant. If you have $1 to spend, would you rather spend that on nuclear or wind?’

 

It is no longer a question of whether these 21st-century technologies can replace
nuclear power and fossil fuels. The question is when.

—MICHAEL MARIOTTE, 1952–2016

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter

July 11, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Resisting Nuclear Power & Weapons

Occupation Re-established at Finnish Reactor Site
Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2016

The Finnish group Stop Fennovoima! organized a week of action April 22–May 1, 2016—around the 30th anniversary of the meltdown of Chernobyl—to oppose the construction of the Fennovoima-Rosatom nuclear reactor in northern Finland. Rosatom—the Russian state-owned builder of the Chernobyl reactor—is the largest investor in the Finnish project. Stop Fennovoima’s original protest camp was dismantled in 2015 after an intense six-month occupation. The 2016 week of action involved reestablishing the encampment, workshops, and direct action, bringing construction work to a halt for several hours. Resisters used lockboxes to chain themselves together barricading the road, and one was u-locked to a piece of construction equipment. Police disrupted the nonviolent actions with pepper spray, rubber bullets, Tasers, a canine unit, and arrested 35 activists. Fennovoima-Rosatom managers hope to have the reactor operational by 2024. —Stop Fennovoima, and Reuters, May 29, & Apr. 26, 2016

Trial and More Action Against Trident

In Bangor, Washington, eight activists from Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action were sentenced April 1, 2016 to 100 hours of community service that does not involve nuclear disarmament work. On Hiroshima Day, August 6, 2015, the eight crossed the line at Kitsap-Bangor Naval Base, home to the largest concentration of operational nuclear weapons in the US arsenal—deployed on eight giant Trident missile submarines. The action involved spreading ashes around bodies in a die-in and attempting to deliver a letter to the base commander. The letter called for “an immediate halt to the proposed updating and expansion of the Kitsap Bangor Trident fleet under your command.” After the trial one of the activists Rev. Anne Hall reflected, “When Magistrate Chrystel said our community service couldn’t go to work for nuclear disarmament, I wanted to say, ‘Did you hear what we are saying? Does it occur to you that if we don’t avert nuclear war there won’t be any community to serve?’” On Mother’s Day 2016 three more activists were arrested after blocking traffic, holding a sign depicting Father Daniel Berrigan and quoting him, “Know where you stand and stand there.” —Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action, May 9 & Apr. 4, 2016

20 Weeks of Peace Actions at Büchel Air Force Base, Germany
Home to 20 US H-bombs

Again this year, the Atomwaffenfrei Büchel (Nuclear-Free Büchel) is engaged in a series of actions to resist the 20 US nuclear weapons stationed at the Büchel Air Force Base, in West-Central Germany. This year’s occupation takes the slogan: “Büchel is Everywhere — nuclear-free now! 20-Week Action Presence in Büchel.” Topping last year’s nine-week protest dubbed “Büchel 65,” this year’s 20-week-long protest began on March 26, the anniversary of the German Parliament’s 2010 resolution to have the missiles removed. The presence is continuing through Nagasaki Day, August 9, with a different organization responsible for actions at the Air Force Base each week. Just outside the gates of the air base, a “Peace Meadow” dotted with banners and disarmament symbols recalls a campaign 30 years ago that successfully ousted 96 US ground-launched nuclear Cruise missiles from Hunsrück, Germany; on Oct. 11, 1986, over 200,000 people marched there against atomwaffen. Today, arts, music, peace, and women’s groups and others have posted dozens of signs and placards near the base’s entrance, clearly visible to passing drivers. The US peace group Code Pink was one of several international organizations that sent representatives to this year’s actions demanding the permanent removal of the United States’ Cold War-era B61 gravity bombs. —Atomwaffenfrei Büchel, May 2016

British Trident Ploughshares Mobilize

As we go to press, the group Trident Ploughshares is ramping up a month-long series of actions aimed at disrupting nuclear weapons production at Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) Burghfield, just west of London. Groups from across England and Europe, united in opposing the maintenance and updating of warheads destined for Trident submarines in Scotland, said June 8th that their blockades had halted work at the factory for three days. England’s Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament reports that the government’s planned replacement of its four Trident subs, at a cost of $296 billion, could pay for 120 new hospitals and wages for 150,000 nurses, three million affordable homes, installation of solar panels in every home in the UK, or tuition fees for eight million students. While AWE is owned by the British Ministry of Defence, work is contracted out to a consortium of US-owned companies including Serco, Jacobs Engineering, and Lockheed Martin. June’s “Scrap Trident” mobilization follows a February march in London that drew 60,000 people. —Trident Ploughshares, June 1, 2016; Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, June 2016

Coming Soon!

Youth between 18 and 26 years are invited to an International Youth Work Camp sponsored by Fellowship of Reconciliation, Germany. It will take place at Büchel Air Force Base July 25 to August 10, 2016. See: https://www.versoehnungsbund.de/sites/default/files/2016-IWC-Einladung-EN.pdf.

—KL

For comprehensive reporting on anti-nuclear actions, visit NukeResister.org.

 

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
  • …
  • 222
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch