Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

July 14, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

‘No New Nuclear Bombs!’ Six Arrested at Kansas City H-bomb Factory

By Brian Terrell

Twenty-three activists gathered at dawn May 19 outside the so-called Kansas City “National Security Campus” to protest its nuclear weapons production.

The group greeted workers arriving for the early shift at the KCNSC, a government facility operated by Honeywell which makes 80 percent of the electrical and mechanical parts for the U.S. military’s nuclear weapons arsenal.

At present, the KCNSC is participating in seven “modernization programs” for land-based, air-dropped, and sea-launched nuclear weapons, including the newly accelerated production of the B61-13 gravity bomb which is to be 25 times more powerful than the atomic bomb the U.S. Army Air Corps dropped on Hiroshima. It is said to be more “precise” than earlier versions of the B61 — as if a 300-kiloton thermonuclear bomb needs precision. The U.S. Hiroshima bomb incinerated 4.4 square miles immediately killing between 70,000 and 140,000 people with fire, blast, and radiation.* Twenty-five of these new H-bombs could incinerate 110 square miles.

At the entrance to the nuclear weapons assembly complex in Kansas City, Kansas May 19, nuclear weapons abolitionists joined a protest and six were arrested. Photo: Jim Hannah.

Even with over 7,000 employees, the KCNSC is undergoing an expansion that will double its size. A banner on the gate of the vast construction site reads “Safe, efficient and timely delivery of KC next critical infrastructure,” celebrating several contractors’ contributions to the government’s mad rush to produce more powerful and easier to use nuclear bombs.

In anticipation of the protest, the “campus” security closed the main gate, directing workers to another entrance. After the morning rush, six activists — Ann Suellentrop of Kansas City, Kansas; Jane and Henry Stoever of Overland Park, Kansas; Mike Miles of Luck, Wisc.; Brother Louis Rodemann of Kansas City, Missouri; and myself — took the protest onto the KCNSC. We were placed under arrest by officers of the Federal Protection Force who turned us over to the Kansas City Police Department who cited us for alleged violations of local ordinances. We were released with orders to appear in court in late June.

— Brian Terrell is a long-time member of the Strangers and Guests Catholic Worker in Maloy, Iowa.
*Whole World on Fire, by Lynn Eden, Cornell Univ. Press 2004, p.20.

Filed Under: Direct Action, Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

July 14, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Nukewatch Joins the Global Majority at UN Conference on Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty

“The truth cannot be forgotten forever. As we’ve passed more than 80 years we’re starting to come together. Because we never thought … that our world would be a global village where everybody can come in the same room and discuss a major problem concerning our humanity. So, this is the time for all of us from different countries to sit and think together and to see the danger of nuclear.”

— Isaiha Mongombe Mombilo, Coordinator of The Missing Link of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Remembering Shinkolobwe, Chairperson of the Congolese Civil Society of South Africa.

Commentary by Kelly Lundeen

In 2021 the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons went into force in 50 nations after it was ratified by Honduras. As a 46-year-old organization dedicated to the abolition of nuclear weapons, Nukewatch naturally joined the movement to pressure the United States and all nuclear-armed nations to sign, ratify, and implement the Treaty. This March, for the third time, we were able to attend the United Nations meetings discussing worldwide progress toward this goal. In Nukewatch style, we made our presence heard inside the United Nations headquarters, on the streets of New York, and inside the cell of a New York City jail.

Over four months of preparation and dozens of meetings we had the great honor of working closely alongside campaigners fighting for nuclear justice from Affected Communities and Allies Working Group (ACAWG), Atlantic Life Community, Catholic Workers, Students for Nuclear Disarmament-University of Montana, and many more. Nukewatch headed a delegation of eight members attending the United Nations meetings. We built trust and relationships leaving us all with hearts bigger than when we had started.

ACAWG is a group of which I am an active member made up of participants from several nuclear-impacted and allied organizations. Thanks to a grant from Utah Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons and others, the group had a large presence at the official U.N. conference, including submitting two working papers, organizing a civil society event, presenting to the Scientific Advisory Group, and making a formal statement during the meetings of U.N. representatives. In October 2024, ACAWG began preparing their first letters of support for those seeking visas to join the U.N. meetings from South Africa.

“Beyond Uranium Mining: Global Roots of Nuclear Injustice” was a standing-room-only United Nations civil society event organized by ACAWG, collaborating with ICAN Germany. Speakers from Turtle Island (North America) and Africa, including Indigenous leaders and representatives of affected communities, shed light on the history of the Belgian Congo’s uranium mining, which created the world’s first nuclear victims and the fissile material for the Trinity, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki bombs. This part of Congolese history has been kept in the dark while nuclear victims in the region remain silent out of fear of retaliation. We then examined the global reality of affected communities in the sacrifice zone of nuclear-armed states and the truth about the connection between the genocide of Indigenous Peoples and current nuclear development and restarting of uranium mining (see “Uranium Mining, Milling, and Ablation, Oh My!” on page 1).

Nukewatch’s collaboration with Atlantic Life Community resulted in a rally outside of the U.S. Mission to the United Nations calling on the United States to sign the TPNW, ending in my arrest with 16 others. On March 5, I found myself inside a jail cell with Frida Berrigan, author of “Who Has Time to Think about Nuclear Weapons?” (see page 1 and 3). As citizens of the United States, it is our duty to demonstrate our opposition to our own government’s use of and constant threat to use nuclear weapons, and the ongoing radioactive violence that will affect countless generations. A few members of our group brought copies of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty to the U.S. Mission to remind our government of the commitment it made exactly 55 years ago to “pursue negotiations in good faith … at an early date…on general and complete [nuclear] disarmament.” We glued the treaty to the sidewalk where it would be trampled on, the way the U.S. does.

Over the megaphone at the United States Mission to the United Nations the day of the arrests, Annie Jacobsen’s book Nuclear War: A Scenario was quoted as Homeland Security, the New York City Police, U.S. Mission guards, and hundreds of onlookers listened in:

“A 1-megaton thermonuclear weapon detonation begins with a flash of light and heat of 180 million degrees, more than 4 times that at the center of the sun, creating a massive fireball that expands at millions of miles per hour. Within a few seconds, the fireball increases to a diameter of a little more than a mile, its light and heat so intense that concrete surfaces explode, metal objects melt or evaporate, stone shatters, and human beings are carbonized. Not a single thing in the fireball remains. The people incinerated are spared the horror that begins to be inflicted on millions of more gravely injured people not yet dead…”

This is what we hope to prevent. In so many ways — in meetings, rallies, at nuclear facilities in court or in jail — Nukewatch will always join the people around the world who continue to struggle for a future in which this scenario is impossible.

— You can watch clips of “Beyond Uranium Mining: Global Roots of Nuclear Injustice” at www.acawg.org.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

July 14, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Nuclear Power’s Great Financial Hoax Can No Longer be Hidden or Ignored

By Colt Stewart

Thirty-eight years ago, the California Legislature passed the Nuclear Moratorium Act. Governor Jerry Brown signed it into law. The law, still on the books today, says that until the federal government certifies a “permanent” method of disposing of radioactive waste, no new nuclear reactors will be built in California. Those of us who worked on and defended this legislation knew the day would come when the ratepayers of California would have to pay the piper for decommissioning those reactors already under construction and we did not want to see the ratepayers stuck with the ultimate costs of decommissioning even more.

The Coalition for a Nuclear-Free Mississippi River, of which Nukewatch is a co-founder, inflated this mock radioactive waste cask beside an info table at the 2025 May Day Parade and celebration in Minneapolis, Minn. The group marched in the parade to raise awareness of the threat the Monticello reactor poses to the river and to drinking water for millions. Photo: Kelly Lundeen.

The Public Utilities Commission (PUC) knew it. The elected officials knew it. The ratepayer watchdog groups knew it. The utility companies knew it. The environmental groups knew it. The lawyers, engineers, and other staffers knew it.

Through “all events tariffs,” the utilities financed the development and construction of their complex, dangerous, large-scale power generating stations in essence financially risk-free. Their argument was always, “We wish to assure the public a reliable source of low-cost electricity.” Sounds reasonable, right? But they never factored in the decommissioning costs or the cost of permanently disposing of the long-term (like up to 1 million years) nuclear waste. In a shortsighted attempt to keep electric rates low, utility executives, PUC commissioners, ratepayer protection groups, engineers, and lawyers all put off attempting to identify those costs until such time — in the future — when they would become due.

Well that time is now.

The great hoax of nuclear power — an endless supply of cheap electricity — is now before us. There are still two gigantic unpaid bills coming due: for decommissioning the existing reactors that have outlived their useful lives, and for the long-term containment and abandonment of the radioactive waste which has overrun all the interim short-term storage solutions. These bills must be paid, whether by the ratepayers, the shareholders, the consumers, the insurance companies, the manufacturers, or all of the above.

— Colt Stewart of Palm Desert is a former Senior Energy Consultant to the California Assembly. He wrote this piece for The Desert Sun.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

July 14, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Executive Order Could Force Cancellation of Sentinel Missile

An April 9 Executive Order from the White House puts the $200 billion+ long-range, land-based missile system dubbed “Sentinel” at risk of cancellation because the program is so far over budget.

The presidential EO directs the Secretary of Defense to complete a “comprehensive review” of all major military acquisition programs. Secretary Pete Hegseth has 90 days, or until early July, to finish the detailed review.

The massive Sentinel project is supposed to replace all 400 Minuteman III intercontinental missiles — along with 40 underground launch control centers and hundreds of miles of buried cables that connect them all to three major Air Force bases — which are now scattered across parts of Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, Nebraska, and North Dakota.

The EO declares that “any program more than 15 percent behind schedule …, 15 percent over cost …, unable to meet any key performance parameters, or unaligned with the Secretary of Defense’s mission priorities, will be considered for potential cancellation.”

A Government Accountability Office review found that the Sentinel’s Air Force contractor Northrop Grumman Corp. was “struggling with staffing shortfalls, supply chain problems and clearance processing delays,” according to the newsletter Defense One. One major cost-savings under consideration is the reuse of much of the underground cable systems connecting the silos, according to Montana’s The Missoulian.

The source DefenseNews.org reported May 6, 2025, that while the Air Force had hoped to reuse existing Minuteman missile silos for the Sentinel, it “has concluded it will have to dig new silos.” The system’s cost instantly ballooned again.

In January 2024, the program blew past the 15% threshold set by the EO, inflating the proposed $77 billion program to $141 billion, or 81% over initial projections. Northrop Grumman CEO Kathy Warden said then that the overruns were due to construction costs and inflation.

After disclosure of the, shall we say, skyrocketing cost overruns, the Air Force fired the head of the program, Col. Charles Clegg.

This past February, the Air Force halted work on parts of the program which will only cause further delays and price hikes. Northrop’s CEO Warden said on January 30 that the Air Force had “paused work on some small infrastructure efforts in the command and launch segment.” Specifically, the service directed Warden “to suspend the design, testing, and construction work” on Sentinel’s “Command and Launch Segment” which was then going on at test facilities in California and Utah.

Mackenzie Knight, a senior research associate for the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists blamed Northrop Grumman for underestimating the costs in order to win Congressional support, telling Defense One online, “At best it comes down to mismanagement and incompetence, and at worst, an intentional effort to downplay the complexities and challenges … to make it appear like it would be the cheaper, easier option.” — Nukewatch staff

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, War

July 14, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Irony Lives: “Clean Energy” Tax Credits Critical for Nuclear’s Future

The nuclear power lobby has abandoned its former motto ⸺ “electricity too cheap to meter” ⸺ and replaced it with the fairy tale that nuclear reactors are “clean” and the “answer to climate change.” The industry has spent so much money lobbying on Capitol Hill and on campaign financing, that Congress bought the whole charade and added nuclear reactor operations to its list of “clean energy” tax credit beneficiaries.

Now, with the Trump backlash against any acknowledgment of climate change or fossil fuel pollution, House Republicans are pushing drilling, mining, and burning and want to rescind all the Congressional “clean energy” tax credits.

Proving that irony is not dead, the myth-making nuclear industry is crying foul, as some of the tax credits identify and “incentivize” reactors as “clean energy assets” ⸺ the very fiction that the industry created.

Consequently, over 100 utilities, industry suppliers, and reactor developers, organized by the Nuclear Energy Institute, wrote to Congress April 30 demanding retention of the tax credits which keep alive dreams of new reactor construction.

The credits are essential to nuclear’s economic future, the letter says, and are “critical to strengthening U.S. energy security” ⸺ meaning the industry cannot compete any more, and its CEO’s have said so.

Speaking in New York City on Nov. 27, 2013, World Bank President Dr. Jim Yong Kim said, “The World Bank Group does not engage in providing support for nuclear power. … we don’t do nuclear energy.”

The U.S. Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism concluded in 2009 that governments should help stop nuclear weapons proliferation by “discouraging … the use of financial incentives in the promotion of civil nuclear power.”

John Rowe, a former chairman and CEO of the nuclear power-heavy Exelon Corp. said “unequivocally,” in March 2012, “that new [reactors] don’t make any sense right now…. It just isn’t economic, and it’s not economic within a foreseeable time frame.”

Even the former CEO of the Nuclear Energy Institute, Marvin Fertel, told Scientific American in 2012, “We won’t build large numbers of new nuclear in the U.S. in the near term. Today, you ought to build gas.” And Bill Johnson, CEO of Progress Energy, said in the same article, “Nuclear can’t compete today.” In 2011, Siemens Corp. declared that, following Germany’s decision to close all 17 of its reactors by 2022 (all built by Siemens), the company would stop building new reactors anywhere in the world. “The chapter for us is closed,” said Chief Executive Peter Löscher.

Calling new reactors “too expensive,” Jon Wellinghoff, a former chair of the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, said in 2009, “We may not need any, ever,” adding that renewables “like wind, solar and biomass would be able to provide enough energy to meet base load capacity and future demand.”

Jeffrey Immelt, CEO of the reactor engineering giant General Electric, said in 2010, “If you were a utility CEO and looked at your world today, you would just do gas and wind. … You would never do nuclear. The economics are overwhelming.”

Asked about Duke Power Florida’s August 2013 decision to cancel new reactor plans, former Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chair Peter Bradford told the Tampa Bay Times that a nuclear construction boom, “was just this artificial gold rush. And yes, it does show the renaissance is dead.” ⸺ JL

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Renewable Energy

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • …
  • 222
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch