Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

New Report on Gender and Radiation

On November 20, the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) announced publication of a new report entitled “Gender and Ionizing Radiation: Towards a New Research Agenda Addressing Disproportionate Harm.” The report is authored by Mary Olson, Founder of the Gender and Radiation Impact Project, and Amanda M. Nichols, Postdoctoral Researcher, University of California, Santa Barbara. The UNIDIR summarizes the report as “an overview of recent research on the correlation between harm from exposure to ionizing radiation and biological sex,” that “proposes questions for a future research agenda covering gender, radiation impacts, and radiological protection standards.” The UNIDIR describes itself as an autonomous institution within the United Nations that conducts independent research on pressing global challenges related to disarmament, arms control, and international security. UNIDIR writes, “our work aims to provide the foundations for meaningful collective action towards a more secure world.”

Read the full report here: https://unidir.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Gender_and_ionizing_radiation_web.pdf

Filed Under: Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

U.S. Troops Exposed to Enriched Uranium at Base in Uzbekistan Refused Compensation

U.S. special operations troops deployed to a former Soviet base in Uzbekistan in October 2001 are still experiencing the health effects of exposure to radioactive uranium. From 2001-2005, over 15,000 U.S. troops were sent to Karshi-Khanabad (K2), where remnants of yellow cake, or powdered enriched uranium, were found where missiles had been stored. Declassified Pentagon documents confirm the highly radioactive material was found throughout the base and in the soil. The documents suggest that radiation levels there in 2001 were 40,000 times those of naturally occurring uranium. Twenty-three years after their deployment, more than 1,500 of the 5,000 K2 veterans contacted have suffered cancers, kidney and bone conditions, reproductive issues, and other illnesses linked to radiation exposure including having children with birth defects.

However, the PACT Act, signed by President Biden in 2022 to mete out veterans’ aid, does not recognize radiation exposure at K2. Though K2 veterans can access some funding and care for at least one service-related condition, many have died seeking recognition of their radiation-based claims, according to K2 veterans group Stronghold Freedom Foundation. Though U.S. forces pulled out of the base in 2005, around a dozen U.S. troops remain deployed there, assisting Uzbekistan in joint efforts targeting the Islamic State. There appears to be no communication about the radioactive uranium between the Pentagon and Uzbek military leaders. Though Congress made Pentagon data and environmental reviews from the base public four years ago in an attempt to seek recognition and veterans’ compensation, and though there was recently new legislation introduced, U.S. agencies have not officially acknowledged the radiation exposure.

⸺ Associated Press, Sept. 10; Military.com, Aug. 13, 2024

Filed Under: Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Harvard Prof. to Study Cancer Rates and Radionuclides near Three New England Reactors

Petros Koutrakis, professor of environmental sciences at Harvard, is piloting two new studies of incidences of cancer and levels of radioactivity exposure around nuclear reactors in New England. In his first study, Koutrakis hopes to produce data illustrating the public health impacts of three nuclear power facilities: Pilgrim in Massachusetts, Seabrook in New Hampshire, and Yankee in Vermont. Pilgrim and Yankee are currently shut down. Seabrook is still operating. His second study will examine blood samples from people within 31 miles of Pilgrim, to look for biological indications, such as DNA damage, to illustrate the effects of wastewater evaporation at Pilgrim. Koutrakis will seek to better understand the public health risks of exposure to radionuclides, such as tritium, cesium-137, lead-210, and iodine-131, released into the air and water as a result of this evaporation.

Wastewater evaporation at Pilgrim began last February, so while the cancer data can show effects over a longer period, the blood samples hope to shed light on more immediate health effects. The first study will analyze cancer rates in Massachusetts from 2008 to 2017, and is awaiting more current data. The study hopes to have results compiled by Spring 2025.

Koutrakis emphasized that the public must demand policymakers require other disposal methods, such as storage or shipment of waste, though those still present health threats due to leaks, transportation accidents, and environmental justice issues, Koutrakis said. “But the thing I can tell you with certainty,” he added, “is that they should not evaporate or dump in the bay. So that should stop right now.”

⸺ Harvard HSPH News, Jan. 29; Vermont Public Radio, Jan. 25; Plymouth Independent, Feb. 16, 2024

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Fukushima: Disaster Response is to Spread Radioactive Waste to the Commons

By John LaForge

Fourteen-million cubic meters of radioactive “fill” could be spread to the commons

Japan has doubled down on the nuclear industry’s historical practice of spreading radioactive pollutants to public air space and to common waterways.

In addition to the often-reported pumping of thousands of tons of radioactively contaminated cooling water to the Pacific Ocean from the Fukushima-Daiichi reactor complex, the government has announced its intention to spread around the country as much as 14 million cubic meters of radioactively contaminated soil, reportedly for road-building, construction projects, and even agricultural underlayment. Last September the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna — which promotes the nuclear reactor industry around the world — declared that the plan to disperse the waste “is consistent with international safety standards.”

The federal government in Tokyo announced a cabinet-level meeting set for December to discuss its plans to disperse the contaminated soil in public works projects. In 2016, a government study group outlined the plan to allow 14 million cubic meters of contaminated soil generated from decontamination in Fukushima prefecture, to be used for public works projects and agricultural land development nationwide, if it emits less than 8,000 becquerels-per-kilo of cesium-137.The becquerel is a measure of radioactivity, and vast areas were contaminated with wildly varying amounts of cesium-137 and other radio-isotopes which spewed from Fukushima’s three out-of-control reactors.

The contaminated soil was scraped up and removed from farms, school yards, public parks, and other green spaces during the government’s attempt to “decontaminate” thousands of square kilometers around the Fukushima-Daiichi site. These millions of bags have been kept in the open air for years at over 1,000 “temporary storage sites” in Fukushima prefecture.

The Japan Times reported in 2015 that there were then 22 million cubic meters of the poisoned soil in bags. Four years ago, the Indian daily The Hindu said that there were 20 million cubic meters, and that by early 2019 its collection and bagging had cost the government $27 billion.

Fukushima’s cesium fallout contaminated over 9,000 square kilometers (3,474 sq. miles) of forests, farmland, and residential areas, according to a 2019 European Geosciences Union (EGU)assessment of the decontamination work, that was published in the journal Soil. The Hindu reported in January 2020 that the EGU authors warned, “No decontamination activities are planned for the majority of forested areas, which cover about 75 per cent of the main contaminated area,” and that “outdoor workers in the special decontamination zone [a 1,117 sq. km area] may, as a group, be exposed to more than the government’s long-term suggested limit of radiation.”

The cesium-contaminated waste should be containerized and kept out of the environment for up to 300 years (after the cesium has decayed to other elements). But the government has arbitrarily decided that a certain amount of cesium-137 contamination will be permitted in “fill” for highway construction and other projects.

To make way for the public’s contamination with the radioactivity in public works and agriculture, the government has increased by 80 times the “allowable” cesium contamination in the collected soil. Hajime Matsukubo, with the Nuclear Information Centre in Tokyo, has warned that the standard for soil contamination was previously just 100 becquerels per kilogram. The new 8,000 Bq/kg limit goes “against their own recommendations,” according to Matsukubo, who said, “My fear is that once they relax this rule, they can then go on and ease all sorts of other rules.” (In a related case of weakening radiation standards, in 2023 the government shortened the list of radioactive materials it will measure in seawater near the Fukushima contaminated wastewater release site from 64 to 30. The new list removed 39 nuclides and added five.)

The daily Yomiuri Shimbun reported December 5, that the ministers will consider using soil “as a base for asphalt in road construction, after taking measures to prevent the radiation from spreading.” The paper noted that Tokyo actually tested the use of the contaminated soil in farm fields, “harvesting cucumbers and daikon radishes in fields where the [contaminated] soil has been covered with normal soil and using it to raise the ground level.”

Rain moving through the cesium-contaminated soil will of course move the long-lived radioactive material into groundwater.

Melted fuel: Under 1 gram removed, only 880 million grams to go

The first tiny morsel of melted reactor fuel has been removed by a remote-controlled robotic arm from inside unit #2 of the Fukushima-Daiichi triple disaster (earthquake, tsunami, meltdowns) in Japan. It could take up to a year to analyze the 0.7 grams (1/40th of an ounce) of lethally radioactive debris that was grasped by the 72-foot long robot, according to a Nov. 21, 2024 announcement by Fukushima’s owner/operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. (Tepco). Reactor #2 holds an estimated 237 tons of melted reactor fuel wreckage.

Tepco also said that studying this bit of waste — about one raisin worth — will “shed light” on the chemical structure of the estimated total 880 tonnes of ruined, radioactive, and hot reactor fuel now lost somewhere below the site’s three rubbished reactors. For perspective, there are 1 million grams in 1 metric tonne, so the 880 tonnes of melted reactor fuel amounts to 880 million grams.

In March of 2011, the three units lost all cooling capacity which caused their uranium fuel rods to overheat beyond control and melt. Some experts speak of the possibility of a “melt through,” in which the extreme temperature of the molten core causes it to burn through the bottom of the steel reactor vessel. This possibility has not been ruled out at Fukushima.

Fukushima-Daiichi’s first-ever triple-reactor meltdown followed the 2011 earthquake, the largest in Japan’s recorded history — which smashed the reactors’ foundations and wrecked off-site transmission lines, and produced the biggest tsunami in Japan’s recorded history, which then destroyed the site’s emergency diesel generators causing a “station
blackout.” The catastrophic March 11 earthquake killed or disappeared an estimated 20,000 people, and the resulting tsunami and meltdowns amounted to an astonishing and unheard-of triple terror of widespread earthquake destruction, devastating floodwaters, and vast plumes of radioactive gases and liquids spread around the Northern Hemisphere by the wind and throughout the Pacific Ocean by currents.

Now, 13 years since the events began, the Japanese government, Tepco, and Japan’s reactor industry need to convince the public that some 880 tonnes of reactor fuel inside or under the devastated reactors can be cooled, captured, and contained for hundreds of thousands of years — the period that the fuel remains lethally radioactive. Finding, removing, and packaging the melted uranium and plutonium fuel (6 per cent of the fuel in reactor #3 was plutonium) is likely an impossible mission, but officially remains a part of the government’s disaster response and decontamination process.

The time and expense of managing this volume of lethally radioactive waste will be so enormous that Japan will eventually decide instead to cover the deadly wreckage with a giant Quonset hut, like the Soviet Union and later Russia did at Chernobyl. At the site of the 1986 single-reactor disaster in Chernobyl, the then USSR simply abandoned the fuel
wreckage and rubble and built a covering to keep rain off of the highly radioactive materials. This first concrete cover degraded rapidly and was famously replaced in 2019 with a giant sliding cover at a cost of 1.5 billion Euros.

— For more information: A detailed evaluation of Japan’s deceptive plan to use contaminated soil in public works projects is now available from the Citizens’ Nuclear Information Center (Tokyo), at https://cnic.jp/english/?p=7917.

Filed Under: Environment, Fukushima, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Indigenous Sovereignty Stops Uranium Shipments, for Now

By Kelly Lundeen

On Tuesday, July 30, Navajo Nation police attempted to stop a truck shipment of radioactive uranium ore on the reservation. Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. successfully crossed the Nation going from the Pinyon Plain Mine near the Grand Canyon in northern Arizona to the White Mesa Mill in southeastern Utah more than 300 miles away. The truck crossing was in violation of the Nation’s “Radioactive and Related Substances Equipment, Vehicles, Persons, and Materials Transportation Act” passed by the tribal government in 2012, which prohibits such transports.

Navajo Nation president Buu Nygren told Four Corners Public Radio KSUT, “Once they enter the boundaries of the Navajo Nation, they’re on Navajo land. They need to follow Navajo law. They snuck through the Navajo Nation, and they made it to the Utah side, outside of the reservation. So to me, they operated covertly to travel the Navajo Nation illegally.”

The illegal two-truck shipment not only broke Navajo Nation law, it was an infringement on an agreement that Energy Fuels had made to notify the Tribe and other entities two weeks prior to any transport. While Energy Fuels asserts that it briefed stakeholders of the ore transport with adequate notice, neither of the appropriate tribal authorities, the Navajo Nation EPA and the Havasupai Tribal Council, were ever contacted, deepening a lack of trust. Energy Fuels is a Canadian company that owns the Pinyon Plain mine and the White Mesa Mill.

While ignoring months of pressure and over 17,000 petitions from tribal members and environmental advocates, Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs responded to the Navajo Nation President and arranged to uphold the uranium transport ban temporarily while Navajo Nation and Energy Fuels negotiate terms for its safest possible transport. On August 29, Navajo Nation reaffirmed its opposition to radioactive transports by amending the 2012 ban. The new legislation extends the required notification time prior to transport from four to seven days, and authorizes the Navajo Nation EPA to create “reasonable license fees, bonding requirements, route restrictions, curfews and other terms.” It no longer acknowledges the Nation’s right to exclude non-Tribal members from entry onto Navajo Nation lands.

The transport pause remains in effect, so while a small battle has been won for now, the struggle against nuclear colonialism will continue. The land where the Pinyon Plain mine is located was stolen from the Havasupai people who oppose the mine. Under the 1872 mining law still in effect in many areas, lands such as Pinyon Plain, were taken from the original Indigenous owners and given to anyone who could prove there were minerals. The ore is transported through ancestral lands of the Diné People, Ute Mountain Utes, and other tribal communities, to the mill — without free, prior, or informed consent of any.

Over 500 abandoned uranium mines remain on Navajo Nation without remediation. The Navajo Birth Cohort Study has shown that at birth, babies are already carrying uranium in their bodies in areas uranium mining previously occurred. Thousands of Navajo have been killed or sickened with cancers, birth defects, and other terminal illnesses as a result of uranium mining and milling. Extraction at Pinyon Plain continues, and uranium ore is expected to be delivered to the mill as interstate commerce laws of the U.S. federal government protect industries in spite of other nations’ laws. Meanwhile, the Indigenous-led organization Haul No! continues to spread awareness while monitoring the mine and transportation route.

On both the national and global scale, the economic outlook for uranium is on the rise as it is necessary to fuel both the renewed arms race and push for new commercial reactors. The price of uranium reached a 17-year high in January after many had assumed the days of uranium mining in the United States were over. U.S. production hit a low at 21,000 pounds in 2021 with only three operating mines. However, during the first six months of 2024 (the U.S. Energy Information Administration reported) uranium ore production via in-situ leaching reached 180,242 pounds, putting it on track to be the highest since 2019. This does not include the astounding 9-million-pound stockpile stranded at the Pinyon Plain mine. Navajo Nation and Energy Fuels must negotiate an agreement on monitoring, fees, and regulations, prior to restarting transport. In addition to the five mines currently operating in Wyoming, Arizona, and Texas, new mines in Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Wyoming are projected to open or reopen in the coming years.

— Sources: Grand Canyon Trust, Fall/Winter 2024; U.S. Energy Information Administration, Sept. 19 & May 23, 2024; 25th Navajo Nation Council, Aug. 26, 2024; and Navajo Birth Cohort Study Preliminary Results, Oct. 7, 2019

Filed Under: Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Uranium Mining

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • …
  • 62
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch