Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

July 11, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Fukushima Radiation Continues to Spread

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2016
By John LaForge

March 11 marked the fifth anniversary of the worst earthquake in Japanese history and the devastating tsunami that followed, smashing Japan’s northeastern coast, killing as many as 19,000 people and sparking the worst radiation catastrophe since Chernobyl. Crashing over a 30-foot seawall, tsunami waters flooded the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear complex, knocking out emergency cooling pumps and causing three reactors to overheat, melt, and burn their way through their steel containers. A series of hydrogen explosions blew apart the containment buildings surrounding the reactors resulting in the widespread dispersal of iodine-131, cesium-134, cesium-137 and other radioactive materials.

Fukushima cesium concentrating in zooplankton, anchor of the oceans’ food web

Scientists tracking radioactive materials leaked to the Pacific by the Fukushima disaster have given oceanographers surprising new information, notably that most of the contaminated surface water pushed by ocean currents east toward the United States from Japan, is “submerged to a depth of [1,312 feet] near to the International Date Line and then turns toward southwest.” This pattern of ocean currents was completely unknown prior to the new study, published in the journal Applied Radiation and Isotopes.

Zooplankton are the main food source for millions of small sea animals and fish. The one in the photo has been magnified many times.

Japanese scientists, in collaboration with the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre traced the movement of cesium-134, and cesium-137 (known as radio-cesium) and collected samples of both zooplankton and suspended particles. Their study has found that “zooplankton contained higher amounts of radio-cesium than particulate matter as [zooplankton] consumes organic matter and thereby accumulates cesium.”

That the animals have more radio-cesium than the suspended particles is related to the process called bio-accumulation in which the plankton absorbs the isotope faster than it is excreted. The concentration of cesium is multiplied, increasing the ratio of the toxin in living tissue, as larger species eat smaller ones on up the food chain—something biologists have warned of since the spill began in March 2011.

Zooplankton are at the very bottom of the ocean food chain, and are eaten by everything from small animals and fish to huge whales. Many small animals and fish depend on zooplankton as their main source of food. The new study’s results are useful, the authors said, in order “to understand the uptake in the food chain and estimate impact on biosystems of future releases.”

While the Fukushima catastrophe is always called “second” in overall radiation release behind the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, the total amount of cesium-137 spewed by the Fukushima meltdowns may be two to four times greater than Chernobyl, according to a 2014 report by the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute. —Sciencedaily.com, June 6, 2016

Unprecedented oceanic radiation release

This past March, Ken Buesseler, a marine radiochemist with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution reported: “More than 80 percent of the radioactivity from the damaged reactors ended up in the Pacific—far more than reached the ocean from Chernobyl… this event is unprecedented in its total release of radioactive contamination into the ocean.”

“The continued release of radionuclides from groundwater and leaking tanks at Fukushima… needs to be watched closely, as the character or mix of radionuclides is changing. One example is the higher levels of strontium-90 contained in groundwater and in storage tanks that are leaking into the ocean.”—www.WHOI.edu

Japan to use radioactive waste in building roads—lessons unlearned from US desert Southwest

The Environment Ministry on June 7 drew up a basic plan to use soil contaminated with radioactive substances in fallout from the Fukushima Daiichi triple meltdown releases to build roads.

Under the plan, soil tainted with relatively low radioactive cesium concentrations of up to 5,000 to 8,000 becquerels per kilogram will be used to form the base layer of roads.

This layer will then be covered with uncontaminated soil, asphalt and other material at a thickness of between 19 and 39 inches.

According to the ministry, covering radioactive soil with untainted material will minimize the health risk for residents living in nearby areas, as their annual radiation dose will be kept to 0.01 millisievert or less.

The ministry plans to launch a verification project in Minamisoma, Fukushima Prefecture, as early as this summer to test the use of contaminated soil as the base material for road construction.

Tainted soil in the prefecture, generated from decontamination work following the March 2011 accident …, will be kept in an interim storage facility near the nuclear reactor complex for final disposal at a site outside the prefecture within 30 years.

The interim facility, located in an area that straddles the towns of Okuma and Futaba, is believed to store up to 22 million cubic meters of contaminated soil. The latest plan will help the ministry facilitate the reuse of contaminated soil within and outside the prefecture to reduce the amount to be transferred to the final disposal site. —JIJI, The Japan Times, June 7, 2016

600-Ton Mass of melted fuel still not located in wreckage of three Fukushima reactors 

Even 63 months since the triple melt-throughs, 600 tons of this molten uranium fuel—200 tons in each devastated reactor—is unaccounted for. Neither emergency response teams nor decommissioning authorities have been able to locate the mass of ferociously hot (radioactively and thermally) molten uranium fuel—which has to be constantly flooded with cooling water to prevent further melting.

As Energy Biz reported March 31, “The cooling water becomes radioactive and leaks out through damaged areas into the building basements, where it mixes with groundwater, increasing the volume of contaminated water.” Scientific American put it this way on March 1, “Groundwater flowing from a hill behind the crippled plant now mingles with radioactive materials before heading into the sea.”

“There is no end in sight for communities in Fukushima,” said Junichi Sato, Executive Director of Greenpeace Japan. “What started as a natural disaster turned into one of the worst industrial accidents in human history and a reminder that humanity must urgently turn its efforts toward safe, clean renewables,” Sato said.

One temporary fix—a $312 million refrigeration or “ice wall” dug into the ground uphill from the destroyed reactor complex—was switched on March 31 for the first time. The wall is supposed to divert groundwater to keep it from continually seeping through quake-damaged foundations under the reactor buildings. Flowing through the wreckage, the groundwater becomes highly radioactive by mixing with cooling water that is continually being poured onto the three masses of melted fuel. —Australian Broadcasting Corporation, May 24, 2016

Filed Under: Environment, Fukushima, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

July 11, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

 Lake Superior Barrels: Red Cliff Will Seek Funds for Repeat of Knife River Survey

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2016

Between 1957 and 1962 at least 1,458 barrels of toxic and radioactively contaminated military waste, from Honeywell’s Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant in Arden Hills, Minnesota, was secretly dumped by the Army Corps of Engineers into Lake Superior along Minnesota’s North Shore. Almost all the barrels are still in the water.

Nukewatch has long demanded the identification, recovery and proper disposal of the barrels that remain intact. (See our special report, “Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Waste Haunts Lake Superior,” January 2013.) Our work has helped keep this scandal in the public eye and has earned some hard-won success.

It appears that Nukewatch’s insistence has resulted in an important expansion of the ongoing investigation being conducted by the Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa. The Band’s Lake Superior barrels study has been funded by major grants from a Pentagon program for remediation of Formerly Used Defense Sites.

The breakthrough regards the Knife Island/Knife River dump site 10 miles north of Duluth, Minnesota (one of at least seven barrel dumping areas) and was revealed last November in a public presentation by Frank Koehn, a spokesperson for the Band. Since 2012, the Band has reported that only a “debris field” and no identifiable barrels could be seen in its underwater sonar pictures of the Knife Island site.

But in four detailed letters, Nukewatch provided the Band with official documentation of over 700 barrels having been dumped at Knife Island. In particular, Nukewatch provided the Band’s study committee with copies of the Army Corps’ own records including tug boat logs indicating the exact dates, times, numbers, and even weights of the barrels discarded at Knife Island/River.

The documentary record of dumping at Knife Island/Knife River is well established: 206 barrels on the night of June 26, 1962 and 500 barrels September 26, 1962.

The Band didn’t respond to the letters, seemed unmoved, and its committee staff said that the ongoing recovery plan would not pursue anything at the Knife River site. One staff member suggested to Nukewatch, “The tug boat logs may not be reliable.”

Then, late last year, Red Cliff reversed its position. The Band will now seek funds to redo its lake bottom sonar survey of the Knife Island/Knife River site. Koehn said in his presentation, “The bulk of this stuff was put off Knife Island,” and the Band’s new informational materials now state, as Nukewatch and others reported earlier, that 706 of the 1,458 barrels were dumped there.

When asked by Nukewatch if the acknowledgement of the need to more thoroughly study Knife River was a reversal of the Band’s earlier position, Koehn admitted it was. The Band now believes that its sonar scan was “done too fast, about nine square miles per day, and that it will return to the area and scan at two square miles per day,” if funding can be secured, according to Koehn.

—JL

Filed Under: Environment, Lake Superior Barrels, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

July 11, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Another Uranium Truck Crashes in Canada

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2016

In at least the second Canadian highway accident involving uranium in 2016, a truck hauling uranium trioxide collided with a car on northern Ontario’s Highway 17 on the morning of April 17. The truck was hauling uranium from the Cameco refinery in Blind River to southern Ontario when it struck the car just outside of Massey.

An investigation by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission found no damage to the packages and no uranium spill. The material was transferred to another truck and delivered to another Cameco facility in Port Hope for further processing. A Cameco spokesperson told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) that the Blind River facility turns out several truckloads of yellow uranium powder every week.

In January, a truck hauling 63 drums of uranium spilled part of its load on a Saskatchewan highway while en route to the Blind River refinery. Officials declared the site uncontaminated after two days of clean-up.

—Nukewatch Quarterly, Spring 2016; CBC News, Apr. 18, 2016

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

July 11, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Test Drilling for Possible Rad Waste Disposal, Rejected in North Dakota, Faces Opposition in South Dakota

Energy Dept. Eyes 26 States for Potential “Deep Borehole” Experiments
Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2016
By John LaForge

The US Department of Energy (DOE)—always looking to dispose of radioactive waste—was recently told to leave Pierce County, North Dakota where the agency had proposed one of its current radioactive waste experiments.

The DOE wants to drill large-diameter boreholes more than three miles into the earth to evaluate rock formations for potential deep disposal of high-level radioactive waste left from nuclear weapons production.

A February 16 public hearing in Rugby, the county seat, was attended by almost 300 opponents—both residents and political officials—who demanded guarantees that radioactive materials would never be a part of the test drilling.

The Battelle Memorial Institute, Inc.—with 22,000 employees at 60 sites worldwide—was awarded a $35 million taxpayer-funded contract to oversee the experimental attempt to cut straight down 16,000 feet (three miles) into granite bedrock.

Also hired were Schlumberger, an oil and gas drilling firm from Houston, Texas, and Solexperts of Switzerland, which does highly specialized field tests on tunneling and nuclear waste repositories.

The tiny, isolated town of Rugby, North Dakota, population 2,876, is on US Highway 2, about 35 miles south of Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation and 130 miles north of Bismarck.

The journal Science reports that DOE scientists “need to figure out how practical and how expensive it will be to drill a [17-inch]-wide hole that deep.” And the department wants to test ways “to ensure the surrounding rock at the bottom of the hole is solid enough, and that any water there can’t travel up toward the surface.” DOE has hired the giant company, which manages a number of DOE research labs, to lead a five-year-long, $80 million experimental “pilot” deep borehole drilling test to answer such questions.

Even after Battelle and agency officials promised the community that no nuclear waste would be involved, Pierce County Commissioners unanimously agreed to reject the project and place a moratorium on any such experimental drilling in the county. On February 18, the Pierce County Planning and Zoning Board unanimously endorsed the commission’s moratorium.

For the North Dakota test, Battelle had teamed up with the University of North Dakota’s Energy & Environmental Research Center, which had agreed to do the drilling.

North Dakota out, South Dakota on the hook

Almost immediately after the Pierce County, North Dakota Commission rejected the test drilling, the Energy Department and Battelle hurriedly moved their focus to a remote East-Central South Dakota site near Redfield.

Rod Osborne, with Battelle, told South Dakota Public Broadcasting (SDPB) on May 12 that the geology near Redfield, population 2,333, in Spink County, South Dakota is great for testing to see whether deep boreholes are possible and to figure out how to make them.

Robert MacKinnon, a technical manager on the project at DOE’s Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, told the Salt Lake Tribune, “It’s to confirm the viability and concept.”

The research team will analyze the deep rock body for water permeability, stability, geothermal characteristics and seismic activity.

The Department of Energy is considering drilling three-mile-deep boreholes to test the viability of granite bedrock as a potential disposal method for high-level radioactive waste.

But at meetings May 11 and 17 in Redfield, South Dakota, Spink County residents spoke against the proposal. Local television reported, “Opponents … are organized and letting commissioners know what they think.” The critics have formed “Citizens for a Non-Nuclear South Dakota” and are working to make sure their county commissioners deny a drilling permit.

“What we are doing is testing the idea of drilling a very straight hole, fairly sizeable in diameter, eight and half inches, 16 thousand feet into the granite,” Battelle’s Osborne told SDPB. “So the combination of the depth, the very straight hole, and the diameter into granite is pretty unique. So we’re going to have to develop new tools, new methods, [and] new pieces of equipment to be able to do this kind of a test. And that’s really as much part of the project as actually getting the actual rock data.”

If nearby earthquakes occur, the crystalline rock could slip and allow for water and radioactive materials to migrate away from the site, according to Stephen Hickman, director of the US Geological Survey’s Earthquake Science Center, who spoke to the Salt Lake Tribune. Other potential problems with crystalline rock disposal are cavities, lava tubes and other voids in rock that could facilitate movement of water that could carry contaminants beyond the boreholes.

On May 23, Battelle spokesman T. R. Massey said to the Sioux Falls Argus Leader, “These wells will not be designed to hold nuclear waste. Period.”

Instead, dummy canisters without radioactive material would be used in the project’s third and final phase.

Waste fuel rods—the vast majority of high-level radioactive waste—“have been ruled out as too big to easily fit in these boreholes,” Science reported.

Warren Cornwall writing for the magazine said, “But [Energy Secretary Ernest] Moniz has said it could be ideal for some kinds of waste, particularly 1,936 slender, half-meter-long tubes of highly radioactive cesium-137 and strontium-90. Those are currently stored in a pool of water at a federal nuclear facility in eastern Washington State.”

These “capsules” of cesium and strontium had been scheduled to be directly disposed of inside Yucca Mountain, in Nevada, but that program was cancelled in 2010. A DOE Inspector General’s report says that these capsules are not to be disposed of before 2048.

16 billion gallons already injected in deep wells

According to the engineers involved with the deep borehole experiment, this sort of drilling test has not previously been attempted.

The “Deep Borehole Field Test” is supposed to combine several complex drilling practices and do something completely new: Drill a wide-diameter hole three miles deep into solid granite. One vexing problem is cutting a hole straight enough to allow the lowering of waste canisters.

“It can’t be off two inches here or three inches there, because the can won’t be able to slide down,” Massey told the Argus Leader.

The Energy Department’s January 5, 2016 press release announcing the deep borehole disposal experiment stated in part: “Over 40 years ago, scientists suggested the idea of disposing of nuclear weapons production waste in holes drilled miles into granite. In January 2012, the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future recommended research into the possibility of using deep boreholes…”

Deep well disposal of liquid radioactive waste was practiced in Idaho for more than 18 years but then halted. Some 16 billion gallons of waste water were dumped into the Snake River Aquifer at the Idaho National Engineering Lab (INEL) between 1952 and 1970. Wells were drilled directly into the Snake River Plain aquifer and the wastes were injected into the groundwater. [For perspective, 16 billion gallons would fill 127 football fields including end zones to a depth of 300 feet.] State and public pressure forced the DOE to stop the use of these injection wells in the mid-1980s.*

A 1976 study by EG&G, a prime contractor at INEL, found that radioactive wastes may follow groundwater through fractures and cracks in rock formations. Water may also collect at the bottom of disposal sites, tending to facilitate movement through discrete zones.

Sparsely populated sites targeted

Ranked 46 and 47 out of 50 states in population respectively, South and North Dakota may have been considered by the DOE to be short on public opposition. Over two dozen other states have similar granite bedrock characteristics but have so far not been named as test drilling hosts.

A 2008 DOE study (“Report to the President and the Congress by the Secretary of Energy on the Need for a Second Repository”) identifies 25 states considered potentially suitable for deep disposal of high-level waste. Named because of granite geology, the states are: Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, N. Carolina, S. Carolina, Georgia, Washington, Idaho, Arizona, Wyoming, Texas, Alabama, South Dakota, and Oklahoma.

Seven decades and no answer

Seventy years into the federal experiment with radioactive waste production, the only operational deep hideaway for it—the Waste Isolation Pilot Project, WIPP, in Carlsbad, New Mexico—was abruptly closed in February 2014. The shutdown happened when at least one waste barrel burst apart, spreading plutonium debris throughout the underground chambers, inundating the elevator and air shafts, and sending a plume into the open air above ground. Some 22 site workers were internally contaminated, having inhaled the contaminated dust. The WIPP site has not yet reopened.

*Deadly Defense: Military Radioactive Landfills by the Radioactive Waste Campaign (1988), p. 51; and Killing Our Own by Harvey Wasserman and Norman Solomon, (1980), p. 167.

Sources: Argus Leader, May 23; South Dakota Public Broadcasting, May 12; KSBY-TV, May 11; Bismarck Tribune, May 10, Mar. 2, Feb. 2 & 18; Dakota Free Press, Apr. 27; AP, Apr. 21; Science Online, March 23; Exchange Monitor, Apr. 22 & Mar. 4; Salt Lake Tribune, and Minneapolis StarTribune, Feb. 14; Pierce County Tribune, Feb. 5; Columbus Ohio Dispatch, Jan. 24; DOE and Beyond Nuclear, Jan. 5, 2016

 

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

July 11, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Locals “Shouldn’t Fear” Waste from Wisconsin Isotope Factory

Nukewatch Quarterly Summer 2016

On February 25, 2016, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission granted a construction permit to SHINE Medical Technologies for a $100 million factory in Janesville, Wisconsin to produce molybdenum-99 (moly-99).

Press coverage of the permit caught our attention because the firm’s promotional materials promise that its production method “generates less waste” than other methods.

Moly-99 decays to “technetium-99m,” which is used in medical scans to identify the stages of certain cancers, to diagnose heart disease, and in other diagnostic procedures. SHINE, headquartered in Madison, expects to produce over one quarter of the global demand for moly-99, and the Janesville factory will provide a US source of the medical isotope. Such a source will help avoid supply problems like the current suspension of imports from Canada and The Netherlands, which have both shut down production reactors because of leaks and other safety violations.

SHINE’s public information says the company’s process involves the use of neither a nuclear reactor nor highly enriched uranium (HEU)—used in most current production methods—eliminating the risk of diversion or theft of weapons usable nuclear materials. Notwithstanding these benefits, there appears to be little advantage over current methods of production in terms of liquid, post-reprocessing radioactive waste.

SHINEmed.com says the firm “was founded to deploy a safe, cost-effective and environmentally friendly technology to produce medical isotopes.” It boasts a “patented, proprietary manufacturing process” that it says “uses less electricity [and] generates less waste” than conventional production methods. Additional radioactive materials produced by SHINE will include iodine-131, iodine-125, and xenon-133.

While SHINE’s production of moly-99 will employ low-enriched uranium (LEU), its radioactive waste materials mostly are the same, along with attendant risks of accidents along transportation routes. Low Enriched Uranium will arrive at the southern Wisconsin facility and SHINE’s new system will produce moly-99 using an “ion-beam” or “gas target neutron generator.” The neutrons will be used to fission uranium atoms, producing a host of “fission products” (broken bits of uranium atoms) including moly-99, iodine-131, and xenon-133.

The Janesville Gazette’s editorial board said on the opinion page that, “Residents shouldn’t fear the small amounts of uranium waste.” But according to Dr. Gordon Edwards, President of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility, additional radioactive wastes from the process include cesium-137, strontium-90, plutonium-239, and the radioactive varieties of krypton and argon gas. Neither the radioactive or toxic character of the generated waste, nor its volume, is explained on SHINE’s website.

SHINE’s factory will be across Highway 51 from the Southern Wisconsin Regional Airport, according to the Gazette. “Isotopes disintegrate quickly—thus SHINE’s desire to build across from the airport so it could speed its product to market,” the paper reported.

SHINE declined to answer Nukewatch’s questions about the source of its LEU and the nature and volume of its radioactive waste. Spokesperson Katrina Pitas wrote in an email, “It appears our two organizations have directly opposing goals. Because of this, we respectfully decline to provide comment for your article.”

SHINE has benefited from generous funding from the federal government including $15 million from the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration to produce radioisotopes without weapons-grade highly enriched uranium. The City Council of Janesville approved a $9 million incentive package for SHINE in 2012.

SHINE hopes to open its factory in three years pending NRC approval of an operating permit. There are other methods for producing medical isotopes that do not require the use of uranium at all, whether LEU or HEU and that do not produce highly radioactive waste containing fission products.

—KL & JL

—Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility emails June 14, 7, & May 25; SHINE Medical Technologies, email, June 2; Janesville Gazette, Mar. 2; Minneapolis StarTribune, Feb. 26; & SHINE press release, Feb. 25, 2016; Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Oct. 26, 2015, & Mar. 28, 2010. 

 

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure, Radioactive Waste

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • …
  • 69
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch