Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

October 10, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

International Nuclear Power Fading Fast, Study Finds 

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2014

The latest World Nuclear Industry Status Report, published in July 2014,* provides a comprehensive review of nuclear power data, which “is critically important to understanding the past and current situations without bias for a healthy public policy debate.” According to the study’s forward by Tatsujiro Suzuki — who until March 2014 was Vice-Chairman of the Japan Atomic Energy Commission and is one of the report’s eight authors. 

The collage “Unsinkable,” by Chris Jordan, is made up of 67,000 photos of mushroom clouds, equal to the number of metric tons of ultra-radioactive waste being stored in temporary on-site pools at the US’s 100 operating reactors. A closer view o f the art is available at www.chrisjordan.com.

The report includes information on reactor operations, production and construction and looks extensively at the status of new-build programs in existing as well as in potential newcomer countries, considering in detail how changing market conditions are affecting the economics of nuclear power. The 2014 edition updates a Fukushima Status Report featured for the first time in 2013 which then triggered widespread media attention. The Nuclear Power vs. Renewable Energy chapter provides comparative data on investment, capacity and generation and assesses how nuclear power performs in systems with high renewable energy share. 

The report’s detailed country-by-country analysis provides an overview of all 31 countries operating nuclear power reactors, with extended sections on China, Japan and the United States. 

Some of the key findings by the report’s eight authors reporting from London, Paris, Berlin, Hamburg and Tokyo, include: 

• A declining role. Nuclear power’s share of global commercial primary energy production declined from the 2012 low of 4.5 percent, a level last seen in 1984, to a new low of 4.4 percent. 

• Aging machinery. The average age of the world’s operating nuclear reactors is increasing and by mid-2014 stood at 28.5 years. 

• Construction delays. At least 49 of the total of 69 construction sites — including three quarters of the Chinese projects — have encountered delays, many of them multi-annual. Construction of two units in Taiwan was halted. 

• Project cancellations. Several projects have been cancelled and new programs indefinitely delayed, including in the Czech Republic and in Vietnam. 

• Operating costs soar. Nuclear reactor generating costs jumped 16 percent in real terms in three years in France, and several units were shut down in the US because income does not cover operating costs. The economic survival of nuclear reactors is also threatened in Belgium, Germany and Sweden. 

• Renewables trump nuclear. In 2013 alone, 32 gigawatts (GW) of wind and 37 GW of solar were added to the world power grids. By the end of 2013, China had 91 GW of wind power and 18 GW of solar capacity installed, solar exceeding operating nuclear capacity for the first time. China added four times more solar than nuclear reactor capacity in the past year, and Spain generated more power from wind than from any other source, outpacing nuclear for the first time. Also the first time in any country, Spain made wind the largest electricity generating source over an entire year. Spain has thus joined the list of reactor operating countries that produce more electricity from new renewables — excluding large hydro-power — than from its nuclear reactors. The others are Brazil, China, Germany, India and Japan. 

*www.worldnuclearreport.org/IMG/pdf/201408msc-worldnuclearreport2014-hr-v4.pdf 

For further information and full copies of all previous reports see www.WorldNuclearReport.org. — JL

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter, Renewable Energy

October 10, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Action Alert: EPA’s Carbon Reduction  Proposal Promotes Nuclear

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2014

WASHINGTON, DC — The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s draft proposal for cutting greenhouse gas emissions, released in early June, treats nuclear reactors as “zero carbon” power sources and includes them in the baseline “clean energy” production statistics above which state reduction targets are set. Effectively, this would force states with aging reactors to keep them open or pay the extra penalty of making up that share of “zero-carbon” energy production through other sources — on top of meeting their regular target goals.

The proposal does not consider the toxic legacy of radioactive waste, high likelihood of further catastrophic accidents and security breaches, high levels of water use and waste, dirty process of uranium mining, or routine radiation releases that come with nuclear power. It also ignores research that has shown nuclear to be six times more carbon-emitting than wind power and at least twice as emitting as solar (both of those proportions go up as the efficiency of renewable technology increases). Hydropower, which is comparable to nuclear in many respects as a non-fossil-fuel power source, is not included in the proposal at all.

The nuclear power industry spent more than $650 million on lobbying, campaign contributions, and advertising from 2000-2010. Still, there is an opportunity for citizen voices to be heard before the final carbon rule goes into effect: the public comment period for the EPA proposal extends through October 16. A guide and link for submitting comments is available at www.nirs.org. — NIRS briefing, July 2014; Greenwire, June 2 & Aug. 8, 2014

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Renewable Energy

October 10, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

ALEC and Nuclear Industry Fighting Against Renewables in Illinois

Nukewatch Quarterly Fall 2014

SPRINGFIELD, Illinois — A May 29 voice vote of the Illinois House passed pro-nuclear resolution HR-1146, a bill that would provide massive subsidies to the state’s unprofitable nuclear power reactors and curb the growth of truly “clean,” renewable energy sources. Watchdog groups have reason to believe the bill, introduced by House Speaker Michael Madigan, was largely written by Illinois nuclear utility giant Exelon Corporation as part of a larger effort organized on the national level by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).

“This Resolution is not just a pro-nuclear resolution. It is an overt effort to destroy renewable energy statewide, a way to keep dirty coal plants running, and a way to continue and make permanent the outdated system of ‘centralized baseload power,’” said David Kraft, Director of the Nuclear Energy Information Service (NEIS) in Chicago.

Exelon is now investing $12-15 million per year, along with other ALEC members, in a pro-nuclear industry front group called Nuclear Matters. ALEC’s July 2014 Energy Task Force Meeting, where the Environmental Protection Agency’s new carbon rules were a focus of discussion, included a presentation from Nuclear Matters. In the last two years, ALEC has focused on attacking renewable energy standards in at least sixteen states, but, despite its massive financial investments, these efforts it has been largely unsuccessful. It did succeed in freezing the Ohio renewable energy standard for two years earlier this year. The Progressive magazine has launched an “ALEC Exposed” campaign, with more information available at www.progressive.org. — NEIS Press Release, May 29; Energy and Policy Institute Briefing, July 2014

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Renewable Energy

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Japan Increases Wind, Solar Capacity as Former Leaders Call for End to Nuclear

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014
By Arianne Peterson

Japan has made significant strides toward renewable alternatives and away from long-term reliance on nuclear power since the 2011 earthquake and tsunami destroyed the four reactors at Fukushima Daiichi, according to recent reports. Before the disaster, less than 3% of Japan’s electricity came from (non-hydro) renewable sources, with about 30% provided by the country’s 54 nuclear reactors. In one year alone, between June 2012 and June 2013, Japan added 3.6 gigawatts of renewable energy capacity — an amount coincidentally equal to the average output of four nuclear reactors. All 54 of Japan’s reactors have been either incapacitated or shut down for safety retrofits since the Fukushima disaster began.

Japan’s renewable energy success has been driven by the feed-in tariff (FIT) program the federal government launched in July 2012. Similar to the program that has supported Germany’s renewable energy boom, Japan’s FIT requires local utilities to purchase all of the power generated from solar installations over 10 kilowatts for at least 20 years. The program has revitalized Japan’s solar industry, which had been stagnant since 2004 when Japan became the first country to reach 1 gigawatt in solar capacity. In August, the country became just the fifth nation in the world to exceed 10 gigawatts of installed photovoltaic solar capacity, and its leaders are looking to add over 5 gigawatts of solar capacity next year alone.

On Nov. 1, Japan celebrated the opening of its largest solar photovoltaic power plant to date, the Kagoshima Nanatsujima Mega Solar Power Plant near Kagoshima Bay in southern Japan. At 70 megawatts, the Kagoshima solar plant covers an area equal to that of 27 baseball stadiums and is expected to power about 22,000 households.

In Fukushima Prefecture, just 12 miles from the shore where the Fukushima Daiichi reactor complex continues to release radioactive water to the Pacific ocean at an alarming rate, Japan’s first floating offshore wind turbine was completed on Nov. 11. The 2,000 kilowatt wind generator will power about 1,700 homes and is the first in a series of three trial projects planned by the Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry, the University of Tokyo, and 10 major private industry partners. Japan’s total wind energy potential is estimated at a staggering 1,570 gigawatts — five times the country’s current energy output — but steep elevation changes and deep waters off of most of the island nation’s coastline have posed significant logistical challenges to turbine installation. The Fukushima turbine is built on a floating platform that is anchored to the sea bed by massive steel chains. If successful, the initiative could lead to the building of over 140 floating turbines by 2020, with a total capacity of over 1 gigawatt. With almost 100% of the materials for the new offshore turbine technology produced in Japan, the project has great job-creation potential and would be applicable to deep-water offshore locations all over the world.

Despite the wind and solar capacity progress, Japan’s utilities are still lobbying for the government to restart 14 nuclear reactors, complaining that they cannot afford to provide electricity without them. However, a November report showed that for the period from April through September, five of nine Japanese utilities with nuclear reactors posted a net profit.

Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco), which operates the Fukushima Daiichi facility, was the biggest gainer, with a $6.19 billion net profit. Tepco attributed its positive numbers to a recent rate hike, postponed maintenance on its thermal power plants, and a government subsidy of $666 billion. But Hokuriku Electric, which has held the most sustainable profits of the five utilities, is also the least dependent on nuclear power. As Greenpeace-Japan spokesperson Akiko Sekine told Reuters, in one of two reports it published Nov. 12, “They have said they wouldn’t be able to get by without restarting reactors, but it seems they can.”

Recently, three high-level former political leaders joined a call for the permanent closure of all of Japan’s reactors. On Nov. 12, former premier Junichiro Koizumi urged his past deputy, current Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, to fully abandon nuclear power. Abe has pledged to phase

Japan’s remaining reactors out of the nation’s energy portfolio over the next 20 years. Koizumi, who was one of Japan’s most popular leaders when he stepped down in 2006, was in favor of nuclear power while in office but has reversed his position. He believes Abe has the political power to abolish nuclear power in Japan. And, according to a recent poll, 60% of the Japanese public agrees with his “zero nukes” plan.

Another former prime minister who has spoken out against nuclear, Morihiro Hosokawa, recently told the Tokyo Shimbun why he supported Koizumi’s position.

“I can’t understand why they want restarts of the nuclear plants when there is no place to discard the nuclear waste,” he said. “It is a crime against future generations for our generation to restart nuclear [reactors] without resolving this issue.”

Given the combined forces of the Fukushima disaster, political pressure, popular opinion, and nearly boundless renewable energy potential, Abe has confirmed that it is only a matter of time before Japan abandons nuclear power forever. Whether the move will take two years or two decades, and how much more damage will be done in the meantime, remains to be seen.

— New York Times, Oct. 23; EcoSeed, Nov. 6; Earth Techling, Nov. 7; LA Times, Nov. 11; Reuters, Nov. 12; AP, Nov. 12, 2013.

Filed Under: Fukushima, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter, Renewable Energy

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

The Pentagon’s Renewable War Power

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014

The US military is the largest energy hog in the country in an unsustainable situation that even the Pentagon recognizes. 

In 2008, the Pentagon spent $24 billion on electricity and fossil fuel — 80% of the government’s energy consumption. In 2010, the military used more than 5 billion gallons of fuel. The military uses more than 125 million barrels of petroleum every year, at times costing $400 per gallon when delivered in Afghan and Iraqi war zones. The Navy alone uses 80,000 barrels of oil daily. 

A 2010 Pentagon and Energy Department Memorandum of Understanding says the Pentagon is “increasing its use of renewable energy supplies and reducing energy demand to improve energy security and operational effectiveness, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in support of US climate change initiatives, and protect the DoD from energy price fluctuations.” 

Since the 1970s, the Pentagon has been reducing its usage and increasing renewable energy production. Working with the Natural Resources Defense Council, the military aims to get 25% of its energy from renewables by 2025. Private sector investment of at least $7 billion is going into renewable projects on government property. Private companies pay for and install solar, wind, geothermal and biomass. In exchange for land use, the military gets electricity at a fixed long-term rate. Residual energy feeds the civilian electric grid. An entire neighborhood at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona sports roof-top solar panels. The development of renewables is necessary so the Pentagon gets a point for participation. War, on the other hand, will never be green. 

— Department of Defense press release, Nov. 20; SolarCity Corporation, July 24, 2013; American Council on Renewable Energy, Jan. 2012; CleanTechnica, Tina Casey, undated. — BU

Filed Under: Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Renewable Energy

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch