Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

April 7, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Italian Bank Chief: Weapons Building is “Development in Reverse”

By Nukewatch Staff

The head of Italy’s Central Bank, Fabio Panetta, declared in January that weapons production does not lead to long-term economic growth. In a speech in Bologna, Panetta confronted European Union consideration of increased military spending, saying, “War cannot bring prosperity,” Reuters reported.

Perhaps not the sage he sounds like, Panetta put forth the very reasonable rationale that any money made in the short-term from weapons manufacturing paled in comparison to the much longer-lived costs of war. Costs likely not tallied in lives lost and trauma inflicted, but rather in the dollar-wise damage to infrastructure, machinery, raw materials, and the supply chain — which is no doubt the predominant language understood on the European Central Bank’s governing council, of which Panetta is a member.

Fabio Panetta, Governor of the Bank of Italy

“The manufacturing of war equipment does not help increase a country’s growth potential. Development comes from productive investment, not from arms,” Panetta said. “Moreover, it is misleading to attribute technological progress to military expenditure,” he added. Though he fell short of declaring war as anathema to both human survival and the development of a healthy and sustainable civilization, Panetta at least named war “a form of development in reverse,” one that the U.S., NATO allies, and their whole “developed” circus have certainly crowned as the most holy deserved squandering of modernity’s precious resources. — Yahoo.com, Feb. 28; Reuters, Jan. 16, 2025

Filed Under: Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, War

January 31, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

New U.S. Hydrogen Bombs May Have Arrived at NATO Bases

JOHN LAFORGE, January 31, 2025

The head administrator of the U.S. nuclear weapons program, Jill Hruby, seems to have confirmed the transfer of new U.S. nuclear bombs to air bases in Europe as part of the quaint-sounding “nuclear sharing” program.

In remarks to the Hudson Institute January 16, Hruby said, “The new B61-12 gravity bombs are fully forward deployed, and we have increased NATO’s visibility to our nuclear capabilities,” etc.

Hruby’s announcement came just a week after her National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) revealed that production of the newest of the U.S.’s thermonuclear gravity bombs was complete. “In December 2024, the B61-12 life extension program reached its ‘last production unit’, finishing its production run.” the Eurasian Times reported January 18.

NNSA’s notification came only three days after Hans Kristensen, et al reported in Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, “[I]t remained unclear whether any B61-12s had been delivered to European bases.” Hruby’s surprisingly rare public declaration prompted Kristensen, of the Federation of American Scientists, to tell Eurasian Times, “This almost sounds like official confirmation that deployment of the B61-12 to Europe has begun.”

That Hruby’s announcement was “almost like” official confirmation is about as much openness as the public ever gets regarding the highly secretive world of nuclear weapons. Only an eye-witness account of the arrival of a giant U.S. Air Force C-17 cargo plane at any of six NATO “nuclear sharing” bases — in Germany, Italy, Belgium, and the Netherlands — could be a more certain affirmation.

In preparation for the delivery of the new air-drop thermonuclear gravity bombs, the foreign air force bases have all undertaken major, costly upgrades and expansions. The Bulletin reports, “these upgrades include the installation of double-fence security perimeters, modernizing the weapon storage and security systems and the alarm communication and display systems….” In addition, “A loading pad designed for U.S. C-17 aircraft that transports nuclear weapons is also being added at Kleine Brogel (Belgium), Büchel (Germany), Ghedi (Italy), and Volkel (the Netherlands).”

The approximately €1.1 billion ($1.14b) Büchel air base upgrade also makes way for the new F-35 Stealth jet fighters being purchased by Germany and to be flown by German air force pilots who will continue their role as planners, preparers, and prospective executioners of nuclear weapons attacks aimed at Russia.

News of the likely transfer of the new B61-12s came just as a group of nuclear weapons opponents were gathering only 15 miles from Germany’s Büchel airbase, south of Cologne. The anti-nuclear group Nonviolent Action for Abolition met to welcome out of prison the U.S. nuclear resister Susan Crane, who had served 230 days resulting from protests at the base, and to discuss the coming year’s schedule of events which are directed against “nuclear sharing” in general and Büchel’s collaboration in particular.

The NNSA’s January 18th B61-12 “job done” announcement included the thrilling, career-saving and budget-retaining news that its 60-year-old assembly line “will transition to producing the B61-13 bomb.” The Bulletin noted more soberly that the B61-version 13 comes with a thermonuclear explosive force of 360 kilotons, “significantly higher than the B61-12’s yield of 50 kilotons.”

With 24 Hiroshima-sized firestorms in each “13,” you could say this jobs program has “unlucky” written all over it. Yet there is evidently no thought of arms control or belt tightening when it comes to mass production of this Ford Mustang of mass destruction. The War Zone reports this month that, “The B61-13 and future variants will require highly specialized engineering … the U.S. Air Force’s Nuclear Weapon Center’s recent contracting notice said.” (emphasis added).

Yes, contracting is the thing. And you thought it was about deterrence.

John LaForge is a Co-director of Nukewatch, a peace and environmental justice group in Wisconsin, and edits its newsletter.

–originally at Counterpunch.org

Filed Under: B61 Bombs in Europe, Nuclear Weapons, US Bombs Out of Germany, War, Weekly Column

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Germany Plans Roll Back of Military Funding to Ukraine

Germany is signaling it may slow its military support to Ukraine, showing little enthusiasm for two of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky’s demands: striking deep into Russia with German Taurus missiles and fast-tracking NATO membership.

Zelensky’s latest bid to bolster the war took him to the UK, France, Italy, and Germany. For now, Berlin will not send anymore of the requested Leopard 2 tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, or armored howitzers. The German Defense Ministry does not anticipate Kiev can launch a successful counteroffensive in the near future, according to reports in German news outlet Bild.

Although German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has promised to deliver 1.4 billion Euros of combined support alongside Belgium, Denmark, and Norway by the end of the year, Germany’s projected military aid to Ukraine for 2025 is half what it gave in 2024. So far, Germany has provided or pledged about 28 billion Euros in military funding for Ukraine.

Behind the U.S., Germany remains Ukraine’s second-largest source of military funding. Even Zelensky’s hard lines drawn earlier seem to be wavering as his administration considers swapping Ukrainian territories for a peace agreement with Russia. The specter of waning military assistance grows larger with the change in U.S. leadership and Germany’s new reticence.

⸺ BBC, July 17; Global Research, Oct. 14, 2024

Filed Under: Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, War

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Netanyahu to Biden: “Well, you dropped the atom bomb.”

Opinion by John LaForge

Israel’s ghastly genocidal destruction of Gaza drags on and is horrifyingly clear for all to see. The Israeli Defense Forces’ criminal mass murder is so blatant and unabashed that in December last year, even U.S. President Joe Biden challenged Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu. Speaking to an audience of campaign donors in Washington, D.C., including a former president of AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Biden said Israel was “starting to lose support by the indiscriminate bombing that takes place.”

According to Philip Weiss at mondoweiss.net, Biden went on to say that when speaking with Netanyahu himself, the Israeli leader justified the mass attacks by reminding Biden of U.S. massacres. Biden reportedly said to the donors:

“It was pointed out to me — I’m being very blunt with you all — it was pointed out to me — by Bibi [Benjamin Netanyahu] — that ‘Well, you carpet bombed Germany. You dropped the atom bomb. A lot of civilians died.’”

Such a face-to-face plastering of U.S. hypocrisy by a head-of-state is unheard of. Netanyahu’s smug spanking of a sitting U.S. president over U.S. massacres at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was absolutely unprecedented.

Netanyahu’s mass killing has garnered him an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court, yet that stinging global stigma is hardly enough of a condemnation in view of the 42,000 civilians his government has killed in Gaza. Netanyahu’s grizzly indiscriminate bombardment of schools, hospitals, churches, mosques, apartment buildings, open markets, and other civilian gathering points is such an open-and-shut case of criminal war-making, that only blindly obedient sycophants or collaborators can imagine any rationalization of it.

Bibi’s point in slapping Biden in the face with “you dropped the atom bomb” is that President Truman and his administration claimed to have “saved lives” by killing 210,000 civilians at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The guilt-ridden, self-righteous absurdity of Truman’s claim has always been clear to historians and outside observers. Dorothy Day, Albert Camus, and others immediately condemned the atomic bombings for what they were. Nothing excuses mass destruction of innocent non-combatants. Regardless of the circumstances, deliberately indiscriminate attacks on civilians and civilian objects have been a violation of universal laws of war since 1907.

The truth-telling thrown at Biden is that the United States of Amnesia has no moral authority to brandish, no superior standing of any kind from which to condemn Israeli atrocities or bemoan its multiple massacres in Gaza. Regardless of the IDF’s unjustified, unlawful, and criminal murder of civilians there, U.S. military action in WWII, in Korea, in Southeast Asia, in Afghanistan, and in Iraq, in Abu Ghraib, CIA Black Sites, and at Guantanamo Bay, has permanently erased any claim the U.S. government ever had as a defender of human rights or the so-called rules-based order.

Our U.S. high school history books’ vision of the U.S. as a “shining city on a hill” was always a fiction that drew groans from Native American descendants of genocidal U.S. Army raids of the 1800s, and from African American descendants of 300 years of slavery.

No wonder Netanyahu punched Biden in the nose. The U.S. has never even acknowledged the criminality of killing Japanese civilians in order to save soldiers’ lives, much less apologized for it. Yet for Netanyahu to call Biden a fraud is an indirect admission that his government has adopted the murderous metrics of historical U.S. militarism and made them its own. Massacres are just as criminal in Gaza as they were in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, War

January 15, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Pine Gap Readies for U.S. Nuclear War

With Australians still adjusting to the new AUKUS military agreement, the United States has been quietly expanding and refocusing its satellite surveillance base at Pine Gap, preparing to attack China with nuclear weapons.

By Peter Cronau

The rapid expansion of the Pine Gap satellite surveillance base near Alice Springs, Australia from 35 to 45 satellite dishes, is designed to give the U.S. the edge in a potential nuclear war with China.

Where desert oaks and spinifex tufts once baked in the Central Australian sun, three new white domes have mushroomed in a 14-hectare clearing along the western edge of the U.S.’s ‘most important surveillance base’ in the world.

Under huge plastic radomes, three of Pine Gap’s new satellite dishes have been built to receive information from a new generation of U.S. spy satellites that bring a heightened level of surveillance of China’s nuclear missile launch sites at a time of increasing confrontation between China and the U.S. and its allies.

Thermal imaging satellites presently used by the Pine Gap base are able to detect rocket and missile launches in the battlefields of Gaza and Ukraine, as I have earlier reported, but the greatest interest of the new satellite dishes at the base are missile launches from China.

A new generation of ‘eyes-in-the-sky,’ known as Overhead Persistent InfraRed (OPIR) satellites, will soon be launched by the U.S. military to augment the existing satellites of the Space-Based Infrared System (SBIRS). These satellites are designed to detect the thermal signatures of rocket and missile launches, using immensely sensitive infrared sensors.

The Rush to Catch Up

The U.S. Defense Department’s ‘Space Force’ is poised to launch five new ballistic missile early warning infrared sensor tracking satellites. The first
launch had been planned for 2025, but technical difficulties have seen it delayed until 2026. Three of the five new OPIR satellites will go into geostationary orbit at 35,000 kilometers altitude over the equator and two will orbit the poles.

The new Pine Gap dishes will use these OPIR satellites acting as ‘spotters’ to better detect heat signatures from ballistic missiles at the earliest stages of launch, to then send this data to low orbit tracking satellites, which aim to guide the targeting of the launch locations and of the incoming missiles.

They will aim to defeat the latest hi-tech maneuverable ballistic and hypersonic missiles which have been developed by China and Russia. As Declassified Australia reported in depth in 2022, the U.S. has no present infallible defense against hypersonic missiles, which can reach speeds of 12,500 kilometers per hour and carry either conventional or nuclear warheads.

Lacking any defense against the new missiles, developing new surveillance satellites therefore became urgent.

It became evident to U.S. military planners that the older SBIRS satellites were not up to dealing with the advanced hypersonic missiles — developing new surveillance satellites therefore became urgent.

As the new satellites were being developed to face the new hypersonic threat, new satellite dishes and electronics on the ground were also needed. That’s why they need to upgrade Pine Gap.

— Nexusnewsfeed, June 15 – 21, 2024

— Peter Cronau is an award-winning investigative journalist, writer, and film-maker. His documentaries have appeared on ABC’s Four Corners and Radio National’s Background Briefing. He is an editor and cofounder of Declassified Australia.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, War

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 32
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch