Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

April 18, 2024 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

“The Only Sane Solution …”

By Brian Terrell

“We still hold that nonviolent resistance is the only sane solution,” Dorothy Day wrote in 1940, in a time of war much like our own, minus the daily escalating threat of nuclear annihilation that we face today. “We have to continue to make our voice heard until we are finally silenced — and even then, in jail, or concentration camp, to express ourselves.” In that spirit, Catholic Workers and other activists in Kansas City will be hosting the annual Spring Midwest Catholic Worker Resistance Retreat there April 12-15.

Each spring for more than 20 years, Catholic Workers and their fellow travelers have left their homes, houses of hospitality, and farms to lend support for a local campaign of nonviolent resistance somewhere in the Midwest.

The Kansas City “National Security Campus,” (KCNSC) “creating technology roadmaps to ensure we’re at the forefront of national security innovation” — along with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, the Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Nevada National Security Site, the Pantex Plant, the Sandia National Laboratories, and the Y-12 National Security Complex — is a facility of the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). With some 7,000 employees, the Kansas City “campus” produces more than 80% of the non-nuclear components in U.S. nuclear weapons.

In January 2022, officials at KCNSC announced the completion of the B61-12 “Life Extension Program’s” first production unit (FPU): “It is with great pride and excitement that we see the B61-12 achieve FPU,” said Eric Wollerman, president of Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies which manages and operates the “campus” complex, formerly known as the Kansas City Plant.

The new B61-12 H-bombs are on their way to replace the old B61 freefall gravity bombs at bases in five NATO countries as part of “nuclear sharing” arrangements. These new, “more flexible” thermonuclear bombs — with adjustable tail assemblies that allow them to be guided, and a built-in option to dial up to 50 kilotons (three times the destructive power of the Hiroshima bomb) or down to less than one kiloton — are the nuclear weapons closest to the borders of Russia. If or when the order is given, they will be “delivered” to their target areas by their host countries’ air forces.

New technologies like the B61-12 have inspired optimism in U.S. war planners that a nuclear war, once started, can be controlled and brought to decisive victory. Open talk about “using nuclear weapons could create conditions for decisive results and the restoration of strategic stability,” in the words of a June 2019 report by the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, “and create conditions that affect how commanders will prevail in conflict ” has become commonplace. On Oct. 12, 2023, the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States published its report on the unsubstantiated dangers posed by China and Russia, suggesting that “the United States and its Allies and partners must be ready to deter and defeat both adversaries simultaneously.”

Responding to “the demands of a rapidly evolving security environment,” on October 27 the [Pentagon] announced that “a modern variant of the B61 nuclear gravity bomb, designated the B61-13” would be produced. [According to the Arms Control Association, the B61-13 would have a maximum explosive force of around 360-kilotons, “a massive increase when compared to the most recent 50-kiloton B61-12.”] The B61-13 “would be deliverable by modern aircraft … providing the president with additional options against certain harder and large-area military targets,” the Pentagon said. The doctrine of “mutually assured destruction” (MAD) — that a nuclear war could have no winners and would annihilate the combatant parties leaving much of the planet lifeless — was never a good plan for lasting peace. The existential fear that gripped the planet in the cold war years was “not a way of life at all, in any true sense,” President Eisenhower said in 1953, but “humanity hanging from a cross of iron.” MAD didn’t prevent endless conflicts and wars of proxy, but somehow, by sheer luck some say, a final nuclear weapons exchange did not happen in those years.

In the 1990s, there was some real progress toward disarmament and even now, the nations of the world are uniting in support of a total prohibition of nuclear weapons. Over the past three administrations, however, the United States has led the other nuclear powers in a new arms race. For elected officials and policy makers, talk of arms reduction has been replaced by “stockpile stewardship,” ensuring the nuclear threat for future generations. While quality of life declines globally and the world faces imminent climate collapse, the U.S. Department of Energy commits trillions of dollars for “life extension” of the B61-12 and other nuclear weapons systems.

Last August, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres warned, “This year, we face an alarming rise in global mistrust and division. At a time in which nearly 13,000 nuclear weapons are stockpiled around the world — and countries are working to improve their accuracy, reach, and destructive power — this is a recipe for annihilation.”
This will be the second such retreat and action by Catholic Workers at the Kansas City National Security Campus. The first one in 2011 drew some 150 participants and culminated in fifty-three arrests on May 2 for blocking the construction of what was to become the nation’s first nuclear weapons production factory built in 33 years. Since then, Catholic Workers have regularly organized protests and resistance there, as they have at the weapons plant that preceded it, sponsored by PeaceWorks Kansas City.

Print by Sarah Fuller, sarahfullerart.com

Last August, Catholic Workers and others from around Europe and the U.S. joined protests hosted by the Jeanette Noel Catholic Worker in Amsterdam at Volkel air base in the Netherlands. The group participated in a series of other protests sponsored by the German coalition “Büchel is Everywhere!” at Germany’s Büchel air base. Both bases host U.S. air force squadrons that maintain their B61 bombs, ready to be loaded onto Dutch and German fighter jets at a moment’s notice.

“Fill the Jails!” was Dorothy Day’s urgent advice to Catholic Workers during the war on Vietnam. The Earth has not seen such perilous times as the “rapidly evolving security environment” that we are living through today. This spring’s retreat in Kansas City is a weekend of education, prayer, reflection, community-building, and training, followed on Monday, April 15, with nonviolent direct action to disrupt the deadly business as usual at the KCNS nuclear weapons factory. For more information contact Ann Suellentrop, 913-271-7925, annsuellen@gmail.com.

— Brian Terrell is a peace activist who has spent time in prison for protesting assassinations at U.S. military drone bases and lives at Strangers and Guests Catholic Worker farm in Maloy, Iowa.

Filed Under: B61 Bombs in Europe, Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, On The Bright Side, Quarterly Newsletter, Through the Prism of Nonviolence, War

April 18, 2024 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Biggest NATO War Games on Russian Front Since 1988

By John LaForge

On Jan. 18, 2024, NATO launched its biggest anti-Russia war games in 35 years. Dubbed “Steadfast Defender,” the rehearsals involve 90,000 troops from all 31 NATO allies, 50 battleships, 80 fighter jets, helicopters, drones, and over 1,200 combat vehicles, according to Reuters. The exercises, funded by NATO states, are being staged in thirteen countries. Provocatively, in the midst of ongoing war against Russia in Ukraine, the participating Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, and Poland, comprise NATO’s eastern front and three of them directly border Russia. The last NATO war games of this size took place in 1988. The rehearsals are to continue through May like a trade show for new weapons systems. NATO’s massive military theatrics were described defensively by U.S. Army General Chris Cavoli, the alliance’s top commander, who said January 18 that they “demonstrate NATO’s ability to rapidly deploy forces from North America and other parts of the alliance.” — NATO.ACT, Jan. 26; Reuters, Jan. 18, 2024

Photo: Military Review.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, War

April 18, 2024 by Nukewatch 2 Comments

Be Afraid. Be Very Afraid.

WWII propaganda poster by General Motors. You too can purchase a screen-printed T-shirt version still today.

Google would have us believe that the United States is in grave danger, threatened by the likes of North Korea, China, Iran, and asteroids. A holiday list of headlines from Google’s nuclear weapons prompts included these fearsome warnings:

“N. Korea will likely keep amassing nuclear warheads until next negotiation,” The Korea Times, Dec. 25, 2023; “Iran’s nuclear breakout: ‘Twas the night before Armageddon,” New York Post, Dec. 24, 2023; “China’s H-20 Bomber Is a Real Threat to the U.S. Military,” The National Interest, Dec. 24, 2023; “Is China rebuilding its old base for nuclear tests? Should India be concerned?” Firstpost, India, Dec. 23, 2023; “Buried nuclear secrets, exploding U.S. tensions: Inside China’s Lop Nur,” The Victoria Advocate, U.K., Dec. 23, 2023; “U.S. expresses serious concern over signs of N. Korea commissioning light-water reactor,” The Korea Times, Seoul, Dec. 26, 2023; “Iran navy receives new cruise missiles amid growing regional tension,” Deccan Herald India, Dec. 24, 2023; “Scientists explore using nuclear explosions to fend off asteroids,” BGR [consumer electronics news], Dec. 24, 2023.

Ironically, supposed U.S. “concern” over a nuclear reactor in North Korea contradicts Washington’s boldly broadcast embrace and promotion of nuclear reactor construction, demonstrated most theatrically at COP28 with Biden’s declaration to “triple global nuclear capacity by 2050.”

If the United States truly has the intention to harass, condemn, and weaken North Korea, it could not do more harm to its government and its territory than to promote the hasty and widespread construction of nuclear reactors, uranium mines, and uranium fuel fabrication factories like the kind spreading cancer and immune deficiency disorders in industrialized countries.

Fighting authoritarianism? Sell radiation to dictators! The grave wave of the future.

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, North Korea, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, War

April 18, 2024 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

What Can the Courts Offer Gaza?

By Lindsay Potter

As billions of people witness the horrors unfolding in Gaza, the recent interim ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in the genocide case against Israel brought by South Africa, feels inadequate. If the International Court is capable of naming genocide but incapable of stopping it, what is the usefulness of the court ruling and how can it offer justice or consolation to any population under daily attack? The answer is that it cannot. The world seems suspended in speculative debate, unable to reign in the beast of Israeli aggression and the shameful support of its U.S. handlers.

The ICJ’s determination invokes all 153 states parties to the Genocide Convention’s obligation to prevent the genocide in Gaza and criminalizes complicity. The Biden administration is also in violation of the Genocide Convention Implementation Act under U.S. law. Yet, the UN Security Council and international courts are largely instruments of Western and nuclear-armed nations who hold overwhelming sway through vetoes and military blackmail. Codepink’s Marcy Winograd recently compiled a thorough list of avenues to effectively sanction Israel. Winograd writes: “If the nations of the world wanted to stop Israel’s slaughter, torture, and ethnic cleansing in Gaza, they could do so tomorrow with suspension of oil, arms, and technology imports and exports to Israel.”

Gaza by Palestinian artist Malak Mattar, 24, who arrived in London to study on Oct.6, 2023. thetricontinental.org.
Puppet Courts Fail Global Community

Ilan Pappé, Israeli historian and professor at the University of Exeter, wrote “Palestinians, and whoever supports any struggle against crimes committed by countries of the global north, ceased a long time ago to be impressed by symbolic actions … Ever since its final institutionalization after the Second World War, international law failed to deal properly with colonialism as a crime and was never able to challenge settler colonial projects like Israel. It also became clear that imperialist policies pursued by the U.S. and Britain, in clear violation of international law, are totally exempt from international law’s jurisdiction. It did not stop the killing of one single Palestinian … nor did it prevent the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Indeed, the list of its failures is too long to be detailed here.”

Francis Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law, confirms the racism and cronyism of the international justice system is also embodied in the International Criminal Court, which tries individuals on criminal charges of human rights violations and distinct from the ICJ: “I regret to report that the ICC has not done one darn thing to help the Palestinians … [it] has all the blood of the Palestinian people on its hands. The ICC basically operates at the behest of its funders and founders and masters: the U.S., NATO states, European states. Until their expedited indictment of Putin as U.S.-NATO lawfare against Russia, the ICC had not indicted one American, one European, one Brit, one NATO citizen, one Israeli, one white person.”

The court’s ineptitude is not news to countries like Nicaragua, who took the U.S. to the ICJ in 1984. The U.S. was found in violation of international law and ordered to cease its actions and pay reparations to Nicaragua, to no avail. The ICJ called outright for a ceasefire in Ukraine and yet the war rages on.

Painting: Fathi Ghaben (1947-2024), internationally recognized Gazan painter and educator who died from lack of medical care under Israel’s war.
Justice Must Lie in the Court of Global Action

Israel has shown that it intends to expand rather than end its killing and destruction in Gaza. Since January 26, thousands more Palestinians have been killed and Israel is threatening a ground invasion of Rafah, once deemed a safe zone and now hosting over a million displaced Gazans. Hospitals, refugee camps, and food convoys continue to be targeted. Aid is still denied and Israel’s Western allies pulled funding for UNRWA, the primary UN aid agency in Palestine. The World Food Programme has stopped issuing food to the starving population of northern Gaza and the Israeli government continues to refuse any deal for a Palestinian state.

The UN Security Council can vote on pushing for Israeli compliance through sanctions, arms embargoes, travel bans, and ultimately it has the power to intervene with force. However, the U.S. has consistently vetoed Security Council action on Israel’s behalf. Israel shows as much recognition to the ICJ as the U.S. has before it. The U.S. seems to have trained the Israeli state in everything from intelligence-gathering, to weapons of war, to disdain for human rights and accountability to the international community.

Some Nations Will Not Stand By Idly

The case before the ICJ offers another venue for speaking truth. While the consequences of such a hearing may feel ineffective, it is a necessary tool for naming crimes against humanity and those who perpetrate them. It is crucial to establish these facts to set the record, in hope that doing so can begin to reorder the global power structure.

Haidar Eid, associate professor at Al-Aqsa University in Gaza, wrote in Al-Jazeera: “With this case, South Africa has put not only Israel, but the entirety of the global justice system on trial. This case is a major turning point for humanity, because it marks the first time in history when a Global South country bravely crossed a red line drawn by the colonial West and demanded its favourite settler colony, Israel, be held to account for the crimes it has long been committing against an Indigenous people. Today, thanks to South Africa, the entire colonial West, and its centuries-long history of theft, dispossession, and injustice is on trial at the World Court. Yes, a new world order is in the making.”

As voices in the streets grow louder, holes are appearing in the U.S. and Europe’s steadfast denial. Belgium denounced U.S. arms sales to Israel, a court in the Netherlands ordered to block the export of F-35 fighter jet parts to Israel, the French foreign minister called for an immediate ceasefire, and Ireland’s senate unanimously approved sanctioning Israel, calling for an international arms embargo against Israel, and barring U.S. weapons shipments to Israel through Irish airspace. France, Jordan, and Canada are now air-dropping humanitarian aid off Gaza’s coast, with the U.S. now hypocritically joining this token offering to slow the cascading death toll.

The U.S. vetoed a third ceasefire resolution at the UN Security Council. But Biden’s administration is batting an eye as he enters this election year haunted by criticism of his handling of the war. President Biden signed an executive order in February sanctioning Israeli settlers; the U.S. promised its own weak, six-week ceasefire resolution; Secretary of State Blinken condemned Israeli plans for thousands of new settlements in the occupied West Bank as “counterproductive to a lasting peace and inconsistent with international law” (a humanitarian standard he selectively acknowledges). It is paltry and insulting, but it is a glimmer of possibility that U.S. blank-check justifications for the Israeli government’s actions are wavering, if only to save political face.

Chile, Slovenia, Mexico, Bangladesh, Bolivia, the Comoros, and Djibouti have all backed cases against Israel at the ICJ or ICC. The U.S. and Fiji are alone in support of Israel in a separate six-day hearing before the ICJ on Israel’s decades-long occupation of Palestinian territories. More than 50 countries are arguing on behalf of Palestine — the largest-ever participation in the court’s history. It will take time to balance the scales against undemocratic U.S. and nuclear-armed veto power and to build coalitions that demand a new world order, but these countries demonstrate they will speak out, they are ready to stand up amidst the rubble of the crumbling U.S. empire and to topple the pillars of Israeli impunity.

Sources:

Law for Palestine Database, reliefweb, Jan. 8, 2024.

“ICJ Israel decision: A new world order in the making” by Haidar Eid, Al Jazeera, Jan. 26, 2024.

“Will the U.S. Block the ICJ on Gaza? It’s Thwarted the Court Before,” Jon Schwarz, The Intercept, Jan. 30 2024. 

Francis Boyle on Democracy Now!, Feb. 2, 2024.

Al Jazeera, Feb. 2, 2024.

Al Jazeera, Jan. 19, 2024.

“ICJ Ruling is Not Good Enough, and This is the Way Forward,” ILAN PAPPE, The Palestine Chronicle, January 29, 2024. 

 

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, War

January 18, 2024 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

The Weapons Connection

By Lindsay Potter

As we go to print, it has been eight weeks since the beginning of the bombardment of Gaza, with over 17,000 (now 24,000) civilians killed, the number growing daily and nearly half of them children. The living are mostly without water, electricity, food, fuel, and medicine, entry or exit, and the Israeli government continues to use criminal tactics to carry out genocide — documented and named by the Center for Constitutional Rights, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International.

Within a week after the start of Israel’s war, weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin’s stock surged 11%, following a 36% increase in Spring 2023 as a result of the war in Ukraine. In September, Lockheed reported a total annual revenue of over $67 billion. Lockheed’s weapons have been documented in use in Israeli war crimes against Palestinians and
Lockheed’s Hellfire missiles are currently among the demands from Israel. But this is only business as they have conducted it for decades. Lockheed’s profits soared 41% in 2004 as a result of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In Nov., protestors block an entrance to the offices of a Lockheed Martin subsidiary which won $1 million in state funding to expand its St. Paul, MN operations.

Under President Bush, a Lockheed Martin lobbyist was appointed General Consul for the Department of Homeland Security. The company spends millions of dollars in lobbying and campaign contributions and currently their CEO is on the board of the Council on Foreign Relations. Over the last twenty years, Lockheed has been involved in billion dollar contracts to manage Sandia Laboratories, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and the Nevada Test Site — federally owned sites for the research, development, and testing of nuclear and non-nuclear weapons technology.

Despite legislation alerting Congress to the giant waste of the nearly $2 trillion renovation of U.S. ICBMs and despite arguments by former Secretaries of Defense that land-based missiles are too expensive, too risky, and redundant, Lockheed has $3.7 billion in current contracts for the Minuteman III and its replacements meant to carry the arsenal through 2075. The U.S. Navy plans to use Lockheed Martin Hercules aircraft for nuclear command and communications. Lockheed has a current $6.3 billion contract for work on the Trident II nuclear submarine missiles for the U.K. and U.S. So far, the U.S. has sent over $46 billion in weapons to Ukraine, including Javelin anti-tank missiles, M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System launchers, and Guided Multiple Launch Rocket Systems, all made by Lockheed Martin.

U.S.-Israeli Exceptionalism & the New Arms Race

Lockheed profits from U.S. violation of international law and the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, with $50 billion in sales of its F-35 war plane to seven different countries, many with the possible purpose of hauling the U.S.’s own B61 bomb. Israel was the first to receive the new Lockheed Martin F-35, and it has been used in bombing sorties over Gaza. In addition to the U.S. exceptionalism enshrined in the NPT, the U.S. boldly violates the treaty with nuclear sharing. Much was made of Russia sending nuclear missiles to Belarus, and when Russia tried this once before during the Cuban Missile Crisis. However, little is said of the U.S. forward-deployed nukes in five NATO countries.

If North Korea tests a warhead, the U.S. responds with joint military drills in the North Pacific and threats of economic and military retaliation. Iran, though it signed the NPT and agreed to inspections, though it followed the letter of the Iran Nuclear Deal until Tr

Nukewatch’s Lindsay Potter (center) spoke Oct. 28 at a protest against weapons giant Lockheed Martin in St. Paul, Minnesota.

ump unilaterally withdrew, though
it has suffered U.S. sanctions for decades, is still demonized as a potential nuclear threat. Yet, Israel has never signed the NPT and does not acknowledge its arsenal of anywhere from 80 to as many as 600 nuclear warheads, according to Seymour Hersch. Israel’s real nuclear capabilities and complete exemption from inspections, accountability, and standards of international law are encouraged by Western Europe and are a feather in the U.S. cap, a base of operations for U.S. hegemony.

 

Lockheed Martin has an office and show room in Tel Aviv. Israeli contractor Rafael is partnering with Lockheed, and an Israeli company won the lucrative contract to make the outer wing box for the new F-35s. Now Israel, as an arm of the U.S. empire, not only wields Lockheed’s weapons to kill civilians, it will grow its economy by the same manufacture of death. Demand is so high Lockheed Martin is currently taking up to four years to fill orders, for example for war planes for Poland. Because of the global demand for weapons, with the market for nuclear weapons projected to double from 2020 to 2030, Lockheed and other manufacturers are coordinating efforts to increase production infrastructure.

Though Russia put forward a UN security council resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, the U.S. vetoed. Brazil put forward a resolution for a humanitarian pause for aid to be let through and still the U.S. vetoed. The U.S. chooses the profits of Lockheed and the imperial ambitions of the U.S., Israel, and allies, over the lives of civilians. The same is true of the U.S. and U.K. dismantling the proposal for peace in Ukraine presented by China. Lockheed Martin is in the business of killing people and the U.S. government acts as if it leads its international PR and market development — rolling over entire populations in order to ensure the demand for weapons only increases.

Filed Under: Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, War

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • …
  • 32
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch