Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

July 14, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Report: Radiation and the Damage it Causes

A new publication from Beyond Nuclear, “Radiation and harm to human health,” is the latest in its series of booklets that together comprise what it calls, “The Case Against Nuclear Power: Facts and Arguments from A-Z.” Available online, BN says: “It’s time to set the record straight on radiation and the damage it causes, particularly to pregnancy, children and women. Contrary to what Trump’s recent executive orders claim, abundant and largely officially ignored, scientific evidence demonstrates that childhood cancers increase around normally operating nuclear facilities, with indications that these cancers begin during pregnancy. Uranium mining to get fuel for reactors, a worldwide environmental justice travesty, is also associated with a number of health impacts. Even already existing background radiation (from the nuclear industry’s uranium fuel chain) is associated with childhood cancers — a fact that nuclear proponents conveniently forget — the industry compounds these health impacts by releasing radiation accidentally, and routinely, from nuclear reactors; releases the U.S. NRC has been happy to legalize. Clearly our current radiation standards aren’t protective enough.”

— Read it here: https://beyondnuclearinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/radiation-and-harm-to-human-health_27-july.pdf

Filed Under: Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

July 14, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Lakenheath AFB Blockader: “I’m here to prevent a crime”

Declaring “We campaign to scrap nuclear weapons,” 250 activists joined a peace camp outside the Lakenheath “Royal” Air Force base in Northeast Britain April 14 to 26, organized by Lakenheath Alliance for Peace. Seven resisters were arrested April 26 during a blockade of the main gate. Besides protesting the return of U.S. B61 nuclear bombs to Britain, the camp drew attention to the U.K.’s role in supporting Israel’s genocide in Palestine, as well as how Lakenheath and the global network of 800 U.S. military bases drive climate breakdown, the Alliance reported. Sophie Bolt, of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, said, “Rather than arresting people for peacefully protesting the return of U.S. nuclear weapons to Britain and the base’s role in supporting Israel’s genocide in Gaza, the police should be investigating clear violations of international law being facilitated by both the British government and U.S. bases in Britain.

During a blockade at the end of a 12-day peace camp, activists shut down the main gate to RAF Lakenheath in Northeast England, one of the largest air bases in Europe, which may soon see the stationing of U.S. B61-12 hydrogen bombs. Photo: Jim Scott.

Nuclear weapons don’t make us safer, they make us a target.” The Morning Star online reported, “Last month, CND forced the declassification of [documentation] that U.S. forces are exempt from adhering to British nuclear safety regulations.” Bolt said, ‘There’s no public consultation. This is all being done behind closed doors. It’s a complete nuclear cover-up.’” One placard at the gate read: “I am not here for protest, I am here to prevent a crime.” — Lakenheath Alliance for Peace and CND, April 28; Morningstar online, April 27, 2025 

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

July 14, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Milwaukee’s Common Council Tells Congress: We Want Nuclear Weapons Abolished

On April 2, the Common Council of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, unanimously adopted a nuclear weapons abolition resolution calling on U.S. leaders to: actively pursue a verifiable agreement among nuclear-armed states to eliminate their nuclear arsenals; renounce the option of using nuclear weapons first; end the sole, unchecked authority of any U.S. president to launch a nuclear attack; take U.S. nuclear weapons off hair-trigger alert; and cancel plans to replace the entire U.S. nuclear arsenal with enhanced weapons.

The Milwaukee Common Council exercises all policy-making and legislative powers of the city

Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson signed the measure which was introduced by Council Member Marina Dimitrijevic. The resolution is part of the national Physicians for Social Responsibility’s campaign Back from the Brink, and was pushed by a coalition of 18 state groups led by Peace Action-Wisconsin, Milwaukee Veterans for Peace, Physicians for Social Responsibility-Wisconsin, and the United Nations Association of Greater Milwaukee. Representatives of the groups who spoke to the Council in favor of the resolution were Julie Enslow, Pam Richard, Steve Watrous, Paula Rogge, and Bill Christofferson, one of Nukewatch’s founders in 1979.

— Milwaukee Peace Action, April 2, 2025

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

July 14, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

U.S. Nuclear Weapons Programs Slated for 53% Budget Increase

Department of Energy budget figures have been released with the Trumpian headline, “Unleashing a Golden Era of Energy Dominance and Energy Innovation and Protecting the Nation.” However, 65% of the DOE’s proposed $46 billion budget is earmarked for its nuclear weapons section known as the National Nuclear Security Administration. In turn, more than 80% of the NNSA’s proposed fiscal year 2026 funding is for nuclear weapons research and production programs, with a 25% funding increase over FY 2025. In addition, the Trump administration is adding another $4.8 billion from so-called “reconciliation” funding, bringing the NNSA’s “total weapons activities” to just under $30 billion. Taken together, the nuclear weapons budget is 53% above FY 2025. To help pay for this extravaganza, nuclear nonproliferation and cleanup programs are being cut by 5%, cyber-security and emergency response by 25%, and energy efficiency and renewable energy programs by 74%.

— Nuclear Watch New Mexico; and New York Times, June 3, 2025

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, War

July 14, 2025 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

39th Chernobyl Anniversary: Radiation Warnings Still Apply

On April 26 1986, the no. 4 reactor of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant exploded

The Belarusian Department for Nuclear and Radiation Safety said at a press conference on Earth Day that 39 years after the April 26, 1986, Chernobyl disaster, “60% of cesium-137 and 62% of strontium-90 have decayed.” Yekaterina Shmeleva, the Deputy Head of the Department, reported that the “area of radioactive contamination” includes about 12% of the country’s territory — some 9,600 square miles — an area bigger that either Vermont (9,249 sq mi), New Hampshire (8,969), Massachusetts (7,838) or New Jersey (7,419). Shmeleva reported that the 1,859 settlements in the “zones of radioactive contamination” have a population of about 930,000, including 181,000 children. Belta reported that Shmeleva “urged [the public] to carefully choose the places for summer foraging and to do radiation control of mushrooms and berries.” Left unsaid was that it takes thirty years for cesium-137 to decay by half, and that it will not decay completely for another 261 years — until the year 2286. In their 2006 study “The Other Chernobyl Report,” Ian Fairlie and David Sumner note that, “particularly large areas of Belarus, Ukraine and Russia were contaminated with high levels of radioactivity.” — Belarusian Telegraph Agency (Belta), April 22, 2025

Filed Under: Chernobyl, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • …
  • 266
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch