Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Contaminated Jam Recalled in Japan, “Safe” Here

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014

TOKYO, Japan — Multiple batches of organic Fiordifrutta Wild Blueberry jam produced in Italy have been found to contain cesium-137. Some 5,184 jars were recalled in Japan on Oct. 17. The berries were harvested in Bulgaria where the countryside is still contaminated as a result of the Chernobyl reactor disaster of 1986. The news magazine Shukan Asahi had the jam tested and discovered 164 becquerels per kilogram (Bq/kg) of cesium-137. Tokyo municipal health authorities then tested some of the jam and found 140 Bq/kg of cesium. Fiordifrutta is marketed as a high-quality, certified organic, non-GMO product. 

Japan has a stricter standard for food-borne radiation than the US or Europe. Japan’s limit is 100 Bq/kg. The limit for contamination in the EU is 600 Bq/kg, and in the US it’s 1,200 Bq/kg. So, the jam will not be recalled in the US. It’s being sold by Amazon, Whole Foods and elsewhere. Nukewatch staffer Arianne Peterson picked some up in the natural food cooperative in Cumberland, Wisconsin. The office RadAlert didn’t detect any contamination, but no one has put it on their toast. — NaturalNews.com, Nov. 17; SimplyInfo, Oct. 28; Shukan Asahi, Nov. 2013

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Radiation Exposure

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Lawsuit Challenges Doubled Bomb-Handling Risks

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014

BANGOR, Washington — The Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action and Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility have filed a federal lawsuit against the Navy in Washington State, challenging construction of a second weapons handling wharf at the Bangor Trident base in Kitsap County. The Navy does not have permission from the Pentagon’s Explosives Safety Board to construct the controversial wharf, but they’re doing it anyway. The wharf sits next to an existing submarine dock where nuclear weapons are loaded and unloaded from eight existing Trident submarines. Concern over the $715 million, three-year project regards the handling of the missiles, each containing volatile rocket fuel equal to 155,000 pounds of TNT. With two Trident subs potentially undergoing upgrades at the same time, the risks double — something the Navy refuses to acknowledge. No study has been undertaken to determine the effect of a chain reaction-type explosion at two Bangor wharfs. One Navy memo claims, “There are no new increased risks.” Up to 240 nuclear warheads can be on each submarine, as there are ten warheads on each of 24 ICBMs — all with a range of 6,500 miles. The Navy claims construction of the second wharf is legal because it accepts responsibility for potential accidents, the risk of which it puts at one-in-a-million. 

— KOMO News Radio, Seattle, Oct. 28; Law360, Oct. 29; Seattle Weekly News, Nov. 4, 2013

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Surprise! The Pentagon was Overcharged

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014

WASHINGTON, DC — Chicago based Boeing Corp., the world’s second largest military contractor, has been accused of overcharging the Pentagon for used helicopter parts passed off as new. Since 2008 government auditors have repeatedly found excessive or unjustified payments for Boeing’s Pentagon contracts. The latest fraud took place this summer, when Boeing overcharged the Army $16.6 million for selling refurbished equipment from old aircraft. Bridget Serchak, a spokeswoman for the inspector general stated, “The bottom line is that using reworked parts rather than new parts increased Boeing’s profit.” In other cases of fraud, the inspector general found the Pentagon paid Boeing $13.7 million more than it should have for spare parts, including $2,286 apiece for an aluminum “bearing sleeve” that should have cost $10. A May 2011 audit found about $13 million in overcharges on $23 million worth of orders from a Texas Army depot. That report said Boeing charged $644.75 for a plastic motor gear used on Chinook helicopters that another Pentagon unit purchased for $12.51. In 2012, Boeing did more than $30 billion worth of business with the Pentagon, and despite this investment, the lack of oversight is staggering. According to Henry Kleinknecht, the inspector general’s former director for pricing and logistics who monitored Boeing audits until last year, “Unfortunately, the Army does not have a cost/price analysis group, much less an experienced one. Government and military contracting officials don’t have the technical expertise in a lot of these complex areas to go in and figure out what the problems are.” 

— Bloomberg News & Reuters, Oct. 14, 2013

Filed Under: Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

H-bomb Plutonium-to-Fuel Project on the Rocks

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014

SAVANNAH RIVER, South Carolina — The Energy Department is considering abandoning its half-finished plutonium fuel production facility at the Savannah River Site near Aiken, South Carolina. The agency has already spent $3.7 billion on the project, which is intended to turn plutonium salvaged from retired US nuclear weapons into commercial reactor fuel. The cost estimate for the so-called “mixed oxide” or “MOX” program, recently jumped from $4.9 billion to $7.7 billion. The White House’s budget request for the current fiscal year says the “current plutonium disposition approach may be unaffordable” and that the administration “will assess the feasibility of alternative plutonium strategies.” On Oct. 4, the National Nuclear Security Administration announced a one-year extension of the deadline for an environmental impact study for the MOX facility. The delay follows an August announcement of layoffs for 500 project employees and is widely regarded as a move toward alternative means of isolating some 40 tons of weapons grade plutonium. — DOE Budget for FY 2014; New York Times, June 25; Augusta Chronicle, Oct. 8, 2013

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

January 18, 2014 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Court Victory for Reactor Waste Generators

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2013-2014

WASHINGTON, DC — On Nov. 19, a federal appeals court gave nuclear reactor operators a small fortune, ruling that the Energy Department (DOE) must stop collecting $750 million per year from them for the radioactive waste landfill fund. The decision was based on the DOE’s failure to find an alternative to the failed Yucca Mountain project in Nevada. The DOE must now reduce the assessment to zero, until it either complies with the Nuclear Waste Policy Act — which established Yucca Mountain as the national nuclear waste disposal site — or until Congress enacts an alternate plan. The fund has collected over $29 billion since it was established in 1983. Exelon Corp., which contributed $168 million into the fund in 2012, stands to benefit most from the dodge of responsibility. Other major beneficiaries include Entergy Corp., Duke Energy and Southern Company. Currently, 70,000 metric tons of radioactive waste are held in temporary storage at reactor sites across the country. 

— Bloomberg News, Nov. 20; Associated Press, Nov. 19; The Recorder, Nov. 15, 2013

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 208
  • 209
  • 210
  • 211
  • 212
  • …
  • 222
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch