Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

June 21, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Biggest Arms Dealers Break Sales Record

Anti-war protesters block access to Lockheed Martin subsidiary in St ...

In December 2025, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) issued its 2024 list of the biggest arms producers. SIPRI’s data shows that annual revenue from sales of weapons and military services by the 100 top war profiteers rose in 2024 to a record $679 billion, “the highest level ever recorded by SIPRI,” said Lorenzo Scarazzato of SIPRI’s Military Expenditure and Arms Production Program. In 2024, the combined arms revenues of 39 U.S. companies in the top 100 reached $334 billion. These weapons dealing giants include Lockheed Martin (F-35 jet fighter), Northrop Grumman (Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missiles), and General Dynamics (Columbia class ballistic missile submarines). The three Israeli arms companies in the ranking increased their combined arms revenues to $16.2 billion. “The growing backlash over Israel’s actions in Gaza seems to have had little impact on interest in Israeli weapons,” said Zubaida Karim, researcher with the SIPRI Military Expenditure and Arms Production Program. — The new data is available from SIPRI, www.sipri.org.

Filed Under: Military Spending, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

June 21, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

China Reaffirms Nuclear No-First-Use Policy

Last November, China re-affirmed its policy of no-first-use of nuclear weapons and called on other nuclear-armed states to follow suit. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said in Beijing, “China firmly adheres to a no-first-use nuclear weapons policy and upholds a nuclear strategy of self-defense.”

How much China's economy has grown over the last 70 years

The Foreign Ministry issued a white paper in December also noting, “…China has always committed to its policy of no-first-use of nuclear weapons, firmly upheld a nuclear strategy of self-defense, and promoted the modernization of its nuclear forces to safeguard China’s own strategic security and overall global strategic stability.

“The adoption of a no-first-use policy is a practical move to reduce the role of nuclear weapons in national security policies and achieve the goal of nuclear disarmament. If the five nuclear-weapon states — China, France, Russia, the UK, and the U.S. — could reach a consensus on mutual no-first-use of nuclear weapons, it would be conducive to reducing strategic risks, avoiding nuclear arms races, and promoting global strategic balance and stability.”
— Reuters, Dec. 23; Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Nov. 27, 2025, and July 23, 2024

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

June 21, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Russian Nuclear-capable Oreshnik Missiles in Belarus

The Russian Federation’s Defense Ministry confirmed Dec. 30, 2025 that Russian Oreshnik mobile intermediate-range ballistic missile systems have been deployed in the forests of Belarus, the Atlantic Council reported Jan. 11, 2026.Here's why Russia's humongous new missile is worth worrying about

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko said earlier in December that the missiles had arrived in the country. Lukashenko said that up to ten such missile systems will be stationed in Belarus, according to PBS Newshour. Russia previously deployed air-dropped nuclear weapons in Belarus, whose territory it used to launch a military invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. President Lukashenko has said that his country has several dozen Russian nuclear weapons, a “nuclear sharing” program similar to the U.S. stationing of about 100 thermonuclear gravity bombs at six NATO air bases in Europe. — Atlantic Council, Jan. 11, 2026; and PBS Newshour, Dec. 30, 2025

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, War

June 21, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Opposition to More Nuclear Waste in Utah

A recent proposal to import radioactive waste from Canada to a dump in Utah faces opposition from 88 environmental organizations in the U.S. and Canada, including Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah, the Sierra Club of Utah, and Uranium Watch of Moab.

Giant nuclear waste dump in Pennsylvania set to be dug up after decades ...EnergySolutions, a firm based in Salt Lake City, is proposing to ship 1.31 million cubic yards of radioactive waste from Ontario, Canada to its Clive site in Utah, roughly 80 miles west of Salt Lake City. The site is also supposed to receive radioactive waste set to be transferred from one of the country’s largest nuclear waste dumps, located in Parks Township, Pennsylvania. The “clear-out” of the Pennsylvania site, which will involve shipping rad waste across the country to Utah, is slated to cost $500 million and last six years. Likewise, the volume of waste from Canada would be shipped to Utah over a period of ten years.

The proposed dumping needs a license from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and a permit from Canada’s government. EnergySolutions claims that leaders in the host state back the plan, and Utah’s Governor Spencer Cox is also pushing for more nuclear power in the state. — The Cold Down; and KSL AM Radio (Salt L. City), Dec. 18, 2025

Filed Under: Environment, Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Radioactive Waste

June 21, 2026 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Executive Order and Global Hegemony

A plan for U.S. world domination is outlined in glowing, benign terms in a December 2025 executive order (EO) from the White House titled “Ensuring American Space Superiority.”

The EO says U.S. “superiority” from outer space should include “expanding American presence in space”; “establishing initial elements of a permanent lunar outpost by 2030”; demonstrating “missile defense technologies by 2028”; “ensuring the ability to detect, characterize, and counter threats”; “[increasing] space security spending”; “investing in America’s space industrial base”; “growing a vibrant commercial space economy”; and “attracting at least $50 billion of additional investment in American space markets by 2028.”

NASA explained the recent Artemis II lunar flyby in April as “aligning agencywide initiatives to achieve President Donald Trump’s National Space Policy and advance American leadership in space.”Image result for nasa artemis !!

The EO promotes “utilization of space nuclear power by deploying nuclear reactors on the Moon and in orbit, including a lunar surface reactor ready for launch by 2030.” The Artemis flyby can be seen as a scouting mission for U.S. settler occupation of the moon.

The thought of sending nuclear reactors into space might raise a political uproar in Florida and Texas where radioactive fallout from lift-off failures would contaminate soil, water, and the food chain across thousands of square miles.The reentry of failed orbiters would also spread radioactive materials far and wide.

The EO also calls for “detecting, characterizing, and countering potential adversary placement of nuclear weapons in space” — weapons outlawed by the 1967 Outer Space Treaty. China and Russia have proposed a treaty more completely prohibiting weapons in space, but the U.S. refuses to join treaty negotiations.

— Futurism, Mar. 24, 2026; Executive Orders, “Ensuring American Space Superiority,” Dec. 18, 2025

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Uncategorized

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 217
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch