Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

May 12, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Reactors in War Zones

Nukewatch Quarterly Spring 2022
By John LaForge

In June 2019, we reported on “Project Dilithium,” a U.S. Army proposal to build small, portable nuclear reactors that could be hauled to remote military outposts to provide electricity. The Army said the reactors could reduce the number of diesel tanker caravans, could shorten military supply lines, and could eliminate some easy targets. Popular Mechanics and the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists warned at the time that putting a reactor in a warzone exchanges one easy target for another, one that risks catastrophic health and environmental damage from core meltdowns. With Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine threatening its 15 nuclear reactors, we trust the U.S. Army will scrap its plans for battlefield units.

Now in the context of Russia’s war in Ukraine, two Massachusetts Institute of Technology professors, Kate Brown and Susan Solomon, have penned a powerful warning against nuclear power in the Washington Post. The piece — “One thing nuclear power plants weren’t built to survive: War”—  is excerpted below for space reasons.

“Military strategists commonly target the enemy’s electrical grid. That’s a problem when combat is in a nuclearized country like Ukraine. … The world is watching the first war in a nuclearized country — and combat has already reached active reactors.

“Even without a direct hit on a reactor, we are learning of the fragility of nuclear power [reactors]. … it is vulnerable not only to terrorism but to war.

“As power was cut to the Chernobyl [complex in March], nuclear engineers explained the importance of the electricity grid — even for plants that have been out of operation for decades. Chernobyl’s molten radioactive lava self-heats inside the belly of the blown reactor. Without ventilation, which requires electricity, hot air forms condensation that rains down inside the building, corroding and damaging equipment.

“Chernobyl’s [waste] fuel is another danger. Left to its own devices, it can heat up to 1,000 degrees Celsius. At high temperatures, the zirconium sleeves covering the fuel can ignite. After the Chernobyl accident in 1986, Soviet liquidators hastily built huge basins to store highly radioactive [waste] fuel rods. Water pumped into the basins cools the fuel and blocks radioactive gamma rays that emanate from the irradiated uranium. Now 20,000 fuel rods are stored in Chernobyl basins designed for 17,000.

“Even more troubling is the fact that the 15 active nuclear power reactors in Ukraine are still operating or were shut down only recently. They are chock-full of extremely radioactive, hot nuclear fuel, both inside the reactors and in cooling ponds. As nuclear materials expert Claire Corkhill explained to the BBC, if electricity is cut to those plants as it was to Chernobyl, we could face a meltdown of multiple reactors similar to the catastrophe at Fukushima.”

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, War

May 12, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Secret Blown: U.S.-Armed Nuclear NATO

Nukewatch Quarterly Spring 2022
By John LaForge

With a U.S. flag imposed over half of Belgium, the insignia (above) of the U.S. Air Force’s 701st Munitions Support Squadron, was mistakenly posted on social media. The 701st maintains twenty or so U.S. B61 hydrogen bombs stationed at Kleine Brogel airbase in Belgium. While the transfer of nuclear weapons to other countries is never officially acknowledged by the United States or their NATO recipients, the insignia graphically boasts that U.S. bombs are part of the Belgian airbase’s arsenal. The “open secret” of U.S. nuclear weapons being stationed at five European countries has often been accidentally revealed, made public in the press, and acknowledged by host country parliamentarians.

– Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, Aug 18, 2021; De Morgen (Antwerp), July 16, 2019, Ann De Boeck, “Finally in black and white: there are American nuclear weapons in Belgium”; The Stimson Center, August 15, 2016, “US Nuclear Weapons in Turkey at Risk of Seizure by Terrorists, Hostile Forces”; The Washington Post, July 19, 2016 , “The U.S. stores nuclear weapons in Turkey. Is that such a good idea?” by Dan Lamothe; “Green Party MEPs arrested in Belgium nuclear weapons protest”, BCC, 20 February 2019; Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 67, No. 1, online Nov. 27, 2015, pp. 64-73, “U.S. tactical nuclear weapons in Europe, 2011.”

 

–

“Within the context of NATO, the United States deploys approximately 150 nuclear weapons in Europe, most notably B61 free-fall bombs, which can be deployed by both US and allied aircraft. These bombs are stored in six American and European bases: Kleine Brogel in Belgium, Büchel in Germany, Aviano and Ghedi-Torre in Italy, Volkel in the Netherlands and Inçirlik in Turkey.” [From the official statement of the NATO Parliament.] (De Morgen).

 

Filed Under: B61 Bombs in Europe, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter

May 12, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Germany to Buy U.S. F-35s to Carry New B61 Nuclear Bombs

B61 – 12 in production
Nukewatch Quarterly Spring 2022
By John LaForge

Ending years of debate, Germany’s minister of defense said March 14 that the country will purchase U.S.-made F-35 fighter jets to replace the Germany’s PA 200 Tornado jet bombers, EurAsian Times reported March 16.

The F-35s can carry the U.S. nuclear weapons that are stationed in Germany under a program called “nuclear sharing.” Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht said, “With the F-35 aircraft type, the task of nuclear sharing will be guaranteed in the future. The goal is to replace the Tornado by 2030.”

Earlier reports suggested that Germany will buy 35 of the Lockheed Martin F-35s, at a cost of approximately $80 million each, according to NBC News. Germany could have to pay over $2.8 billion for the 35 warplanes which have been plagued with design, engineering and testing problems.

In a related event, the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration, the Los Alamos National Lab and the Sandia National Lab announced in December 2021 that the first production model of the new nuclear gravity bomb called B61-12 had been completed, and that full-scale production would begin in May 2022 and run through 2026.

David Wiegandt, a senior manager on the program at Sandia Lab said, “The first production unit is the first War Reserve B61-12 built at Pantex [Texas] that meets all customer requirements….” The customer is the U.S. air force.

“There’s something really special about this program,” Wiegandt said in a Sandia press announcement. “It has really solid team members who believe in how to do sound engineering and really bring the future of safety and security into modern nuclear weapons.”

Germany and four other NATO members plan to replace their current B61s with the new “model 12” bomb. The Eurasian Times reported that, “Germany stores 20 or fewer U.S. B61 nuclear gravity bombs at the Büchel airbase.”

—EurAsian Times, March 16; DOE/Sandia National Lab, Feb. 2, 2022; and NBC News, March 7, 2021

Filed Under: B61 Bombs in Europe, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter

May 12, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

NATO and U.S. Lawmakers Urge Biden: End Nuclear “First-Use” Threat

Nukewatch Quarterly Spring 2022
By John LaForge

Thirty-four current and former legislators from allied countries that are members of NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Org.) wrote to President Biden November 28 urging him to abandon the U.S. and NATO’s policy of first-use of nuclear weapons. Biden could formally do so in his upcoming “nuclear posture review.” The military NPR is the declassified description of attack plans for the U.S. nuclear arsenal.

“We do not believe that a first-use option is in the security interests of our countries or in the interests of NATO as a whole,” the letter said, and its signers came from Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Slovenia, Turkey, and the UK.

Foreshadowing Russia’s February invasion of Ukraine, the letter warned of conflicts and tensions between nuclear-armed countries, of the risks that these conflicts could escalate, and castigated nuclear weapons threats, such as the Pentagon’s and NATO’s ongoing first-use policy, which contributes to international mistrust, uncertainty and alarmism. (See the Spring 2019 Nukewatch Quarterly p.3 for details about NATO first-strike policy.)

The Europeans were followed two months later by 55 Democrats from the House and the Senate who urged Biden to declare a “no first-use” policy in a letter sent January 26. The lawmakers’ letter called on Biden to use the Nuclear Posture Review to stop the deployment of a new Trident submarine warhead and halt development of a nuclear-armed sea-launched Cruise missile.

Cross-party delegations from European parliaments,  the U.S. Congress, and the Russian parliament repeatedly endorsed the adoption of no-first-use policies in declarations adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, including the Berlin Declaration July 11, 2018, and the Tbilisi Declaration, July 5, 2016.

Support has also come from more recent appeals like the 2021 ‘Open Letter to Biden and President Putin,’ endorsed by over 1,200 political, military and religious leaders, legislators, academics, scientists, and other representatives of civil society from 69 countries. Over 400 of the endorsers were from NATO states and almost 700 from the United States.

 — Air Force Magazine, Jan. 26, 2022; NoFirstUseGlobal.org, Nov. 29, 2021

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter

May 12, 2022 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Abolitionists Convicted in German Courts

Nukewatch Quarterly Spring 2022
By John LaForge

In recent court cases in Germany, several nuclear weapons abolitionists charged with trespassing, etc. at the nuclear-armed Büchel air force base have presented a defense of “crime prevention.” The defense is based in large part on the analysis of nuclear weapons presented by Professor Francis A. Boyle in his book, The Criminality of Nuclear Deterrence (Clarity Press 2002).

In a nutshell, the argument is that because the air base’s plans and preparations for attacks with the weapons (known as nuclear deterrence) amount to a criminal conspiracy to commit atrocities with indiscriminate weapons of mass destruction, nonviolent offenses committed in order to prevent that crime are excusable.

German courts that have heard protest cases stemming from the civil resistance to oust the U.S. weapons from Germany have ruled that the defense is not applicable. The judges have refused to hear expert witness testimony that could substantiate the defense, so the argument has gone unexamined by them. The local court nearest the base, in Cochem, the regional or appeal court in Koblenz, and the Constitutional Court (Germany’s highest) in Karlsruhe have all ruled that the stationing of U.S. nuclear weapons in Germany (and their threatened use) is “legalized” by various, mostly secret “nuclear sharing agreements” between Berlin and Washington, DC. These court rulings ignore the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons which explicitly prohibits nuclear weapons from being transferred from one country to another, and raise appeal issues that have been argued in several cases.

Marion Küpker and Stefanie Augustine both of Germany have appealed their trespass convictions to the European Court of Human Rights. Sometimes called the “Strasbourg court” after its location in France, the ECHR is the high court of the Council of Europe and it interprets the European Convention on Human Rights. The ECHR has not yet ruled on whether to hear this appeal.

If the ECHR in Strasbourg decides not to consider the appeal by Marion and Stefanie, several other similarly situated defendants, including Susan Crane of Redwood City, California and me, also intend to appeal to the ECHR.

Susan is scheduled for an appeal hearing at Regional Court in Koblenz this May 31, where she will contest  several trespass convictions that have been consolidated into one case. The trespass charges against Susan and me stem from nonviolent “go-in” actions taken at the Büchel air base over the last few years.

An appeal hearing for me in Koblenz last December 9, resulted in conviction after the court refused to hear expert witness testimony regarding international law and the criminal status of U.S. nuclear weapons and war policy in Germany.

Defense attorney Anna Busl of Bonn presented detailed motions to the court explaining the need for the experts I wanted to call. But the judge ruled that there was no need to hear from the witnesses. An appeal brief contesting this conviction will be filed with the Constitutional Court by April 24.

Filed Under: Direct Action, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, US Bombs Out of Germany

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • …
  • 222
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch