Nukewatch

Working for a nuclear-free future since 1979

  • Issues
    • Direct Action
    • Environmental Justice
    • Nuclear Power
      • Chernobyl
      • Fukushima
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • On The Bright Side
    • Radiation Exposure
    • Radioactive Waste
    • Renewable Energy
    • Uranium Mining
    • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Resources
    • Nuclear Heartland Book
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reports, Studies & Publications
      • The New Nuclear Weapons: $1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and Fake Cleanups
      • Nuclear Power: Dead In the Water It Poisoned
      • Thorium Fuel’s Advantages as Mythical as Thor
      • Greenpeace on Fukushima 2016
      • Drinking Water at Risk: Toxic Military Wastes Haunt Lake Superior
    • Nukewatch in the News
    • Links
    • Videos
  • About
    • About Nukewatch
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Action Alerts!
    • Calendar
  • Donate

June 30, 2017 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Rockets’ Red Glare and Bombs Bursting in Air

Library image: US Marines fire a Howitzer in northern Syria on March 24th 2017 in support of Coalition operations. (Photo: Airwars.org, via USMC/ Cpl. Zachery C. Laning) 

A June 27 Pew Research Center poll says world opinion of the United States has plummeted since Donald Trump took office. Surveying people in 37 countries, 49 percent held a positive view of the United States, down from 65 percent at the end of 2016. Maybe we could cancel the fireworks this 4th of July considering the insensitive symbolism of vicariously enjoying war.

With the Pentagon’s rockets’ red glare and bombs bursting in air smashing seven majority Muslim countries — Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen — negativity toward the United States is easy to understand. US drone attacks originating in Nevada, 7,200 miles from Iraq, and jet fighter-bomber strikes launched from super-carriers in the Persian Gulf are killing hundreds of frightened bystanders month after month. At least 25 civilians were killed in Mosul, Iraq on Sat., June 24 when US bombs destroyed four houses.

Every child killed or maimed by US-made weapons inevitably creates enemies among survivors. President Obama (pronounced “Oh-Bomb-Ah”) made the point himself May 23, 2013 in a speech to National Defense University. He said drone attacks “raise profound questions: about who is targeted, and why; about civilian casualties, and the risk of creating new enemies…” And Obama warned that, “US military action in foreign lands risks creating more enemies.”

Whether bombing civilians only “risks” creating enemies or can be positively guaranteed always to do so, is a matter of opinion. But one need only consider the globalized, mechanized, mass US military reaction to 9/11 — and the country’s demonization of whole groups and religions — to know that demands for revenge, retribution, and retaliation always follow the deaths of innocents.

If your business is peddling weapons, you could be smugly satisfied about every civilian wedding party, funeral procession, hospital, or Sunday market hit by US drones, gunships or F-18s. One StarTribune headline on April 2, 2017 directed attention away from our arms dealers. It read, “Civilian deaths a windfall for militants’ propaganda.” Never mind the windfall for war profiteers.

US offers $6,000 for each dead civilian [sarcasm alert]

In the world of weapons sales, nothing is better for business than TV footage of the anguished and grief-stricken after civilians are indiscriminately attacked by “foreigners.” In the countries being bombed, we are those foreigners, occupiers, and militarists accused of cheapening human lives. You decide: when a US gunship obliterated the hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan Oct. 3, 2016 killing 42, the Pentagon offered $6,000 for each person killed, and $3,000 for each one injured.

The government and munitions makers say our bombs are saving people by killing terrorists, and — being a world away from the torn limbs, the burning wounds, the screaming parents — Americans want to believe it. The US dropped 26,171 bombs across the seven states during 2016, according to Jennifer Wilson and Micah Zenko writing in Foreign Policy. Each explosion is guaranteed to produce enough newly minted militants to insure steady orders for more jets, bombs and missiles.

Even with a stockpile of 4,000 Tomahawk Cruise missiles, some in the military say the store could be run low by the bombing of Syria, Iraq and the others. “We’re expending munitions faster than we can replenish them,” Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh told USA Today in December 2015. “Since then, Secretary of Defense Ash Carter has asked Congress to include funding for 45,000 smart bombs in the [Pentagon’s] 2017 budget,” Public Radio International reported in April 2016. And now Trump’s SecDef, Gen. James Mattis has asked for far more in the 2018 budget for what he calls an “annihilation campaign.”

Lockheed Martin Corp. was paid $36.44 billion for weapons in 2015, and $47.2 billion in 2016, according to the Stockholm Int’l Peace Research Institute’s February 2017 report. SIPRI says that half of all US weapons exports in 2015 went to the Middle East. Last May’s $110 billion US sale to Saudi Arabia alone is bound to bring peace and stability to the region. Obama’s $112 billion in arms to the Saudis over eight years certainly did. The Kingdom’s fireworks in Yemen will cause “oooohs” and “ahhhs” of a different sort than our holiday firecracker fakery.

This cheering of faux bombs on the 4th while denying that our real ones produce enemies and prolong the war is why terrified villagers, refugees and the internally displaced of seven targeted countries will go on cringing and crouching over their children as US drones and jets howl overhead. But “Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just, And this be our motto — ‘In God is our trust’ — And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave, O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.” —John LaForge

Filed Under: Environmental Justice, Nuclear Weapons, Uncategorized, Weekly Column

March 15, 2017 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Reflection and Commitment on Being a Better Ally

Water Protectors stand together in opposition to the Dakota Access Pipeline in October 2016. Photo: Rob Wilson.

Editorial

Spring 2017 Quarterly

In our winter fund appeal, we highlighted Nukewatch’s engagement with the struggle against the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) led by Indigenous Water Protectors at the Standing Rock Reservation in North Dakota. Since then, we have reflected on our position—as a mostly white organization—in relation to a Native-led struggle, and we realize we made some mistakes that perpetuated, rather than resisted, the forces of colonialism that continue to oppress and work to erase the presence of Native people in our society.

The letter included a photo of one of our members at a Standing Rock camp holding our Nuclear Heartland banner, which shows the location of US nuclear missiles deployed throughout the Great Plains. We referenced the intersection of our anti-nuclear mission with the No DAPL movement in an appeal for funds, excerpted here:

“The combination in North Dakota of nuclear-armed missiles, dangerous oil pipelines, and 3,000 active hydraulic fracturing wells, has created a literally explosive conflation of the worst environmental threats faced by rural communities anywhere. Help us relieve the region of at least the military leg of this terrible triad by donating to Nukewatch today.”

Simply put, we used the success of a Native-led struggle for justice to draw attention—and money—to our own issues and organization. This was wrong, and we deeply regret it. Because in doing so we failed to prioritize the concern of the Indigenous people who are leading this difficult battle: the fact that they have a fundamental right to exist on the land that white colonizers have been trying to take from them for generations. Native rights are the main issue here and should not be obscured by the concerns of more racially privileged activists.

We are grateful to writer and organizer Kelly Hayes for her piece, “How to Talk About #NoDAPL: A Native Perspective,” published October 27 on her blog transformativespaces.org, which helped us realize our mistakes. Here is an excerpt:

“In discussing #NoDAPL, too few people have started from a place of naming that we have a right to defend our water and our lives, simply because we have a natural right to defend ourselves and our communities. When ‘climate justice,’ in a very broad sense, becomes the center of conversation, our fronts of struggle are often reduced to a staging ground for the messaging of NGOs.

“This is happening far too frequently in public discussion of #NoDAPL.

“Yes, everyone should be talking about climate change, but you should also be talking about the fact that Native communities deserve to survive, because our lives are worth defending in their own right—not simply because ‘this affects us all.’

“So when you talk about Standing Rock, please begin by acknowledging that this pipeline was redirected from an area where it was most likely to impact white people. And please remind people that our people are struggling to survive the violence of colonization on many fronts, and that people shouldn’t simply engage with or retweet such stories when they see a concrete connection to their own issues—or a jumping off point to discuss their own issues. Our friends, allies and accomplices should be fighting alongside us because they value our humanity and right to live, in addition to whatever else they believe in.”

Rather than referencing Standing Rock’s relationship to our anti-nuclear work in our fundraising letter, we should have amplified the voices of Native Water Protectors and called for our fellow white activists to support their efforts. We acknowledge these mistakes here as part of an effort to improve the way we work in solidarity with those fighting for racial justice. We hope our white readers in particular might be reminded by our reflections to avoid similar pitfalls through truly listening to the voices of people of color and more critically analyzing our ally roles, as we intend to do.

Nukewatch is committed to amplifying and supporting calls for justice from marginalized groups not just because they are related to our anti-nuclear work, but because they need to be heard. We will continue to take action in ways that reflect the priorities of disenfranchised activists, such as answering calls from Standing Rock to organize local protests that target banks funding the DAPL. We will also send a portion of the donations received as a result of our fund appeal to the legal defense collective at Standing Rock. If you are not already involved, please join us in defending Native rights at Standing Rock and beyond.

For more about the continuing struggle at Standing Rock go to LastRealIndians.com.

To learn more about being an ally, see the Standing Rock Solidarity Toolkit from Showing Up for Racial Justice.

—Arianne Peterson wrote this piece, representing the views of the Nukewatch staff.

Filed Under: Environmental Justice, Newsletter Archives, Quarterly Newsletter, Uncategorized

December 10, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Citizen’s Groups to Canadian Regulators: Protect the Public, not the Industry

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2016-2017

Alarm bells have been rung about current members of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) and their connections to the nuclear industry. In May, whistleblowers, most likely from within the CNSC, described grave reactor risk issues in a letter documenting violations such as underestimated seismic hazards. No independent investigation has yet been required to evauate the claims made by whistleblowers. An audit released in October by the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development concluded, “The CNSC could not show that it had adequately managed its site inspections of nuclear power plants. …could not demonstrate that its inspection plans included the appropriate number and types of inspections, and that it had the staff needed to verify that nuclear power plants were complying with all applicable requirements, or that site inspections were carried out according to the CNSC’s procedures.” Canadian Green Party leader Elizabeth May said about the allegations, “People tend to sit upright when you tell them about a nuclear reactor that is not getting properly inspected.”

CNSC’s president Michael Binder has personally been accused of conflicts of interest. Like the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Department of Energy in the US, the CNSC appears to have been captured by the industry which it routinely promotes and protects. In the article “Liquid Nuclear Waste Convoys a Threat to the Waters of the Great Lakes,” Janet McNeill of Durham Nuclear Awareness refers to the CNSC as the “all-too-compliant regulator.” (See page 1.) Bruce Peninsula Environment Group, several Members of Parliament, and 30 other organizations sent an October 11 letter to Minister of Natural Resources Jim Carr, asking that senior CNSC officials including Binder be removed.

—Toronto Globe and Mail, Oct. 12, 2016; Office of the Auditor General of Canada, Oct. 4, 2016

 

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Power, Quarterly Newsletter, Uncategorized

December 10, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Atomic Weapons, Snipers & Assault Rifles: “Ideal for Ages 12 and Up”

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2016-2017
“Nuketown,” a game designed for kids, boasts that it “demonstrates the effects of an atomic weapon on a residential neighborhood.”

War toys aren’t just wooden guns any more. One recent game ad gushes: “Nuketown was a nuclear testing site in the 1950’s and demonstrates the effects of an atomic weapon on a residential neighborhood. A clocktower stands at the corner of Trinity Avenue and Latchkey Road, showing the

countdown to detonation. The streets are blocked off with barbed wire barricades making it difficult to reach the fully buildable two-story green house. Two super-poseable micro action figures are armed and ready to survey the debris. Send the soldiers into the house to take sniper shots through shattered windows, duck behind eerie mannequins and flee using the fire escape. Ideal for ages 12 and up.”

The game features: “Buildable Nuketown with 1950s style house with white picket fence, a clock tower, street sign and barbed wire barricade; Two highly detailed and super-poseable micro action figures with detachable accessories; Two micro mannequins; Full-assembly sniper and assault rifles with high-powered scopes.” Like the actual nuclear weapons arsenal which also lacks a purpose, the box urges players to “build the mission!”

—“Mega Bloks Call Of Duty Nuketown Toys & Games”

Filed Under: Newsletter Archives, Nuclear Weapons, Quarterly Newsletter, Uncategorized

December 10, 2016 by Nukewatch Leave a Comment

Air Force Pushes New Land-Based Missile

Nukewatch Quarterly Winter 2016-2017

Even after two former secretaries of defense and a former vice chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff have called for the elimination of land-based ballistic missiles, the Department of the Air Force this past summer invited industry proposals for building an entirely new arsenal of the long-range nuclear-armed missiles.

Retired Pentagon chiefs Chuck Hagel and William Perry have both signed official reports declaring that the current system of 450 Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) are too redundant, dangerous and destabilizing to retain. Retired Gen. James Cartwright, once the second highest ranking military officer in the United States, has also called for permanent retirement of land-based missiles, and Mr. Perry has said cancelling its replacement would save up to $100 billion.

Gen. Robin Rand of Global Strike Command said in a press release that the Minuteman system will have “a difficult time surviving” future air defenses. However, plans for the follow-on replacement may not survive budget constraints, as even Senator John McCain, R-Ariz., has questioned the usefulness and high cost of keeping all three nuclear weapons systems: missiles, submarines and heavy bombers.

—AP, July 29; & IRIA News, July 30, 2016

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • Next Page »

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Subscribe

Donate

Categories

  • B61 Bombs in Europe
  • Chernobyl
  • Counterfeit Reactor Parts
  • Depleted Uranium
  • Direct Action
  • Environment
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fukushima
  • Lake Superior Barrels
  • Military Spending
  • Newsletter Archives
  • North Korea
  • Nuclear Power
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Office News
  • On The Bright Side
  • Photo Gallery
  • Protect the Water Close Xcel's Monticello Reactor
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Radioactive Waste
  • Renewable Energy
  • Social Issues
  • Sulfide Mining
  • Through the Prism of Nonviolence
  • Uncategorized
  • Uranium Mining
  • US Bombs Out of Germany
  • War
  • Weekly Column

Contact Us

(715) 472-4185
nukewatch1@lakeland.ws

Address:
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, Wisconsin 54853
USA

Donate To Nukewatch

News & Information on Nuclear Weapons,
Power, Waste & Nonviolent Resistance

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 · Nukewatch